Triiodothyronine supplementation in a sheep model of intensive care.

Triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations in plasma decrease during acute illness and it is unclear if this contributes to disease. Clinical and laboratory studies of T3 supplementation in disease have revealed little or no effect. It is uncertain if short term supplementation of T3 has any discernible effect in a healthy animals. Observational study of intravenous T3 (1 µg/kg/h) for 24 h in a healthy sheep model receiving protocol-guided intensive care supports (T3 group, n=5). A total of 45 endpoints were measured including hemodynamic, respiratory, renal, hematological, metabolic and endocrine parameters. Data were compared with previously published studies of sheep subject to the same support protocol without administered T3 (No T3 group, n=5). Plasma free T3 concentrations were elevated 8-fold by the infusion (pmol/l at 24 h; T3 group 34.9±9.9 vs. No T3 group 4.4±0.3, P<0.01, reference range 1.6 to 6.8). There was no significant physiological response to administration of T3 over the study duration. Supplementation of intravenous T3 for 24 h has no physiological effect on relevant physiological endpoints in healthy sheep. Further research is required to understand if the lack of effect of short-term T3 may be related to kinetics of T3 cellular uptake, metabolism and action, or acute counterbalancing hormone resistance. This information may be helpful in design of clinical T3 supplementation trials.

Biomarkers of coagulation, endothelial, platelet function, and fibrinolysis in patients with COVID-19: a prospective study.

Prospective and sequential evaluation of homeostatic changes leading to thrombosis across COVID 19 disease severity spectrum are limited. In this prospective observational study, haemostasis was evaluated in patients with mild, moderate-severe, and critical COVID-19 infection. Markers of endothelial activation [Soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), von Willebrand Factor (VWF)], platelet activation [Soluble P-selectin, beta-thromboglobulin (BTG)] and global haemostasis [Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)] were evaluated on days 1 and 5 after admission. The study cohort comprised of 100 adult patients (mild = 20, moderate-severe = 22, critical = 58). Sixty-five patients received anticoagulation for 10 (7-14) days. Thrombotic events were seen in 9 patients. In-hospital mortality was 21%. Endothelial activation markers were elevated at baseline in all subgroups, with levels in moderate-severe (sTM = 4.92 ng/ml, VWF = 295 U/dl) [reference-ranges: sTM = 2.26-4.55 ng/ml; Soluble P-selectin = 13.5-31.5 ng/ml; BTG = 0.034-1.99 ng/ml] and critical patients (sTM = 6.07 ng/ml, VWF = 294 U/dl) being significantly higher than in the mild group (sTM = 4.18 ng/ml, VWF = 206 U/dl). In contrast, platelet activation markers were elevated only in critically ill patients at baseline (Soluble P-selectin = 37.3 ng/ml, BTG = 2.51 ng/ml). The critical group had significantly lower fibrinolysis on days 1 and 5 when compared with the moderate-severe arm. COVID-19 infection was associated with graded endothelial activation and lower fibrinolysis that correlated with illness severity.

Approach to Intensive Care Costing and Provision of Cost-effective Care.

Intensive care unit (ICU) service is resource-intense, finite, and valuable. The outcome of critically ill patients has improved because of a better understanding of disease pathology, technological developments, and newer treatment modalities. These improvements have however come at a price, with ICUs contributing significantly to health budgets. Several costing tools are used to assess cost. Accurate assessment has been hampered by the lack of standardized methodology and the heterogeneity of ICUs. In a costing exercise, the level of disaggregation (micro-costing vs gross-costing) and the method of costing (top-down vs bottom-up) need to be considered. Intensive care unit costing also needs to be viewed from the perspective of stakeholders. While all stakeholders aim to provide quality health care, objectives may vary. For the public health care provider, the focus is on optimizing expenditure; for the private health care provider it is bottomline; for a patient, it is affordability; for an insurance service provider, it is minimizing payout; and for the regulator, it is ensuring quality standards and fair pricing. The field of health economics deals with the application of the principles of cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit to identify treatments that result in the best outcome at the lowest cost, without limiting resources to other competing interests. In the ICU setting, studies on the efficient use of available resources, and interventions that reduce cost and minimize avoidable cost, would not only translate to cost savings, lives saved, and quality-adjusted life years gained but also enable policymakers to better allocate health care resources. How to cite this article: Chacko B, Ramakrishnan N, Peter JV. Approach to Intensive Care Costing and Provision of Cost-effective Care. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(12):876-887.

