Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 18(5): 1124-34, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10694566

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel when given with PSC 833 (valspodar) to patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were initially treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) over 3 hours. Subsequently, 29 hours of treatment with CIVI PSC 833 was started 2 hours before paclitaxel treatment was initiated. In this combination, the starting dose of paclitaxel was 52.5 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel doses were escalated by 17.5 mg/m(2) increments for four subsequent cohorts. Each cohort consisted of three patients with the exception of the last cohort, which consisted of six patients. Data for the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel with and without concurrent PSC 833 administration were obtained. RESULTS: All 18 patients completed at least one course of concurrent treatment (median, two courses; range, one to six) and were evaluable for toxicity. The MTD for paclitaxel with PSC 833 was 122.5 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT. All patients had PSC 833 blood concentrations greater than 1, 000 ng/mL before, during, and 24 hours after the paclitaxel infusion. PSC 833 produced small increases in the paclitaxel peak plasma concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curve. However, PSC 833 greatly prolonged the terminal phase of paclitaxel, resulting in plasma paclitaxel concentrations of more than 0.05 micromol/L for much longer than expected. As a result, myelosuppression was comparable to that produced by full-dose paclitaxel given without PSC 833. Of the 16 patients who were assessable for response, one patient experienced a partial response and an additional nine patients experienced disease stabilization after paclitaxel treatment alone. CONCLUSION: Treatment with paclitaxel 122.5 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour CIVI concurrent with a 29-hour CIVI of PSC 833 results in acceptable toxicity. The addition of PSC 833 alters the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, which explains the enhanced neutropenia experienced by patients treated with this drug combination.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Estudos de Coortes , Ciclosporinas/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporinas/efeitos adversos , Ciclosporinas/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; (15): 11-24, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7912517

RESUMO

Taxol is the first of a novel class of anticancer drugs, the taxanes. Taxol's unique effects include its ability to polymerize tubulin into stable microtubules in the absence of cofactors and to induce the formation of stable microtubule bundles. During its development, formidable challenges were overcome: a suitable formulation was developed, an adequate supply was ensured, severe hypersensitivity reactions were diminished in incidence and severity, and clinical efficacy was demonstrated. Phase II evaluation is still underway; to date, clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in ovarian, breast, non-small-cell lung, and head and neck cancer. Response rates were low in early studies in melanoma, prostate, colon, cervix, and renal cancer, but for these tumors, additional evaluation is ongoing with a higher Taxol dose or different schedule. In December 1992, Food and Drug Administration approval was granted for use of Taxol as second-line therapy in ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, important questions regarding optimal use of this important new drug remain. These include determination of optimal dose and schedule and development of suitable combination chemotherapy regimens. The clinical development of Taxol and current status of phase I, II, and III clinical trials are reviewed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacologia
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 82(15): 1247-59, 1990 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1973737

RESUMO

Microtubules are among the most strategic subcellular targets of anticancer chemotherapeutics. Despite this fact, new antimicrotubule agents that possess unique mechanisms of cytotoxic action and have broader antineoplastic spectra than the vinca alkaloids have not been introduced over the last several decades--until the recent development of taxol. Unlike classical antimicrotubule agents like colchicine and the vinca alkaloids, which induce depolymerization of microtubules, taxol induces tubulin polymerization and forms extremely stable and nonfunctional microtubules. Taxol has demonstrated broad activity in preclinical screening studies, and antineoplastic activity has been observed in several classically refractory tumors. These tumors include cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma in phase II trials and malignant melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma in phase I studies. Taxol's structural complexity has hampered the development of feasible processes for synthesis, and its extreme scarcity has limited the use of a conventional, broad-scale screening approach for evaluation of clinical antitumor activity. However, taxol's unique mechanism of action, its spectrum of preclinical antitumor activity, and tumor responses in early clinical trials have generated renewed interest in pursuing its development.


Assuntos
Alcaloides/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Alcaloides/uso terapêutico , Alcaloides/toxicidade , Animais , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/toxicidade , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Microtúbulos/efeitos dos fármacos , Paclitaxel
4.
Cancer Treat Res ; 48: 171-87, 1989.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2577137

RESUMO

GST isozymes are an important part of the normal cellular defense against toxic xenobiotics and carcinogens. These multifunctional proteins can interact with a broad range of substrates in a variety of ways. In particular, GSTs have been implicated in the detoxication of many antineoplastic agents. Elevated levels of certain GST isozymes have been associated with malignant transformation and with experimental drug resistance. Although the role of GST in antineoplastic drug resistance is unclear, recent studies have shown increased activity of GST in many human tumors relative to normal tissues. These findings raise the possibility that the presence of certain GST isozymes may be a marker for malignant transformation in some human tumors, and that GSTs may play a role in de novo and acquired drug resistance. Identifying the factors which regulate the expression of these drug-metabolizing enzymes as well as agents which inhibit their activities may provide new insights into the therapy of tumors clinically refractory to chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Glutationa Transferase/metabolismo , Animais , Antineoplásicos/metabolismo , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...