Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) ; 45(3): 115-8, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12515049

RESUMO

This study was undertaken to compare implant survival after one- or two-stage sinus augmentation. Ninety-two maxillary sinuses in 77 patients were augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss). These sinuses were sub-divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 49) was operated on with a one-stage procedure, and Group 2 (n = 43) with a two-stage operation. A hundred and eighty-five implants were inserted in these augmented sinuses. Clinical and radiographical evaluations were performed and recorded according to certain criteria. The follow-up period was ranging from 16 to 44 months. Out of the implants inserted using the one-stage procedure, all survived. Two implants failed in the two-stage procedure group (98.91% implant survival). This study showed that no statistically significance was observed between the two surgical techniques (P < 0.05). Therefore, the authors concluded the type of surgical procedure (one- or two-stage) has no effect on implant survival.


Assuntos
Substitutos Ósseos/administração & dosagem , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Minerais/administração & dosagem , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...