Surgically Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Contemporary Approach.

New treatment paradigms for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with an emphasis on personalized care and a multidisciplinary approach, have significantly improved patient outcomes. The incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into neoadjuvant, perioperative and adjuvant treatment algorithms is reshaping the standard of care for resectable NSCLC. Adjuvant targeted therapy trials have also paved the way for a much-needed personalized approach for patients with actionable genomic alterations. Innovative surgical techniques and judicious use of post operative radiotherapy may mitigate the toxicity associated with a multimodality approach. Amidst many new treatment options, questions remain about the best approach to consider for each patient. Measurement of minimal residual disease and achievement of pathologic complete response are emerging biomarkers of interest to help further refine treatment selection. This review summarizes the current management of resectable NSCLC, focusing on ongoing and recent advances in surgical approaches, the role of postoperative radiotherapy, and the rapidly changing field of systemic therapies.

Toward a Skin Dose-Area Metric Predictive of Moist Desquamation Using In Vivo Skin Dosimetry and Skin Assessments.

Purpose: Moist desquamation (MD) is a concerning acute side effect of radiation therapy for breast cancer, often seen in skin folds for patients having large or pendulous breasts. In vivo skin dosimetry, clinical assessments, and patient-reported skin reactions were used to determine a relationship between dose-area metrics and the development of MD, to lend insight into skin tolerances and possibly guide future treatment planning dose constraints. Methods and Materials: Skin dose was measured using GafChromic film on the inner surface of an early prototype carbon-fiber accessory for breast support to remove the inframammary fold in 20 patients at high risk of developing MD undergoing adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy. Prescribed doses were 42.5 Gray (Gy) in 16 fractions or 50 Gy in 25 fractions using 6 to 15 MV x-rays. To account for fraction size differences, analysis was performed using the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions using α/ß = 11 (EQD211). MD was assessed out to 2 weeks post radiation therapy by trained therapists and by a patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Results: Statistically significant differences in areas receiving 30 to 48 Gy (EQD211) were observed between patients who did and did not develop MD in the inframammary area. Patients receiving EQD211 maximum dose ≤ 46 Gy and ≥ 38 Gy to ≤ 50 cm2 of their breast skin did not develop MD. Conclusions: The findings of this study offer insight into the relationship between skin toxicity and areas of skin irradiated to doses up to 50 Gy. Potential skin dose constraints to test in future studies to prevent MD are suggested.

Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Moist Desquamation among Breast Radiotherapy Patients.

There has been an increasing interest in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in both the clinical and research settings to improve the quality of life among patients and to identify when clinical intervention may be needed. The primary purpose of this prospective study was to validate an acute breast skin toxicity PRO measure across a broad sample of patient body types undergoing radiation therapy. Between August 2018 and September 2019, 134 women undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT) consented to completing serial PRO measures both during and post-RT treatment and to having their skin assessed by trained trial radiation therapists. There was high patient compliance, with 124 patients (92.5%) returning to the clinic post-RT for at least one staff skin assessment. Rates of moist desquamation (MD) in the infra-mammary fold (IMF) by PRO were compared with skin assessments completed by trial radiation therapists. There was high sensitivity (86.5%) and good specificity (79.4%) between PRO and staff-reported presence of MD in the IMF, and there was a moderate correlation between the peak severity of the MD reported by PRO and assessed by staff (rho = 0.61, p < 0.001). This prospective study validates a new PRO measure to monitor the presence of MD in the IMF among women receiving breast RT.

