Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 32(11): 2851-3, 1994 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7852585

RESUMO

Bordetella pertussis was isolated from a culture of blood from a 31-year-old man with Wegener's granulomatosis. The organism was detected with the BACTEC 9240 system after 6 days of incubation and was confirmed as B. pertussis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of the recovery of B. pertussis from blood.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bordetella pertussis/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Masculino
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 29(3): 457-62, 1991 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2037661

RESUMO

The accuracy of the RapID-ANA II system (Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.) was evaluated by comparing the results obtained with that system with results obtained by the methods described by the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Three hundred anaerobic bacteria were tested, including 259 clinical isolates and 41 stock strains of anaerobic microorganisms representing 16 genera and 48 species. When identifications to the genus level only were included, 96% of the anaerobic gram-negative bacilli, 94% of the Clostridium species, 83% of the anaerobic, nonsporeforming, gram-positive bacilli, and 97% of the anaerobic cocci were correctly identified. When correct identifications to the genus and species levels were compared, 86% of 152 anaerobic gram-negative bacilli, 76% of 34 Clostridium species, 81% of 41 anaerobic, nonsporeforming, gram-positive bacilli, and 97% of 73 anaerobic cocci were correctly identified. Eight isolates (3%) produced inadequate identification in which the correct identification was listed with one or two other possible choices and extra tests were required for separation. A total of 9 isolates (3%) were misidentified by the RapID-ANA II panel. Overall, the system was able to correctly identify 94% of all the isolates to the genus level and 87% of the isolates to the species level in 4 h by using aerobic incubation.


Assuntos
Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Bactérias Anaeróbias/classificação , Bacteroides/classificação , Bacteroides/isolamento & purificação , Clostridium/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Propionibacterium/isolamento & purificação , Especificidade da Espécie
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 28(12): 2804-5, 1990 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2280013

RESUMO

Reference values for quality control of in vitro susceptibility tests with meropenem against anaerobic bacteria were determined in a multilaboratory study by the approved National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution method for the four quality control strains. The study protocol also included the evaluation of microdilution testing, medium additives, and multiple lots of media. The recommended MIC control ranges for three of the control organisms are as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 0.06 to 0.125 micrograms/ml; Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml; and Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml. The modal MIC for Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124 was at or below the lowest concentration of meropenem tested, and no values are recommended.


Assuntos
Bactérias Anaeróbias/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Tienamicinas/farmacologia , Meropeném , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Controle de Qualidade , Valores de Referência
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 26(2): 225-30, 1988 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3343321

RESUMO

An evaluation of the Vitek Anaerobe Identification (ANI) card was performed with 341 bacterial isolates, including 313 clinical isolates and 28 stock strains of anaerobic microorganisms. Identifications obtained with the ANI card were compared with those determined by conventional methods. The card identified 73.2% of 149 anaerobic gram-negative bacilli, 63.6% of 44 Clostridium spp., 65.8% of 38 anaerobic nonsporeforming gram-positive bacilli, and 69.1% of 110 anaerobic cocci, with no further testing required. When genus-level identifications were included, 83.9% of the anaerobic gram-negative bacilli, 70.5% of Clostridium spp., 73.7% of the anaerobic nonsporeforming gram-positive bacilli, and 73.6% of the anaerobic cocci were identified. Nineteen isolates (5.6%) produced identifications of good confidence but marginal separation or questionable biotype, in which the correct identification was listed with one or two other possible choices and extra tests were required and suggested. A total of 28 (8.2%) were not identified and 29 isolates (8.5%) were misidentified by the ANI card. Among the commonly isolated clinically significant anaerobes, the ANI card identified 100% of 55 Bacteroides fragilis and 100% of 8 Clostridium perfringens. Use of supplemental tests and expansion of the data base to include additional strains of organisms that are difficult to separate even with conventional methods may improve the accuracy of the ANI card as a method for identification of anaerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory.


Assuntos
Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias/classificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/classificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Software
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...