Response of small female and midsize male models with active musculature in pre-crash maneuvers and low-speed impacts.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate computationally efficient small female (54.1 kg, 149.9 cm) and midsize male (78.4 kg, 174.9 cm) models with active muscles using volunteer sled test data in a frontal-oblique loading direction and check their response in crash mitigating maneuvers using field test data. METHODS: The Global Human Body Models Consortium small female (F05-OS+Active) and midsize male (M50-OS+Active) simplified occupant models with active musculature were used in this study. The data from a total of 48 previously published sled test experiments were used to simulate a total of 16 simulations. The experimental study recorded occupant responses of six small female and six midsize male volunteers (n = 12 total) in two muscle conditions (relaxed and braced) at two acceleration pulses representing pre-crash braking (1.0 g) and a low-speed impact (2.5 g). Each model's kinematics and reaction forces were compared with experimental data. Along with sled test simulations, both of these models were simulated in abrupt braking, lane change, and turn and brake events using literature data. A total of 36 field test simulations were carried out. A CORA analysis was carried out using reaction load and displacement time-history data for sled test simulations and head CG displacement time-history was used for field test simulations. RESULTS: The occupant peak forward and lateral excursion results of both active models reasonably matched the volunteer data in the low-speed sled test simulations for both pulse severities. The differences between the active and control models were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) based on the results of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests using peak forward and lateral excursion data. The average CORA scores calculated for the sled test (sled test: M50-OS+Active= 0.543, male control= 0.471, F05-OS+Active= 0.621, female control= 0.505) and field test (M50-OS+Active= 0.836, male control= 0.466, F05-OS+Active= 0.832, female control= 0.787) simulations were higher for active models than control. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of the F05-OS+Active and M50-OS+Active models were better than control models based on overall CORA scores calculated using both sled and field tests. The results highlight their ability to predict occupant kinematics in crash-mitigating maneuvers and low-speed impacts in the frontal, lateral and frontal-oblique directions.

Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to implement active muscles in a computationally efficient small female finite element model (54.1 kg, 149.9 cm) suitable for predicting occupant response during precrash braking and low-speed frontal sled tests. We further calibrate and compare its results against an average male model (78.4 kg, 174.9 cm) using the same developmental approach. METHODS: The active female model (F05-OS + Active) was developed by adding active skeletal muscle elements (n = 232) to the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) 5th percentile female simplified occupant model (F05-OS v2.3). The muscle properties and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) for each muscle were taken from the M50-OS + Active v2.3 model but PCSAs were mass scaled to a 5th percentile female. A total of 8 simulations were conducted; 2 acceleration pulses (1.0 g and 2.5 g), 2 models (F05-OS + Active and M50-OS + Active), and 2 muscle states (activation and control; e.g., no activation). Each model's kinematics and reaction forces were compared with experimental data. Occupant responses of 6 5th percentile female and 6 50th percentile male volunteers (n = 12 total) were used. The data depict occupant response in precrash braking and low-speed frontal sled tests in a rigid test buck. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Virginia Tech institutional review board. Each volunteer was in a relaxed state before the applied acceleration. RESULTS: The occupant peak forward excursion results of both active models reasonably match the volunteer data for both pulse severities. The differences between active and control models were found to be significant by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < .05). The reaction loads of the active and control models lie within the experimental corridors. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to concurrently calibrate and compare equivalently developed computational models of females and males in precrash and low-speed impacts. The modeling approach is capable of capturing the varied kinematics observed in the relaxed condition, which may be an important factor in studies focused on the effects of low-g vehicle dynamics on the occupant position. Finally, the computationally efficient modeling approach is imperative given the long duration (>500 ms) of the events simulated.