A novel carbon-fibre adjustable reusable accessory (CARA) for supine breast positioning to reduce toxicity in breast adjuvant radiotherapy: a study protocol for a multicentre phase III randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A novel device for supine positioning in breast radiotherapy for patients with large or pendulous breasts has been developed and tested in phase II studies. This trial is designed to assess the efficacy of the device to reduce skin toxicity and unwanted normal tissue dose in comparison to the current clinical standard for supine breast support during breast radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients at high risk for moist desquamation, having infra-mammary fold or lateral ptosis, will be randomized into two arms. Patients in the control arm will receive breast radiotherapy with supine positioning using current standard of care. Patients in the experimental arm will be positioned supine with the novel device. The primary endpoint is the incidence of moist desquamation in the infra-mammary fold. We hypothesize a 20% reduction (from 50 to 30%) in the rate of moist desquamation in the study arm versus the control arm. For 80% power, two-tailed α = 0.05 and 10% loss to follow up, 110 patients will be assigned to each arm. The proportion of patients experiencing moist desquamation in the two arms will be compared using logistic regression adjusting for brassiere cup size, skin fold size, body mass index, smoking status, and dose fractionation schedule. An unadjusted comparison will also be made using the chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate. Secondary endpoints include dose-volume statistics for the lung and heart, skin dose and clinical parameters including setup time, reproducibility, and staff experience with setup procedures. Patient-reported pain, skin condition interference with sleep and daily activities, and comfort during treatment are also secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: Based on results from earlier phase II studies, it is expected that the device-enabled elimination of infra-mammary fold should reduce toxicity and improve quality of life for this patient population. Earlier studies showed reduction in dose to organs at risk including lung and heart, indicating potential for other long-term benefits for patients using the device. This study is limited to acute skin toxicity, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical factors to inform integration of the device into standard breast radiotherapy procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04257396 . Registered February 6 2020.

Breast Tangent Beam Energy, Surgical Bed-to-Skin Distance and Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Treatment.

PURPOSE: Higher energy (>6 MV) photons reduce dose inhomogeneity with breast tangent beams, thereby reducing late breast toxicity, but skin and superficial tissue sparing by higher energy beams raises concerns about local recurrence (LR) risk. This study aimed to determine whether beam energy and surgical bed-to-skin distance affect LR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This population-based study included newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers without skin involvement (pT1-4a, any-N, M0) treated with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy without bolus or beam spoilers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of LR (CILR). Multivariable analysis (MVA) included mean beam energy, age, T-stage, nodal status, overall stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), grade, margin status, extensive intraductal component (EIC), breast cancer subtype, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy. In a subgroup with contoured surgical beds, another MVA included surgical bed-to-skin distance. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 10,083 women treated from 2002 to 2011: 327 with 4 MV, 6006 with 6 MV, 2083 with >6 to 10 MV, and 1667 with >10 MV tangents. The median follow-up time was 11.1 years. The 10-year CILR was 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.4) with 4 MV, 2.8% (2.4-3.3) with 6 MV, 4.2% (3.4-5.3) with >6 to 10 MV, and 2.6% (1.9-3.5) with >10 MV. On MVA of the entire cohort, LR risk was increased with positive margins, LVI, EIC, and lack of hormone therapy, but was not associated with beam energy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05; P = .8). On MVA of 3359 patients with contoured surgical beds, LR risk was not associated with surgical bed-to-skin distance (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Use of higher breast tangent beam energies is not associated with increased risk of LR, including in cases with surgical beds that are close to the skin.

Reduction in Doses to Organs at Risk and Normal Tissue During Breast Radiation Therapy With a Carbon-Fiber Adjustable Reusable Accessory.

PURPOSE: This pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04543851) investigates a novel breast positioning device using a low density, high tensile carbon-fiber cradle to support the breast, remove the inframammary fold, and reduce dose to organs at risk for whole breast radiation therapy in the supine position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients with inframammary folds ≥1 cm or lateral ptosis in supine treatment position were planned with standard positioning and with a carbon-fiber Adjustable Reusable Accessory (CARA) breast support. Twenty patients received whole breast with or without regional nodal irradiation with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions or 50 Gy in 25 fractions using CARA. Median body mass index was 32 in this study. RESULTS: CARA removed all inframammary folds and reduced V20Gyipsilateral lung, V105%breast, and V50% body, without compromising target coverage. Median (range) V20Gyipsilateral lung for whole breast radiation therapy was 12.3% (1.4%-28.7%) with standard of care versus 10.9% (1.2%-17.3%) with CARA (Wilcoxon P = .005). Median V105% breast was 8.0% (0.0%-29%) with standard of care versus 4.0% (0.0%-23%) with CARA (P = .006) and median V50% body was 3056 mL (1476-5285 mL) versus 2780 mL (1415-5123 mL) with CARA (P = .001). CARA was compatible with deep inspiration breath hold and achieved median V25Gyheart = 0.1% (range 0%-1.9%) for all patients with left breast cancer. Skin reactions with CARA were consistent with historical data and daily variation in treatment setup was consistent with standard supine positioning. CONCLUSIONS: CARA can reduce V105%breast, lung and normal tissue dose, and remove the inframammary fold for breast patients with large or pendulous breasts and high body mass index treated in the supine position, without compromising target coverage. CARA will undergo further study in a randomized controlled trial.

