Cost analysis of disease including treatment with dalbavancin in a Spanish hospital: ECODAL ANALYSIS.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic with activity against gram-positive bacteria that allows early discharge of patients requiring intravenous therapy. Outpatient treatment helps offset hospitalisation costs associated with standard intravenous treatment. Our objective was to assess the cost of disease management, including treatment with dalbavancin, in a Spanish hospital for 1 year, and the hypothetical costs associated with treatment with other therapeutic alternatives to dalbavancin. METHODS: A single-centre, observational, retrospective post-hoc analysis was conducted based on electronic medical records analysing all patients who received dalbavancin treatment throughout 1 year; cost analysis was performed for the whole process. In addition, three scenarios designed on the basis of real clinical practice by clinical experts were hypothesised: (i) individual therapeutic alternative to dalbavancin, (ii) all patients treated with daptomycin, and (iii) all days of dalbavancin as outpatient treatment transformed into hospital stay. Costs were obtained from the hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated with dalbavancin; their mean age was 57.9 years, and 70.6% were men. The main reasons for dalbavancin use were outpatient management (61.7%, n = 21) and ensuring treatment adherence (26.5%, n = 9). The main indications were: osteoarticular infection (32.4%) and infective endocarditis (29.4%). One-half (50%) of the infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus (23.5% were methicillin resistant). All patients achieved clinical resolution, and no costs associated with dalbavancin-associated adverse events or re-admissions were reported. The mean total cost of treatment was 22,738€ per patient, with the greatest expenditures in interventions (8,413€) and hospital stay (6,885€). The mean cost of dalbavancin treatment was 3,936€; without dalbavancin, this cost could have been increased to 3,324-11,038€ depending on the scenario, mainly due to hospital stays. MAIN LIMITATION: Limited sample size obtained from a single centre. CONCLUSION: The economic impact of the management of these infections is high. The cost of dalbavancin is offset by the decreased length of stay.

Real-world Use of Bezlotoxumab and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Background: We aimed to describe the frequency of use and effectiveness of bezlotoxumab (BZX) and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in real-world practice. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a university hospital in which adult patients treated with BZX or FMT from January 2018 to April 2021 were included. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of BZX and FMT in preventing early (within 8 weeks) and late (within 1 year) CDI recurrences (rCDI). A multivariate analysis of risk factors for early recurrence was performed. Results: Of 1377 consecutive CDI episodes, 117 (8.5%) received BZX or FMT, with full information available for 100 of the episodes: 51 received BZX, and 49 received FMT. BZX was used mostly in immunosuppressed patients (66.7%) and in first episodes or first recurrences in 70.6% of the cases. FMT was prescribed only in CDI recurrences. Despite the different conditions of the patients, there were no significant differences between BZX and FMT in preventing early rCDI (19.6% vs 24.5%; P = .55) or late rCDI (9.8% vs 18.4%; P = .31). In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for recurrence were presence of ≥2 previous rCDI episodes (odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.03-8.63) and use of non-CDI antibiotics (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.24-9.57). Conclusions: BZX and FMT were infrequently used in real-world practice. Both treatments had similar effectiveness in preventing CDI recurrence despite their application to different populations.

Bezlotoxumab in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections: a real-life experience / Bezlotoxumab para el tratamiento de las infecciones por Clostridioides difficile:experiencia en vida real

Background. Following the approval of bezlotoxumabin 2017, studies evaluating its effectiveness in prevention ofClostridioides difficile infection under “real-life” conditions arescarce.Material and methods. We conducted a retrospectivestudy developed in a large tertiary care hospital describing theuse and outcomes of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treated with bezlotoxumab.Results. A total of 16 patients were include, all of whomhad an episode of CDI with high probability of recurrence and14 of them had some kind of immunosuppression. Bezlotoxumab was effective in the prevention of CDI recurrence in 11of the 14 cases in which follow up was possible, without significant side effects.Conclusions. Bezlotoxumab was well tolerated and theincidence of recurrent CDI in a high-risk population for recurrence was only 21.4%. (AU)

Antecedentes. Tras la aprobación de bezlotoxumab en2017, son escasos los estudios que evalúan su eficacia en laprevención de la infección por Clostridioides difficile en condiciones de vida real. Material y métodos. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo desarrollado en un hospital terciario describiendo el uso ylos resultados de los pacientes con infección por Clostridioidesdifficile (ICD) tratados con bezlotoxumab.Resultados. Se incluyeron un total de 16 pacientes, todosellos con un episodio de ICD con alto riesgo de recurrencia y14 de ellos con algún tipo de inmunosupresión. El bezlotoxumab fue eficaz en la prevención de la recurrencia de la ICD en11 de los 14 casos en los que fue posible el seguimiento, sinefectos secundarios significativos.Conclusiones. El bezlotoxumab fue bien tolerado. La incidencia de ICD recurrente en una población de alto riesgo derecurrencia, fue sólo del 21,4%. (AU)

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of sequential chemotherapy.

