New horizons for uncommon mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: BRAF, KRAS, RET, MET, NTRK, HER2.

The 2004 discovery of EGFR mutations, followed by ALK rearrangements, ushered in a targeted therapy era for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting gene alterations have substantially improved survival and quality of life for patients with NSCLC. In the last decade, rearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene have been incorporated into healthcare practice that are applicable to another small subgroup of patients who benefit from similar targeted strategies. Recent genome studies of lung adenocarcinoma have identified other possible therapeutic targets, including RET, NTRK fusions, c-MET alterations, and activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and HER2, all with frequencies greater than 1%. Lung cancers harbouring these genome changes can potentially be treated with agents approved for other indications or under clinical development. This review updates the therapeutic arsenal that especially targets those genes.

Utilidad del tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg frente a atorvastatina 80 mg en la reducción de los niveles de colesterol LDL en pacientes con ictus isquémico o ataque isquémico transitorio / Utility of treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg in reducing the levels of LDL cholesterol in patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack

Introducción. Tras un ictus isquémico, reducir los niveles de colesterol LDL (LDLc) disminuye el riesgo de recurrencia. El riesgo de recurrencia es menor con reducciones más intensas de las cifras de LDLc. Objetivo. Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento hipolipemiante combinado con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg tras un ictus isquémico o ataque isquémico transitorio (AIT). Pacientes y métodos. Evaluación de la eficacia del tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg (n = 34) frente a atorvastatina 80 mg (n = 52) en la modificación de parámetros lipídicos tras un ictus isquémico o AIT. Se estableció como objetivo primario la obtención de niveles de LDLc ≤ 70 mg/dL o la reducción de las cifras de LDLc ≥ 50%. Adicionalmente se evaluó la presencia de efectos secundarios en ambos grupos. Resultados. Se observó un incremento significativo de las probabilidades de alcanzar el objetivo primario en el grupo tratado con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg (odds ratio: 11,94; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 2,82-50,64; p = 0,001) y en los varones (odds ratio: 4,76; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 1,35-16,67; p = 0,02). El tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg obtuvo reducciones superiores de LDLc (p < 0,001), colesterol total (p = 0,001) y no HDLc (p < 0,001). Ambos tratamientos fueron seguros, con escaso número de efectos secundarios. Conclusiones. En comparación con atorvastatina 80 mg, el tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg incrementa la probabilidad de alcanzar los objetivos de LDLc. Ambos tratamientos son seguros y bien tolerados (AU)

Introduction. After an ischaemic stroke, to reduce LDL cholesterol (LDLc) levels decreases the risk of recurrence. The risk of recurrence is lower with more intense reductions in LDLc levels. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and security of atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Patients and methods. We retrospectively evaluated stroke or TIA patients admitted to our hospital who received atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 34) or atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 52) at discharge. We analyzed changes in lipid parameters and established as a primary outcome LDLc ≤ 70 mg/dL and/or reduction in LDLc ≥ 50%. Furthermore, safety parameters were assessed. Results. Predictors associated with primary outcome achievement were treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (odds ratio: 11.94; 95% CI: 2.82-50.64; p = 0.001) and male (odds ratio: 4.76; 95% CI: 1.35-16.67; p = 0.02). Treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg achieved significantly greater reductions in LDLc (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and non-HDLc (p < 0.001). Both treatments were safe and well tolerated, with a low number of secondary effects. Conclusions. Compared with atorvastatin 80 mg, atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg increases the likelihood of achieving LDLc goals after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated (AU)

Lesión intraoperatoria de nervio periférico en cirugía colorrectal. Revisión de conjunto / Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury in colorectal surgery. An update

La lesión de nervio periférico durante procedimientos de cirugía colorrectal constituye una complicación potencialmente grave a menudo infravalorada durante el postoperatorio. La posición de Trendelenburg, la colocación de topes y las abducciones de los brazos han demostrado favorecer el desarrollo de plexopatía braquial durante los procedimientos laparoscópicos. En cirugía colorrectal abierta las lesiones nerviosas son menos frecuentes, afectan preferentemente al plexo femoral y se asocian a la posición de litotomía y al uso de autorretractores. Aunque en la mayoría de los casos la recuperación es completa, el tratamiento consiste en fisioterapia para prevenir la atrofia muscular, protección de las zonas con hipoestesia y analgésicos frente al dolor neuropático. El objetivo del presente artículo es realizar una revisión de la literatura existente sobre incidencia, prevención y manejo de la lesión intraoperatoria de nervio periférico

Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury during colorectal surgery procedures is a potentially serious complication that is often underestimated. The Trendelenburg position, use of inappropriately padded armboards and excessive shoulder abduction may encourage the development of brachial plexopathy during laparoscopic procedures. In open colorectal surgery, nerve injuries are less common. It usually involves the femoral plexus associated with lithotomy position and self-retaining retractor systems. Although in most cases the recovery is mostly complete, treatment consists of physical therapy to prevent muscular atrophy, protection of hypoesthesic skin areas and analgesics for neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study is to review the incidence, prevention and management of intraoperative peripheral nerve injury

[Utility of treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg in reducing the levels of LDL cholesterol in patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack]. / Utilidad del tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg más ezetimiba 10 mg frente a atorvastatina 80 mg en la reducción de los niveles de colesterol LDL en pacientes con ictus isquémico o ataque isquémico transitorio.

INTRODUCTION: After an ischaemic stroke, to reduce LDL cholesterol (LDLc) levels decreases the risk of recurrence. The risk of recurrence is lower with more intense reductions in LDLc levels. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and security of atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stroke or TIA patients admitted to our hospital who received atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 34) or atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 52) at discharge. We analyzed changes in lipid parameters and established as a primary outcome LDLc <= 70 mg/dL and/or reduction in LDLc >= 50%. Furthermore, safety parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Predictors associated with primary outcome achievement were treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (odds ratio: 11.94; 95% CI: 2.82-50.64; p = 0.001) and male (odds ratio: 4.76; 95% CI: 1.35-16.67; p = 0.02). Treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg achieved significantly greater reductions in LDLc (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and non-HDLc (p < 0.001). Both treatments were safe and well tolerated, with a low number of secondary effects. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with atorvastatin 80 mg, atorvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg increases the likelihood of achieving LDLc goals after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated.

TITLE: Utilidad del tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg frente a atorvastatina 80 mg en la reduccion de los niveles de colesterol LDL en pacientes con ictus isquemico o ataque isquemico transitorio.Introduccion. Tras un ictus isquemico, reducir los niveles de colesterol LDL (LDLc) disminuye el riesgo de recurrencia. El riesgo de recurrencia es menor con reducciones mas intensas de las cifras de LDLc. Objetivo. Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento hipolipemiante combinado con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg tras un ictus isquemico o ataque isquemico transitorio (AIT). Pacientes y metodos. Evaluacion de la eficacia del tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg (n = 34) frente a atorvastatina 80 mg (n = 52) en la modificacion de parametros lipidicos tras un ictus isquemico o AIT. Se establecio como objetivo primario la obtencion de niveles de LDLc <= 70 mg/dL o la reduccion de las cifras de LDLc >= 50%. Adicionalmente se evaluo la presencia de efectos secundarios en ambos grupos. Resultados. Se observo un incremento significativo de las probabilidades de alcanzar el objetivo primario en el grupo tratado con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg (odds ratio: 11,94; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 2,82-50,64; p = 0,001) y en los varones (odds ratio: 4,76; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 1,35-16,67; p = 0,02). El tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg obtuvo reducciones superiores de LDLc (p < 0,001), colesterol total (p = 0,001) y no HDLc (p < 0,001). Ambos tratamientos fueron seguros, con escaso numero de efectos secundarios. Conclusiones. En comparacion con atorvastatina 80 mg, el tratamiento con atorvastatina 40 mg mas ezetimiba 10 mg incrementa la probabilidad de alcanzar los objetivos de LDLc. Ambos tratamientos son seguros y bien tolerados.

Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury in colorectal surgery. An update.

Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury during colorectal surgery procedures is a potentially serious complication that is often underestimated. The Trendelenburg position, use of inappropriately padded armboards and excessive shoulder abduction may encourage the development of brachial plexopathy during laparoscopic procedures. In open colorectal surgery, nerve injuries are less common. It usually involves the femoral plexus associated with lithotomy position and self-retaining retractor systems. Although in most cases the recovery is mostly complete, treatment consists of physical therapy to prevent muscular atrophy, protection of hypoesthesic skin areas and analgesics for neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study is to review the incidence, prevention and management of intraoperative peripheral nerve injury.