Delayed inflammatory pulmonary syndrome: A distinct clinical entity in the spectrum of inflammatory syndromes in COVID-19 infection?

BACKGROUND: During the second wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a subset of critically ill patients developed delayed respiratory deterioration in the absence of new infection, fluid overload or extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction. AIM: To describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics, outcomes, and management of these patients, and to contrast this entity with other post COVID-19 immune dysregulation related inflammatory disorders. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of a 2200-bed university affiliated teaching hospital, between May and August 2021, who fulfilled clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome was assessed by a change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and levels of inflammatory markers before and after immunomodulation, duration of mechanical ventilation after starting treatment, and survival to discharge. RESULTS: Five patients developed delayed respiratory deterioration in the absence of new infection, fluid overload or extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction at a median interquartile range (IQR) duration of 32 (23-35) d after the onset of symptoms. These patients had elevated inflammatory markers, required mechanical ventilation for 13 (IQR 10-23) d, and responded to glucocorticoids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. One patient died (20%). CONCLUSION: This delayed respiratory worsening with elevated inflammatory markers and clinical response to immunomodulation appears to contrast the well described Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome - Adults by the paucity of extrapulmonary organ involvement. The diagnosis can be considered in patients presenting with delayed respiratory worsening, that is not attributable to cardiac dysfunction, fluid overload or ongoing infections, and associated with an increase in systemic inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein, inteleukin-6 and ferritin. A good response to immunomodulation can be expected. This delayed inflammatory pulmonary syndrome may represent a distinct clinical entity in the spectrum of inflammatory syndromes in COVID-19 infection.

Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.

Background: During the pandemic, traditional family meetings were replaced by remote telecommunications. We assessed the families' satisfaction with these communications using a survey-based questionnaire. Methods: The study involved 20-minute telephonic surveys conducted with the family member who was updated during the hospitalization of the patient. A thematic-based questionnaire with responses on a scale of 5 ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied was used. The responses were dichotomized into bad and good reports for analysis. Results: A total of 196 patients were eligible. Only 154 patients' family representatives consented to the study. The frequency and content of the telephonic updates were satisfactory. The bad report was assigned to 5% of families only. Among features assessing empathy of communication providers, the satisfaction rate was much higher with 3% of families alone providing a bad report. The response was significantly biased against the final outcome of the patient with poor review often provided by relatives of patients who had succumbed to the illness. The dissatisfaction rate was much higher, above 12% for the trust of communication and ICU visitation. However, the final outcome of the patient did not affect the trust in the information conveyed by the physician. Interpretation: This study highlights several drawbacks in the communication strategy during the second surge of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The final outcome of the patient was the key decisive factor for the response to most of the questionnaire. Sustained faith in communication by the physician despite the final outcome of the patient, re-emphasizes the need for emotional connection and training for breaking bad news. How to cite this article: Varghese MP, Selwyn T, Nair S, Samuel S, Chacko B, Pichamuthu K. Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):537-544.

Clinical and Genomic Evolution of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections over Two Time Periods at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine the evolution of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) infections and their impact at a tertiary care hospital in South India. METHODS: A comparative analysis of clinical data from two prospective cohorts of patients with CRKp bacteremia (C1, 2014-2015; C2, 2021-2022) was carried out. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and whole genome sequencing (WGS) data of selected isolates were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were enrolled in the study, 56 from C1 and 125 from C2. CRKp bacteremia shifted from critically ill patients with neutropenia to others (ICU stay: C1, 73%; C2, 54%; p = 0.02). The overall mortality rate was 50% and the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam did not change mortality significantly (54% versus 48%; p = 0.49). Oxacillinases (OXA) 232 and 181 were the most common mechanisms of resistance. WGS showed the introduction of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-5 (NDM-5), higher genetic diversity, accessory genome content, and plasmid burden, as well as increased convergence of hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance in C2. CONCLUSIONS: CRKp continues to pose a significant clinical threat, despite the introduction of new antibiotics. The study highlights the evolution of resistance and virulence in this pathogen and the impact on patient outcomes in South India, providing valuable information for clinicians and researchers.

