Impact of Prophylactic Ranibizumab to Prevent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Eyes With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of prophylactic ranibizumab (PR) injections given every 3 months in eyes with intermediate nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) on drusen volume, macular layer thicknesses, and progression of geographic atrophy (GA) area over 24 months in the PREVENT trial. Methods: This post hoc analysis of the prospective PREVENT trial compared eyes with intermediate AMD randomized to PR versus sham injections to determine rates of conversion to neovascular AMD over 24 months. Drusen area and volume, macular thickness and volume, and retinal layer thicknesses were measured on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images and analyzed. Masked grading of GA area and subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) using fundus autofluorescence images was performed. Results: There were no statistical differences in drusen area and volumes between groups, and similar reductions in central subfield thickness, mean cube thickness, cube volume, and retinal sublayer thickness from baseline to 24 months (P = 0.018 to < 0.001), with no statistical differences between groups in any of these anatomic parameters. These findings were not impacted by the presence or absence of SDD. Among the 9 eyes with GA in this study, mean GA growth rate from baseline to 24 months was 1.34 +/- 0.79 mm2/year after PR and 1.95 +/- 1.73 mm2/year in sham-treated eyes (P = 0.49), and similarly showed no statistical difference with square root transformation (P = 0.61). Conclusions: Prophylactic ranibizumab given every 3 months did not appear to affect drusen volume, macular thinning, or GA progression in eyes with intermediate AMD. Translational Relevance: This work investigates the impact of PR on progressive retinal degeneration in a clinical trial.

Prophylactic Ranibizumab to Prevent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Vulnerable Fellow Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether prophylactic ranibizumab prevents the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in eyes with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) for patients with preexisting nAMD in their contralateral eye. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 50 years and older with intermediate AMD (multiple intermediate drusen [≥63 µm and <125 µm] or ≥1 large drusen [≥125 µm] and pigmentary changes) in the study eye and nAMD in the contralateral eye. INTERVENTION: Intravitreal ranibizumab injection (0.5 mg) or sham injection every 3 months for 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conversion to nAMD over 24 months (primary). Change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 24 months (secondary). RESULTS: Among 108 enrolled participants (54 [50%] in each group), all except 2 were non-Hispanic Whites, 61 participants (56%) were female, and the mean age was 78 years. The mean baseline visual acuity was 77.7 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/32). Conversion to nAMD over 24 months occurred among 7 of 54 eyes (13%) in both groups (ranibizumab vs. sham hazard ratio = 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-2.59]; P = 0.86). At 24 months, the cumulative incidence of nAMD adjusted for loss to follow-up was 14% (95% CI, 4%-23%) in the ranibizumab group and 15% (95% CI, 4%-25%) in the sham group. At 24 months, the mean change in visual acuity from baseline was -2.1 letters (standard deviation, 5.4 letters) with ranibizumab and -1.4 letters (standard deviation, 7.7 letters) with sham (adjusted difference = -0.8 letters [95% CI, -3.7 to 2.2 letters]; P = 0.62). The proportion of eyes that lost at least 10 letters of visual acuity from baseline at 24 months was 2 of 39 (5%) with ranibizumab and 4 of 40 (10%) with sham. There were no serious ocular adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly dosing of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in eyes with intermediate AMD did not reduce the incidence of nAMD compared with sham injections; however, the study was likely underpowered given the 95% CI, and a clinically meaningful effect cannot be excluded. There also was no effect on visual acuity at 24 months. Other strategies to reduce neovascular conversion in these vulnerable eyes are needed.

