RESUMO
The antiparasitic drug flubendazole and the antineoplastic compound harringtonine were studied for ability to induce chromosomal damage in Chinese hamster lung (CHL) cells and cytotoxicity and morphological transformation in C3H/10T1/2 Cl 8 (10T1/2) mouse embryo fibroblasts. Flubendazole caused a dose- and time-dependent induction of polyploidy in CHL cells. In cells treated with 0.78 micrograms/ml flubendazole, the yield of polyploid cells was 95%. Harringtonine caused a dose- and time-dependent induction of chromosome breaks, and 0.195 micrograms/ml harringtonine induced chromosome breaks in 47% of CHL cells. Both flubendazole and harringtonine caused dose-dependent cytotoxicity to 10T1/2 cells at concentration ranges of 0.04-1.60 and 0.05-0.8 micrograms/ml, respectively. Flubendazole and harringtonine at concentrations of 0.08-0.4 and 0.4-0.8 micrograms/ml, respectively, induced morphological transformation (predominantly type II foci) in 10T1/2 cells. Three of four harringtonine-transformed cell lines and two of four flubendazole-transformed cell lines formed foci in reconstruction experiments with non-transformed 10T1/2 cells. All four harringtonine-transformed and all four flubendazole-transformed cell lines formed colonies in soft agar. Similar concentrations of flubendazole and harringtonine induced chromosome damage in CHL cells and cytotoxicity and morphological transformation in 10T1/2 cells. The ability of flubendazole to induce polyploidy may be part of the mechanism by which this compound induces morphological transformation. Similarly, the ability of harringtonine to induce chromosomal aberrations may be part of the mechanism by which this compound induces morphological transformation. Therefore, flubendazole and harringtonine induce cytotoxicity and morphological and anchorage-independent transformation, harringtonine induces chromosome aberrations (breakage, translocation, and rings), and flubendazole induces polyploidy in cultured mammalian cells. The clastogenic and cell transformation-inducing properties of these compounds suggest that these drugs may have carcinogenic potential. This should be investigated rigorously in animal carcinogenesis bioassays. The genotoxicity of these drugs should be considered during their development as antiparasitic and antineoplastic agents.