The Effect of Bolus on Local Control for Patients Treated With Mastectomy and Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Bolus use during postmastectomy radiation therapy doubles the risk of grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity. Despite its unknown benefit, bolus is often prescribed during postmastectomy radiation therapy for patients without skin involvement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For women with breast cancer receiving photon 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, bolus was used routinely for chest walls but was omitted for breast reconstructions by about half of radiation oncologists from 2007 to 2011. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers without skin involvement (pT1-4a, any-N, M0) treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiation therapy. For the bolus and no-bolus groups, we compared the cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) with distant recurrence and death as competing risks and breast cancer mortality (BCM). Multivariable analysis of LR and BCM included stage, subtype, lymphovascular invasion, grade, margin status, beam energy, bolus use, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and reconstruction. RESULTS: Systemic therapy was used for 98% of the 1887 patients. The bolus group had 1569 patients and the no-bolus group had 318 patients. Bolus was used in 51% (281/550) of patients treated with reconstruction and 96% (1288/1337) of patients treated without reconstruction. The 10-year outcomes (95% confidence interval) in patients treated with and without bolus were, respectively: LR 1.9% (1.3-2.7) versus 0.9% (0.3-2.6), LRR 3.1% (2.3-4.0) versus 3.2% (1.6-5.5), and BCM 19.4% (17.3-21.6) versus 18.3% (13.9-23.2). On multivariable analysis, bolus use was not associated with better LR (hazard ratio = 1.4 [0.3-6.4]) or BCM (hazard ratio = 0.8 [0.5-1.2]). CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated with mastectomy, radiation therapy, and modern systemic therapy, the cumulative incidence of LR was low, with or without bolus. Because bolus use increases toxicity and does not reduce LR or BCM, it should no longer be used routinely for patients without skin involvement who receive systemic therapy.

Signed family physician reminder letters to women overdue for screening mammography: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether signed family physician reminder letters to women overdue for screening mammography prompts rescreening. METHODS: A randomized double-blind trial conducted in 2013 among women aged 51-73 and overdue for screening by 6-24 months. The study was carried out by the publicly funded British Columbia Cancer Agency Screening Mammography Program, which routinely sends standard reminder postcards to women who are due for mammography. Participating family physicians signed letters for the overdue women in their practices. The overdue women were mailed either the signed reminder letter and the standard reminder postcard, or the standard reminder postcard alone. The primary endpoint was the proportion of overdue women that attended a screening mammogram appointment within six months of mailing the study letters. The analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: In total, 822 family physicians participated and 5638 women were randomized. Mammography attendance by six months after mailing the reminders was 34.4% (947/2749) for women in the signed family physician letter arm, compared with 24.0% (660/2749) for women in the control arm (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age, number of previous screening mammograms, and months overdue, women in the signed letter arm were significantly more likely to return for screening than women in the control arm (RR 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.30-1.54). CONCLUSION: A signed family physician reminder letter improved mammography attendance for women who were overdue for screening mammography.

The Use of Hormone Therapy Alone Versus Hormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: A Population-Based Study.

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial randomized elderly women with estrogen receptor-positive, stage 1 breast cancer to receive either hormone therapy (HT) or HT and radiation therapy (HT-RT) after lumpectomy and showed no difference in survival. After this publication, a practice guideline made HT alone a standard treatment option in British Columbia. The subsequent population-based pattern of practice was studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All women aged 70 to 79 years, referred after lumpectomy from 1999 to 2009, with stage 1, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer were identified. The use of adjuvant HT or HT-RT was evaluated in 2 eras: before (1999-2003) and after (2005-2009) the CALGB publication. The proportion receiving each treatment in these eras was determined. Kaplan-Meier analyses with Cox regression were used for survival endpoints. The Fine and Gray method was used with non-breast cancer death as a competing risk for event-free survival. The Charlson score was used to quantify comorbidity. Adherence was defined as dispensation of 80% of prescribed HT. RESULTS: HT-RT was used in 91% of patients before (n=319) and 89% of patients after (n=403) the CALGB publication (P=.4). In the HT-alone group, the rate of HT adherence was 75% at 1 year and 55% at 4 years. The 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate was 98% with HT-RT and 90% with HT alone (P=.01), whereas the 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate was 96% with HT-RT and 95% with HT alone (P=.2). Patients with grade 3 histology or lymphovascular invasion were more likely to have low event-free survival. On multivariate analysis, treatment type did not predict overall survival (P=.3). CONCLUSIONS: Our patient outcomes closely matched those of the CALGB trial, suggesting that its results are generalizable to a population of elderly breast cancer patients with typical HT adherence. The CALGB trial results, as well as the resulting practice guideline, did not change the use of adjuvant HT-RT in our population-based cancer program.

