Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition associated with significant adverse health consequences affecting multiple organ systems. As the first point of contact for most patients with OSA, general practitioners (GPs) have an important role in the diagnosis of this common sleep disorder. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to improve awareness of common risk factors for and clinical presentation of OSA in primary care to improve patient health outcomes. We seek to understand how screening tools, such as the OSA50 questionnaire and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, can help GPs identify patients who are at high risk for OSA with significant daytime sleepiness. DISCUSSION: Patients at high risk of symptomatic moderate-severe OSA should proceed to further investigation with sleep study testing. Referral to a sleep physician should be considered for patients with complex presentations or other suspected sleep disorders, commercial drivers, and those who fail to comply with or respond to initial OSA treatments.

Management of obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is common in the community and is increasing in prevalence. Primary care plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of OSA. OBJECTIVE: This article focuses on the management options for a patient with an established diagnosis of OSA and provides a guide for driving licensing requirements. Indications for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are discussed and tips provided to consider when conducting a review appointment, including trouble shooting. DISCUSSION: There are several treatment options available for patients with an established diagnosis of OSA. Selecting the optimal therapy involves aligning the symptoms and severity of OSA with the presence of comorbidities. CPAP is a highly effective therapy for symptomatic adults with moderate-to-severe OSA and for some symptomatic patients with mild OSA. Early trouble shooting of side effects and using supportive interventions increases the probability of long-term adherence, which is key to symptomatic improvement.

Management of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in a Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Center: Model of Care Adaptation and Implementation.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent and poorly managed in spinal cord injury (SCI). Alternative management models are urgently needed to improve access to care. We previously described the unique models of three SCI rehabilitation centers that independently manage uncomplicated OSA. Objectives: The primary objective was to adapt and implement a similar rehabilitation-led model of managing OSA in an SCI rehabilitation center in Australia. Secondary objectives were to identify the local barriers to implementation and develop and deliver tailored interventions to address them. Methods: A clinical advisory group comprised of rehabilitation clinicians, external respiratory clinicians, and researchers adapted and developed the care model. A theory-informed needs analysis was performed to identify local barriers to implementation. Tailored behavior change interventions were developed to address the barriers and prepare the center for implementation. Results: Pathways for ambulatory assessments and treatments were developed, which included referral for specialist respiratory management of complicated cases. Roles were allocated to the team of rehabilitation doctors, physiotherapists, and nurses. The team initially lacked sufficient knowledge, skills, and confidence to deliver the OSA care model. To address this, comprehensive education and training were provided. Diagnostic and treatment equipment were acquired. The OSA care model was implemented in July 2022. Conclusion: This is the first time a rehabilitation-led model of managing OSA has been implemented in an SCI rehabilitation center in Australia. We describe a theory-informed method of adapting the model of care, assessing the barriers, and delivering interventions to overcome them. Results of the mixed-methods evaluation will be reported separately.

Sleep apnea multi-level surgery trial: long-term observational outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The sleep apnea multi-level surgery (SAMS) randomized clinical trial showed surgery improved outcomes at 6 months compared to ongoing medical management in patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This study reports the long-term outcomes of the multi-level surgery as a case series. METHODS: Surgical participants were reassessed >2 years postoperatively with the same outcomes reported in the main SAMS trial. Primary outcomes were apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), with secondary outcomes including other polysomnography measures, symptoms, quality of life, and adverse events. Long-term effectiveness (baseline to long-term follow-up [LTFU]) and interval changes (6 month to LTFU) were assessed using mixed effects regression models. Control participants were also reassessed for rate of subsequent surgery and outcomes. RESULTS: 36/48 (75%) of surgical participants were reevaluated (mean (standard deviation)) 3.5 (1.0) years following surgery, with 29 undergoing polysomnography. AHI was 41/h (23) at preoperative baseline and 21/h (18) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -24/h (95% CI -32, -17; p < 0.001). ESS was 12.3 (3.5) at baseline and 5.5 (3.9) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -6.8 (95% CI -8.3, -5.4; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were improved long term, and adverse events were minor. Interval change analysis suggests stability of outcomes. 36/43 (84%) of the control participants were reevaluated, with 25 (69%) reporting subsequent surgery, with symptom and quality of life improvements. CONCLUSION: Multi-level upper airway surgery improves OSA burden with long-term maintenance of treatment effect in adults with moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional therapy failed. CLINICAL TRIAL: Multi-level airway surgery in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have failed medical management to assess change in OSA events and daytime sleepiness; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366019&isReview=true; ACTRN12614000338662.

