RESUMO
Background: Oral second-generation antihistamines (sgAH) constitute the first-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), a debilitating dermatological condition. However, many patients respond incompletely, and up-dosing sgAHs up to four-fold their conventional dose is recommended for disease control. Many physicians refrain from up-dosing due to a paucity of efficacy and safety data, instead adding a second antihistamine or an immunomodulator. Objective: With the aim of addressing this knowledge gap, we conducted a literature review to highlight efficacy and safety data on up-dosed sgAHs. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature across multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google scholar) using the keywords (alone and in combination) and MeSH items as well as non-MeSH terms such as "chronic spontaneous urticaria", "chronic idiopathic urticaria", AND "updosing", "second-generation anti-histamines", "cetirizine", "fexofenadine", "levocetirizine", "desloratadine", "ebastine", "bilastine", and "rupatadine". Results: Our review suggests bilastine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine, and cetirizine are recommended for up-dosing in non-responsive patients with CSU (Grade A recommendation), while desloratadine and ebastine can be recommended (Grade B recommendation). Among those with Grade A recommendation, bilastine and levocetirizine may be up-dosed safely to four times, while fexofenadine has been studied at three times the conventional dose. None of the drugs showed any dose-dependent increase of adverse effects; however, cetirizine up-dosing may increase the risk of dose-related sedation. There were no reports of systemic complications, including cardiotoxicity, at higher than licensed doses of these drugs. Only cetirizine and rupatadine up-dosing have been documented to be effective and safe in children, while there is lack of data on geriatric patients and pregnant or lactating females.
RESUMO
Background Chronic urticaria exerts a profound impact on quality of life. Recent guidelines recommend its evaluation in all chronic urticaria patients. Currently, the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) is the only validated tool to assess chronic urticaria-specific quality of life. Objective To validate and adapt the CU-Q2oL to the Bengali language for its widespread use. Methods The CU-Q2oL questionnaire was translated into Bengali. Its internal consistency and reliability were tested by asking 42 chronic urticaria patients to complete this version. They completed the validated Bengali Dermatology Life Quality Index and Urticaria Control test questionnaires, and their scores were correlated with CU-Q2oL score to assess the validity of our Bengali version. Results The mean CU-Q2oL score of our patients (mean age 38.41 ± 13.4 years, male: female 29:13) was 48.8 ± 16.5. Domain 4 (sleep problems) was worst affected, followed by domain 1 (pruritus), while domain 2 (swelling) was least affected. We detected an excellent overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93) of our version and nearly complete agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.91) between the test-retest scores. We found a significant positive correlation between the overall CU-Q2oL and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores (rs = 0.53, P = 0.0002), thus implying the validity of our version. Additionally, we noted a significant negative correlation between the overall CU-Q2oL and Urticaria Control test scores (rs = -0.48, P = 0.0007), suggestive of a more severe impairment of quality of life with poorer disease control. Limitations Small sample size, observational design and bias in test-retest reliability analysis due to the use of rescue therapy in-between assessment sessions were important limitations of our study. Conclusion The Bengali version of CU-Q2oL questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool suitable for both clinical and research use in Bengali speaking chronic urticaria patients.