Canadian Phase III Randomized Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventionally Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Stage I, Medically Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer - Rationale and Protocol Design for the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)-LUSTRE Trial.

We describe a Canadian phase III randomized controlled trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus conventionally hypofractionated radiotherapy (CRT) for the treatment of stage I medically inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (OCOG-LUSTRE Trial). Eligible patients are randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions for peripherally located lesions; 60 Gy in 8 fractions for centrally located lesions) or CRT (60 Gy in 15 fractions). The primary outcome of the study is 3-year local control, which we hypothesize will improve from 75% with CRT to 87.5% with SBRT. With 85% power to detect a difference of this magnitude (hazard ratio = 0.46), a 2-sided α = 0.05 and a 2:1 randomization, we require a sample size of 324 patients (216 SBRT, 108 CRT). Important secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease-free survival, toxicity, radiation-related treatment death, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. A robust radiation therapy quality assurance program has been established to assure consistent and high quality SBRT and CRT delivery. Despite widespread interest and adoption of SBRT, there still remains a concern regarding long-term control and risks of toxicity (particularly in patients with centrally located lesions). The OCOG-LUSTRE study is the only randomized phase III trial testing SBRT in a medically inoperable population, and the results of this trial will attempt to prove that the benefits of SBRT outweigh the potential risks.

Patient-reported Long-term Cosmetic Outcomes Following Short Fractionation Whole Breast Radiotherapy With Boost.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cosmetic effect of a tumor-bed boost after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI+B) using a patient-reported questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 4392 women aged 75 years and younger with unilateral early-stage breast cancer received HF-WBI alone or HF-WBI+B. From each group, 800 randomly sampled surviving and nonrelapsed women were invited to complete the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 312 women completed the questionnaire: 154 received HF-WBI alone and 158 received HF-WBI+B. Median ages of respondents were 57 years for HF-WBI alone and 52 years for HF-WBI+B (P<0.001). Women receiving HF-WBI+B had a shorter follow-up interval, higher T stage, higher grade, and were more likely to have had nodal radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There were similar responses comparing the overall appearance of the treated to untreated breast (42% stating no or slight difference for HF-WBI alone vs. 41% for HF-WBI+B, P=0.87). The HF-WBI+B group was: (a) slightly worse on the cosmetic subscale (2.3 vs. 2.1, P=0.02); (b) worse on the pain subscale (2.0 vs. 1.6, P<0.0001); but (c) better on the functional subscale (1.5 vs. 1.8, P<0.001). When the pain subscale was applied to the area around the scar (a surrogate for the tumor-bed), the 2 groups were similar (2.0 vs. 2.0, P=0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to conventional fractionated whole breast radiotherapy with a tumor-bed boost, women who received short fractionation whole breast radiotherapy with boost self-report only slightly worse long-term cosmetic and pain outcomes compared with women who received short fractionation alone.

Long-term mortality from cardiac causes after adjuvant hypofractionated vs. conventional radiotherapy for localized left-sided breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ongoing concern remains regarding cardiac injury with hypofractionated whole breast/chest-wall radiotherapy (HF-WBI) compared to conventional radiotherapy (CF-WBI) in left-sided breast cancer patients. The purpose was to determine if cardiac mortality increases with HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1998, 5334 women with early-stage breast cancer received post-operative radiotherapy to the breast/chest wall alone. A population-based database recorded baseline patient, tumor and treatment factors. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors were identified from hospital administrative records. A propensity-score model balanced risk factors between radiotherapy groups. Cause of death was coded as breast cancer, cardiac or other cause. Cumulative mortality from each cause after radiotherapy was estimated using a competing risk approach. RESULTS: For left-sided cases, median follow-up was 14.2 years. 485 women received CF-WBI, 2221 women received HF-WBI. There was no difference in 15-year mortality from cardiac causes: 4.8% with HF-WBI and 4.2% with CF-WBI (p=0.74), even after propensity-score adjustment (p=0.45). There was no difference in breast cancer mortality or other cause mortality. For right-sided cases, there was no difference in mortality for the three causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: At 15-years follow-up, cardiac mortality is not statistically different among left-sided breast cancer patients treated with HF-WBI or CF-WBI.