Improving Transplant-free Survival With Low-volume Plasma Exchange to Treat Children With Rodenticide Induced Hepatotoxicity.

Background: In a prior report, no patient with rodenticidal hepatotoxicity who met Kochi criteria (MELD score ≥36 or baseline INR ≥6 with hepatic encephalopathy) (PMID: 26310868) for urgent liver transplantation survived with medical management alone. Plasma exchange (PLEX) may improve survival in these patients. Objectives: We describe our experience with low-volume PLEX (PLEX-LV) in treating rodenticide ingestion induced hepatotoxicity in children. Methods: From prospectively collected database of rodenticidal hepatotoxicity patients managed as in-patient with department of Hepatology from December 2017 to August 2021, we retrospectively studied outcomes in children (≤18 years). Hepatotoxicity was categorized as acute liver injury (ALI, coagulopathy alone) or acute liver failure (ALF, coagulopathy and encephalopathy). Kochi criteria was used to assess need for urgent liver transplantation. The primary study outcome was one-month survival. Results: Of the 110 rodenticidal hepatotoxicity patients, 32 children (females: 56%; age: 16 [4.7-18] years; median, range) constituted the study patients. The study patients presented 4 (1-8) days after poison consumption (impulsive suicidal intent:31, accidental:1). Twenty children (62%) had ALI [MELD: 18 (8-36)] and 12 (38%) had ALF [MELD: 37 (24-45)].All children received standard medical care, including N-acetyl cysteine; ALF patients also received anti-cerebral edema measures. None of the patient families opted for liver transplantation. Seventeen children (ALI: 6, ALF: 11) were treated with PLEX-LV (3 [1-5] sessions, volume of plasma exchanged per session: 26 [13-38] ml/kg body weight) and peri-procedure low dose prednisolone.At 1 month, 28 of the 32 children (87.5%) were alive (4 ALF patients died). Of 10 children who met Kochi listing criteria for urgent liver transplantation, two children were ineligible for PLEX-LV (due to hemodynamic instability) and of the remaining 8 children treated by PLEX-LV, 6 (75%) survived. Conclusions: PLEX-LV shows promise as an effective non-liver transplant treatment in children with rodenticidal hepatotoxicity.

Persistent bacteremia predicts poor outcomes among neutropenic patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bloodstream infections receiving appropriate therapy.

PURPOSE: Identifying persistent bacteremia early in patients with neutropenia may improve outcome. This study evaluated the role of follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) positivity in predicting outcomes among patients with neutropenia and carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bloodstream infections (CRGNBSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study conducted between December 2017 and April 2022 included patients more than 15 years old with neutropenia and CRGNBSI, who survived for ≥ 48 h, receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy and had FUBCs. Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia within 30 days were excluded. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Persistent bacteremia, septic shock, recovery from neutropenia, prolonged or profound neutropenia, requirement of intensive care and dialysis, and initiation of appropriate empirical therapy were also studied. RESULTS: In our study cohort of 155 patients, the 30 day mortality rate was 47.7%. Persistent bacteremia was common in our patient cohort (43.8%). Carbapenem resistant isolates identified in the study were K.pneumoniae (80%), E.coli (12.26%), P.aeruginosa (5.16%), A.baumanii (1.94%) and E.cloacae (0.65%). The median time for sending a FUBC was 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days). Patients with persistent bacteremia had higher mortality than those without (56.76% versus 32.1%; p < 0.001). Appropriate initial empirical therapy was given to 70.9%. Recovery from neutropenia occurred in 57.4% while 25.8% had prolonged or profound neutropenia. Sixty-nine percent (107/155) had septic shock and needed intensive care; 12.2% of patients required dialysis. Non-recovery from neutropenia (aHR, 4.28; 95% CI 2.53-7.23), presence of septic shock (aHR, 4.42; 95%CI 1.47-13.28), requirement of intensive care (aHR,3.12;95%CI 1.23-7.93), and persistent bacteremia (aHR,1.74; 95%CI 1.05-2.89) significantly predicted poor outcomes in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: FUBC showing persistent bacteremia predicted poor outcomes among neutropenic patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bloodstream infections (CRGNBSI) and should be routinely reported.

Estimation of Free Phenytoin Concentration in Critically Ill Patients with Hypoalbuminemia: Direct-measurement vs Traditional Equations.

