Antero-Posterior vs. Lateral Vestibular Input Processing in Human Visual Cortex.

Visuo-vestibular integration is crucial for locomotion, yet the cortical mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. We combined binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to characterize the cortical networks activated during antero-posterior and lateral stimulations in humans. We focused on functional areas that selectively respond to egomotion-consistent optic flow patterns: the human middle temporal complex (hMT+), V6, the ventral intraparietal (VIP) area, the cingulate sulcus visual (CSv) area and the posterior insular cortex (PIC). Areas hMT+, CSv, and PIC were equivalently responsive during lateral and antero-posterior GVS while areas VIP and V6 were highly activated during antero-posterior GVS, but remained silent during lateral GVS. Using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses, we confirmed that a cortical network including areas V6 and VIP is engaged during antero-posterior GVS. Our results suggest that V6 and VIP play a specific role in processing multisensory signals specific to locomotion during navigation.

Parkinson's patients can rely on perspective cues to perceive 3D space.

3D perception, which is necessary for an optimal navigation in our environment, relies on 2 complementary kinds of cues; binocular cues allowing precise depth localization near the point of visual interest and monocular ones that are necessary for correct global perception of visual space. Recent studies described deficient binocular 3D vision in PD patients; here we tested 3D vision in PD patients when based on monocular cues (m3D). Sixteen PD patients and 16 controls had to categorize visual stimuli as perceived in 2D (flat) or 3D (with depth). Both performance and response times were measured. EEGs were recorded to extract Visual Evoked Potentials. Effects of PD were tested by comparing psychometric and electrophysiological data obtained in controls and PD patients evaluated without dopaminergic treatment. Effects of Levodopa were tested by comparing data in PD patients with and without dopaminergic treatment. We didn't find statistical differences between PD patients and controls' performance. Severity of PD (UPDRS III) in OFF condition is positively correlated with P1 amplitudes and latencies for both 2D and m3D stimuli. Levodopa administration didn't modify either PD patients' performances although it increases principal visual components latencies for both 2D and m3D stimuli. Unlike binocular 3D vision, monocular 3D vision does not seem to get affected by PD. However given the correlation between severity of PD and VEPs' modifications, alteration of visual cortical processing might have nonetheless begun. PD patients reporting trouble in perceiving space must rely more on m3D cues present in the environment.

Privileged visual processing of the straight-ahead direction in humans.

At any moment, the objects we face are endowed with a special behavioral status, either as potential obstacles during navigation or as optimal targets for visually guided actions. Yet, the gaze frequently jumps from one location to another when exploring the visual surroundings, so that objects located straight-ahead are often seen from the corner of the eyes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that peripheral vision might nevertheless ensure a privileged processing of these behaviorally important objects. Human subjects were asked to respond as fast as possible to the appearance of visual objects in their peripheral field of view while gazing successively in different directions. The visual objects formed similar images on the retina and differed only with respect to their egocentric location: either straight-ahead or eccentric with respect to the head/body midline. We found that straight-ahead objects elicit consistently shorter behavioral responses than eccentric objects (median difference of at least 10 ms). Additional experiments indicate that neither binocular visual cues nor full attentional resources play a fundamental role in this mechanism, and that it cannot be resumed to a simple preference for objects contralateral to the direction of gaze. These results are in agreement with recent electrophysiological findings showing that the early integration of gaze-related signals in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys lead to a higher neuronal sensitivity to the straight-ahead direction.