Pneumatic Vitreolysis with Perfluoropropane for Vitreomacular Traction with and without Macular Hole: DRCR Retina Network Protocols AG and AH.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) in eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with and without full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Two multicenter (28 sites) studies: a randomized clinical trial comparing PVL with observation (sham injection) for VMT without FTMH (Protocol AG) and a single-arm study assessing PVL for FTMH (Protocol AH). PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adults with central VMT (vitreomacular adhesion was ≤3000 µm). In Protocol AG, visual acuity (VA) was 20/32 to 20/400. In Protocol AH, eyes had a FTMH (≤250 µm at the narrowest point) and VA of 20/25 to 20/400. METHODS: Pneumatic vitreolysis using perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central VMT release at 24 weeks (Protocol AG) and FTMH closure at 8 weeks (Protocol AH). RESULTS: From October 2018 through February 2020, 46 participants were enrolled in Protocol AG, and 35 were enrolled in Protocol AH. Higher than expected rates of retinal detachment and tear resulted in early termination of both protocols. Combining studies, 7 of 59 eyes (12% [95% CI, 6%-23%]; 2 eyes in Protocol AG, 5 eyes in Protocol AH) that received PVL developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n = 6) or retinal tear (n = 1). At 24 weeks in Protocol AG, 18 of 23 eyes in the PVL group (78%) versus 2 of 22 eyes in the sham group (9%) achieved central VMT release without rescue vitrectomy (adjusted risk difference, 66% [95% CI, 44%-88%]; P< 0.001). The mean change in VA from baseline at 24 weeks was 6.7 letters in the PVL group and 6.1 letters in the sham group (adjusted difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -6.1 to 4.5]; P = 0.77). In Protocol AH, 10 of 35 eyes (29% [95% CI, 16%-45%]) achieved FTMH closure without rescue vitrectomy at 8 weeks. The mean change in VA from baseline at 8 weeks was -1.5 letters (95% CI, -10.3 to 7.3 letters). CONCLUSIONS: In most eyes with VMT, PVL induced hyaloid release. In eyes with FTMH, PVL resulted in hole closure in approximately one third of eyes. These studies were terminated early because of safety concerns related to retinal detachments and retinal tears.

Post-hoc analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism profile for eyes with vascularized pigment epithelial detachment due to ARMD.

INTRODUCTION: This post-hoc case-control study compares single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profile of eyes with vascularized pigment epithelial detachment (vPED) due to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) with: (1) Control-1 eyes (no ARMD and AREDS Severity Scale 0); and (2) Control-2 eyes (drusen or AREDS Severity Scale 2). SNP profile of High Responders (HR) was also compared with Low Responders (LR) to ranibizumab. METHODS: Blood samples from 40 patients with vPED treated with ranibizumab were sent for SNP-specific genotype analysis for comparison of variant allele frequencies of 23 SNPs associated with ARMD (VAF) to VAF in 184 Control-1 eyes, and VAF in 85 Control-2 eyes. VAF of HR-50 (⩾50% decrease in PED height) and VAF of HR-75 (⩾75% decrease in PED height) were also compared with VAF of LR. RESULTS: These SNPs were more frequent in vPED than Control-1 eyes: APOE rs4420638 (A/G), HTRA1 rs104904924 (G/T), VEGF rs943080 (T/C), CFH rs1061170 (T/C), CFH rs2274700 (C/T), CFH rs10737680 (A/C), CFH rs10801555 (G/A). These SNPs were more frequent in vPED than Control-2 eyes: APOE rs4420638 (A/G), CFI rs4698775 (G/T), COL15A1/TGFBR1 rs334353 (T/G). FRK rs3812111 (T/A) was more frequent in HR-50 and HR-75 eyes compared with LR. CONCLUSION: Seven SNPs were more frequent in vPED eyes than non-ARMD eyes, and three SNPs were more frequent in vPED eyes than drusen eyes. Adjusting for multiplicity, only CFH rs2274700 (C/T) was significant for first comparison, and only COL15A1/TGFBR1 rs334353 (T/G) was significant for second comparison. APOE rs4420638 (A/G) was the single SNP more frequently linked to vPED eyes for both comparisons. FRK rs3812111 (T/A) was consistently associated with high responders.