Background: In critically ill patients with low albumin, dose individualization of phenytoin is a challenge. The currently used Sheiner-Tozer equation does not accurately predict the free phenytoin concentration in serum and can result in incorrect dose modifications. The best measure to advocate in these patients is the direct-measurement of free phenytoin concentration. Aims and objectives: Phenytoin exhibits complex pharmacokinetics, requiring careful therapeutic drug monitoring. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the established Sheiner-Tozer calculation method against the direct-measurement of free phenytoin concentration in serum by high performance liquid chromatography in critically ill patients with low albumin. Materials and methods: Blood specimens for direct-measurement of both total and free phenytoin concentration were obtained from 57 patients with hypoalbuminemia monitored in the intensive care unit. Results: The median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] for Sheiner-Tozer equation calculated total phenytoin concentration and direct-measured total was 17.14 (10.63-24.53) and 9.82 (6.02-13.85) µg mL-1, respectively. Approximately 53 and 5% of patients were found to be subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic for direct-measured total phenytoin concentrations, respectively. In contrast, on applying the Sheiner-Tozer calculation, 23 and 40% had subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations, respectively, for total phenytoin concentration. The median (IQR) for direct-measured, routine and Sheiner-Tozer equation calculated free phenytoin concentration were 1.92 (1.06-2.76), 0.98 (0.60-1.39), and 1.71 (1.06-2.45) µg mL-1, respectively. Only 45.7% of patients were in agreement with respect to the therapeutic category when direct-measured free was compared against routine calculation free. Conclusion: In patients with low albumin, free phenytoin concentration based on the Sheiner-Tozer corrected equation accurately classified patients based on their therapeutic category of free phenytoin in 73.7% of patients. Hence, for individualization of phenytoin dosage in critically ill patients with low albumin, we recommend direct-measurement of free phenytoin concentration. How to cite this article: Wilfred PM, Mathew S, Chacko B, Prabha R, Mathew BS. Estimation of Free Phenytoin Concentration in Critically Ill Patients with Hypoalbuminemia: Direct-measurement vs Traditional Equations. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(6):682-687.

Noninvasive Ventilation in the Management of Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 Infection: Experience From a Resource-Limited Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with C-ARF managed on NIV were categorized as NIV success or failure (death or intubation). Factors associated with failure were explored using regression analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Between April 1, 2020, and September 15, 2020, a total of 286 patients with a mean ± SD age of 53.1±11.6 years and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 11.1±5.5 were initiated on NIV. Of the 182 patients (63.6%) successfully managed on NIV alone, 118 had moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. When compared with NIV success, NIV failure was associated with lower admission PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (P<.001) and higher respiratory rate (P<.001). On penalized logistic regression analysis, NIV failure was associated with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24), severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.24 to 12.9), D-dimer level of 1000 ng/mL DDU (to convert to mg/L, divide by 1000) or greater (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.87), need for inotropes or dialysis (OR, 12.7; 95% CI, 4.3 to 37.7), and nosocomial infections (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 4.06 to 45.9). Overall mortality was 30.1% (86/286). In patients requiring intubation, time to intubation was longer in nonsurvivors than survivors (median, 5; interquartile range, 3-8 vs 3; interquartile range, 2-3 days; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive ventilation can be used successfully in C-ARF. Illness severity and need for non-respiratory organ support predict NIV failure.

Community seroprevalence and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in different subpopulations in Vellore, India, and their implications for future prevention.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to inform public health policy decisions through the assessment of IgG antibody seroprevalence in the population and the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: The seroprevalence of IgG antibodies among different subpopulations at the end of the first and second waves of the pandemic was estimated. Various risk factors associated with seropositivity, including sociodemography, IgG antibodies against endemic human coronavirus, and vaccination status, were also assessed. RESULTS: For all 2433 consenting participants, the overall estimated seroprevalences at the end of first and second waves were 28.5% (95% CI 22.3-33.7%) and 71.5% (95% CI 62.8-80.5%), respectively. The accrual of IgG positivity was heterogeneous, with the highest seroprevalences found in urban slum populations (75.1%). Vaccine uptake varied among the subpopulations, with low rates (< 10%) among rural and urban slum residents. The majority of seropositive individuals (75%) were asymptomatic. Residence in urban slums (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.57-2.6; p < 0.001), middle socioeconomic status (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17-2.67; p = 0.007), presence of diabetes (OR 1.721, 95% CI 1.148-2.581; p = 0.009), and hypertension (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.16-2.64; p = 0.008) were associated with seropositivity in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Although considerable population immunity has been reached, with more than two-thirds seropositive, improved vaccination strategies among unreached subpopulations and high-risk individuals are suggested for better preparedness in future.