Late urinary side effects 10 years after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: population-based results from a multiphysician practice treating with a standardized protocol and uniform dosimetric goals.

PURPOSE: To determine late urinary toxicity (>12 months) in a large cohort of uniformly treated low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1998 to 2009, 2709 patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined low-risk and low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with Iodine 125 ((125)I) low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy; 2011 patients with a minimum of 25 months of follow-up were included in the study. Baseline patients, treatment, implant factors, and late urinary toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] grading system and International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) were recorded prospectively. Time to IPSS resolution, late RTOG genitourinary toxicity was examined with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression was done for individual covariates and multivariable models. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 54.5 months (range, 2-13 years). Actuarial toxicity rates reached 27% and 10% (RTOG ≥2 and ≥3, respectively) at 9-13 years. Symptoms resolved quickly in the majority of patients (88% in 6-12 months). The prevalence of RTOG 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 toxicity with a minimum of 7 years' follow-up was 70%, 21%, 6.4%, 2.3%, and 0.08%, respectively. Patients with a larger prostate volume, higher baseline IPSS, higher D90, acute toxicity, and age >70 years had more late RTOG ≥2 toxicity (all P≤.02). The IPSS resolved slower in patients with lower baseline IPSS and larger ultrasound prostate volume, those not receiving androgen deprivation therapy, and those with higher D90. The crude rate of RTOG 3 toxicity was 6%. Overall the rate of transurethral resection of the prostate was 1.9%; strictures, 2%; incontinence, 1.3%; severe symptoms, 1.8%; late catheterization, 1.3%; and hematuria, 0.8%. The majority (80%) resolved their symptoms in 6-12 months. CONCLUSION: Long-term urinary toxicity after brachytherapy is low. Although actuarial rates increase with longer follow-up (27% RTOG 2 and 10% RTOG 3 at 13 years), symptoms resolve relatively quickly; between 5 and 13 years' follow-up, >90% of patients have minimal urinary toxicity. Refining patient selection criteria, planning, and treatment delivery may further reduce toxicity.

Adjuvant hypofractionated versus conventional whole breast radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: long-term hospital-related morbidity from cardiac causes.

PURPOSE: The risk of cardiac injury with hypofractionated whole-breast/chest wall radiation therapy (HF-WBI) compared with conventional whole-breast/chest wall radiation therapy (CF-WBI) in women with left-sided breast cancer remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an increase in hospital-related morbidity from cardiac causes with HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1990 and 1998, 5334 women ≤ 80 years of age with early-stage breast cancer were treated with postoperative radiation therapy to the breast or chest wall alone. A population-based database recorded baseline patient, tumor, and treatment factors. Hospital administrative records identified baseline cardiac risk factors and other comorbidities. Factors between radiation therapy groups were balanced using a propensity-score model. The first event of a hospital admission for cardiac causes after radiation therapy was determined from hospitalization records. Ten- and 15-year cumulative hospital-related cardiac morbidity after radiation therapy was estimated for left- and right-sided cases using a competing risk approach. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 13.2 years. For left-sided cases, 485 women were treated with CF-WBI, and 2221 women were treated with HF-WBI. Mastectomy was more common in the HF-WBI group, whereas boost was more common in the CF-WBI group. The CF-WBI group had a higher prevalence of diabetes. The 15-year cumulative hospital-related morbidity from cardiac causes (95% confidence interval) was not different between the 2 radiation therapy regimens after propensity-score adjustment: 21% (19-22) with HF-WBI and 21% (17-25) with CF-WBI (P=.93). For right-sided cases, the 15-year cumulative hospital-related morbidity from cardiac causes was also similar between the radiation therapy groups (P=.76). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in morbidity leading to hospitalization from cardiac causes among women with left-sided early-stage breast cancer treated with HF-WBI or CF-WBI at 15-year follow-up.