Poststroke conscious visual deficit: clinical course and changes in cerebral activations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the outcome and recovery mechanisms of visual perception after a focal lesion of the occipital lobe in humans, especially after stroke. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the clinical course and the neural substrates of conscious perceptive visual deficit after posterior cerebral artery infarct. METHODS: The authors prospectively included 8 patients (7 men and 1 woman; mean age, 64.6 ± 18 years) with visual deficit induced by partial damage of the striate cortex related to acute posterior cerebral artery infarct. Conscious perception of color and motion was assessed from the acute phase to the third month. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed to investigate neural substrates of visual recovery. RESULTS: In the acute phase of stroke, visual deficiency was global (3/8 patients), selective to color (4/8 patients), or selective to motion (1/8 patients). During the follow-up, visual performance increased with respect to color (from 29% to 70%; P < .005) and with respect to motion (from 47% to 74%; P < .005). Despite a lack of ipsilesional V1 area activation in the acute phase, activations in this area and in the contralesional extrastriate cortex were obtained during follow-up. Both ipsilesional and contralesional V4 activations were correlated with better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive visual recovery occurs early after partial acute posterior cerebral artery infarct. Spared islands in ipsilesional V1 area and transcallosal pathways might be involved in poststroke visual recovery.

Privileged processing of the straight-ahead direction in primate area V1.

Gaze direction modulates the gain of neurons in most of the visual cortex, including the primary visual (V1) area. These gain modulations are thought to support a mechanism involved in the spatial localization of objects. In the present study, we show that part of them may reflect an additional function: enhancing the visual processing of the objects located straight ahead. Using single- and multiunit recordings in behaving macaques, we found that in peripheral V1, the gain of most neurons increases as their receptive fields (RF) are brought closer to the straight-ahead direction by changing the direction of gaze. No such tendency was observed in central V1, although the influence of gaze direction is similar in term of strength. This previously unknown organization of the gaze-related gain modulations might insure that objects located straight ahead still receive a privileged processing during eccentric fixation, reflecting the ecological importance of this particular egocentric direction.

Visuo-auditory interactions in the primary visual cortex of the behaving monkey: electrophysiological evidence.

BACKGROUND: Visual, tactile and auditory information is processed from the periphery to the cortical level through separate channels that target primary sensory cortices, from which it is further distributed to functionally specialized areas. Multisensory integration is classically assigned to higher hierarchical cortical areas, but there is growing electrophysiological evidence in man and monkey of multimodal interactions in areas thought to be unimodal, interactions that can occur at very short latencies. Such fast timing of multisensory interactions rules out the possibility of an origin in the polymodal areas mediated through back projections, but is rather in favor of heteromodal connections such as the direct projections observed in the monkey, from auditory areas (including the primary auditory cortex AI) directly to the primary visual cortex V1. Based on the existence of such AI to V1 projections, we looked for modulation of neuronal visual responses in V1 by an auditory stimulus in the awake behaving monkey. RESULTS: Behavioral or electrophysiological data were obtained from two behaving monkeys. One monkey was trained to maintain a passive central fixation while a peripheral visual (V) or visuo-auditory (AV) stimulus was presented. From a population of 45 V1 neurons, there was no difference in the mean latencies or strength of visual responses when comparing V and AV conditions. In a second active task, the monkey was required to orient his gaze toward the visual or visuo-auditory stimulus. From a population of 49 cells recorded during this saccadic task, we observed a significant reduction in response latencies in the visuo-auditory condition compared to the visual condition (mean 61.0 vs. 64.5 ms) only when the visual stimulus was at midlevel contrast. No effect was observed at high contrast. CONCLUSION: Our data show that single neurons from a primary sensory cortex such as V1 can integrate sensory information of a different modality, a result that argues against a strict hierarchical model of multisensory integration. Multisensory interaction in V1 is, in our experiment, expressed by a significant reduction in visual response latencies specifically in suboptimal conditions and depending on the task demand. This suggests that neuronal mechanisms of multisensory integration are specific and adapted to the perceptual features of behavior.

Neural bases of stereopsis across visual field of the alert macaque monkey.

