Performance of an automatic arrhythmia classification algorithm: comparison to the ALTITUDE electrophysiologist panel adjudications.

INTRODUCTION: Adjudication of thousands of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-treated arrhythmia episodes is labor intensive and, as a result, is most often left undone. The objective of this study was to evaluate an automatic classification algorithm for adjudication of ICD-treated arrhythmia episodes. METHODS: The algorithm uses a machine learning algorithm and was developed using 776 arrhythmia episodes. The algorithm was validated on 131 dual-chamber ICD shock episodes from 127 patients adjudicated by seven electrophysiologists (EPs). Episodes were classified by panel consensus as ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or non-VT/VF, with the resulting classifications used as the reference. Subsequently, each episode electrogram (EGM) data was randomly assigned to three EPs without the atrial lead information, and to three EPs with the atrial lead information. Those episodes were also classified by the automatic algorithm with and without atrial information. Agreement with the reference was compared between the three EPs consensus group and the algorithm. RESULTS: The overall agreement with the reference was similar between three-EP consensus and the algorithm for both with atrial EGM (94% vs 95%, P = 0.87) and without atrial EGM (90% vs 91%, P = 0.91). The odds of accurate adjudication, after adjusting for covariates, did not significantly differ between the algorithm and EP consensus (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm performs at a level comparable to an EP panel in the adjudication of arrhythmia episodes treated by both dual- and single-chamber ICDs. This type of algorithm has the potential for automated analysis of clinical ICD episodes, and adjudication of EGMs for research studies and quality analyses.

Impact of shock energy and ventricular rhythm on the success of first shock therapy: the ALTITUDE first shock study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of shock in converting different ventricular tachyarrhythmias has not been well characterized in a large natural-practice setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine shock success rate by energy and ventricular rhythm in a large cohort of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS: Two thousand patients with 5279 shock episodes were randomly sampled for analysis from the LATITUDE remote monitoring system. Within an episode, the rhythm preceding therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing [ATP]) was adjudicated. Patients who died after unsuccessful implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks did not transmit final remote monitoring data and were not included in the study. RESULTS: Of 3677 shock episodes for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, 2679 were treated with shock initially and were classified as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia ( n = 1544), polymorphic/monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 371), or ventricular fibrillation (n = 764). The success rate after the first, second, and final shock averaged 90.3%, 96.4%, and 99.8%, respectively. After unsuccessful initial ATP (n = 998), the first, second, and final shock was successful in 84.8%, 92.9%, and 100% of the episodes. The success rate after the first or second shock was significantly lower after failed ATP compared to shock as first therapy (both P<.001). Among episodes treated initially with shock, the success rate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (89.2%) when treated with energy level ≤ 20 J was significantly higher than that for ventricular fibrillation (80.8%) (P = .04). The level of shock energy was a significant predictor of the success of the first shock (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of first shock as first therapy is approximately 90%, but was lower after failed ATP. Programming a higher level of energy after ATP is suggested.

Noise, artifact, and oversensing related inappropriate ICD shock evaluation: ALTITUDE noise study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 12-21% of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients receive inappropriate shocks. We sought to determine the incidence and causes of noise/artifact and oversensing (NAO) resulting in ICD shocks. METHODS: A random sample of 2,000 patients who received ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator shocks and were followed by a remote monitoring system was included. Seven electrophysiologists analyzed stored electrograms from the 5,279 shock episodes. Episodes were adjudicated as appropriate or inappropriate shocks. RESULTS: Of the 5,248 shock episodes with complete adjudication, 1,570 (30%) were judged to be inappropriate shocks. Of these 1,570, 134 (8.5%) were a result of NAO. The 134 NAO episodes were determined to be due to external noise in 76 (57%), lead connector-related in 37 (28%), muscle noise in 11 (8%), oversensing of atrium in seven (5%), T-wave oversensing in two (2%), and other noise in one (1%). The ICD shock itself resulted in a marked decrease in the level of noise in 60 of 134 (45%) NAO episodes, and the magnitude of this effect varied with the type of NAO (58% for external noise, 35% for muscle, 27% for lead/connector, and 0% for oversensing; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in NAO likelihood based on type of lead (integrated bipolar 89/1,802 vs dedicated bipolar 9/140, P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: External noise and lead/connector noise were the primary causes, while T-wave oversensing was the least common cause of NAO resulting in ICD shock. Noise/artifact decreased immediately after a shock in nearly half of episodes. The specific ICD lead type did not impact the likelihood of NAO.

