Prognostic variables in patients with thick melanomas. Analysis of 362 cases.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma epidemiological and prognostic studies are based on Caucasian populations, in whom the predominant subtype is superficially-spreading melanoma and in whom thin melanomas (Breslow < 3 mm) predominate. Mexican patients show a predominance of thick melanomas (Breslow ≥ 3 mm), and the acral subtype is the most common. There are no publications on prognostic factors in thick melanomas. We hypothesize that we will identify factors that determine the prognosis in this group of patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical-pathological factors associated with the prognosis of patients with thick melanomas in the Mexican population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on melanomas with Breslow > 3 mm were collected from 2010 to 2015. The prognostic influence of various clinical-pathological factors was analyzed. RESULTS: The most common subtypes were acral melanoma in 271 patients (74.9 %) and nodular melanoma in 49 (13.5 %). Median Breslow thickness was 7 mm. 56.6 % of the patients had lymph node metastases (clinical stage [CS] III), 269 (74.3 %) had ulceration, and surgical margins were positive in 15 (4.1 %). Elevated neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (≥ 2) was found in 188 (51.9 %). The variables associated with lower overall survival were CS (p < 0.001), Breslow thickness (p = 0.044), ulceration (p = 0.004), mitotic activity (p < 0.001), < 2-cm margin (p < 0.001) and an increased neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.037). In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with overall survival were CS, mitotic activity, and surgical margin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with thick melanomas, overall survival is influenced by mitotic activity, a positive margin, and clinical stage.

ANTECEDENTES: Los estudios sobre factores pronóstico de melanoma están basados en poblaciones cau­cásicas, con predominio de melanomas delgados (Breslow < 3 mm). Los pacientes mexicanos muestran predominio de melanomas gruesos (Breslow ≥ 3 mm). OBJETIVO: Identificar factores asocia­dos al pronóstico de pacientes con melanomas gruesos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizó la influencia pronóstica de factores clinico­patológicos en 362 melanomas gruesos. RESULTADOS: La mediana de Breslow fue de 7 mm, 271 (74.9 %) pacientes tuvieron melanoma acral y 49 (13.5 %) melanoma nodular. El 56.6 % de los pacientes se encontró en etapa clínica [EC] III), 269 (74.3 %) tenía ulceración y 15 (4.1 %) márgenes positivos. Las variables asociadas con menor supervivencia global [SG] fueron la EC (p < 0.001), Breslow (p = 0.044), ulceración (p = 0.004), mitosis (p < 0.001) y margen < 2 cm (p < 0.001) . En el análisis multivariante los factores que influyen en SG fueron la EC, mitosis y el margen quirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con melanomas gruesos la SG es influida por un margen positive, mitosis y EC.

The influence of body mass index on the survival of patients with melanoma. A cross-sectional study of 707 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been linked with an increased incidence of melanoma; however, there are few data about its impact on melanoma prognosis. We aimed to determine if there is an association between body mass index (BMI) and overall survival (OS) in 707 patients with melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 707 patients with melanoma collected consecutively from 2005 to 2015 with a diagnosis of melanoma, who were been diagnosed and treated in our institution and who had clinical follow-up was carried out. Survival analysis was performed comparing patients according to their BMI. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, factors influencing the 5-year OS were a positive margin (HR = 3.475, 95% CI: 1.829-6.600), the clinical-stage (HR = 2.565, 95% CI: 2.020-3.257, per switch to the upper stage), ulceration (HR = 3.475, 95% CI: 1.829-6.600), and BMI (HR .905, p = 0.018 for the overweight group; HR = 0.663, p = 0.021 for obesity grade I). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had a BMI between 25 and 34.9 kg/m2 had better survival.

Variables pronósticas de pacientes con melanomas gruesos. Análisis de 362 casos / Prognostic variables in patients with thick melanomas. Analysis of 362 cases

Resumen Antecedentes: Los estudios sobre factores pronóstico de melanoma están basados en poblaciones caucásicas, con predominio de melanomas delgados (Breslow < 3 mm). Los pacientes mexicanos muestran predominio de melanomas gruesos (Breslow ≥ 3 mm). Objetivo: Identificar factores asociados al pronóstico de pacientes con melanomas gruesos. Material y métodos: Se analizó la influencia pronóstica de factores clinicopatológicos en 362 melanomas gruesos. Resultados: La mediana de Breslow fue de 7 mm, 271 (74.9 %) pacientes tuvieron melanoma acral y 49 (13.5 %) melanoma nodular. El 56.6 % de los pacientes se encontró en etapa clínica [EC] III), 269 (74.3 %) tenía ulceración y 15 (4.1 %) márgenes positivos. Las variables asociadas con menor supervivencia global [SG] fueron la EC (p < 0.001), Breslow (p = 0.044), ulceración (p = 0.004), mitosis (p < 0.001) y margen < 2 cm (p < 0.001) . En el análisis multivariante los factores que influyen en SG fueron la EC, mitosis y el margen quirúrgico. Conclusiones: En pacientes con melanomas gruesos la SG es influida por un margen positive, mitosis y EC.

Abstract Background: Studies on prognostic factors in melanoma are based on Caucasian populations, with a predominance of thin melanomas (Breslow <3 mm). Mexican patients show a predominance of thick melanomas (Breslow ≥ 3 mm). Objective: To identify factors associated with the prognosis of patients with thick melanomas. Material and methods: The prognostic influence of clinicopathological factors was analyzed in 362 thick melanomas. Results: The Breslow median was 7 mm, 271 (74.9 %) patients had acral melanoma and 49 (13.5 %) nodular melanoma. The 56.6 % of patients were found in clinical stage [CS] III), 269 (74.3 %) had ulceration, and 15 (4.1 %) had positive margins. The variables associated with lower overall survival [OS] were CS (p < 0.001), Breslow (p = 0.044), ulceration (p = 0.004), mitosis (p < 0.001) and margin < 2 cm (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the factors influencing OS were CD, mitosis, and the surgical margin. Conclusions: In patients with thick melanomas, OS is influenced by a positive margin, mitosis and CS.

Interobserver Variability in Assessing Pathologic Response to Preoperative Treatment in Rectal Cancer: Standardization of an Evaluation Method and Comparisons Between Published Scales.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating tumor response of rectal cancer to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has a prognostic value on overall survival; however, grading tumor response is a controversial issue due to lack of reproducibility and the lack of information about the standardization of the evaluation. METHODS: We performed this study to examine the variability between observers' assessment of the pathological responses to NCRT using a systematic quantitative grading system based on a percentage of tumor response against the proportion of residual tumor burden. As a secondary aim, we classified the tumor response according to six published systems to determine the correlation between the observers into each grading system. RESULTS: From 70 cases, the mean age was 60.6 ± 11.78 years, 36 (51.47%) patients were female, the pathological T stage was pT3 in 48.6% of cases, pT2 in 32.9%, pT1 in 11.4% and 7.1% in pT4, whereas 40% had lymph node metastasis. The median lymph node count was ten lymph nodes (range 6-43). Our method of tumor regression evaluation has a good intraclass correlation (ICC) value. From the scales compared regarding interobserver agreement, the Ryan's and Royal College of Pathologists showed fair agreement (but good ICC); the scales from Dworak, Becker, and Rizk showed substantial agreement (and good to excellent ICC values); and the scale from Rödel showed almost-perfect agreement. RESULTS: All the evaluated systems showed good interobserver agreement, but the best interobserver agreement was reached with the Rödel's scale.