Meticulous multimodal analysis of aflibercept therapy for submacular vascularized pigment epithelial detachment associated with neovascular AMD in a prospective case series, the EVEN study.

PURPOSE: This prospective case series investigates the visual and anatomical outcomes including detailed volumetrics of eyes with vascularized pigment epithelial detachments (PED) treated with aflibercept in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) through meticulous analysis in a reading center setting. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm multicenter, prospective, open-labeled, interventional case series, comparing visual and anatomic outcomes at 12 months with baseline for intense aflibercept therapy. Eyes with submacular vascularized PED due to AMD received 2.0 mG of intravitreal aflibercept at baseline and then monthly for 6 months. During the subsequent 6 months, mandatory aflibercept therapy was given for every other month, while additional aflibercept injections were allowed between mandatory injections if necessary, at 4 weeks after last injection, contingent on pre-defined visual and anatomic re-treatment criteria. Standardized ETDRS vision measurement, anterior and posterior segment examination, and high-density spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans were obtained at baseline and monthly, while fundus photography and fluorescein angiography were obtained at baseline, 3,6, and 12 months. Indocyanine-green angiography was obtained at baseline and 3 months. Meticulous multidimensional assessment of the scanned multimodal serial images was then performed by Doheny Image Reading Center. RESULTS: Of 36 eyes and patients with mean age of 80, mean baseline and 12-month-ETDRS BCVA was 59 ± 8.9 letters (20/66), and 65 ± 27 letters (20/50), respectively; (6.5 letters improvement, p = 0.02). Significant reductions from baseline to month-12 were noted for multiple anatomic measures, including PED maximum height, entire lesion and central 1-mm subfield of PED mean thickness and volume, and mean subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) thickness and volume, also entire lesion of retinal thickness, retinal volume, and mean subretinal fluid (SRF) thickness (mean reductions in magnitude ranging from 37.5 to 91.7%, all p < 0.001). FA measurements also showed significant decrease from baseline to month-12, including area and greatest linear diameter (GLD) of fibrovascular PED, area and GLD of NV area and leakage (mean reductions in magnitude from 41.9 to 87.7%, p value from 0.002 to <0.001). This case series shows that while majority of reductions in SRF volume occurred during first month from baseline, majority of reduction in retinal, PED, and SHRM volumes occurred during first 2 months after onset of anti-VEGF injections. RPE tears developed in 5 eyes (13.9%) correlating with eyes with large PED height and volume at baseline (mean height >800 µm, mean volume >4 mm3). Geographic atrophy (GA) was noted in only 1 eye at baseline, but in 16 eyes (44.4%) by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Significant improvement in vision and anatomic measures including volumetrics of vPED were noted at 12 months after aflibercept therapy. Besides substantial PED height, large PED volume at baseline also correlated with RPE tears in 13.9% of eyes with vPED after anti-VEGF therapy. Reduction in SHRM correlated directly with decrease in PED, and more than 40% of study eyes developed GA by 12 months following intense anti-VEGF therapy.

Modified insertion technique for a sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®).

PURPOSE: We describe a modified injection technique that adheres a sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) to the vitreous base. OBSERVATIONS: This modified technique was applied after removal of a prior dislocated Ozurdex® that migrated into the anterior chamber in one patient, and also on another patient bothered by perception of a large floater induced by a free-floating Ozurdex® in the vitreous cavity previously inserted with the conventional technique. The main feature of this new technique consisted of altering the conventional "bevel-up" orientation of the insertion needle tip towards the vitreous cavity to the modified "bevel-down" orientation of the needle tip directed towards the pars plana and vitreous base, for the purpose of adhering a portion of or the entire dexamethasone implant to the vitreous base. Neither patient developed postoperative complications with this technique. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: This modified insertion technique allows adherence of Ozurdex® to the vitreous base and avoids adverse effects associated with a free-floating Ozurdex®, such as its migration into the anterior chamber, or visual disturbance associated with movement of the implant.