Impact of relaxation training on patient-perceived measures of anxiety, pain, and outcomes after interventional electrophysiology procedures.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiology procedures vary in invasiveness, duration, and anesthesia utilized. While complications are low and efficacy high, cases are elective and patient experiences related to anxiety, pain, and perceived outcomes are not well studied. We sought to determine if a 30-minute audio compact disc (CD) that teaches relaxation techniques and wellness perception prior to an elective procedure impacts validated measures of anxiety, pain, and procedural outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to a control group (CG) (N(CG) = 31) or interventional group (IG) (N(IG) = 30). Both groups answered a baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) survey consisting only of anxiety assessment questions. The IG listened to the CD the night prior to their procedure. Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored on admission and prior to the procedure. Postprocedure, both groups completed two HADS-A surveys as well as two Patient Experience Surveys (PES). There was no statistical difference in the demographics and the rate of procedural complications between the groups. The statistical significance of our data was determined using a Student's t-test and χ(2) test. RESULTS: At baseline, both groups had equal amounts of anxiety prior to their procedures (P = 0.2). The patients in the IG had lower systolic blood pressures during admission and prior the administration of analgesics in comparison to the CG. Postprocedure, results from administering the HADS-A demonstrated that the IG had 33% lower anxiety (P = 0.02) than CG patients. CONCLUSION: The implementation of basic relaxation teaching techniques prior to planned electrophysiology procedures lowers systolic blood pressure and postprocedural anxiety.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries: methodology and observations from ALTITUDE.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of remote monitoring with the associated large retrievable databases provides a unique opportunity to analyze observations on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Adjudication of a large number of stored ICD electrograms (EGMs) presents a unique challenge. The ALTITUDE study group was designed to use the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to evaluate ICD patient outcomes across the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 81,081 patients on remote monitoring, a random sample of 2,000 patients having 5,279 shock episodes was selected. The ALTITUDE EGM review committee was comprised of seven electrophysiologists from four institutions. An online EGM adjudication system was designed. Episodes were classified as appropriate (70% of shock episodes) or inappropriate ICD therapies (30%). Light's Kappa was used to assess agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for dual-chamber ICDs were 0.84 (0.71-0.91) and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), consistent with substantial agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for single-chamber ICDs were 0.61 (0.54-0.67) and 0.69 (0.59-0.79). The rhythm categories of "nonsustained arrhythmia" and "polymorphic and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia" resulted in the greatest degree of discordant adjudication between reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: This method of adjudication of a large volume of stored EGM data prior to device therapies will allow new observations in regards to device performance and has the potential to improve device programming and design. There was substantial interreviewer agreement for rhythm classification. Agreement was greater for dual-chamber compared to single-chamber devices, indicating the atrial lead adds diagnostic value in rhythm interpretation.

Ventricular tachycardia in the era of ventricular assist devices.

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced cardiomyopathy is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia. Newer treatment strategies have evolved that combine the use of catheter ablation to target the substrate for VT and ventricular assist devices (VADs) to hemodynamically support the failing ventricle. This editorial is targeted to the practicing clinician caring for these difficult patients. The current article reviews the use of percutaneous VADs to support catheter ablation of VT, the use of durable VADs to support the failing heart in patients with recurrent VT, ventricular arrhythmias in patients with durable VADs, and the use of catheter ablation to treat VT in patients with durable VADs.

Novel use of a vascular plug to anchor an azygous vein ICD lead.

We describe the case of a young patient with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and marginal defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) at implant of a standard transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) system. The patient subsequently experienced multiple failed ICD shocks during a prolonged episode of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Placement of a second single-coil shocking lead in the azygous vein resulted in acceptable DFTs, but the new lead migrated superiorly within hours of the procedure. To stabilize the lead position, a vascular plug was placed in the distal azygous vein, and the shocking lead screw was actively fixated to the meshwork of the device. Subsequent testing confirmed both adequate defibrillation and stable lead position.

Supraventricular tachycardia after orthotopic cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to define the incidence, mechanisms, and management, including catheter ablation, of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in a large series of patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). BACKGROUND: Supraventricular arrhythmias are frequently encountered after OHT, but their characteristics in this population have not been well established. METHODS: We analyzed the incidence, clinical course, and management of SVTs in a cohort of 729 adult patients who underwent OHT. Furthermore, the mechanisms of arrhythmias among the patients referred for electrophysiological study (EPS) and ablation were also characterized. RESULTS: The most common arrhythmia was atrial flutter, which occurred in 9% of this cohort. Persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurred in 7%, the majority (57%) in the perioperative period. Persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was observed in OHT patients, beyond the post-operative period, only in the presence of rejection or transplant vasculopathy. Other persistent or paroxysmal SVTs were seen in 47 stable OHT patients (7%). Of these, 24 patients (4%) underwent EPS. Accessory and dual atrioventricular nodal pathways in the donor heart caused SVT in 3 patients. Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia was seen in 7 patients, and isthmus-dependent atrial flutter occurred in 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of SVTs in stable OHT patients can be attributed to macro-reentrant tachycardias (flutter and scar reentry). Catheter ablation is effective in management of these SVTs. Atrial fibrillation was never encountered in stable patients in our series, and its occurrence should prompt an evaluation for acute rejection and/or vasculopathy.