Stenotrophomonas isolates in a tertiary care centre in South India.

PURPOSE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging multi-drug resistant pathogen increasingly isolated in India. This study aimed to identify patients from whom Stenotrophomonas maltophilia had been isolated and assess predictors of mortality in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with a positive culture for S. maltophilia over a 3-year period. Clinical details and laboratory results were assessed from hospital records. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age 48.6 years) were included in the study. Of these, 111 patients were hospitalized for at least 48 â€‹hours prior to culture and 98 were admitted in the intensive care unit. Bivariate analysis revealed multiple associations with mortality, including a background of renal, cardiac, autoimmune disease, recent carbapenam use and COVID-19 infection and increasing ventilatory requirement, lower PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, vasopressor use, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia at the time of positive isolate. Multivariate analysis showed that autoimmune disease [OR 27.38; 95% CI (1.39-540)], a P/F ratio of less than 300 [OR 7.58; 95% CI (1.52-37.9)], vasopressor requirement [OR 39.50; 95% CI (5.49-284)] and thrombocytopenia [OR 11.5; 95% CI (2.04-65.0)] were statistically significantly associated with increased mortality, while recent surgery and receipt of antibiotics [OR 0.16; 95% CI (0.03-0.8)] targeted against S. maltophilia were associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSION: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is primarily isolated in patients in the intensive care unit. In our study the need for vasopressors, autoimmune disease, lower P/F ratios and thrombocytopenia were associated with higher mortality. The association of targeted antibiotics with reduced mortality suggests that the pathogenic role of S. maltophilia should not be underestimated. This finding needs to be confirmed with larger, prospective studies.

Factors associated with mortality among moderate and severe patients with COVID-19 in India: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Large data on the clinical characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 in the Indian population are scarce. We analysed the factors associated with mortality in a cohort of moderately and severely ill patients with COVID-19 enrolled in a randomised trial on convalescent plasma. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma to Limit COVID-19 Associated Complications in Moderate Disease. SETTING: 39 public and private hospitals across India during the study period from 22 April to 14 July 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 464 patients recruited, two were lost to follow-up, nine withdrew consent and two patients did not receive the intervention after randomisation. The cohort of 451 participants with known outcome at 28 days was analysed. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Factors associated with all-cause mortality at 28 days after enrolment. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 51±12.4 years; 76.7% were males. Admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 2.4±1.1. Non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation and vasopressor therapy were required in 98.9%, 8.4% and 4.0%, respectively. The 28-day mortality was 14.4%. Median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was similar in survivors (4 days; IQR 3-7) and non-survivors (4 days; IQR 3-6). Patients with two or more comorbidities had 2.25 (95% CI 1.18 to 4.29, p=0.014) times risk of death. When compared with survivors, admission interleukin-6 levels were higher (p<0.001) in non-survivors and increased further on day 3. On multivariable Fine and Gray model, severity of illness (subdistribution HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.35, p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 ratio <100 (3.47, 1.64-7.37, p=0.001), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio >10 (9.97, 3.65-27.13, p<0.001), D-dimer >1.0 mg/L (2.50, 1.14-5.48, p=0.022), ferritin ≥500 ng/mL (2.67, 1.44-4.96, p=0.002) and lactate dehydrogenase ≥450 IU/L (2.96, 1.60-5.45, p=0.001) were significantly associated with death. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of moderately and severely ill patients with COVID-19, severity of illness, underlying comorbidities and elevated levels of inflammatory markers were significantly associated with death. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2020/04/024775.

A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19.

