Use of fenofibrate in the management of protease inhibitor-associated lipid abnormalities.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors are associated with several metabolic abnormalities including hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Fenofibrate is a new lipid-lowering agent for adults with very high triglyceride levels that was administered to two HIV-positive patients who were taking protease inhibitors and developed hypertriglyceridemia. Starting dosages were 134 and 201 mg/day, and were increased to 268 mg/day in both patients. Triglyceride levels decreased from 1450 to 337 mg/dl (76.8%) and from 1985 to 322 mg/dl (83.8%), respectively, after 10 months of therapy. High-density lipoprotein levels increased in both patients.

Enhanced metabolism of levonorgestrel during phenobarbital treatment and resultant pregnancy.

Levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) are an alternative to oral contraceptives and medroxyprogesterone acetate intramuscular injections. An interaction may exist between levonorgestrel and agents that induce the hepatic microsomal enzyme system. A 21-year-old woman with a history of a seizure disorder, treated with phenobarbital, who received levonorgestrel implants became pregnant. After a normal delivery, she took oral contraceptives concomitantly with phenobarbital. Although she was educated about the importance of a backup method of contraception, the woman again became pregnant and delivered twins. A recent national survey of neurologists and obstetricians was conducted evaluating prescriber knowledge of interactions between oral contraceptives and anticonvulsants. Only 4% of neurologists and zero percent of obstetricians knew all the interactions between the six most commonly prescribed anticonvulsants and oral contraceptives. This case supports the importance of continued patient and prescriber education regarding the possibility of drug-drug interactions in women taking anticonvulsants and hormonal contraceptives.

Issues surrounding tight glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To review the prospective evidence surrounding the issue of tight glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and resultant long-term complications. DATA SOURCE: Conference proceedings and a MEDLINE search (1966-February 1998) identified pertinent English-language publications on type 2 diabetes in humans. Key search terms included insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, non-insulin-dependent, macrovascular complications, microvascular complications, and intensive glycemic control. STUDY SELECTION: Selection of prospective epidemiologic and clinical studies were limited to those focusing on the management of type 2 diabetes. All articles with pertinent information relevant to the scope of this article were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The pathophysiology of type 1 and type 2 diabetes differ; however, both share chronic complications that significantly affect morbidity and mortality. People with type 1 diabetes have an absolute deficiency of insulin, whereas people with type 2 diabetes have varying degrees of insulin resistance and an inadequate compensatory insulin secretory response. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) has clearly indicated that intense control of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes prevents and slows the progression of microvascular (i.e., retinopathy, nephropathy) and neuropathic complications. The Kumamoto study showed similar results in nonobese patients with type 2 diabetes. Intense insulin therapy in both populations has proven advantageous, thus supporting a common pathophysiologic process for the microvascular and neuropathic complications. Trends were seen toward fewer macrovascular (atherosclerotic disease) complications in the intensive insulin arm of the DCCT. Conversely, trends were seen toward an increase in macrovascular complications in the VA Cooperative study in people with type 2 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy. This may suggest a discordance in the pathophysiology of macrovascular disease between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, it remains uncertain whether tight glycemic control prevents the onset or slows the progression of macrovascular disease. Two studies (the University Group Diabetes Program and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in Type 2 Diabetes) to date have examined pharmacotherapy options for patients with type 2 diabetes and resultant macrovascular complications. It has yet to be determined whether any therapeutic intervention will decrease the morbidity and mortality of macrovascular disease in this population. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetes, limited prospective evidence does support tight glycemic control to help prevent or slow the progression of microvascular and neuropathic complications. It is uncertain whether tight glycemic control decreases macrovascular complications and which pharmacotherapeutic agent(s) is/are the best options. However, therapy that improves glucose control in combination with aggressive risk factor management should be initiated and enforced in patients with type 2 diabetes in an effort to reduce long-term complications.

An interdisciplinary effort to help patients with limited prescription drug benefits afford their medication.

BACKGROUND: Patients without prescription benefits present a significant challenge to health care providers. The inability of patients to afford medication may serve as a barrier to adherence and may ultimately result in poor patient outcomes. In this report, we describe the system used at a university-based adult internal medicine center to assist patients in affording medication. METHODS: Patients in need of prescription assistance are identified by any member of the interdisciplinary team, which consists of physicians, clinical pharmacists, nurses, a social worker, a financial counselor, and a dietitian. Medication profiles are reviewed to identify less expensive alternatives. State, federal, institutional, and pharmaceutical company assistance program eligibility is determined, and the appropriate program is accessed. RESULTS: The described approach is effective in assisting patients without prescription benefits with the procurement of medication. CONCLUSION: Use of this interdisciplinary approach is an innovative solution to a common problem encountered in the outpatient setting.