Establishing the acute physiological and sleep disruption characteristics of wind farm versus road traffic noise disturbances in sleep: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Study Objectives: Despite the global expansion of wind farms, effects of wind farm noise (WFN) on sleep remain poorly understood. This protocol details a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the sleep disruption characteristics of WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN). Methods: This study was a prospective, seven night within-subjects randomized controlled in-laboratory polysomnography-based trial. Four groups of adults were recruited from; <10 km away from a wind farm, including those with, and another group without, noise-related complaints; an urban RTN exposed group; and a group from a quiet rural area. Following an acclimation night, participants were exposed, in random order, to two separate nights with 20-s or 3-min duration WFN and RTN noise samples reproduced at multiple sound pressure levels during established sleep. Four other nights tested for continuous WFN exposure during wake and/or sleep on sleep outcomes. Results: The primary analyses will assess changes in electroencephalography (EEG) assessed as micro-arousals (EEG shifts to faster frequencies lasting 3-15 s) and awakenings (>15 s events) from sleep by each noise type with acute (20-s) and more sustained (3-min) noise exposures. Secondary analyses will compare dose-response effects of sound pressure level and noise type on EEG K-complex probabilities and quantitative EEG measures, and cardiovascular activation responses. Group effects, self-reported noise sensitivity, and wake versus sleep noise exposure effects will also be examined. Conclusions: This study will help to clarify if wind farm noise has different sleep disruption characteristics compared to road traffic noise.

Moving toward Equitable Care for Sleep Apnea in the United States: Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Thresholds: An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Background: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is a highly effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence limits its efficacy. In addition, coverage of PAP by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and other insurers in the United States depends on adherence. This leaves many beneficiaries without PAP, disproportionally impacting non-white and low socioeconomic position patients with OSA and exacerbating sleep health disparities. Methods: An inter-professional, multidisciplinary, international committee with various stakeholders was formed. Three working groups (the historical policy origins, impact of current policy, and international PAP coverage models) met and performed literature reviews and discussions. Using surveys and an iterative discussion-based consensus process, the policy statement recommendations were created. Results: In this position paper, we advocate for policy change to CMS PAP coverage requirements to reduce inequities and align with patient-centered goals. We specifically call for eradicating repeat polysomnography, eliminating the 4-hour rule, and focusing on patient-oriented outcomes such as improved sleepiness and sleep quality. Conclusions: Modifications to the current policies for PAP insurance coverage could improve health disparities.

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered chronic disease management within general practice: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases to inform the development and evaluation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic sleep disorders. INTRODUCTION: Increasing prevalence of sleep disorders and subsequent demand for specialist-led sleep services has prompted investigation into the management of uncomplicated sleep disorders by general practitioners. Models of sleep health care with enhanced roles for general practice nurses have been investigated within the context of randomized controlled trials; however, it is unclear how best to implement these models into clinical practice. With limited research exploring the implementation of nurse-delivered models of sleep health care within general practice, this review will examine the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic disease. This will inform the integration of new nurse-delivered models of care for chronic sleep disorders into routine general practice. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies that report barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases for adults into a general practice setting will be included. METHODS: Six databases will be searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Emcare. The search will be limited to qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Studies will be included if they contain data that report on barriers and facilitators for implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases. This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI approach to mixed methods convergent integrated systematic reviews. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021273346.

