Parental refusal of prenatal screening for aneuploidies.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the reasons for refusal of aneuploidy screening in a multicultural Middle Eastern population. METHODS: The study included patients delivering in a university hospital, who had refused aneuploidy screening during their pregnancy. We evaluated through a questionnaire submitted during the postpartum period the sociodemographic characteristics, beliefs, attitudes, and the main reason underpinning their choice. Religious, ethical, and financial factors, personal beliefs, medical information, perceived media information, and familial input were assessed through a Likert scale. RESULTS: Our pilot study included 70 patients. The main reason (33 %) was the refusal to terminate pregnancy if the screening tests ultimately led to a diagnosis of aneuploidy. Lack of adequate information on the availability and benefits of this screening method (28 %), religious beliefs (17 %), in addition to other minor reasons such as financial considerations, familial recommendations, late pregnancy follow-ups, and media influence were also identified as contributing factors. CONCLUSIONS: Aneuploidy screening is routinely offered to couples, with varying uptake rates observed worldwide. Sufficient information on prenatal screening and diagnosis should be provided to all pregnant women, presenting all available options, thus enabling them to make a free and informed choice during their pregnancy.

Hysterectomy Using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A New Advantageous Approach? A Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery aims to reduce surgical trauma and post-operative morbidity. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery is a safe and valid surgical option for hysterectomy. The present systematic review aims to compare hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) with laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of efficacy, surgical outcomes, complications, and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It includes randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, prospective or retrospective cohorts, case-control studies, and previous systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria are as follows: female patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign pathologies by vNOTES or laparoscopic hysterectomy. The assessed outcomes were the following: conversion rate, mean uterus weight (g), operative time (mins), hospital stay (days), peri-operative complications, post-operative complications, peri-operative blood loss (mL), blood transfusion needs, post-operative day 1 hemoglobin (Hb) change (g/dL), post-operative pain level (VAS), and cost (USD) in both techniques. RESULTS: Seven studies were included. vNOTES hysterectomy was not inferior to laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding surgical outcomes, with a shorter operative time, shorter recovery time, less post-operative pain, and fewer post-operative complications. There was no significant difference in the rate of peri-operative complications and no differences in peri-operative blood loss, post-operative day 1 Hb change, and transfusions. Nevertheless, vNOTES hysterectomy was shown to be more expensive than its laparoscopic counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: While the feasibility and safety of the vNOTES hysterectomy were already established, this review also underlines the noninferiority of this technique when compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. In addition, vNOTES hysterectomy was associated with faster operating time, shorter hospital stay, and better post-operative pain scores compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Uterine Scar Evaluation during the Postpartum: Pleading for Extradecidual Suturing during Cesarean Section.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to evaluate ultrasound differences in uterine scar between techniques using extramucosal suturing and full thickness suturing of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study included cases of primary cesarean section. At 6-week postpartum, we evaluated by endovaginal ultrasound two elements in the sagittal view: the thickness of the uterine scar and the surface of defect (niche). Hysterotomy sites closed using a running full-thickness technique including the uterine mucosa (group 1) were compared to hysterotomies operated by the same surgeon but with extramucosal suturing (group 2). The operator switched from the running suture technique to extramucosal in 2013. RESULTS: The study included 241 patients (115 cases in group 1 that were compared to 126 cases in group 2). There were no significant differences in age or body mass index between the two groups. Cesarean scar and niche were detectable in the entire studied population. There was a significant difference in both uterine scar thickness (5.8 vs. 6.2 mm, p = 0.02) and the presence and size of the niche (49 vs. 40 mm2, p = 0.001) in transvaginal ultrasound performed at 6-week postpartum. CONCLUSION: Extramucosal suturing of the uterine scar seems to be associated with a better outcome on the postpartum ultrasound evaluation. KEY POINTS: · The technique for suturing the hysterotomy can be the source of healing changes.. · An extramucosal suturing of the uterus seems to give a better aspect at the postpartum ultrasound.. · Decreasing the niche at cesarean scar may be beneficial for future pregnancies..