Multi-shot Diffusion-Weighted MRI With Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) in the Assessment of Active Inflammation in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging (ssDWI) has been shown useful for detecting active bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD) without MRI contrast. However, ssDWI suffers from geometric distortion and low spatial resolution. PURPOSE: To compare conventional ssDWI with higher-resolution ssDWI (HR-ssDWI) and multi-shot DWI based on multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE-DWI) for evaluating bowel inflammation in CD, using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI) as the reference standard. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Eighty nine patients with histological diagnosis of CD from previous endoscopy (55 male/34 female, age: 17-69 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: ssDWI (2.7 mm × 2.7 mm), HR-ssDWI (1.8 mm × 1.8 mm), MUSE-DWI (1.8 mm × 1.8 mm) based on echo-planar imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and CE-MRI sequences, all at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT: Five raters independently evaluated the tissue texture conspicuity, geometry accuracy, minimization of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality using 5-point Likert scales. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) of each DWI sequences was assessed on per-bowel-segment basis. STATISTICAL TESTS: Inter-rater agreement for qualitative evaluation of each parameter was measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of differences in qualitative scoring between DWI sequences. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Tissue texture conspicuity, geometric distortions, and overall image quality were significantly better for MUSE-DWI than for ssDWI and HR-ssDWI with good agreement among five raters (ICC: 0.70-0.89). HR-ssDWI showed significantly poorer performance to ssDWI and MUSE-DWI for all qualitative scores and had the worst diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 57.0% and accuracy of 87.3%, with 36 undiagnosable cases due to severe artifacts). MUSE-DWI showed significantly higher sensitivity (97.5% vs. 86.1%) and accuracy (98.9% vs. 95.1%) than ssDWI for detecting bowel inflammation. DATA CONCLUSION: MUSE-DWI was advantageous in assessing bowel inflammation in CD, resulting in improved spatial resolution and image quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Point-of-care ultrasound augments physical examination learning by undergraduate medical students.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of the provision of handheld point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) devices on physical examination skills of medical students. METHODS: We describe an educational initiative that comprised a POCUS workshop followed by allocation of a POCUS device to medical students for use over the subsequent 8 weeks. They were encouraged to scan patients and correlate their physical examination findings. A mobile instant messaging group discussion platform was set to provide feedback from instructors. Physical examination skills were assessed by means of clinical examination. RESULTS: 210 final-year medical students from the University of Hong Kong participated in the programme. 46.3% completed the end of programme electronic survey: 74.6% enjoyed using the POCUS device, 50.0% found POCUS useful to validate physical examination findings and 47.7% agreed that POCUS increased their confidence with physical examination. 93.9% agreed that the programme should be incorporated into the medical curriculum and 81.9% would prefer keeping the device for longer time from 16 weeks (45.6%) to over 49 weeks (35.3%). Medical students who participated in the POCUS programme had a higher mean score for abdominal examination compared with those from the previous academic year with no POCUS programme (3.65±0.52 vs 3.21±0.80, p=0.014), but there was no statistically significant difference in their mean score for cardiovascular examination (3.62±0.64 vs 3.36±0.93, p=0.203). CONCLUSION: The POCUS programme that included provision of a personal handheld POCUS device improved students' attitude, confidence and ability to perform a physical examination.