Is the French criminal psychiatric assessment in crisis?

The criminal psychiatric assessment in France seems to be facing growing criticism related to disagreements between experts and, on the other hand, a lack of interest of psychiatrists for the assessment. We start by explaining the current framework of the criminal psychiatric assessment in France, which differs from the assessment used in English-speaking countries, where Roman law applies. Then, we will describe the disagreements through a literature review and two clinical vignettes. Finally, we will try to understand the causes of discrepancies between experts and the reasons for a supposed lack of interest of the psychiatrists for the expertise. For this, we conducted a survey among the psychiatric experts. We individually questioned experts on the discrepancies and on their awareness of the expertise. We found that 75% of the experts we surveyed had already faced the divergent opinion of a colleague. In addition, the experts were divided on their conclusions related to the fictional scenario we gave them for an a priori assessment (a person with schizophrenia who was accused of murder), particularly in the specific contexts that we submitted to them. The main cause of disagreement between experts was the various schools of thought that influence the psychiatric experts in the forensic discussion and, therefore, the conclusions of a case. Moreover, the experts believed that the decrease in the number of psychiatric experts could be attributed to the adverse financial situation of the assessment, the considerable workload required, and the extensive responsibility that falls on the expert. Calling on a team of forensic experts to perform assessments seems to be the first solution to this crisis. Furthermore, if the experts were better compensated for the assessments, more people would want to undertake this work.

[Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder: Study with experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence]. / Divergences dans l'expertise de responsabilité des personnes schizophrènes accusées d'homicide volontaire : enquête auprès des experts de la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence.

INTRODUCTION: In France, forensic psychiatric assessment plays a central role in the relationship between psychiatry and justice. The psychiatric expert is commissioned to determine whether or not the accused has a mental disorder and to specify whether or not it affected discernment at the time of offense. Nowadays, psychiatric expertise is coming under more and more criticism, particularly regarding divergences between experts. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to find points of divergence between experts, try to understand causes and suggest ways to try to reduce them. METHODS: For this we conducted a study, between July 2012 and January 2013, with psychiatric experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence through semi-structured interviews. We focused on a limited context: psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder. We questioned the experts about the issue of criminal liability of a person with schizophrenia in general but also in clinical situations we thought particularly involved in disagreements. RESULTS: We recruited a population of 17 psychiatrists, mostly males of average age of 58 years, working mostly in the department of adult psychiatry of a hospital. We highlighted the differences between the experts, first with regards to the issue of liability in general. Experts divided seemed to keep in majority (52.9 %) the alternative between abolition and alteration of discernment when faced with a schizophrenic person accused of murder. The differences were even more pronounced in specific contexts. Thus, the fact that the person had suffered from delirium at the time of the offense led half of the experts (47.1 %) to conclude a systematic abolition of discernment, while the other half made such a conclusion when the delirium was directly linked to the facts. Discontinuation of neuroleptic treatment, drug abuse or existence of premeditation changed the conclusions of the experts in half the cases, more in the sense of an increased accountability in the cases of drug abuse or premeditation, and in the direction of a reduction of liability in case of cessation of treatment. The denial of facts by the accused caused fewer disagreements between experts. Among experts, 76.5 % had already observed differences, which, according to them, were based primarily on schools of thought, or personal views (64.7 %), which could distort clinical evaluation and especially forensic interpretation of the relationship between pathology and facts. The experts thought it was possible and desirable to reduce differences and proposed different solutions for this, especially the return to dual expertise and colleges of experts. DISCUSSION: Our results were consistent with those in the literature. Based on proposals from experts and data from the literature, we identified five perspectives likely to reduce differences: first it would be useful to put in place a better specific training in forensic psychiatry and expertise, not only theoretical but also in terms of practical training through tutoring. We would identify a jurisprudence in forensic psychiatric assessment and identify consensual points. It would be good to allow experts to acquire sufficient experience not just through tutorials but also by statutory changes. Moments of exchange between experts - including a return to dual expertise and the organization of work meeting - could also reduce differences. Finally, we propose legislative changes: not only to rewrite the paragraph 2 of Article 122-1 of the French Penal Code, but also to give priority to the expertise of responsibility on the expertise of dangerousness. CONCLUSION: We showed that there were differences between the experts mainly concerned with the forensic interpretation, and that they seemed linked to schools of thought or to personal views of each expert. To reduce the differences, we discussed five perspectives.

[Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature]. / Divergences dans l'expertise psychiatrique de responsabilité : bilan et premières hypothèses à travers une revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Forensic psychiatric assessment regarding liability ensures a balance between justice and psychiatry. In France, criminal assessment is not contradictory. The psychiatric expert is commissioned by judges to determine whether or not the accused has a mental disorder and specify whether it affects discernment and control of actions at the time of offense. Its mission focuses on the mental element required to constitute an offense, and is structured around Article 122-1 of the Criminal Code. This article, composed of two paragraphs, distinguishes the framework of the abolition of discernment ­ a cause of non-imputability and therefore of a statement of lack of criminal responsibility due to mental disorder ­ and the framework of the alteration of discernment. Nowadays expertise seems to meet discomfort, with criticism focusing on possible differences among psychiatric experts, without specific studies having been conducted to confirm it. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to identify the main points of disagreement between psychiatric experts and to propose explicative hypotheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this, we carried out a literature review on PubMed, Science Direct and Cairn, and studied the report of the 2007 public hearing on forensic psychiatric assessment with contributions from different authors. The keywords were: forensic psychiatry, psychiatric court report, psychiatric expertise, differences among experts, legal responsibility, and discernment. We defined differences as disagreements between experts, or as a mismatch in conclusions and approaches of experts. RESULTS: The differences among experts concerned mainly forensic interpretation, i.e. the discussion of the relationship between pathology and offense, particularly in contexts that involve a larger forensic discussion, including interruption of medication, use of drugs, association with antisocial personality, premeditation, denial of facts, especially when the accused suffers from a mental illness (especially schizophrenia). For a finding of abolition of discernment, an expert must consider two requirements, one temporal (the mental disease must be active during offense) and the other causal that involves seeking a direct and exclusive relationship between the offence and the mental state, according to expert jurisprudence. Some experts do not comply with these two requirements or this jurisprudence, whence differences. There were also diagnostic differences and disputes relating to the concept of "alteration of discernment". Disagreements appeared to be related primarily to personal ideologies or different schools of thought that influenced interpretations and conclusions of experts, e.g. accountability as a therapeutic response for the psychotic person. Then, the lack of clarity of expert mission regarding necessary causal relationship ­ between any disease and crime ­ to demonstrate to conclude an abolition of discernment, could also contribute to differences. Moreover, time available to achieve the mission is too short and the expert would not devote enough time to an expert examination, which could lead to less good expertise and differences; especially as observed clinical examination in expertise is sometimes difficult, misleading, due to pathological reticence of accused mentally ill but also sometimes due to possible simulations. Finally, the low quality of some expert reports ­ due in part to the less well-trained experts, but also the particular conditions of achievement of expertise, especially in prisons ­ were mentioned by some authors as causes of differences. DISCUSSION: It appears from this review of literature that differences mainly concern forensic interpretation and are mainly explained by ideologies. This synthesis is a preliminary work prior to a study among psychiatric experts.

[Management, needs and expectations of patients suffering from bipolar I disorders (The ECHO study - France)]. / Prises en charge, besoins et attentes de patients souffrant de troubles bipolaires I (Étude ECHO - France).

AIM: The ECHO study is the first French study directly asking patients with bipolar I disorders on the history and experiences of their disease, their perceptions of care, their sociofamilial relationships, and their expectations regarding what should be done by healthcare professionals and their environment. METHOD: Three hundred euthymic patients suffering from bipolar disorder I were interviewed using a semi-standardized evaluation through telephone interviews. These patients were selected according to the quota method of nationally representative INSEE 99 to be representative of the French population. RESULTS: Ninety-nine percent of patients consulted at least once for psychological signs before the correct diagnosis was established. The average age at the time of diagnosis was of 30.1 years (± 11.3). The average time between first consultation for psychological symptoms and diagnosis is about 5 years. In 92% of cases, the psychiatrist is the health professional that made the diagnosis; 74% of patients were also followed by a general practitioner. One hundred percent of participants had been hospitalized for manic episodes (criterion for inclusion in the study) and 86% were also hospitalized for depressive symptoms. The experience of hospitalization is positive (feeling of security for 84% of the sample, feelings of being helped for 81% of the sample), although these experiences are also associated with the perception of confinement (52% of the sample). At the time of the interview, 97% of these patients were followed by one or more health professionals. Only 34% of these patients were taking a mood stabilizer (lithium, anticonvulsant or atypical antipsychotic with indications in France for bipolar disorder), while 44% were taking an antidepressant and 38% were taking anxiolytics; 84% of patients had experienced side effects related to their current treatment. Acceptance of the disease is difficult and only 56% of patients personally feel they suffer from bipolar disorders. Patients believe that their mental health problems have a significant impact on their lives, including impact on their self-esteem and happiness. Relationships with family, friends but also sexual relations are affected. Even in the euthymic phase, 44% of patients have difficulties in their daily tasks. Three quarters of patients said they had already experienced rejection or discrimination related to their disease. Finally, patients gave a score of 6.4 out of 10 to assess the impact of the disorder on their quality of life. Patients request more dialogue with health professionals and a more personalized treatment, taking into account side effects. They also want more information on the treatment. They would also like to be supported, together with their families, and advised on how to cope with the disease.

