Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 28(3): 443-8, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rater reproducibility of the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), which categorizes stools into one of seven types, is unknown. We sought to determine reliability and agreement by individual stool type and when responses are categorized by Rome III clinical designation as normal or abnormal (constipation or diarrhea). METHODS: Thirty-four gastroenterology providers from three institutions rated 35 stool photographs using the BSFS. Twenty rerated the photographs. KEY RESULTS: 1190 individual stool type ratings were completed. Though only four photographs had absolute agreement (all Type 1 or Type 7), general agreement was high with 1132 (95.1%) of ratings being within one category type of the modal rating. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the BSFS by individual stool type was excellent with intraclass correlations of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90, p < 0.001) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91, p < 0.001), respectively. However, agreement decreased when using Rome III designations with 13 (37%) photographs having significantly diverging classifications (semi-interquartile range = 0.5). These 13 photographs were rated by the majority of raters as either type 2 vs type 3 or type 5 vs type 6 stools, representing the boundaries of normal vs abnormal stools. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the BSFS by Rome III clinical categorization decreased with intraclass correlations of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81, p < 0.001) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49-0.81, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The Bristol Stool Form Scale has excellent reliability and agreement when used to rate individual stool type by raters. However, BSFS reliability and agreement decreases when determining Rome III stool form categories.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Gastroenterologia/normas , Fezes , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Physician Exec ; 27(4): 38-41, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11481890

RESUMO

You worked hard to search for a job--sending out resumes, networking with your peers and contacting recruiters. But when the offer finally comes, your work isn't done. Now it's time to negotiate the best salary and employment contract. Take a look at today's standard compensation packages, including bonuses, stock options, relocation expenses and other features. What's negotiable and what's not?


Assuntos
Candidatura a Emprego , Negociação , Diretores Médicos/economia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos , Salários e Benefícios , Humanos , Liderança , Diretores Médicos/normas , Estados Unidos
4.
Med Econ ; 76(15): 56, 61, 1999 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10557820
8.
Med Econ ; 76(1): 31, 34, 37, 1999 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10351079
10.
Med Econ ; 76(20): 52, 54-5, 1999 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10662031
13.
Med Econ ; 75(17): 31-2, 1998 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10185521
20.
Med Econ ; 74(16): 201-2, 1997 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10169108
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...