Decline in acute urinary toxicity: a long-term study in 2011 patients with prostate brachytherapy within a provincial institution.

PURPOSE: To determine whether acute urinary toxicity rates improve with the overall experience of a large prostate brachytherapy program. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1998 to 2009, 2937 patients were treated with prostate brachytherapy at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. Baseline patient, treatment, and implant factors were recorded prospectively. Acute urinary toxicity data were prospectively recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit. Patients with ≥2 years of follow-up data were grouped into cohorts of 500 for analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand eleven patients met the above criteria. Acute urinary retention (AUR) in the acute period (within 6 months of implant) occurred in 9.1% of patients overall and was prolonged (catheterization >20 days) in 3.4%. Both overall AUR and prolonged AUR decreased across implant cohorts (p ≤ 0.001 in both cases). Overall acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Grades 0 and 1 urinary toxicity rate was 57.5% and RTOG Grades 2 and 3 urinary toxicity rates were 34.3% and 8.1%, respectively. Acute toxicity improved over time for both RTOG Grades ≥2 and ≥3 toxicity (p < 0.0001). International prostate symptom score resolution to baseline was achieved in 80.5% of patients with a median time of 12.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Acute AUR and RTOG urinary toxicity rates continue to decline with the increasing experience of our provincial prostate brachytherapy program, despite its expansion to new centers and addition of members. This is likely due to better patient selection, refinement in treatment planning and implantation technique, and mentorship and training process.

High-grade glioma radiation therapy target volumes and patterns of failure obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-FDOPA positron emission tomography delineations from multiple observers.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare recurrent tumor locations after radiation therapy with pretreatment delineations of high-grade gliomas from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) using contours delineated by multiple observers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas underwent computed tomography (CT), gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI, and (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT. The image sets (CT, MRI, and PET/CT) were registered, and 5 observers contoured gross tumor volumes (GTVs) using MRI and PET. Consensus contours were obtained by simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE). Interobserver variability was quantified by the percentage of volume overlap. Recurrent tumor locations after radiation therapy were contoured by each observer using CT or MRI. Consensus recurrence contours were obtained with STAPLE. RESULTS: The mean interobserver volume overlap for PET GTVs (42% ± 22%) and MRI GTVs (41% ± 22%) was not significantly different (P=.67). The mean consensus volume was significantly larger for PET GTVs (58.6 ± 52.4 cm(3)) than for MRI GTVs (30.8 ± 26.0 cm(3), P=.003). More than 95% of the consensus recurrence volume was within the 95% isodose surface for 11 of 12 (92%) cases with recurrent tumor imaging. Ten (91%) of these cases extended beyond the PET GTV, and 9 (82%) were contained within a 2-cm margin on the MRI GTV. One recurrence (8%) was located outside the 95% isodose surface. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade glioma contours obtained with (18)F-FDOPA PET had similar interobserver agreement to volumes obtained with MRI. Although PET-based consensus target volumes were larger than MRI-based volumes, treatment planning using PET-based volumes may not have yielded better treatment outcomes, given that all but 1 recurrence extended beyond the PET GTV and most were contained by a 2-cm margin on the MRI GTV.

Dose-distance metric that predicts late rectal bleeding in patients receiving radical prostate external-beam radiotherapy.

The relationship between rectal dose distribution and the incidence of late rectal complications following external-beam radiotherapy has been previously studied using dose-volume histograms or dose-surface histograms. However, they do not account for the spatial dose distribution. This study proposes a metric based on both surface dose and distance that can predict the incidence of rectal bleeding in prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy. One hundred and forty-four patients treated with radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer were prospectively followed to record the incidence of grade ≥2 rectal bleeding. Radiotherapy plans were used to evaluate a dose-distance metric that accounts for the dose and its spatial distribution on the rectal surface, characterized by a logistic weighting function with slope a and inflection point d0. This was compared to the effective dose obtained from dose-surface histograms, characterized by the parameter n which describes sensitivity to hot spots. The log-rank test was used to determine statistically significant (p < 0.05) cut-off values for the dose-distance metric and effective dose that predict for the occurrence of rectal bleeding. For the dose-distance metric, only d0 = 25 and 30 mm combined with a > 5 led to statistical significant cut-offs. For the effective dose metric, only values of n in the range 0.07-0.35 led to statistically significant cut-offs. The proposed dose-distance metric is a predictor of rectal bleeding in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Both the dose-distance metric and the effective dose metric indicate that the incidence of grade ≥2 rectal bleeding is sensitive to localized damage to the rectal surface.