[Patients' perception of seclusion in psychiatry: ethical perspectives]. / L'isolement en psychiatrie: point de vue des patients et perspectives éthiques.

OBJECTIVE: Although seclusion is legally sanctioned in France, its use remains controversial, and debate continues over ethical and therapeutic aspects of the practice. Seclusion continues to be widely used in the management of disturbed behaviour in hospitalized patients. Although recent studies serve to strengthen the link between the use of seclusion and negative patient responses, they are limited in extending our understanding of the seclusion experience. The objective of this work was two-fold: to examine the perceptions and experiences of patients about their seclusion experience and then suggest ways of improving the use of seclusion in relation to an ethical perspective. METHOD: We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with inpatients in a French Public Psychiatric Hospital, 3 weeks after their seclusion. They were conducted until no new ideas emerged in the content analysis, comprising 30 patients. Interviews were conducted using an interview guide by a physician. Specific attention was paid to their perceptions of seclusion. This guide was based on the concepts of medical ethics (autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance). Interviews were retranscribed and content analysis was performed by two of the authors who were skilled in textual analysis. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 software. RESULTS: Autonomy was challenged by 50% of interviewed patients. For 70% of patients, there was a lack of information and explanation during the seclusion on therapeutics, practices, procedures, expected length of time in seclusion and behaviours. This can contribute to perception of this process as punishment expressed by the patients. The dominant view of patients was that more effective communication about seclusion was needed. A majority of patients perceived the beneficence of the health professionals even if most of them did not express a benefit from this experience: only 26% believed that seclusion made them calm down and 36% that seclusion helped them to feel and behave better. The level and the quality of the relationship with staff during and following the seclusion experience was a major source of satisfaction for patients and can counter-balance their negative perception of seclusion. The non-malfeasance was questioned by patients. The therapeutic value of seclusion was not recognized by a majority of them. Seclusion from the patient's perspective appears to invoke a complex range of feelings that include helplessness (76%), anger (60%), humiliation (60%), depression (50%), and fear (63%). For 60% of patients, the act of placing them in seclusion had a profound negative impact. Seventy-six percent of them considered that seclusion could be prevented. CONCLUSION: Despite advances in our knowledge and understanding of mental illness, seclusion continues, and is likely to continue, as a treatment option for a number of patients. In our study, a certain number of trends were observed. Globally, there is some tension concerning ethical principles. Attention to the specific needs of patients while in seclusion may serve to reduce the punitive connotations linked to the practice. What is needed is a permanent ethical reevaluation of seclusion. For this purpose, healthcare professional staffs may be useful for a truly ethical reflection. The aim is to recognize the patient as the agent of his/her own empowerment through appropriate information. This approach should not only provide the patient with the opportunity to understand why the seclusion occurred, but also some means for overcoming the negative effects of the procedure.