Biventricular pacing and defibrillator use in chronic heart failure.

Since the 1970s when the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was developed, multiple clinical trials have documented survival benefits in certain high-risk subsets of heart failure patients. Over the past decade, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) emerged as an important therapy in carefully selected patients with ongoing symptoms despite optimized pharmacological therapy. ICDs should be considered first-line therapy for survivors of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events. Subsets of patients with both ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy appear to have a survival benefit from primary ICD therapy. CRT has resulted in substantial symptomatic improvement and survival benefits in a subgroup of chronic heart failure patients. CRT should be considered in heart failure patients undergoing ICD implantation who have evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy response is associated with shorter duration of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly associated with heart failure. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on atrial remodeling has been demonstrated. However, biventricular pacing did not reduce the global incidence of AF. We evaluated the relationship between CRT response and AF duration. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 96 patients (59 +/- 15 years; 78% male) who underwent CRT. All patients had class III-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 35%, QRS >130 ms, and sinus rhythm before implantation. CRT response in patients who survived at six months of follow-up was defined as: (1) no hospitalization for heart failure and (2) improvement of one or more grades in the NYHA classification. RESULTS: CRT responders (n = 54) and non-responders (n = 42) had similar baseline characteristics, including the incidence of persistent AF within six months before implantation. Six months after implantation, when compared to baseline, CRT responders exhibited a significant decrease in left atrial size (47.5 +/- 7.1 mm vs 44.6 +/- 7.7 mm, P < 0.01) and in the incidence of persistent AF (17% vs 2%, P = 0.02). At six months, CRT responders demonstrated shorter mean AF duration (7.5 +/- 43.3 hours vs 48.8 +/- 129.0 hours, P = 0.03) and lower incidence of persistent AF (2% vs 19%, P = 0.004) compared to nonresponders. CONCLUSION: CRT response is associated with a reversal of atrial remodeling and a shorter AF duration.

Changes and predictive value of dispersion of repolarization parameters for appropriate therapy in patients with biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on dispersion of repolarization is controversial. The benefit of CRT on sudden cardiac death has been demonstrated only after 3 years follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the immediate effect of CRT on dispersion of repolarization and to define the value of dispersion of repolarization parameters as predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. METHODS: Data from 100 patients who underwent CRT-ICD placement were analyzed retrospectively. Patients had symptoms of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and QRS duration >130 ms or QRS < or =130 ms with left intraventricular dyssynchrony. ECG indices of dispersion of repolarization before and immediately after CRT implantation (QT dispersion, Tpeak-Tend [Tp-e], and Tp-e dispersion) were measured. RESULTS: In patients who were upgraded to a biventricular system, Tp-e did not increase significantly after CRT. However, Tp-e increased significantly after CRT in patients with left bundle branch block or narrow QRS at baseline. After 12-month follow-up, 22 patients had received appropriate ICD therapy. ICD therapy and no ICD therapy groups had similar baseline characteristics, such as secondary prevention and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Postimplantation Tp-e was the only independent predictor of future ICD therapy (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Immediately after CRT, Tp-e did not increase in patients who received a biventricular upgrade; however, Tp-e did increase in patients with preimplantation left bundle branch block or narrow QRS. Postimplantation Tp-e was the only independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy.

Left ventricular apical wall motion abnormality is associated with lack of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with appropriate indications fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the relationship between CRT response and preimplantation apical wall motion abnormality. METHODS: We analyzed data from 83 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent CRT. All patients had New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =35%, and QRS duration > or =130 ms or <130 ms with left ventricular dyssynchrony. CRT responders at 6 months were defined as surviving patients with: (1) no hospitalization for heart failure, and (2) improvement of New York Heart Association classification. Patients underwent echocardiography before and 6 months after implantation to assess changes in regional wall motion and LVEF. RESULTS: At baseline, CRT responders (n = 39) and nonresponders (n = 44) had similar LVEF (22.9% +/- 6.9% vs 23.1% +/- 8.3%), QRS duration (159 +/- 43 ms vs 159 +/- 36 ms), and medical treatment. CRT nonresponders had a higher prevalence of preimplantation apical wall motion abnormality (68% vs 33%, P = .003). Patients with baseline apical wall motion abnormalities (n = 43) were less likely than others (n = 40) to show improvement in wall motion at 6 months (30% vs 81%, P < .001) or clinical response to CRT (31% vs 64%, P = .003). CONCLUSION: The presence of a preimplantation apical wall motion abnormality was associated with a lower rate of CRT response in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Usefulness of preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide level for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Nearly 1/3 of patients with heart failure (HF) fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of preimplantation brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting the clinical response to CRT. We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients who underwent CRT. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, who were not on inotropic medications, had left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and QRS duration >130 ms were included in the study. CRT response in patients who survived at 6-month follow-up was defined as no HF hospitalization and improvement of > or =1 grades in the New York Heart Association classification. BNP assays were performed before implantation and at 6-month follow-up. Patients had ischemic (47%) or nonischemic (53%) cardiopathy. Responders (n = 107) and nonresponders (n = 57) had similar baseline characteristics. Cardiac death and hospitalization for HF occurred in 5 (4.7%) and 18 (31.6%) patients, respectively. CRT responders compared with nonresponders exhibited higher preimplantation BNP levels (800 +/- 823 vs 335 +/- 348 pg/ml, p = 0.0002) and a significant reduction in the QRS duration after implantation (-6 +/- 34 vs +7 +/- 32 ms, p = 0.048). The preimplantation BNP was the only independent predictor of the CRT response (p = 0.001). A BNP value > or =447 pg/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 79% in identifying CRT response. In a subgroup of 41 patients who underwent Doppler tissue imaging analysis, the preimplantation BNP was higher in patients presenting with intraventricular dyssynchrony (845 +/- 779 vs 248 +/- 290 pg/ml, p = 0.04). In conclusion, the preimplantation BNP value independently predicts CRT response and was superior to QRS duration reduction in identifying CRT responders.

