Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 88(3): 465-474, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34086067

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety and immunogenicity of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar HLX04 with reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males. METHODS: In this double-blind Phase 1 study, healthy volunteers (N = 208) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a single 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion of HLX04 or reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States (bevacizumab-US), the European Union (bevacizumab-EU) or China (bevacizumab-CN). Co-primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time profile (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) and from zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). Secondary endpoint was the maximum serum drug concentration (Cmax). Study participants were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and samples were collected for anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing throughout the study. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar across groups. The respective geometric least-squares mean ratios (GLSMR) of AUC0-inf, AUClast and Cmax were: 95.7%, 96.0% and 101.8% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-US; 94.3%, 94.6% and 100.5% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-EU; and 90.0%, 90.4% and 98.2% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-CN. For all test-to-reference comparisons, two-sided 90% confidence intervals of GLSMR for AUC0-inf, AUClast and Cmax fell in the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80-125%). There were no notable differences in the frequency, nature and/or grade of TEAEs. No deaths were reported and no ADAs were detected during the study. CONCLUSION: HLX04 had similar safety and pharmacokinetic profiles to reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males, supporting the confirmatory Phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety equivalence between HLX04 and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT03511963). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03483649.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Povo Asiático , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos Biossimilares/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacocinética , Área Sob a Curva , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/farmacocinética , China , Método Duplo-Cego , União Europeia , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equivalência Terapêutica , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 9(2): e00733, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33682358

RESUMO

The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study (from December 2016 to October 2018) was to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence of adalimumab biosimilar HLX03 and reference adalimumab in healthy volunteers, and to assess safety, and immunogenicity of HLX03. The primary PK endpoints were maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ). Equivalence was determined if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric least square mean ratio between the two treatment groups were within the predefined range of 80%-125%. Safety and immunogenicity were monitored during the study. Healthy Chinese males (N = 220) were randomized 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous 40 mg dose of HLX03 or China (CN)-sourced adalimumab. The ratios of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUC0-t were 102.2% and 105.7%, respectively, with corresponding 90% CIs falling in the predefined margins, which demonstrated PK equivalence between HLX03 and CN-adalimumab. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar in the two groups (73.8% and 66.0% in the HLX03 and CN-adalimumab groups, respectively). Grade 3-4 TEAEs were reported in 7.5% and 5.7% of participants, respectively. The incidences of participants with antidrug antibodies (HLX03: 96.2%; CN-adalimumab: 93.4%) or neutralizing antibodies (HLX03: 40.6%, CN-adalimumab: 41.4%) were comparable between groups. This study demonstrated PK bioequivalence between HLX03 and CN-adalimumab, with similar safety and immunogenicity profiles. These data support further clinical development of HLX03 as an adalimumab biosimilar.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/farmacocinética , Medicamentos Biossimilares/farmacocinética , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/farmacocinética , Adalimumab/administração & dosagem , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adalimumab/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Povo Asiático , Medicamentos Biossimilares/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , China , Método Duplo-Cego , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equivalência Terapêutica , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/administração & dosagem , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Hematol Oncol ; 13(1): 38, 2020 04 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299513

RESUMO

Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy has shown efficacy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for more than 15 years. HLX01 was developed as the rituximab biosimilar following a stepwise approach to demonstrate biosimilarity in analytical, pre-clinical, and clinical investigations to reference rituximab. With demonstrated pharmacokinetic similarity, a phase 3 multi-center, randomized, parallel, double-blind study (HLX01-NHL03) was subsequently conducted to compare efficacy and safety between HLX01 plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (H-CHOP) and reference rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in a total of 407 treatment-naïve, CD20-positive DLBCL patients aged 18-80 years. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) within six cycles of treatment in the per-protocol set (PPS). Secondary endpoints included 1-year efficacy outcomes, safety, and immunogenicity profile. The results showed difference in ORRs [H-CHOP 94.1%; R-CHOP 92.8%] between two treatment groups was 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], - 3.59 to 6.32, p = 0.608) which falls within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ± 12%. The safety profile was comparable between the treatment groups, with a similar overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (H-CHOP 99.5%, R-CHOP 99.0%, p = 1.000) and serious adverse events (H-CHOP 34.0%, R-CHOP 32.5%, p = 0.752). This study established bioequivalence in efficacy and safety between HLX01 and reference rituximab. The trial was registered at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn on 26 August 2015 [#CTR20150583].


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...