Comorbidities and quality of life in Australian men and women with diagnosed and undiagnosed high-risk obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: In a population-based survey, we determined sex differences in health profiles and quality of life between individuals who have a confirmed diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and those who are at high risk of OSA yet remain undiagnosed. METHODS: An online survey of Australian adults ≥ 18 years (n = 3,818) identified participants with self-reported diagnosed OSA (n = 460) or high-risk, undiagnosed OSA (OSA50 score ≥ 5, n = 1,015). Ever-diagnosed comorbidities, sociodemographics, and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10) were assessed. RESULTS: Women were more frequently represented in the high-OSA-risk group compared with those with diagnosed OSA (55.5%, n = 563, versus 43%, n = 198; P < .001). In sex-specific logistic regression analyses, diagnosed OSA was associated with increased likelihoods of ≥ 1 cardiovascular condition (odds ratio: 3.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-4.5), hypertension (1.9; 1.3-2.8), gout (1.8; 1.1-2.9), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.8; 2.1-6.9) in men. In women, an association with asthma (2.0; 1.3-3.0) was seen. Diabetes, arthritis, mental health conditions (ever-diagnosed), and all EQ-5D-5L dimensions were associated with an OSA diagnosis regardless of sex, except for EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression, which was only associated with an OSA diagnosis in women. A diagnosis of OSA was associated with sleepiness-related impairment (lowest quartile of Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10) in men (1.6; 1.01-2.5) and women (2.2; 1.4-3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Sex-specific health conditions may drive diagnosis of OSA; however, clinical suspicion of OSA needs to be increased in men and women. The impaired quality of life and persistent sleepiness in participants with diagnosed OSA observed at a population level requires greater clinical attention. CITATION: Krishnan S, Chai-Coetzer CL, Grivell N, et al. Comorbidities and quality of life in Australian men and women with diagnosed and undiagnosed high-risk obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(7):1757-1767.

Preferred Attributes of Care Pathways for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea from the Perspective of Diagnosed Patients and High-Risk Individuals: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

BACKGROUND: The current healthcare system is challenged with a large and rising demand for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) services. A paradigm shift in OSA management is required to incorporate the preferences of diagnosed patients and individuals at high risk of OSA. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide empirical evidence of the values and preferences of individuals diagnosed with OSA and high-risk populations regarding distinct OSA care pathway features. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was undertaken in two groups: those with a formal diagnosis of OSA (n = 421) and those undiagnosed but at high risk of having OSA (n = 1033). Participants were recruited from a large cross-sectional survey in Australia. The discrete choice experiment approach used mixed-logit regression models to determine preferences relating to eight salient features of the OSA management pathway, i.e. initial assessment provider, sleep study setting, diagnosis costs, waiting times, results interpretation, treatment options, provider of ongoing care and frequency of follow-up visits. RESULTS: The findings indicate that all eight attributes investigated were statistically significant factors for respondents. Generally, both groups preferred low diagnostic costs, fewer follow-up visits, minimum waiting time for sleep study results and sleep specialists to recommend treatment. Management of OSA in primary care was acceptable to both groups and was the most preferred option by the high-risk group for the initial assessment, sleep study testing and ongoing care provision. CONCLUSIONS: The discrete choice experiment results offer a promising approach for systematic incorporation of patient and high-risk group preferences into the future design and delivery of care pathways for OSA management.

The effectiveness of an individualized sleep and shift work education and coaching program to manage shift work disorder in nurses: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: While insomnia and sleepiness symptoms are common in shift workers, 20%-30% experience more severe symptoms and meet the criteria for shift work disorder (SWD). SWD can lead to impairments in cognitive function, physical and mental health, and reduced productivity and increased risk of workplace injury. The aim of this study was to deliver and evaluate a shift work individual management coaching program, focusing on sleep education, promoting good sleep hygiene, and providing individualized behavioral strategies to cope with shift schedules. METHODS: A clustered randomized controlled trial of sleep education and sleep disorders screening was undertaken, based on hospital wards at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Participants identified as high risk for SWD underwent one of two 8-week programs, a shift work individualized management program, or an active control. The primary outcome was ward-based sick leave. Secondary outcomes were SWD risk, sleep hygiene, insomnia, depression, and anxiety. A total of 149 nurses, across 16 wards (96% female, 34.66 ± 11.99 years) completed both baseline and follow-up questionnaires (23.9% were high risk SWD). RESULTS: There was no significant reduction in sick leave between intervention and control wards (mean difference = 1.2 days, P = .063). Improvements were seen in insomnia (P < .0001) and depression (intervention, P ≤ .0001, control, P = .023) in both groups, but were not significantly different between programs. Anxiety (P = .001. control P = .079) and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire 10 (P = .001 control P = .056) improved only for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This SWD intervention trial did not reduce sick leave compared to the active control but there was an improvement. Improvements in sleep hygiene, insomnia, depression, and anxiety severity were seen for both groups. Future intervention trials should consider including both sleep and mental health interventions, strategies to avoid between group contamination and the duration of programs for optimal behavioral modification. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Sleep Health Management for Healthcare Workers; URL: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12616000369426; Identifier: ACTRN12616000369426. CITATION: Booker LA, Sletten TL, Barnes M, et al. The effectiveness of an individualized sleep and shift work education and coaching program to manage shift work disorder in nurses: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1035-1045.

