Race, Gender, and Primary Language Were Not Associated With Changes in Opioid Prescribing in Children: Results From a Single Institution, 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Patients should be prescribed medication based on their medical condition, without prejudice because of their race, gender, or primary language. However, previous research has shown that men are prescribed more medication than women, patients who are White are prescribed more medications than patients who are non-White, and English-speaking people are prescribed more medications than non-English-speaking patients. However, it is unclear whether these differences also occur in pediatric orthopaedic populations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Was the amount of opiates prescribed at discharge associated with patient age, gender, race, or primary language? (2) Did the amount of opiates prescribed to patients at discharge change from 2010 to 2020? METHODS: In a single center, between January 2010 and December 2019, we treated 331 patients younger than 18 years surgically for upper and lower long-bone extremity fractures. Patients were considered eligible if they had a nonpathologic fracture. Femur fractures were not included. Based on these criteria, all patients were eligible. The mean age was 12 ± 4 years. The mean weight was 57 ± 33 kg. Among these patients, 76% (253 of 331) were boys and 24% (78 of 331) were girls. From the hospital discharge records, we recorded the amount of opiates prescribed at the time of discharge as measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). We examined the association of age, gender, race, primary language, weight, and year of treatment using this measurement. We determined a patient's race retrospectively by information given by their parents at time of admission. We did not attempt to contact patients to obtain more nuanced information about their racial background. These data were obtained from the electronic health record. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-test, or chi-square test was used to assess associations depending on the distribution of variables, as appropriate. Because opioids as measured in MMEs is zero-inflated, a two-part model analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables. One component of the model was for the probability of having any opiate prescription and another was for the mean number of opioids received. Findings were considered statistically significant if p values were < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 57% (189 of 331) of children were prescribed opiates at discharge after surgery for long-bone fractures. Opiate MMEs increased with patient age (r = 0.38; p < 0.01). Boys and girls showed no difference in the amounts of pain medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.38 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 2.39]; p = 0.71; adjusted opioid difference: 0.35 MME [95% CI -51.7 to 52.4]; p = 0.99), nor were there differences between patients who were White and those who were non-White (adjusted OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.49 to 1.23]; p = 0.28; adjusted opioid difference: 21.5 MME [95% CI -19.3 to 62.4]; p = 0.30), or between patients for whom English was there primary language and those for whom English was not their primary language (adjusted OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.52 to 2.57]; p = 0.71; adjusted opioid difference: 22.7 MME [95% CI -55.7 to 101.3]; p = 0.57) when adjusted for age and weight. There was no change in opioid prescription amounts from 2010 to 2020 after adjusting for changes in patient age across years (Spearman r = -0.08; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Fairness in opioid prescribing based on race, gender, or primary language is possible. Additional research is needed to determine what factors in our institution led to this result. We suggest that prescribers should apply consistent protocols based on factors such as weight or injury type rather than making individual decisions for each patient. This will lead to fairer opioid prescribing to patients from different race and gender groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus radiation therapy in unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): A narrative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), no clear guideline exists regarding the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) versus radiotherapy. This study reviews current literature regarding TKI and radiotherapy in unresectable DFSP. METHODS: Following PROSPERO registration (CRD42021232508), a systematic literature search was performed including all studies reporting clinical results of TKI and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable DFSP. A narrative synthesis was used to compare patient characteristics, outcomes, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Of 1345 screened studies, 14 were included for review. Patient age ranged 18-77 years and 55% were male. Radiotherapy patients exhibited lower grade disease than TKI patients. Overall clinical benefit following TKI ranged from 70% to 96%. Radiotherapy patients exhibited control or resolution on last follow-up in 90% of cases. Radiotherapy adverse effects were mild, while TKI adverse effects were more severe and managed with dose reduction. CONCLUSION: TKI may be employed in unresectable DFSP of all histology types whereas radiation alone may be limited to low-grade and classic-type DFSP. TKI may cause more severe adverse effects compared to radiation alone.

Tumor-to-Tumor Metastasis: Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastasizing to a Lipoma of the Thigh: A Case Report.

CASE: A 73-year-old man with a medical history significant for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presented with widespread osseous metastases and imaging suspicious for RCC metastasizing to a lipoma interdigitated within the right vastus lateralis. The patient's pathological fractures were surgically addressed, and the lipoma excised. Final histology revealed a thigh lipoma involved by metastatic RCC without direct extension. CONCLUSION: Tumor-to-tumor metastasis is a rare occurrence, with RCC typically being the most common "recipient" tumor. This is the first case to the best of our knowledge of RCC metastasizing to a lipoma, highlighting a rare phenomena in a patient with metastatic disease.