UNLABELLED: Objective. We conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the sequential nonplatinum combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) followed by weekly docetaxel (DOC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: stage IV NSCLC, Performance status =/< 2, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted on: VNR 25 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, followed by docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) weekly until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results. 21 stage IV patients were enrolled. All patients are evaluable for treatment response and toxicity profile. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range: 51 to 72) with 18 (86%) males and 3 (14%) females. Histology types were: adenocarcinoma in 8 patients (38%), large cell carcinoma in 1 patients (5%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 12 patients (57%). The majority of the patients had and ECOG PS of 1. Eight patients (38%) did not complete six cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine. The median number of cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine was 4 (range 2-6) Of the 13 patients (61%) who completed six cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine, all of them went on to receive weekly docetaxel and received at least 3 cycles, with a median number of 8 cycles (range 3- 16). The overall response rate was 33%. Respect survival, the minimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6-25 months). The median survival time (MST) was 7.9 months, and the 1-year survival was 30%, and the median progression-free survival was 4.7 months. Toxicity was mild, well tolerated and mostly hematologic. In the GEM/VNR cycle, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 14%, two patients with febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 anaemia in 1 patients (5%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (5%). Nonhematologic toxicity was also mild: 1 patient with Grade 3 skin toxicity with docetaxel, 1 patient with grade 3 infection, 2 patients with grade 3 astenia and 1 patient with a mild allergic reaction postchemotherapy treatment with docetaxel. Conclusion. The sequential triplet nonplatinum chemotherapy consisted of GEM/VNR followed by weekly DOC is active and can be administered safely in advanced NSCLC. Our results are similar with other sequential regimens and did not represent a significant improvement in the treatment of this disease.

Cisplatin plus continuous infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

No disponible

Backbround. In this Phase I/II trial, the maximumtolerateddose (MTD) and activity of cisplatin plusvinorelbine (VRL) administered in continuous infusionas first-line treatment of advanced non smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC) was determined in 12consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with advancedNSCLC.Patients and methods. The dose of cisplatin was100 mg/m2 in all patients, and vinorelbine was administeredas an initial intravenous (iv) bolus of 8mg/m2 on day 1 followed by a 4-day continuous ivinfusion at 4 different 24 h dose levels (DLs) to berepeated every 21 days. All 12 patients (47 cycles)were evaluable for response and toxicity.Results. The MTD was 8 mg/m2 bolus followed by acontinuous iv infusion of 8 mg/m2 per day over 4days. The dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were febrileneutropenia in 4 patients and grade 3 mucositis in 1patient. There was less neuro-toxicity and comparedto the weekly bolus scheme. There was nosignificant cumulative toxicity after 3 cycles. Partialresponses were observed in 6 patients; an overall responserate of 50% (95% CI: 30-65%). Median time toprogression was 5,5 months (95% CI: 1,5-11 months)and median survival was 11 months (95% CI: 5-20months).Conclusions. The results demonstrate that, in thissetting of first-line treatment of NSCLC, cisplatinplus vinorelbine at 8 mg/m2 bolus followed by acontinuous infusion of 8 mg/m2 per day over 4 daysis the recommended schedule. Further trials wouldbe useful to establish activity of this combination

Continuous-infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study.

BACKGROUND: In this phase I/II trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and activity of vinorelbine administered in continuous infusion as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was determined in 25 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Vinorelbine was administered as an initial intravenous (I.V.) bolus of 8 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by a 4-day continuous I.V. infusion at 5 different 24-hour dose levels to be repeated every 21 days. All 25 patients (159 cycles) were evaluable for response. The MTD was 8 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a continuous I.V. infusion of 11 mg/m(2) per day over 4 days. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia in 6 patients and grade 3 mucositis in 2 patients. There was less neurotoxicity and constipation and more mucositis compared with the weekly bolus scheme. There was no significant cumulative toxicity after 3 cycles. Treatment responses were observed in 6 patients: 1 complete response and 5 partial responses. The overall response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-40%). Median time to progression was 4 months (95% CI, 2-11 months), and median survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2-18 months). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that, in this setting of first-line treatment of NSCLC, vinorelbine administered as an 8 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 11 mg/m(2) per day over 4 days is the recommended schedule. Further trials are necessary to establish activity and possible benefits of combination with other agents.