Prolonged Capecitabine Chemotherapy Following Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) Regimen Chemotherapy Failed to Improve Survival of Stage III Colorectal Cancer After Radical Resection.

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered to be a worldwide health problem because of its increasing incidence and prevalence. Surgery offers an opportunity for cure, but the postoperative recurrence rate is still high despite the advancement of chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy following CAPOX chemotherapy for stage III  CRC after radical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 212 patients with stage III CRC undergoing open radical surgery from July 2010 to June 2015. Among those patients, 104 patients received prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy (prolonged group) following 8 cycles of CAPOX regimen chemotherapy, while the other 108 patients (control group) received no prolonged chemotherapy. The prolonged chemotherapy consisted of capecitabine (1000 mg/m² per day for 2 weeks) and was repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles at most. Long-term survival and toxicities were retrospectively compared. RESULTS Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. For all patients, no significant difference was found in the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.7775) or 3-year overall survival (OS) rates between the 2 groups (P=0.5787). The prolonged group had significantly higher frequency of hand-foot syndrome (P=0.0267) and paresthesia (P=0.0164). In further subgroup analyses, no benefit for 3-year DFS or 3-year OS of prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy was found in colon cancer or rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy following CAPOX regimen chemotherapy failed to improve the survival of patients with stage III CRC after radical surgery.

[Dual regulation effect of somatostatin on immunity in patients with severe sepsis caused by abdominal diseases].

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the effect of somatostatin on inflammatory immune disorders and prognosis in patients with severe sepsis caused by abdominal diseases. METHODS: fifty-three patients with severe abdominal sepsis (age > 18 years, APACHE-II score > 15) from June 2005 to June 2009 were randomly divided into Somatostatin group (n = 23) and SSC Group (n = 30). Fifteen healthy volunteers of the same age range were chosen as Control group. The SSC group was treated with classical SSC therapy, and the Somatostatin Group was treated with the same regime plus 14-peptide somatostatin continuous infusion at the dose of 6 mg/24 h for 7 days. The serum levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined by using ELISA. CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell subsets were determined by fluorescence activated cell sorter(FACS) and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) was calculated. APACHE-II score was observed on admission (d1) and day 3, 7 and 14 after treatment. Morality rates in 28 days in two groups were recorded. RESULTS: compared with Control group, IL-10 and TNF-α levels were significantly elevated in patients with severe abdominal sepsis (P < 0.05), while CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with the Somatostatin group CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) on d7 and d14 in SSC Group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), while IL-10 and TNF-α decreased significantly(P < 0.05). APACHE-II scores on d3, d7, d14 of Somatostatin group were significantly lower than those of SSC group, and 28 d mortality rate also declined. CONCLUSIONS: in patients with severe abdominal sepsis, systemic inflammatory response and immune suppression exist simultaneously. Somatostatin has a dual immunomodulatory activity in these patients.