Validation of a professionals' satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records (PSQ-EMR) in psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are currently being implemented in psychiatric hospitals throughout Europe. The perceptions of health care professionals can contribute important information that may predict their acceptance of and desired mode of use for EMR, thus guiding EMR implementation. AIMS: To develop a self-administered instrument designed to assess health care professionals' satisfaction regarding EMR in a psychiatric hospital, based only on the professional point of view, according to the psychometric standards. METHODS: The development was supervised by a steering committee and undertaken by three standard steps. Item generation was derived from 115 face-to-face interviews with health care professionals in a French, public, psychiatric hospital. The item-reduction process resulted in a 25-item questionnaire. The validation process was based on construct validity, reliability and some aspects of external validity. RESULTS: The final version of the questionnaire contained 25 items that described five dimensions, leading to a global score. The factor structure accounted for 72% of the total variance. Internal consistency was satisfactory (item-internal consistency over 0.40 and Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.95). The scalability was satisfactory with INFIT statistics inside an acceptable range. Scores of dimensions were strongly positively correlated with visual analogue scale scores (all p < 0.001). External validity showed statistical associations between scores and age, gender, seniority in psychiatry and ward type. Participation rate was 66%. CONCLUSION: The availability of a reliable and valid questionnaire (professionals' satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records [PSQ-EMR]) concerning health care professionals' satisfaction regarding EMR in psychiatry, exclusively generated from interviews with health care professionals, enables legitimate feedback to be incorporated into EMR implementation in order to formulate a high-quality health care.

[Psychometric properties of the Activities Daily Life Scale (ADL)]. / Caractéristiques psychométriques de l'échelle des activités de la vie quotidienne (AVQ).

OBJECTIVE: Deficits in social functioning are an important core feature of mental health. Recently in France, the Activities Daily Life (ADL) scale has been proposed by the French authorities to assess social functioning for all hospitalized patients in a psychiatric ward. The perspective is to use this scale in the financing and organization of mental health services in France. The ADL scale is a 6-item (dressing/undressing, walking/mobility, eating/drinking, using toilets, behaviour, relationships/communication) heteroquestionnaire completed by a health care professional at the beginning of each hospitalization, assessing functioning of patients suffering from mental health diseases. However, limited consensus exists on this scale. The psychometric properties of the ADL scale have not been assessed. There is a pressing need for detailed examination of its performance. The aim of this study was to explore ADL psychometric properties in a sample of hospitalized patients in a psychiatric ward. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed data for all episodes of care delivered to hospitalized patients in a psychiatric ward in our French Public Hospital from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008. The study involved retrospective review of administrative and medical databases. The following data were collected: age, gender, diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases - 10th version, ADL scale and Assessment of Social Self-Sufficiency scale (ASSS). The psychometric properties were examined using construct validity, reliability, external validity, reproducibility and sensitivity to change. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 and WINSTEP software. RESULTS: A total of 1066 patients completed the ADL scale. Among them, 49.7% were male, mean age was 36.5 ± 10.8, and 83.5% were single. Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (40.0%), mood disorders (27.9%) and mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use (12%) were the most common diagnoses. Factor analysis with varimax rotation identified a 2-factor structure accounting for 82% of the total variance. The first dimension (ADL 1) comprised four items and represented personal care activities. The second dimension (ADL 2) comprised two items and represented social functioning. A floor effect was reported for ADL 1 and its unidimensionality was not satisfactory: two items showed an INFIT statistic outside the acceptable range. Internal consistency was satisfactory for the two dimensions: each item achieved the 0.40 standard for item-internal consistency. The correlation of each item with its contributory dimension was higher than with the other (item discriminant validity). Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged over 0.70 in the whole sample. Concerning external validity, positive correlations were not systematically found between ADL and ASSS dimensions. The score of ADL 1 had medium to high correlations with four dimensions scores of the ASSS, while the score of ADL 2 were not at all or weakly correlated with ASSS dimension scores. Globally, ADL did not cover sentimental life and social relationships. There were statistical associations between ADL and age or gender: women and subjects older than 60 had a higher level of dependency. We didn't find any association with marital status or diagnoses. The ADL scale presented a good reproducibility but was not sensitive to change. CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of the ADL scale were not sufficient for several parameters such as validity or sensitivity to change, contrary to other available French scales. The use of a heteroquestionnaire rather than a self-administered questionnaire should be discussed by professionals and the French authorities. These results should be taken into account in the use of the ADL scale for the economic and administrative management of psychiatry. Further research should be conducted to confirm these results.

[Therapeutics approach of adult patients with acute and chronic psychotic states: REALITE survey]. / Approche thérapeutique d'une population de patients présentant des troubles psychotiques aigus ou chroniques: enquête REALITE (Recherche Epidémiologique sur l'activité de la Loxapine et ses Indications en Thérapeutique quotidiennE).