Primary versus Specialist Care for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Individual-Participant Data-Level Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: Primary care clinicians may be well placed to play a greater role in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of sleep apnea management in primary versus specialist care, using an individual-participant data meta-analysis to determine whether age, sex, severity of OSA, and daytime sleepiness impacted outcomes. Methods: Data sources were the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid SP, Scopus, ProQuest, U.S. National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and ISRCTN registry (inception until 09-25-2019). Hand searching was undertaken. Two authors independently assessed articles and included trials that randomized adults with a suspected diagnosis of sleep apnea to primary versus specialist management within the same study and reported daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (range 0-24; >10 indicates pathological sleepiness; minimum clinically important difference 2 units) at baseline and follow-up. Results: The primary analysis combined data from 970 (100%) participants (four trials). Risk of bias was assessed (Cochrane Tool). One-stage intention-to-treat analysis showed a slightly smaller decrease in daytime sleepiness (0.8; 0.2 to 1.4), but greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure in primary care (-1.9; -3.2 to -0.6 mm Hg), with similar findings in the per-protocol analysis. Primary care-based within-trial healthcare system costs per participant were lower (-$448.51 U.S.), and quality-adjusted life years and daytime sleepiness improvements were less expensive. Similar primary outcome results were obtained for subgroups in both management settings. Conclusions: Similar outcomes in primary care at a lower cost provide strong support for implementation of primary care-based management of sleep apnea.

Swallowing biomechanics before and following multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The effect of contemporary multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea on swallowing is unclear. This study assessed the biomechanical swallowing function in participants with obstructive sleep apnea pre- and post-modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue. METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal study, adults diagnosed with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea who underwent modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue surgery had swallowing biomechanics assessed using high-resolution pharyngeal manometry and analyzed with swallowgateway.com. Symptomatic swallowing difficulty was evaluated using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (≥ 234). General linear mixed-model analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference pre- and post-modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue. Data are presented as mean [95% confidence intervals]. RESULTS: High-resolution pharyngeal manometry assessments were conducted in 10 participants (7 men; median age 50 [interquartile range 36-65]) preoperatively and repeated postoperatively at 9 months [interquartile range 6-13]. Self-reported dysphagia was unchanged following surgery (Sydney Swallow Questionnaire =149 [53, 447] to 168 [54, 247]; P = .093). High-resolution pharyngeal manometry outcomes indicated reduced mesopharyngeal pressures (148 [135, 161] to 124 [112, 137] mm Hg s cm; P = .011), reduced hypopharyngeal pressures (113 [101, 125] to 93 [84, 102] mm Hg s cm; P = 0.011), and reduced upper esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure (5 [4, 6] to 2 [1,3] mm Hg; P = 0.001) but no change to velopharyngeal pressures (135 [123, 147] to 137 [117, 157] mm Hg s cm; P = .850) postsurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty may have less implications on the swallow mechanism than previously suspected. In contrast, the reduction in mesopharyngeal contractile pressures associated with coblation channeling of the tongue, although within normal limits, may affect bolus propulsion. Biomechanical alterations were insufficient to worsen self-reported swallowing function. CITATION: Schar MS, Omari TI, Woods CW, et al. Swallowing biomechanics before and following multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1167-1176.

Assessment, referral and management of obstructive sleep apnea by Australian general practitioners: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The high and increasing demand for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) care has exceeded the capacity of specialist sleep services prompting consideration of whether general practitioners could have an enhanced role in service delivery. However, little is known about the current involvement, experiences and attitudes of Australian general practitioners towards OSA. The purpose of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of Australian general practitioners' experiences and opinions regarding their care of patients with OSA to inform the design and implementation of new general practice models of care. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with maximum variation in age, experience and location. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and were analysed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified: (1) General practitioners are important in recognising symptoms of OSA and facilitating a diagnosis by others; (2) Inequities in access to the assessment and management of OSA; and (3) General practitioners currently have a limited role in the management of OSA. CONCLUSIONS: When consulting with patients with symptoms of OSA, general practitioners see their primary responsibility as providing a referral for diagnosis by others. General practitioners working with patients in areas of greater need, such as rural/remote areas and those of socio-economic disadvantage, demonstrated interest in being more involved in OSA management. Inequities in access to assessment and management are potential drivers for change in future models of care for OSA in general practice.

Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multilevel upper airway surgery effects on pharyngeal structure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The Sleep Apnea Multilevel Surgery (SAMS) trial found that modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy (if tonsils present) combined with radiofrequency tongue ablation reduced obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and daytime sleepiness in moderate-severe OSA. This study aimed to investigate mechanisms of effect on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction by assessing changes in upper airway volumes (airway space, soft palate, tongue, and intra-tongue fat). METHODS: This is a case series analysis of 43 participants of 51 randomized to the surgical arm of the SAMS trial who underwent repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Upper airway volume, length, and cross-sectional area, soft palate and tongue volumes, and tongue fat were measured. Relationships between changes in anatomical structures and AHI were assessed. RESULTS: The participant sample was predominantly male (79%); mean ± SD age 42.7 ± 13.3 years, body mass index 30.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2, and AHI 47.0 ± 22.3 events/hour. There were no, or minor, overall volumetric changes in the airway, soft palate, total tongue, or tongue fat volume. Post-surgery there was an increase in the minimum cross-sectional area by 0.1 cm2 (95% confidence interval 0.04-0.2 cm2) in the pharyngeal airway, but not statistically significant on corrected analysis. There was no association between anatomical changes and AHI improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary multilevel upper airway surgery has been shown to be an effective OSA treatment. The current anatomical investigation suggests there are not significant post-operative volumetric changes associated with OSA improvement 6-month post-surgery. This suggests that effect on OSA improvement is achieved without notable deformation of airway volume. Reduced need for neuromuscular compensation during wake following anatomical improvement via surgery could explain the lack of measurable volume change. Further research to understand the mechanisms of action of multilevel surgery is required. CLINICAL TRIAL: This manuscript presents a planned image analysis of participants randomized to the surgical arm or the clinical trial multilevel airway surgery in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have failed medical management to assess change in OSA events and daytime sleepiness. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=266019&isReview=true%20Australian%20New%20Zealand%20Clinical%20Trials%20Registry%20ACTRN12514000338662, prospectively registered on March 31, 2014.

Knowledge to action: a scoping review of approaches to educate primary care providers in the identification and management of routine sleep disorders.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The referral burden on health care systems for routine sleep disorders could be alleviated by educating primary care providers (PCPs) to diagnose and manage patients with sleep health issues. This requires effective professional education strategies and resources. This scoping review examined the literature on existing approaches to educate PCPs in sleep health management. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 8 databases to identify citations describing the education of PCPs in diagnosing and managing sleep disorders, specifically insomnia and sleep apnea. A conceptual framework, developed from the knowledge-to-action cycle, was used to analyze citations from a knowledge translation perspective. RESULTS: Searches identified 616 unique citations and after selection criteria were applied, 22 reports were included. Reports spanning 38 years were analyzed using components of the knowledge-to-action cycle to understand how educational interventions were designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated. Interventions involved didactic (32%), active (18%), and blended (41%) approaches, using face-to-face (27%), technology-mediated (45%), and multimodal (5%) delivery. Educational effectiveness was assessed in 73% of reports, most commonly using a pre/post questionnaire (41%). CONCLUSIONS: While this scoping review has utility in describing existing educational interventions to upskill PCPs to diagnose and manage sleep disorders, the findings suggest that interventions are often developed without explicitly considering the evidence of best educational practice. Future interventional designs may achieve greater sustained effectiveness by considering characteristics of the target audience, the pedagogical approaches best suited to its needs, and any environmental drivers and barriers that might impede the translation of evidence into practice. CITATION: King S, Damarell R, Schuwirth L, Vakulin A, Chai-Coetzer CL, McEvoy RD. Knowledge to action: a scoping review of approaches to educate primary care providers in the identification and management of routine sleep disorders. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(11):2307-2324.

What is a Clinically Meaningful Target for Positive Airway Pressure Adherence?