Month 24 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 10: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Two-year outcomes are reported comparing eyes originally assigned to aflibercept or bevacizumab to assess the need for continued anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) from participants in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) trial. Objective: To investigate outcomes 1 year after cessation of the SCORE2 treatment schedule. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of the SCORE2 randomized clinical trial, follow-up included 117 participants originally randomized to aflibercept and 119 participants originally randomized to bevacizumab between September 17, 2014, and November 18, 2015. Data for the analyses were frozen on September 13, 2018. Interventions: SCORE2 participants completed the treatment protocol at month 12, were subsequently treated at investigator discretion, and underwent assessment at month 24. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: Among 362 participants randomized to aflibercept or bevacizumab, 65.2% (236 of 362) completed a protocol visit at month 24 (mean [SD] age, 68.5 (12.0) years; 53.8% male). The mean (SD) VALS improved from baseline to 12 months by 21.6 (14.5) in the aflibercept group compared with 21.9 (16.6) in the bevacizumab group (difference, -0.3; 99% CI, -5.6 to 4.9), then worsened from those values by a mean (SD) VALS of 7.6 (17.5) in the aflibercept group and 7.5 (14.5) in the bevacizumab group (difference, -0.1; 99% CI, -5.6 to 5.3) at month 24. The mean (SD) CST improved from baseline to 12 months by 394 (231) µm in the aflibercept group compared with 420 (274) µm in the bevacizumab group (difference, 26 µm; 99% CI, -62 to 114 µm), then worsened from those values by a mean (SD) of 58 (192) µm in the aflibercept group compared with 48 (186) µm in the bevacizumab group (difference, 10 µm; 99% CI, -58 to 78 µm) at month 24. Conclusions and Relevance: No differences in VALS or CST outcomes at month 24 were identified when participants originally assigned to aflibercept were compared with those assigned to bevacizumab. Caution in interpretation is needed because of loss to follow-up. In both groups, VALS and CST improved through month 12 and then worsened somewhat during the second year, when treatment was at investigator discretion. This analysis suggests that CRVO and HRVO warrant close monitoring and treatment as needed over at least 2 years to optimize outcomes in eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01969708.

Loculated subretinal fluid after pneumatic vitreolysis.

PURPOSE: To present, to the authors' knowledge, the first reported case of loculated subretinal fluid associated with pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL). OBSERVATIONS: A 74 year old female was followed for 9 months with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and 20/20 visual acuity in her right eye. Her visual acuity decreased at 9 months to 20/50 and she was treated with PVL. VMT release was successful on day 7. An isolated shallow pocket of loculated subretinal fluid developed inferotemporal to the fovea at one month after PVL and persisted for 14 months. The subretinal fluid eventually resolved at 14 months after PVL, and visual acuity improved to 20/30, and there were no electroretinographic abnormalities. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: Localized subretinal fluid is an unusual complication of PVL. No adverse visual outcome developed despite the persistent extrafoveal subretinal fluid in this case, and the subretinal fluid eventually resolved over a year after PVL.

Treatment outcomes of conventional or high-dose ranibizumab for vascularized pigment epithelial detachment based on lesion subtypes.