A retrospective observational pharmaco-epidemiological survey was conducted during 24 weeks between October 2004 and March 2005 in metropolitan France (384 investigators) to more clearly define the use of loxapine in acute and chronic psychotic states. The objective of this national survey was to specify the clinical and therapeutic profile of patients managed by this antipsychotic in two cohorts of adult patients: one in "acute phase" (prescription of loxapine during the previous 4 weeks), the other in "maintenance phase" (prescription of loxapine for more than 8 weeks). The two groups of the recruited population (1,511 patients) presented identical sociodemographic data. Selection criteria were adapted to the data collected to ensure statistically relevant analysis: 696 patients in acute phase and 633 patients in maintenance phase. The acute phase group was predominantly composed of known patients (82% of patients had a psychotic history) with schizophrenia (47%) or mood disorders (57%) who had already presented acute episodes (an average of 5.4). The current episode consisted of a state of agitation (88%) lasting an average of two weeks, requiring hospitalization (87%), scheduled admission [HDT (admission at the request of another person) in 47.5% of cases and HO (statutory admission) in 40.8% of cases] and prescription of loxapine monotherapy (56%) at a mean daily dose of 177,3 mg. The maintenance phase group comprised a population of known patients (87.5%), schizophrenics (63%), presenting psychotic symptoms (dissociation 82%, delusions 74%) or mood disorders (71%) requiring voluntary hospitalization (78%) for a mean duration of 180 days and a prescription of loxapine monotherapy in 28% of cases at a mean daily dose of 131.6 mg. The loxapine-haloperidol combination (21%) was prescribed more frequently in the second group in the case of chronic disorders; in the other cases, loxapine was coprescribed with the main second generation antipsychotics: risperidone (16%), olanzapine (16%), amisulpride (11%). CGI assessment of the overall study population revealed a marked or very marked clinical improvement with no significant adverse effects in more than 80% of cases.

The role of captodiamine in the withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discontinuation of benzodiazepines can be associated with the emergence of a withdrawal syndrome which compromises successful termination of treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether a six week administration of captodiamine during benzodiazepine discontinuation could prevent emergence of a benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome and thus facilitate discontinuation of these drugs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A controlled, randomised, double-blind trial of captodiamine versus placebo was conducted in 81 subjects presenting mild to moderate anxiety and treated for at least 6 months with a stable dose of benzodiazepine. Each subject was gradually weaned from benzodiazepines over a 14 day period using a tapering dose schedule and received captodiamine (150 mg/d) or placebo for 45 days from the beginning of the weaning period. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome criterion was the extent of withdrawal symptoms assessed using the Tyrer Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptom Questionnaire. Secondary outcome criteria were; self-evaluation of tension, anxiety, drowsiness and slowing of physical and mental performance using visual analogue scales; quality of sleep using the Spiegel questionnaire; anxiety using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; and cognitive function using a driving stimulation test. RESULTS: Analysis of the primary study criterion revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the emergence of withdrawal symptoms between the two groups in favour of captodiamine at two, six and eight weeks following initiation of therapy. These results were supported by significant beneficial effects of captodiamine on the majority of secondary outcome measures. The switch to captodiamine was associated with an improvement in vigilance, which may be an advantage for the overall safety of the anxiolytic treatment, for example with regard to road safety. Discontinuation of captodiamine was not associated with the emergence of rebound anxiety. CONCLUSION: Captodiamine represents an interesting strategy for achieving benzodiazepine substitution with a low risk of dependence or impairment of cognitive function. Further clinical studies addressing the anxiolytic activity and safety of captodiamine in such subjects are merited.

Switching antipsychotic medications: general recommendations and switching to amisulpride.

As more and more novel antipsychotic agents are introduced, the need for practical guidelines on switching these medications is becoming increasingly important. Indications for a switch include situations where the patient or his family/caregiver requests a change in medication, where the patient cannot tolerate current treatment, where they have comorbid physical or psychiatric conditions or where they have achieved only a partial remission, are refractory to treatment or have relapsed. Cross-tapering is generally the most acceptable method of switching, although abrupt withdrawal may be necessary in some cases, such as when a patient develops a severe or acute reaction to their current treatment. Possible problems of switching include the risk of discontinuation reactions and the re-emergence of psychotic symptoms. The pharmacological profile of amisulpride means it has a relatively low potential for interactions with other drugs and may be started while discontinuing the previous antipsychotic. It should be started at the target dose for the patient's current symptoms. A retrospective questionnaire among 60 patients switching to amisulpride treatment was undertaken to identify the characteristics of patients switching antipsychotics and their reasons. Patients were switched from a variety of antipsychotic medications, both traditional (42% of patients) and atypical (58%). Most patients (87%) had at least two reasons for changing medication, with lack of efficacy, adverse events and treatment optimisation before reintegration being the most common. Contrary to recommendations, 89% of patients were switched abruptly between medications. A total of 62% of patients received amisulpride doses in the range 400-800 mg/day and most (72%) required no dose adjustment. The great majority of patients (87%) switched to amisulpride without problems.

