Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 4(4): e004699, 2014 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24710133

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oral corticosteroids are the cornerstone of acute asthma management in the emergency department. Recent evidence has raised doubts about the efficacy of this treatment in preschool-aged children with viral-induced wheezing and in smoking adults. The aims of the study were to: (1) document the magnitude of response to oral corticosteroids in children presenting to the emergency department with moderate or severe asthma; (2) quantify potential determinants of response to corticosteroids and (3) explore the role of gene polymorphisms associated with the responsiveness to corticosteroids. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design is a prospective cohort study of 1008 children aged 1-17 years meeting a strict definition of asthma and presenting with a clinical score of ≥4 on the validated Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure. All children will receive standardised severity-specific treatment with prednisone/prednisolone and cointerventions (salbutamol with/without ipratropium bromide). Determinants, namely viral aetiology, environmental tobacco smoke and single nucleotide polymorphism, will be objectively documented. The primary efficacy endpoint is the failure of emergency department (ED) management within 72 h of the ED visit. Secondary endpoints include other measures of asthma severity and time to recovery within 7 days of the index visit. The study has 80% power for detecting a risk difference of 7.5% associated with each determinant from a baseline risk of 21%, at an α of 0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from all participating institutions. An impaired response to systemic steroids in certain subgroups will challenge the current standard of practice and call for the immediate search for better approaches. A potential host-environment interaction will broaden our understanding of corticosteroid responsiveness in children. Documentation of similar effectiveness of corticosteroids across determinants will provide the needed reassurance regarding current treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Results will be disseminated at international conferences and manuscripts targeted at emergency physicians, paediatricians, geneticists and respirologists. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02013076).


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Asma/complicações , Asma/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Progressão da Doença , Eosinofilia/complicações , Humanos , Lactente , Polimorfismo Genético , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Viroses/complicações
2.
J Pediatr ; 137(6): 762-8, 2000 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11113831

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To elaborate and validate a Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) that would accurately reflect the severity of airway obstruction and the response to treatment in young patients with asthma. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed in 217 children aged 3 to 6 years who presented to a pediatric emergency department with acute asthma. Respiratory resistance measured by forced oscillation served as a gold standard. Children were randomized to either the test group, in which multivariate analyses were performed to elaborate the PRAM, or the validation group, in which the characteristics of the PRAM were tested. RESULTS: For the test group (N = 145), the best multivariate model contained 5 variables: wheezing, air entry, contraction of scalenes, suprasternal retraction, and oxygen saturation. In the validation group (N = 72), the PRAM correlated substantially with the change in resistance (r = 0.58) but modestly with the % predicted resistance measured before (r = 0.22) and after bronchodilation (r = 0.36). A change of 3 (95% CI: 2.2, 3.0) indicated a clinically important change. CONCLUSIONS: PRAM appears to be a responsive but moderately discriminative tool for assessing acute asthma severity. This measure, designed for preschool-aged children, has been validated against a concurrent measure of lung function.


Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Testes de Função Respiratória , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Doença Aguda , Asma/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...