INTRODUCTION:: A post hoc study was conducted to compare visual and anatomic outcomes of vascularized serous pigment epithelial detachment (Group 1) with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (Group 2) due to age-related macular degeneration treated with either 0.5 or 2.0 mg ranibizumab injections. METHODS:: A prospective, randomized trial was performed with the following regimens for 12 months: (1) 0.5 mg monthly, (2) 0.5 mg monthly for 4 months followed by pro re nata injections, (3) 2.0 mg monthly, and (4) 2.0 mg monthly for 4 months followed by pro re nata injections. Primary measure was best-corrected standardized vision. Secondary measures included central subfield, thickness surface area A2, greatest linear diameter, heights of pigment epithelial detachment and choroidal neovascularization (CNV), subretinal fluid, cystoid macular edema, and adverse events. RESULTS:: For 36 eyes (8 in Group 1 and 28 in Group 2), follow-up time was 12 months. There were no differences in baseline features between groups except for pigment epithelial detachment A2 (Group 2 > Group 1). Two-way analysis of variance showed comparable improvements in anatomic and vision outcomes. Three-way analysis of variance also showed similar responses for both lesion subtypes with high-dose treatment. There was a trend toward greater pigment epithelial detachment resolution in Group 1 eyes. There were no differences in retinochoroidal angiomatous proliferation (Type-3 CNV) and cataracts between groups, although greater percentages of eyes in Group 1 developed retinal pigment epithelial tears (25% vs 10.7%). CONCLUSION:: There were no differences in vision and anatomic outcomes between lesion subtypes, and similarly, more rapid responses to high-dose than conventional-dose ranibizumab occurred for eyes with both lesion subtypes. More retinal pigment epithelial tears may develop in eyes with vascularized serous pigment epithelial detachment.

Pneumatic Vitreolysis for Management of Symptomatic Focal Vitreomacular Traction.

Pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) is the intravitreal injection of a small quantity of expansile gas for the purpose of achieving focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) release for eyes with symptomatic VMT, or inducing VMT release and closure of the macular defect for eyes with a small stage-2 macular hole (MH). Initially, there was limited interest in this technique upon its introduction for clinical treatment in human eyes in 1993. With the advent of optical coherence tomography allowing detailed observation of vitreomacular interface changes and rising importance of medical economics in recent years, there has been increasing interest in PVL, a low-cost procedure for managing symptomatic VMT. The success rates of VMT release in the literature have ranged from 60% to 100% and the rates of closure of small macular holes have ranged from 50% to 80% following PVL. In a recent retrospective consecutive series of 56 eyes in two centers undergoing C3F8 gas injection, Chan and Mein reported an overall success of 86% in VMT release and 60% closure of small macular holes with few adverse events (7% with retinal breaks, retinal detachment, or progression of VMT). Multiple recent studies have shown superior outcome utilizing C3F8 gas compared with SF6 gas for PVL. In conclusion, PVL is a promising, low-cost therapeutic option, with the potential for managing symptomatic focal VMT on a global scale.

PNEUMATIC VITREOLYSIS FOR RELIEF OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas injection for symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without Stage 2 macular hole (MH). METHODS: A retrospective review of eyes with VMT treated with 0.3 mL of C3F8 gas was performed. Patients avoided the supine position until gas resolution. Patients with small MH maintained partial face-down positioning. RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (50 eyes) with symptomatic VMT underwent pneumatic vitreolysis between 2010 and 2016. A posterior vitreous detachment developed in 43 eyes (86.0%) after a single gas injection, at a median of 3.0 weeks. Twenty-eight of 35 eyes (80.0%) with VMT only and all 15 eyes (100%) with a small Stage 2 MH developed a posterior vitreous detachment, with MH closure in 10 of 15 eyes (66.7%). Median baseline and last best spectacle-corrected visual acuities were 20/50 and 20/40, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean follow-up time was 11.1 ± 9.9 months. Rate of posterior vitreous detachment was reduced with presence of diabetes mellitus (25%) and with thick cellophane membrane (50%). Univariate analysis showed increased VMT release for eyes with VMT extent within 1 disk area (χ = 13.1, P = 0.002), eyes with absence of diabetes mellitus (χ = 8.8, P = 0.007), and eyes with Stage 2 MH (χ = 5.47, P = 0.019); there was a trend between success and lack of thick cellophane membrane (χ = 3.32, P = 0.068). Results using logistic regression also showed younger age (P = 0.012), followed by better baseline best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.044), lack of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.077), and female gender (P = 0.045) to be predictors of increased VMT release. One VMT-only eye formed a MH and another VMT-only eye developed a retinal detachment. Both eyes responded to vitrectomy. CONCLUSION: Pneumatic vitreolysis with limited face-down position is a viable option for treating VMT with few adverse events. More studies are needed to elucidate its indications, benefits, and risks.