[The use of therapeutic isolation and confinement in psychiatry. A prospective study]. / Utilisation de l'isolement thérapeutique et des contentions en psychiatrie. Enquête prospective.

Despite recent developments in psychopharmacology and a better understanding of agitation patterns in psychiatric patients, the use of seclusion and restraint procedures remains a matter of daily practice. Little or no time is spent on its teaching in a formal way. There is almost no literature on these issues, and it has grown only since legal procedures initiated by patients, which forced practitioners to spend some time analysing these methods. Facing this problem, we realized a prospective study at the CHS de la Savoie, in Chambéry, so as to clarify the current modes of these procedures. This study was led among 460 secluded patients, during one year. 11 data were studied, such as the duration of the seclusion, the reason and the medical history, the desire of the patient to be liberated ... The review or awareness of certain variables may give clinicians a better perspective on the use of procedures which, unfortunately, continue to be the cause of deaths in psychiatric practice.

[Malignant hyperthermia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: report of 4 clinical cases]. / Hyperthermie maligne et syndrome malin des neuroleptiques A propos de quatre observations cliniques.

Very numerous publication in the literature suggest the probable relationship between three clinical entities: peranesthesic malignant hyperthermia (PMH), exercitional malignant hyperthermia (EMH) and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). We briefly describe the clinical history and define, as subjects of research, the personal and familial histories of neuromuscular disease of 4 of our patients having presented with neuroleptic malignant syndrome, as recommended by the European group on malignant hyperthermia, the reference contracture test on neuromuscular fibers and anatomic and cytopathological investigations of neuromuscular fibers. We compare the results for our 4 patients having presented with neuroleptic malignant syndrome and their courses. We confirm the necessity of pursuing both case history and laboratory research in order to elucidate the debate on the hypothesis of a common etiopathogenesis for the 3 syndrome entities.

[Self-assessment questionnaire of alcoholic craving (ECCA Questionnaire: Behavior and Cognition in Relation to Alcohol: French translation and validation of the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale]. / Auto-questionnaire d'appétence alcoolique (questionnaire ECCA: échelle de comportement et de cognitions vis-à-vis de l'alcool: traduction française et validation de l'OCDS (obsessive compulsive drinking scale).

Clinical, neurobiological and neuropsychological hypotheses suggest that the dimension of alcohol craving includes the concept of both obsessive thoughts about alcohol use and compulsive behaviors toward drinking. Anton et al. (1995) developed a 14 items self-rating scale, the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) which includes items for assessing three dimensions: global, and the obsessive and the compulsive subdimensions. In this study, we included 156 patients, 105 men and 51 women, who met DSM IV diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence. The mean age of our population was 39.1 +/- 11.2 years without difference between sexes. We did not found any correlation between the CAGE score and the OCDS total score or the obsessive and compulsive subscores (respectively, r = .15, r = .10 et r = .18). Moreover, we did not found any correlation between OCDS scores and mean daily alcohol consumption (r = .18, r = .16, r = .19). This could indicate that the dimension measured by the scale was somewhat independent of actual drinking. As such, it might act as an independent measure of the "state of illness" for alcohol-dependent patients. The test-retest correlation for the OCDS total score was .95 and the obsessive and compulsive subscales test-retest correlations were .93 and .89 respectively. The internal consistency of the items of the OCDS was high (alpha = .89). Principal component analysis had identified in the french version of the OCDS, three factors accounting for 63.5% of the total variance. These results indicate that the french version of the OCDS seems to validly measure a dimension of alcohol dependence. The ease of administration, reliability, and concurrent validity of the OCDS makes it particularly useful as an outcome measurement tool for various clinical therapeutic protocols in alcoholism.

[What is the meaning of "stabilization" in schizophrenic patients?]. / Que recouvre le terme "stabilisation" des patients schizophrènes?

