Benign fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodule: to repeat or not to repeat?

CONTEXT: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the gold standard for evaluating thyroid nodules. It has a sensitivity rate of about 95%, i.e. false negative results represent up to 5% of cases. The value of repeated FNAC during follow-up is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of repeating the FNAC for initially benign nodules. DESIGN AND METHODS: All 5017 patients who underwent FNAC of the thyroid nodule in years 1991-2008 were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Repeated FNAC was performed in 574 nodules with initially benign results. The number of repetitions varied from one to six. Repeatedly benign results were found in 498 cases, and malignant/suspicious results with initially benign cytology were found in 76 nodules (13.2%). Carcinoma was present in 13 out of the 58 surgically treated malignant/suspicious results of initially benign cytology. CONCLUSIONS: A change from a benign FNAC result to a malignant/suspicious one was present in more than 13% of the patients with initially benign cytology; malignancy has been recognised on the basis of repeated FNAC in 2.3% patients. In the majority of cases, the repetition corrected wrong cytological interpretation of results other than colloidal goitre, especially Hashimoto's thyroiditis and regressive changes. We believe that repeating FNAC in patients with benign cytology in about a 1-year horizon can reduce the rate of undiagnosed tumours.

WAA apheresis registry in the Czech Republic: two centers experience.

INTRODUCTION: Hemaphereses are sophisticated procedures performed for many indications even in severely ill patients. Many authors consider quite necessary to register as many details as possible of treatments with therapeutic apheresis. WAA meets the requirement to compare data with centers not performing apheresis for the same diagnosis. In Czech Republic hemaphereses are used in a broad spectrum of indications. Since the year 2004 data on hemaphereses done in Czech Republic have been registered. In this paper we present a survey of our to date recordings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of performed therapeutic hemaphereses (plasma exchange, erythrocytapheresis, leukapheresis, thrombocytapheresis, photopheresis, immunopheresis, and rheopheresis) have been entered in WAA registry with many details. We have been evaluated 1289 procedures in 216 patients done in our two centers (center I, center II). RESULTS: Center I registered 129 procedures in 41 patients, center II 1260 procedures in 175 patients. The patients are divided according to centers specialization (center II has registered 12 long-term treated patients with LDL-apheresis; mean time of therapy 7.1 years and a median of 34 procedures/patient. Side-effects registered in center I and center II were 3.1% and 5.6% of the procedures, respectively. Most frequent side-effects were citrate toxicity, neurovegetative lability, problems with venous access and hypotension. All were easy to treat, no serious events or death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In Czech Republic hemaphereses are performed in a broad scale of indications and now it is nearly 5 years that data are registered in our two university centers. In 2004 we entered WAA registry because it meets the requirement to compare data with centers that do not perform aphereses for the same diagnosis. This comparison would certainly improve efficacy of the hemapheresis therapy even further. To enter WAA registry is easy, at no expense and without any problems.