TYPE 1 VERSUS TYPE 3 NEOVASCULARIZATION IN PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AFTER ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response to aflibercept therapy for Type 1 and Type 3 neovascularization in pigment epithelial detachments associated with treatment-naive, neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In this multicentered, prospective study, eligible eyes underwent an intravitreal aflibercept injection protocol for 12 months. Visual acuity and morphologic features of the pigment epithelial detachments were compared at baseline and follow-up intervals between eyes with Type 1 versus Type 3 neovascularization. RESULTS: Thirty-six eyes were analyzed. At 12 months, Type 1 lesions showed a 4.5 ± 23 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter improvement (P = 0.1665) versus a 14 ± 11 (P = 0.0072) letter improvement with Type 3 lesions. Both Type 1 and 3 eyes showed a significant decrease in pigment epithelial detachment size, subretinal fluid, and subretinal hyperreflective material; however, Type 3 eyes had a greater reduction in pigment epithelial detachment size and subretinal hyperreflective material, as well as a reduction in central retinal thickness. Type 1 eyes required an average of 1.636 (range, 1-4) injections to resolve fluid, which was greater than Type 3 eyes, which required an average of 1.143 (range, 1-2) injections (P = 0.0251). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept injections were efficacious for pigment epithelial detachments, but baseline and follow-up anatomical and functional outcomes differed in Type 1 versus Type 3 neovascularization. The better response of Type 3 eyes with fewer injections suggests that differentiation of the neovascularization subtype at the initial diagnosis may allow for a more tailored, optimal therapy.

Optical coherence tomographic and visual results at six months after transitioning to aflibercept for patients on prior ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

PURPOSE: To study optical coherence tomographic (OCT) results and vision at 6 months after transition (post-Tx) from intravitreal bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab to aflibercept for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The null hypothesis was the lack of improvements in OCT metrics and vision outcome in study eyes at 6 months after transitioning from bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed 6 monthly OCT (Cirrus) data after transitioning to aflibercept for eyes on prior Legacy-ranibizumab, Legacy-bevacizumab, or mixed treatment for nAMD. Outcome measures were subretinal fluid (SRF), cystoid macular edema (CME), pigment epithelial detachment (PED) heights and volumes, central 1- and 3-mm subfield, Macular Volume, and best spectacle and pinhole visual acuity (VA). A single masked investigator performed all OCT measurements. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine eyes in 172 patients in Legacy-bevacizumab (95 eyes), Legacy-ranibizumab (84 eyes), or Mixed Group(10 eyes) were switched to aflibercept and followed for 6 months. Significant post-Tx reductions were noted in SRF/CME heights and volumes (all P<.001). Similar findings were noted for PED heights (122.8 µm vs 79.4 µm) and PED volumes (all P<.001). Post-Tx VA was better (20/43 vs 20/51, P<.001). There were no differences between Legacy-bevacizumab and Legacy-ranibizumab groups in OCT and VA changes. Post-Tx VA, SRF/CME, and PED heights and volumes were improved for Nonresponders (suboptimal response to bevacizumab/ranibizumab) (P=.001 to <.001), but not Responders (good responses to same). The only adverse event was a retinal pigment epithelial tear in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in vision and OCT metrics developed in Nonresponders but not in Responders. Post-Tx VA and OCT measures were similar for eyes on prior bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Post-Tx adverse events were uncommon.

