Risk factors for epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation.

We performed a study to confirm which risk factors are significantly associated with epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation. One hundred patients who underwent nasotracheal intubation were included. Risk factors for epistaxis were analysed using the multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise variable selection method. Epistaxis was most likely to occur if transit of the tube through the nasal passage was difficult (P=0.0001, odds ratio 625, 95% confidence interval 3.14-14.26). On the other hand, age and gender, obesity, smoking, tube size, repeated attempts of intubation, and intubation performed with the aid of Magillforceps were not significantly related with risk of epistaxis. The presence of nasal anatomical abnormalities also did not correlate significantly with epistaxis. Strategies to ensure smooth transit of the tube through the nasal passageways are essential to reduce the incidence of epistaxis.

Nurses' assessment of postoperative pain: can it be an alternative to patients' self-reports?

This study was designed to evaluate whether the nurses' assessment of postoperative pain can be an alternative to patients' self-reporting. We examined 187 patients receiving postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The nurses assessed the patients' pain with three pain indices (therapeutic efficacy, pain intensity, and facial pain expression) 8 hr after operation. The patients recorded their resting and movement pain using 100-mm visual analog scales immediately following the nurses' assessment. There was an acceptable correlation between overall pain measurement assessed by patients and that assessed by nurses (canonical correlation coefficient=0.72, p=0.0001). The resting pain was more reliably reflected than the movement pain in overall measurement assessed both by nurses and by patients. Among the three pain indices assessed by nurses, the pain intensity most reliably reflected the patients' self-reports. The pain intensity assessed with a simple verbal descriptor scale therefore is believed to be an effective alternative to the patients' self-reports of postoperative pain at rest. However, it mirrored the patients' self-reports during movement less reliably. Therapeutic efficacy and facial pain expression indices were not effective alternatives to patients' self-reporting.

Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate parameters by gestational age.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to define the reference ranges for fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters according to gestational age, by determining the relationship between the FHR and gestational age using a computerized FHR analysis system. METHODS: Using our own software developed by Hanyang University Hospital in Korea, non-stress tests were performed for 20 min. FHR parameters for 6455 subjects were analyzed for various gestational groups; <25 weeks, 25-28 weeks, 29-32 weeks, 33-36 weeks, 37-40 weeks, and >40 weeks. RESULTS: The FHR parameters were related to gestational age. The mean baseline FHR, signal loss, and fetal movements decreased significantly with gestation (P<0.0001). The variability and accelerations of FHR were highest for the 37-40 weeks gestational group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that overall, the differences in the FHR parameters between gestational groups were statistically significant, and the gestational age of the fetus should be considered when interpreting FHR patterns.

Thermosoftening treatment of the nasotracheal tube before intubation can reduce epistaxis and nasal damage.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated whether a thermosoftening treatment with warm saline of a nasotracheal preformed tube can improve navigability through the nasal passageways and reduce epistaxis and nasal damage. A total of 150 patients were randomly allocated to three groups: Group I (untreated tube group, n = 50), Group II (35 degrees C treated tube group, n = 50), and Group III (45 degrees C treated tube group, n = 50). In Groups II and III, the tubes were softened at 35 +/- 2 degrees C and 45 +/- 2 degrees C with warm saline, respectively. In Group I the tube was prepared at room temperature (25 +/- 2 degrees C). The incidence of epistaxis and nasal damage in Groups II and III was significantly less than that of Group I (P: < 0.05). Despite the more frequent incidence of smooth passage in Group III, no statistical difference was found among the groups. Logistic regression analysis also confirmed that epistaxis was more likely to be reduced when the tube had been thermosoftened (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.02, 2.11). We conclude that simple thermosoftening treatment of the nasotracheal tube with warm saline helps to reduce epistaxis and nasal damage. IMPLICATIONS: Thermosoftening treatment of a nasotracheal tube with warm saline before intubation can effectively reduce epistaxis and nasal damage. This technique is safe, easy, and suitable for all types of tubes and does not require additional implements.