CLINICAL QUESTION: What is the role of drugs in preventing covid-19? WHY DOES THIS MATTER?: There is widespread interest in whether drug interventions can be used for the prevention of covid-19, but there is uncertainty about which drugs, if any, are effective. The first version of this living guideline focuses on the evidence for hydroxychloroquine. Subsequent updates will cover other drugs being investigated for their role in the prevention of covid-19. RECOMMENDATION: The guideline development panel made a strong recommendation against the use of hydroxychloroquine for individuals who do not have covid-19 (high certainty). HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED: This living guideline is from the World Health Organization (WHO) and provides up to date covid-19 guidance to inform policy and practice worldwide. Magic Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (MAGIC) provided methodological support. A living systematic review with network analysis informed the recommendations. An international guideline development panel of content experts, clinicians, patients, an ethicist and methodologists produced recommendations following standards for trustworthy guideline development using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. UNDERSTANDING THE NEW RECOMMENDATION: The linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (6 trials and 6059 participants) found that hydroxychloroquine had a small or no effect on mortality and admission to hospital (high certainty evidence). There was a small or no effect on laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (moderate certainty evidence) but probably increased adverse events leading to discontinuation (moderate certainty evidence). The panel judged that almost all people would not consider this drug worthwhile. In addition, the panel decided that contextual factors such as resources, feasibility, acceptability, and equity for countries and healthcare systems were unlikely to alter the recommendation. The panel considers that this drug is no longer a research priority and that resources should rather be oriented to evaluate other more promising drugs to prevent covid-19. UPDATES: This is a living guideline. New recommendations will be published in this article and signposted by update notices to this guideline. READERS NOTE: This is the first version of the living guideline for drugs to prevent covid-19. It complements the WHO living guideline on drugs to treat covid-19. When citing this article, please consider adding the update number and date of access for clarity.

Clinical Profile and Outcome of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Although studies have described the clinical profile of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with tuberculosis, it is unclear if the type of tuberculosis (pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or disseminated) impacts outcome. MATRIALS AND METHODS: Demographic data, microbiology, treatment, and outcomes over 5 years (2012-16) were obtained from electronic records. Patients were categorized as pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or disseminated tuberculosis. Comparisons were done using t test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Predictors of outcome were explored using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of the 428 ICU admissions with suspected tuberculosis, 212 (121 male) patients with mean (standard deviation) age of 41.9 (16.7) years and APACHE-II score of 20.8 (6.6) were diagnosed as pulmonary (n = 55) and extrapulmonary (n = 52) or disseminated tuberculosis (n = 105). In 50.5%, the diagnosis of tuberculosis was established during the current ICU admission when they presented with organ dysfunction. Overall, microbiological confirmation was possible in 75.5%; 14 (10.3%) isolates were Rifampicin resistant. ICU admission was required primarily for ventilation (n = 176; 83%) and hemodynamic instability (n = 67; 32%). Hospital mortality was 50%. Outcomes were similar in the three groups except for longer duration of stay (p value = 0.04) in disseminated tuberculosis. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, pulmonary tuberculosis (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.15-6.95) and vasoactive treatment (OR 15.8; 95% CI 6.4-39.2) were independently associated with death; need for ventilation predicted mortality perfectly. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients admitted to ICU with tuberculosis, 50% were newly diagnosed during ICU admission. Pulmonary site of involvement and need for organ support are independent risk factors for death. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Thomas L, Chacko B, Jupudi S, Mathuram A, George T, Gunasekaran K, et al. Clinical Profile and Outcome of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):21-28.

Adrenaline is effective in reversing the inadequate heart rate response in atropine treated organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning.

BACKGROUND: In acute organophosphorus (OP) or carbamate poisoning, some patients require high dose atropine to counteract the effects on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). This study describes the factors associated with high dose atropine therapy and the use of adrenaline to reverse the inadequate HR response to atropine. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively recruited. Demographic data, treatment and outcomes of patients who failed to achieve target HR (100/min) or systolic BP >90 mm Hg with either a cumulative atropine dose of 100-mg within 6-h following admission or an infusion of 30 mg/h for at least 3-h were compared with patients who achieved the targets. Factors associated with high dose atropine therapy were explored using logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 181 patients admitted with OP or carbamate poisoning, 155 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 35.7 (15.8) years; admission APACHE-II score was 14.6 (7.5). Heart rate and/or BP target was not achieved in 13.6%. In these patients, target HR was achieved after adding adrenaline infusion at 2-4 µg/min. Ventilation duration (11.6 ± 6.3 vs. 8.4 ± 6.9 days, p = 0.05) and ICU stay (12.3 ± 5.8 vs. 8.9 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.01) were longer in patients requiring high dose atropine when compared with others. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, shorter time to presentation to hospital (p = 0.04) was associated with need for high dose atropine. Overall mortality was 9% and similar in both groups (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: High dose atropine therapy is required in a subset of patients with OP and carbamate poisoning and was associated with longer ventilation duration and ICU stay. Adrenaline infusion improved hemodynamics in these patients.