Exploratory analysis of the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab or triamcinolone on worsening of diabetic retinopathy in a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: The standard care for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) usually is panretinal photocoagulation, an inherently destructive treatment that can cause iatrogenic vision loss. Therefore, evaluating the effects of therapies for diabetic macular edema on development or worsening of PDR might lead to new therapies for PDR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab or triamcinolone acetonide, administered to treat diabetic macular edema, on worsening of diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN: Exploratory analysis was performed on worsening of retinopathy, defined as 1 or more of the following: (1) worsening from no PDR to PDR, (2) worsening of 2 or more severity levels on reading center assessment of fundus photographs in eyes without PDR at baseline, (3) having panretinal photocoagulation, (4) experiencing vitreous hemorrhage, or (5) undergoing vitrectomy for the treatment of PDR. SETTING: Community- and university-based ophthalmology practices. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with central-involved diabetic macular edema causing visual acuity impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Eyes were assigned randomly to sham with prompt focal/grid laser, 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab with prompt or deferred (≥24 weeks) laser, or 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide with prompt laser. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Three-year cumulative probabilities for retinopathy worsening. RESULTS: For eyes without PDR at baseline, the 3-year cumulative probabilities for retinopathy worsening (P value comparison with sham with prompt laser) were 23% using sham with prompt laser, 18% with ranibizumab with prompt laser (P = .25), 7% with ranibizumab with deferred laser (P = .001), and 37% with triamcinolone with prompt laser (P = .10). For eyes with PDR at baseline, the 3-year cumulative probabilities for retinopathy worsening were 40%, 21% (P = .05), 18% (P = .02), and 12% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Intravitreal ranibizumab appears to be associated with a reduced risk of diabetic retinopathy worsening in eyes with or without PDR. Intravitreal triamcinolone also appears to be associated with a reduced risk of PDR worsening. These findings suggest that use of these drugs to prevent worsening of diabetic retinopathy may be feasible. Given the exploratory nature of these analyses, the risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections, and the fact that intravitreal triamcinolone can cause cataract or glaucoma, use of these treatments to reduce the rates of worsening of retinopathy, with or without PDR, does not seem warranted at this time.

SCORE Study report #11: incidences of neovascular events in eyes with retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate in The Standard Care versus COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study: (1) incidences of neovascular events and retinal capillary nonperfusion (abbreviated as "nonperfusion"), and their relationship with treatment groups; (2) neovascular incidences by nonperfusion status; and (3) pertinent baseline factors for their potential risk for neovascular events. DESIGN: Two multicenter, randomized clinical trials, 1 evaluating participants with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and the other evaluating participants with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). PARTICIPANTS: At 36 months, data were available for 81 participants with CRVO and 128 with BRVO. INTERVENTION: Standard care (observation or grid photocoagulation) versus 1 or 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neovascularization of the iris (NVI), neovascular glaucoma (NVG), disc or retinal neovascularization (NVD/NVE), preretinal or vitreous hemorrhage (PRH/VH), and nonperfusion. RESULTS: The cumulative 36-month incidences for CRVO and BRVO eyes, respectively, were 8.5% and 2.4% for NVI or NVG; 8.8% and 7.6% for NVD/NVE or PRH/VH. There were no differences in incidences of neovascular events or risk of nonperfusion when comparing the 3 treatment groups within diseases. For CRVO at 36 months, 16.6% of eyes with ≥5.5 disc areas of nonperfusion versus 4.0% of eyes with <5.5 disc areas of nonperfusion developed NVG (P = 0.0003); for BRVO at 36 months, 14.6% versus 2.4% developed NVD/NVE (P<0.0001). Similar results were noted for most other neovascular events. Nonperfusion was the only significant baseline factor for neovascularization in BRVO, with the risk of a neovascular event increasing with greater disc areas of nonperfusion, and the highest risk noted at ≥5.5 disc areas. CONCLUSIONS: In the SCORE Study, triamcinolone treatment was not associated with lower incidences of neovascular events or nonperfusion status compared with observation or grid photocoagulation. Cumulative 36-month incidences for most neovascular events were significantly higher for nonperfused than perfused eyes. Greater baseline disc areas of nonperfusion increased the risk of neovascularization in BRVO but not CRVO eyes, possibly owing to obscuration of retinal capillary details caused by dense hemorrhage at baseline for CRVO eyes. Increased risk of neovascularization was noted below the historical threshold of 10 disc areas of nonperfusion for retinal vein occlusion.