Although good adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (PAP) traditionally is defined as greater than or equal to 4 hours/night, the origins and rationale for this remain unclear. Research studies report variation in optimal duration of PAP adherence, depending on outcome of interest. Evidence demonstrates benefit with PAP for daytime sleepiness, quality of life, neurocognitive outcomes, depression, and hypertension, predominantly in symptomatic, moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Recent randomized controlled trials, however, have failed to demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular and mortality risks. This review explores the question of what can be considered a clinically meaningful outcome for PAP adherence.

Effect of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms on response to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Patients with comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) report increased severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms compared to patients with either insomnia or sleep apnea alone. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi) is an effective treatment for COMISA, previous research suggests a reduced response to CBTi by patients with insomnia and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Therefore, we used randomized controlled trial data to investigate the impact of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms before treatment on changes in insomnia after CBTi vs control in patients with COMISA. METHODS: 145 patients with COMISA (insomnia as defined by the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, third edition and apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h) were randomized to CBTi (n = 72) or no-treatment control (n = 73). One-week sleep diaries and standardized questionnaire measures of insomnia, sleepiness, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress were completed pretreatment and posttreatment. Mixed models were used to examine interactions between depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms before treatment, intervention-group (CBTi, control), and time (pretreatment, posttreatment) on insomnia symptoms. RESULTS: Approximately half of this COMISA sample reported at least mild symptoms of depression (57%), anxiety (53%), and stress (48%) before treatment. Patients reporting greater depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms before treatment also reported increased severity of insomnia, daytime fatigue, and sleepiness. Improvements in questionnaire and diary-measured insomnia symptoms improved during CBTi and were not moderated by severity of depression, anxiety, or stress symptoms before treatment (all interaction P ≥ .11). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that symptoms of depression, anxiety, or stress impair the effectiveness of CBTi in improving insomnia symptoms in patients with COMISA. Patients with COMISA and comorbid symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress should be referred for CBTi to treat insomnia and improve subsequent management of their obstructive sleep apnea. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Treating comorbid insomnia with obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA) study: A new treatment strategy for patients with combined insomnia and sleep apnea; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365184; Identifier: ACTRN12613001178730.

Effect of Multilevel Upper Airway Surgery vs Medical Management on the Apnea-Hypopnea Index and Patient-Reported Daytime Sleepiness Among Patients With Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The SAMS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) use device treatments inadequately and remain untreated. Objective: To determine whether combined palatal and tongue surgery to enlarge or stabilize the upper airway is an effective treatment for patients with OSA when conventional device treatment failed. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial of upper airway surgery vs ongoing medical management. Adults with symptomatic moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional treatments had failed were enrolled between November 2014 and October 2017, with follow-up until August 2018. Interventions: Multilevel surgery (modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and minimally invasive tongue volume reduction; n = 51) or ongoing medical management (eg, advice on sleep positioning, weight loss; n = 51). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; ie, the number of apnea and hypopnea events/h; 15-30 indicates moderate and >30 indicates severe OSA) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; range, 0-24; >10 indicates pathological sleepiness). Baseline-adjusted differences between groups at 6 months were assessed. Minimal clinically important differences are 15 events per hour for AHI and 2 units for ESS. Results: Among 102 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 44.6 [12.8] years; 18 [18%] women), 91 (89%) completed the trial. The mean AHI was 47.9 at baseline and 20.8 at 6 months for the surgery group and 45.3 at baseline and 34.5 at 6 months for the medical management group (mean baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 6 mo, -17.6 events/h [95% CI, -26.8 to -8.4]; P < .001). The mean ESS was 12.4 at baseline and 5.3 at 6 months in the surgery group and 11.1 at baseline and 10.5 at 6 months in the medical management group (mean baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 6 mo, -6.7 [95% CI, -8.2 to -5.2]; P < .001). Two participants (4%) in the surgery group had serious adverse events (1 had a myocardial infarction on postoperative day 5 and 1 was hospitalized for observation following hematemesis of old blood). Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study of adults with moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional therapy had failed, combined palatal and tongue surgery, compared with medical management, reduced the number of apnea and hypopnea events and patient-reported sleepiness at 6 months. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in additional populations and to understand clinical utility, long-term efficacy, and safety of multilevel upper airway surgery for treatment of patients with OSA. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000338662.