Tuberculous ARDS is associated with worse outcome when compared with non-tuberculous infectious ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Patients with tuberculosis (TB) developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may have a higher mortality when compared with ARDS of other infectious etiology. METHODOLOGY: In this single-centre retrospective cohort study spanning 5-years (2012 to 2016), TB-ARDS patients were age and gender matched (1:2) with non-TB infectious ARDS and followed up until death or hospital discharge. Clinical profile, treatment and outcomes were compared using t-test and Chi-square as appropriate. Mortality predictors were explored using Conditional Poisson regression analysis and expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Of the 516 ARDS patients, 74 TB-ARDS and 148 non-TB infectious ARDS patients were included. Although admission APACHE-II (21.4 ± 7.1 vs. 17.6 ± 6.8, p < 0.001), incidence of shock (36.5% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.005) and mortality (59.5% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in TB-ARDS than non-TB etiology, overall ICU length of stay and nosocomial infections were similar in both groups. On regression analysis, after adjusting for confounders, TB-ARDS (RR 1.82; 95% CI 1.13-2.92) and need for inotropes (RR 3.49; 95% CI 1.44-8.46) were independently associated with death. CONCLUSION: Patients with TB-ARDS presented sicker and had higher mortality when compared with ARDS due to non-TB infectious etiology.

A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19

Updates: This is the fourteenth version (thirteenth update) of the living guideline, replacing earlier versions (available as data supplements). New recommendations will be published as updates to this guideline. Clinical question: What is the role of drugs in the treatment of patients with covid-19? Context: The evidence base for therapeutics for covid-19 is evolving with numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recently completed and underway. Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants are changing the role of therapeutics. What is new?: The guideline development group (GDG) defined 1.5% as a new threshold for an important reduction in risk of hospitalisation in patients with non-severe covid-19. Combined with updated baseline risk estimates, this resulted in stratification into patients at low, moderate, and high risk for hospitalisation. New recommendations were added for moderate risk of hospitalisation for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and for moderate and low risk of hospitalisation for molnupiravir and remdesivir. New pharmacokinetic evidence was included for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir, supporting existing recommendations for patients at high risk of hospitalisation. The recommendation for ivermectin in patients with non-severe illness was updated in light of additional trial evidence which reduced the high degree of uncertainty informing previous guidance. A new recommendation was made against the antiviral agent VV116 for patients with non-severe and with severe or critical illness outside of randomised clinical trials based on one RCT comparing the drug with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The structure of the guideline publication has also been changed; recommendations are now ordered by severity of covid-19. About this guideline: This living guideline from the World Health Organization (WHO) incorporates new evidence to dynamically update recommendations for covid-19 therapeutics. The GDG typically evaluates a therapy when the WHO judges sufficient evidence is available to make a recommendation. While the GDG takes an individual patient perspective in making recommendations, it also considers resource implications, acceptability, feasibility, equity, and human rights. This guideline was developed according to standards and methods for trustworthy guidelines, making use of an innovative process to achieve efficiency in dynamic updating of recommendations. The methods are aligned with the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development and according to a pre-approved protocol (planning proposal) by the Guideline Review Committee (GRC). A box at the end of the article outlines key methodological aspects of the guideline process. MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation provides methodological support, including the coordination of living systematic reviews with network meta-analyses to inform the recommendations. The full version of the guideline is available online in MAGICapp and in PDF on the WHO website, with a summary version here in The BMJ. These formats should facilitate adaptation, which is strongly encouraged by WHO to contextualise recommendations in a healthcare system to maximise impact. Future recommendations: Recommendations on anticoagulation are planned for the next update to this guideline. Updated data regarding systemic corticosteroids, azithromycin, favipiravir and umefenovir for non-severe illness, and convalescent plasma and statin therapy for severe or critical illness, are planned for review in upcoming guideline iterations.

Kidney Injury in Sepsis: Fuel to the Fire.

How to cite this article: Chacko B. Kidney Injury in Sepsis: Fuel to the Fire. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(4):216-217.