UNLABELLED: The notion of stabilization in schizophrenia has been investigated, in France, through a survey of 875 psychiatrists. This survey, which has been conducted on the 9th, 10th and 11th of December 1997, looked into the clinical, therapeutic and socio-demographic variables, and the means of patient management, which are used by psychiatrists to ascertain that their patients are stabilized. The data was collected by each psychiatrist by way of a questionnaire administered to his or her next three patients, either at the hospital or in private practice (2,464 questionnaires were completed). RESULTS: 65% of the patients seen during this survey were considered stabilized by their psychiatrist (n = 1,597). The most common clinical presentation was of the paranoïd type. An insiduous onset of disease seems to be correlated with an absence of stabilization. Stabilization appears to be estimated at a given time rather than over a time period, since over half the patients who were considered stabilized had suffered at least one relapse over the last 2 years, and had been rehospitalized an average of 2.4 times over that period. In terms of drug therapy, they received 1.4 neuroleptic drugs, which does not differ markedly from the 1.5 neuroleptics administered to patients who were considered non stabilized. Co-prescriptions of anticholinergic medications, benzodiazepines and antidepressants were very common in these patients considered stabilized (49.9%, 39.8% and 24.8% respectively), which is similar to that observed in their non-stabilized counterparts (47.6%, 45%, 8% and 26.4%, respectively). Patient follow-up remained above an average of 1 patient visit per month (an average of 8.9 visit over the last 6 months), despite the fact that patients were considered stabilized. Two primary criteria were used by psychiatrists to determine that a patient was stabilized: treatment compliance and the absence of positive symptoms. However, 43% of the patients which were considered stabilized still presented with positive symptoms. Negative symptoms were also very prevalent in these patients (65%), as well as concomitant depressive signs (36%) and anxiety (64%). CONCLUSION: Even though the concept of stabilization remains difficult to define, it appears that schizophrenic patients are considered by their psychiatrist as stabilized on the grounds of good treatment compliance and decreased positive symptoms. Therefore, even in these so-called stabilized patients, enhancements are still possible, as symptoms remain present.

[Attempted suicide and alcohol dependence: results of an epidemiologic survey]. / Tentative de suicide et dépendance alcoolique: résultats d'une enquête épidémiologique.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between alcoholism and suicidal behaviour has long been recognized. The present study examined the lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts in alcoholic patients and the impact of comorbidity, namely with depressive anxiety disorders and antisocial personnalit disorder in alcoholic patients who attempted suicide. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design including outpatients referring for alcohol dependance according to DSM III-R criteria, we used a specific standardized and structured interview allowing DSM III-R diagnoses. RESULTS: We include 507 patients (343 males of 164 females). The mean age at the intake of the study was 43.2 (SD:9.6) years without difference between males and females. 129 patients (25.4%) had attempted suicide during their lifetime. The proportion of female was found higher than males among suicide attempters (41.9 vs 29.3%; p < or = 0.001). Age of onset of alcoholism was found younger in suicide attempters than non (p < or = 0.01), either in males and females. Moreover, we found that alcoholic suicide attempters more often reported family histories of alcoholism than did nonattempters. As regard lifetime comorbidity, major depression and drugs misuse were found more frequent in alcoholics who attempted suicide (p < or = 0.001). Moreover, we found a higher prevalence for Panic Disorder and Social Phobia in male suicide attempters.

[Evaluation of efficacy and tolerance of amisulpride in treatment of schizophrenic psychoses]. / Evaluation de l'efficacité et de la tolérance de l'amisulpride dans le traitement des psychoses schizophréniques.

