Bone volume, tooth volume, and incisor relapse: a 3-dimensional analysis of orthodontic stability.

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic relapse is a common and significant problem. Few risk factors have been identified, and the role of bone has only recently been investigated. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of alveolar bone volume and tooth volume on dental relapse. METHODS: The sample was chosen from the postretention database at the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Washington in Seattle. Based on the 10-year postretention (T3) irregularity index (II), 40 relapse subjects (T3 II > 6 mm) and the 40 most stable subjects (lowest T3 II < 1.5 mm) were identified for the study. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken of the posttreatment (T2) models. Total volume (V) was defined laterally by the distal contact points of the canines and vertically by the cusp tips of the canines to a depth 7 mm below the most inferior gingival margin. Alveolar volume (AV) was defined as the region below a vertical line at the most inferior gingival margin and tooth volume (TV) as the region above that line. The ratio TV:AV was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between relapse and AV, and to adjust for potentially confounding variables (TV, initial II, sex, age, retention time, and postretention time). Mandibular cortical thickness (CT) measured on T2 lateral cephalograms was used as another measure of bone quantity. Nine patients from the graduate orthodontic clinic who had pretreatment CBCT scans were identified. V, AV, and TV were measured on both the in-vivo scans and the scans of their dental casts to verify the method. RESULTS: The relapse group had significantly greater V and AV and significantly lower CT. TV:AV was not different between the groups. T2 II was found to be a significant predictor of relapse based on logistic regression analysis, whereas AV was not. CT was poorly correlated with AV. V and AV were highly correlated between in-vivo scans and dental cast scans, whereas TV approached significance. CONCLUSIONS: Although postretention relapse was associated with increased V and AV, when other variables were controlled, bone volume was not a significant predictor of relapse.

Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for orthodontic relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Dental relapse of the mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment is a common problem, and few risk factors have been identified. The purpose of this case-control study was to evaluate whether the amount or the structure of mandibular bone affects the potential for postorthodontic mandibular incisor relapse. METHODS: The subject sample was selected from the postretention database at the University of Washington. Subjects were chosen based on the availability of lateral cephalograms and mandibular periapical radiographs taken approximately 10 years postretention (T3). The mandibular incisor irregularity index (II) was measured on the T3 casts. Two groups were identified: subjects with the II greater than 6 mm (relapse or case) and those with the II less than 3.5 mm (stable or control). Once the case/control status was determined, the II was measured on models taken at the initial orthodontic examination (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2). Sixty relapse and 263 stable subjects were identified. Mandibular cortical thickness measured on both panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs was used to assess the amount of mandibular bone, and fractal analysis was used to analyze the trabecular bone structure around the mandibular incisors on the periapical radiographs. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between dental relapse and significant bone parameters. The models were adjusted for potentially confounding variables (initial II, sex, age, and postretention time). RESULTS: The relapse subjects had a larger mean II at T1 and a longer postretention time than the stable subjects. The mean cephalometric mandibular cortical thickness was significantly smaller in the relapse group than in the stable group at T1, T2, and T3. There were no statistically significant differences in the trabecular structure of bone, as measured with fractal analyses, between the relapse and stable groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that patients with thinner mandibular cortices are at increased risk for dental relapse.