Percutaneous intrapericardial echocardiography during catheter ablation: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous pericardial access, epicardial mapping, and ablation have been used successfully for catheter ablation procedures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of closed-chest direct epicardial ultrasound imaging for aiding cardiac catheter ablation procedures. METHODS: An intracardiac ultrasound catheter was used for closed-chest epicardial imaging of the heart in 10 patients undergoing percutaneous epicardial access for catheter ablation. All patients underwent concomitant intracardiac echocardiography and preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. Using a double-wire technique, two sheaths were placed in the pericardium, and a phased-array ultrasound catheter was manipulated within the pericardial sinuses for imaging. RESULTS: Multiple images from varying angles were obtained for catheter navigation. Notably, image stability was excellent, and structures such as the left atrial appendage were seen in great detail. No complications resulting from use of the ultrasound catheter in the pericardium occurred, and no restriction of movement due to the presence of the additional catheter in the pericardial space was observed. Wall motion was correlated to voltage maps in five patients and showed that areas of scars correlated with wall-motion abnormalities. Normal wall-motion score correlated to sensed signals of 4.2 +/- 0.3 mV (normal myocardium >1.5 mV), and scores >1 correlated to areas with signals <0.5 mV in that territory). CONCLUSION: Intrapericardial imaging using an ultrasound catheter is feasible and safe and has the potential to provide additional valuable information for complex ablation procedures.

Alterations in ion channel physiology in diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic illnesses worldwide. This article focuses on a subgroup of diabetic patients with a specific cardiac complication of this disease--diabetic cardiomyopathy. This article initially gives some general background on diabetic cardiomyopathy and ion channels. Next the focus is on how diabetic cardiomyopathy alters calcium homeostasis in cardiac myocytes and highlights the specific alterations in ion channel function that are characteristic of this type of cardiomyopathy. Finally, the importance of the renin-angiotensin system in diabetic cardiomyopathy is reviewed.

Catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: value of defining coronary anatomy.

INTRODUCTION: Thermal damage to coronary arteries during catheter ablation has been previously reported. Coronary artery damage during LV outflow tract ventricular tachycardia is well recognized. However, the relationship of the coronary arteries to the RV outflow tract during catheter ablation has not been delineated. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the RV outflow tract and the coronary arteries utilizing arteriography, echocardiography, CT angiography, and gross anatomic pathology. METHODS: The relationship of the coronaries to the RV outflow tract was analyzed in three patients groups: Group 1: patients (n = 10) undergoing RV outflow tract ventricular tachycardia; Group 2: patients (n = 50) undergoing CT coronary angiography; Group 3: patients (n = 4) undergoing echocardiography during open heart surgery and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (n = 5). RESULTS: Group 1: The left main coronary artery was found to be 3.8 +/- 1.2 mm from the right ventricular outflow tract in patients undergoing ablation. Group 2: The minimum distance between the left main, left anterior descending, and right coronary artery to the RV outflow tract endocardial wall were 4.1 +/- 1.9 mm, 2.0 +/- 0.6 mm, and 4.3 +/- 1.9 mm (average +/- SD) respectively. Group 3: During open heart surgery using echocardiography, the minimum distance between the left main and the right coronary artery to the RV outflow tract were 3.4 +/- 0.35 mm and 2.0 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively. The distance between the let main coronary artery and the RVOT by ICE was 3.8 +/- 0.45 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The major coronary arteries lie in close proximity of the RVOT, and their anatomic course should be taken into consideration during ablation of ventricular tachycardias arising from the RV outflow tract.