Amisulpride is a benzamide derivative atypical antipsychotic characterized by selective blockade of dopamine D3 and D2 receptors, limbic selectivity and preferential blockade of dopamine autoreceptors at low doses. Its efficacy on predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia at low doses, and on the positive symptoms at doses from 400 to 1,200 mg/day has been demonstrated in several controlled studies. The aim of our study was to assess the use in psychiatric clinical practice under naturalistic conditions, efficacy and safety of amisulpride and patient's ability to cope with social skills during a 3-month period of treatment with a follow-up at 6 months. A total of 445 patients (293 men and 152 women), between 18 and 45 years of age, were included in the study DSM III-R criteria of schizophrenia, paranoid type (295.3), or schizophreniform disorder (295.4) were required for inclusion. The patients received amisulpride with flexible dosage between 600 and 1,200 mg/d during a 3-month period (792 mg/d +/- 318). Evaluation was based on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), on the Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), and on Clinical Global Improvement scale, completed at D0, D14, D28, D60 and D90. Safety was also assessed with a comprehensive statement of adverse events and with the Simpson-Angus scale of extra pyramidal symptoms. A scale of social adaptation (Echelle d'Adaptation PsychoSociale) was completed at D0, D90 and D180. During the 3-month period of treatment, 124 patients (27.9%) dropped out the trial, including 24 cases of inefficacy and 27 cases of concomitant events. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a significant improvement of BPRS scores (40.2 vs 67.6; p < 0.0001), of positive PANSS scores (13.9 vs 27.7; p < 0.0001), and negative PANSS scores (17.45 vs 28.3; p < 0.0001) between D0 and D90. CGI results confirmed these figures. Follow-up assessment at D180 showed a sustained response on BPRS ans PANSS scores. Amisulpride was well tolerated in the study, with 21% of patients reporting adverse events, in majority psychiatric or endocrine disturbances. Only seven adverse events were assessed as serious. Extra pyramidal symptoms remained low during the study, as measured with Simpson-Angus scale. The EAPS scale showed a significant improvement of social adaptation during the treatment, with a sustained response during the 3-month follow-up period. In conclusion, 600-1 200 mg/d of amisulpride is an effective and well tolerated treatment of schizophrenic disorders, as demonstrated through this 3-month study carried in a large sample of 445 patients. Besides results suggest that under treatment with amisulpride in schizophrenic patients patients' ability to social adaptation can be improved, which could facilitate their rehabilitation.

[Absence of frontal lobe dysfunction and working memory deficits in young schizophrenic patients]. / Absence de dysfonctionnement frontal et de trouble de la mémoire de travail chez de jeunes schizophrènes.

The impairment in tasks requiring intact frontal lobe functions has been repeatedly shown in schizophrenics. However, the relative roles of confounding factors, like duration of the disease, social withdrawal, or antidopaminergic medication, are not clearly demonstrated. We studied the performance of 12 young active patients, with chronic residual schizophrenia that had recent onset, and 12 control subjects, with frontal lobe tests and with a battery designed to explore working memory. The results show normal performance in schizophrenia. The small number of patients does not allow definitive conclusions, but this study suggests that a frontal dysfunction may not be present early in the evolution of schizophrenia in active patients.

[Social trajectory and schizophrenia]. / Trajectoire sociale et schizophrénie.

On the occasion of the Clozapine symposium we have had cause to reflect on the social life-histories of schizophrenic patients. After an analysis of a cohort of 40 patients aged over 65 years, whose medical records had been kept up since the start of their disease, we have set up a methodology which enables us to study the social life-histories of these patients. Our aim is ultimately to compare the course of the disease with the treatments received by these patients and the therapeutic structures they have been offered. For this purpose, we shall study three criteria of social exposure: 1) Autonomy, 2) Integration into the family, 3) Integration through work. The aim of the present paper is to record our initial analytical findings in these three years.

[Alzheimer's disease and informed consent of incapacitated people: propositions aimed at improving the procedure]. / Maladie d'Alzheimer et consentement du majeur protégé par la loi: proposition pour améliorer la procédure.

Ethical considerations must be given priority when deciding whether or not to include an Alzheimer's Disease patient in a study leading to direct individual benefits. Although the law applies to ethics, the Huriet-Serusclat law was nevertheless written in the spirit of the major ethical declarations of the last 50 years (Nurenberg, Helsinki, Tokyo...) in order to protect patients from abusive decisions, whether these decisions were for or against the patient receiving treatment. This paper describes an incident during a phase II trial involving patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Four incapacitated patients protected by guardianship had given their informed consent to take part in the study. Their participation required that the informed consent be signed by the guardian as well. By misunderstanding of the law, the guardian transmitted the decision to the guardianship judge. Surprisingly, the guardianship judge refused permission for all patients to take part in this therapeutic trial against the wishes of the patients. Even more surprisingly, it appeared clearly that this judge was not thoroughly informed of each detail of the law. Prevention of this kind of situation might require modifications of the responsibilities of the CCPPRB. It is suggested that before the start of a study the CCPPRB should give a precise definition of the way in which incapacitated persons should be treated.