Optical coherence tomography-measured pigment epithelial detachment height as a predictor for retinal pigment epithelial tears associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to study preinjection optical coherence tomography-related factors in age-related macular degeneration eyes with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED) that may predispose retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tears associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective case series involving 9 retina specialists and 7 centers investigated Stratus optical coherence tomography (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) parameters in eyes with vascularized PED (vPED) from February 2006 to February 2007. Of the 1,280 eyes in 1,255 patients receiving 2,890 intravitreal injections, there were 125 eyes with vPED. For every vPED eye that developed an RPE tear (Group 1), 3 or more vPED eyes without RPE tears (Group 2) were randomly selected in each study center during the same time period for comparison. The primary outcome measure was PED height (microm), and the secondary measures included volume index (vPED height x surface area), total macular volume, subretinal fluid, cystoid macular edema, center-point thickness, central 1 mm, and pre- and postinjection best-corrected Snellen visual acuities. RESULTS: Twenty-one vPED eyes in 21 patients among 125 vPED eyes (16.8% of all vPED eyes) developed RPE tears. The 21 Group 1 eyes were compared with the 78 randomly selected Group 2 eyes. The vPED height was significantly higher for Group 1 eyes in comparison to Group 2 eyes (mean: 648.9 +/- 245.0 vs. 338.1 +/- 201.6 microm, P < 0.001). The same was true for the following: volume index (P = 0.001), subretinal fluid (P = 0.002), and total macular volume (P = 0.04). The mean preinjection and post-RPE tear best-corrected visual acuity were 0.92 logMAR (20/166) and 0.84 logMAR (20/137), respectively (P = 0.25). Multivariate analysis showed PED height to be the only significant risk factor associated with RPE tears in Group 1 eyes [odds ratio = 0.995 (95% confidence interval: 0.992-0.997), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Elevated preinjection vPED height is the single most significant predictor for RPE tears after bevacizumab injections for vPED eyes. A vPED height >400 microm is associated with a significant risk for such a complication.

A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with observation to treat vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 5.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with observation for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to perfused central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial of 271 participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12. RESULTS: Seven percent, 27%, and 26% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the observation, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. The odds of achieving the primary outcome were 5.0 times greater in the 1-mg group than the observation group (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-14.1; P = .001) and 5.0 times greater in 4-mg group than the observation group (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-14.4; P = .001); there was no difference identified between the 1-mg and 4-mg groups (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.1; P = .97). The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the observation and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone is superior to observation for treating vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to CRVO in patients who have characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial. The 1-mg dose has a safety profile superior to that of the 4-mg dose. Application to Clinical Practice Intravitreal triamcinolone in a 1-mg dose, following the retreatment criteria applied in the SCORE Study, should be considered for up to 1 year, and possibly 2 years, for patients with characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.

A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular Edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 6.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care (grid photocoagulation in eyes without dense macular hemorrhage and deferral of photocoagulation until hemorrhage clears in eyes with dense macular hemorrhage) for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 411 participants. Main Outcome Measure Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent, 26%, and 27% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the standard care, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. None of the pairwise comparisons between the 3 groups was statistically significant at month 12. The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the standard care and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference identified in visual acuity at 12 months for the standard care group compared with the triamcinolone groups; however, rates of adverse events (particularly elevated intraocular pressure and cataract) were highest in the 4-mg group. Application to Clinical Practice Grid photocoagulation as applied in the SCORE Study remains the standard care for patients with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO who have characteristics similar to participants in the SCORE-BRVO trial. Grid photocoagulation should remain the benchmark against which other treatments are compared in clinical trials for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.