Palliation by low-dose local radiation therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 2×2 Gy (total dose, 4 Gy) palliative radiation therapy (RT) regimen for treating patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in terms of response rate, response duration, and symptom relief. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Between 2003 and 2007, 54 patients with NHL were treated to 85 anatomical sites with a 2×2 Gy palliative regimen. Local response was assessed by clinical and/or radiographic data. Symptoms before and after treatment for each site treated were obtained from clinical notes in patient medical records. Median follow-up time was 1.3 years. RESULTS: For the 54 patients, the median age at time of treatment was 71.1 years old, and 57% of them were male. Of the 85 disease sites treated, 56% of sites had indolent histology, 28% of sites were diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 13% of sites had aggressive histology, and 2% of sites were shown to have other histology. Overall response rate (ORR) was 81% (49% complete response [CR], 32% partial response [PR]). The 2-year rate for freedom from local progression was 50% (95% CI, 37%-61%). The ORR for follicular lymphoma, Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) histology was 88%, compared with a 59% rate for CLL histology (p=0.005). While the ORR was similar for tumors of different sizes, the CR rate for patients with tumors<5 cm tended to be higher than those with tumors>10 cm (CR rate of 57% vs. 27%, respectively; p=0.06). For the 48 sites with clearly documented symptoms at pretreatment, 92% of sites improved after low-dose RT. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course low-dose palliative radiotherapy (2×2 Gy) is an effective treatment that results in high response rates for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This treatment regimen provides effective symptomatic relief for tumor bulk of all sizes.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer prior to liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases does not adversely affect peri-operative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is being used increasingly in patients with colorectal cancer. The effects of prior systemic adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy on morbidity following hepatic resection for metastases are not well defined. OBJECTIVES: To assess the peri-operative impact of systemic chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases. METHODS: Ninety-six resections for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases performed from July 2001 to July 2003 (93% > or =2 segments) were reviewed. Pre-operative demographics, peri-operative features, and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. Type of chemotherapy and the temporal relationship of chemotherapy to the liver resection were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 96 patients (55%) received a mean of 5.7 cycles (6.1 months) of systemic chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection, with a median interval of 12 months from end of chemotherapy to liver resection (range 1-75 months). Thirty-five received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) alone, nine had irinotecan (CPT-11) in addition to 5-FU/LV, and nine were not specified. Pre-operative age, sex, co-morbidities, ASA score, biochemical and liver enzyme profiles, tumor number, and extent and technique of hepatic resection were the same in the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts. Mean tumor size was smaller (4.5 cm vs. 5.8 cm) and synchronous metastases were half as common (25% vs. 49%) in the chemotherapy group. Liver resection operative time was equivalent (270 min) in the two groups. Higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (1,000 ml vs. 850 ml), but fewer transfusions (23% vs. 15%) were associated with the chemotherapy group. Although not statistically significant, post-operative liver enzyme peaks were higher in the chemotherapy group (AST = 402 U/L vs. 302 U/L, P = 0.09 and ALT = 433 U/L vs. 312 U/L, P = 0.1). Peak changes in INR and serum bilirubin did not differ. Complications and length of stay (LOS) did not differ between the groups. The only post-operative death was in the non-chemotherapy group. Interestingly, hepatic steatosis was present in 28% of the non-chemotherapy cases and 57% of the chemotherapy resection specimens (P = 0.005) and was marked (>30%) in 7% and 10%, respectively. Further analysis of the chemotherapy group based on the interval between completion of chemotherapy and the hepatic resection (<6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, and >2 years) revealed a trend towards worse outcomes in most categories for those in the >2 years cohort. When comparing the 5-FU/LV alone, to the CPT-11 group there were no significant differences except higher intra-operative blood loss in the group receiving 5-FU/LV alone (1,295 ml vs. 756 ml, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite variations in biochemical function and hepatic steatosis, short-term clinical outcomes are not affected by the administration of chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection. Furthermore, there is no detrimental effect of close timing of chemotherapy prior to resection, and there are no appreciable differences between irinotecan containing regimes and more traditional 5-FU-only based therapies, although the subset sample sizes were small in this study.