Left and right retinal images of an object seen by the 2 eyes can occupy slightly disparate horizontal and/or vertical locations. The role of horizontal disparity (HD) in stereoscopic vision is well established, but the functional contribution of vertical disparity (VD) remains unclear. Various psychophysical studies have shown that HD and VD are used differently by the visual system depending on their location in the visual field, whether near the center of gaze or more peripheral. We show this horizontal/vertical distinction at the cellular level in monkey primary visual cortex (area V1). The range of VD encoding is reduced in central but not in the peripheral representation of the visual field. Moreover, neurons respond selectively to particular combinations of both types of disparities depending on the coded orientation as predicted by the disparity energy model. The preferred orientations of neurons near the fovea present a vertical bias that is well suited for stereopsis based on HD selectivity alone. In the periphery, instead, preferred orientations are radially biased, which allows a peripheral detector to convey the same depth signal based on either HD or VD. Such an organization has functional implications in both the perceptual and oculomotor domains.

Evidence for implication of primate area V1 in neural 3-D spatial localization processing.

We investigated the neural mechanisms underlying visual localization in 3-D space in area V1 of behaving monkeys. Three different sources of information, retinal disparity, viewing distance and gaze direction, that participate in these neural mechanisms are being reviewed. The way they interact with each other is studied by combining retinal and extraretinal signals. Interactions between retinal disparity and viewing distance have been shown in foveal V1; we have observed a strong modulation of the spontaneous activity and of the visual response of most V1 cells that was highly correlated with the vergence angle. As a consequence of these gain effects, neural horizontal disparity coding is favoured or refined for particular distances of fixation. Changing the gaze direction in the fronto-parallel plane also produces strong gains in the visual response of half of the cells in foveal V1. Cells tested for horizontal disparity and orientation selectivities show gain effects that occur coherently for the same spatial coordinates of the eyes. Shifts in preferred disparity also occurred in several neurons. Cells tested in calcarine V1 at retinal eccentricities larger than 10 degrees , show that horizontal disparity is encoded at least up to 20 degrees around both the horizontal and vertical meridians. At these large retinal eccentricities we found that vertical disparity is also encoded with tuning profiles similar to those of horizontal disparity coding. Combinations of horizontal and vertical disparity signals show that most cells encode both properties. In fact the expression of horizontal disparity coding depends on the vertical disparity signals that produce strong gain effects and frequent changes in peak selectivities. We conclude that the vertical disparity signal and the eye position signal serve to disambiguate the horizontal disparity signal to provide information on 3-D spatial coordinates in terms of distance, gaze direction and retinal eccentricity. We suggest that the relative weight among these different signals is the determining factor involved in the neural processing that gives information on 3-D spatial localization.

Neurons in parafoveal areas V1 and V2 encode vertical and horizontal disparities.

Stereoscopic vision mainly relies on binocular horizontal disparity (HD), and its cortical encoding is well established in the foveal representation of the visual field. The role of vertical disparity (VD) is more controversial. Thus far, in the monkey, very few studies have investigated the HD sensitivity beyond 5 degrees of retinal eccentricity and no evidence of a real encoding of VD exists in the parafoveal representation of areas V1 and V2. Using dynamic random dot stereograms, we have tested both HD and VD selectivities in the parafoveal representation of V1 (calcarine V1) and V2 (eccentricities > 10 degrees ) in a behaving monkey. HD and VD selectivities have been characterized using fitting with Gabor function. A large proportion of the tested cells were both HD and VD selective (47%) and, to a lesser extent, HD selective only (8%) or VD selective only (23%). We found a real encoding of VD, with the same diversity in the tuning profiles as described for HD, that cannot be assimilated to a simple perturbation of the HD matching process. Moreover, the VD encoding had a finer scale than the HD one, which is coherent with the smaller range of naturally occurring VD. For the HD encoding, both the percentage of selective cells and the tuning parameters were close to those reported in foveal V1. These results show that, at parafoveal eccentricities in V1 and V2, disparity detectors are tuned to both horizontal and vertical dimensions of the positional disparity existing between matched features in both retinas.