Hong Kong Anaphylaxis Consortium Consensus Statements on prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors in the acute care setting.

BACKGROUND: Adrenaline autoinjectors (AAInj) facilitates early administration of adrenaline and remains the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. However, only a minority of anaphylaxis survivors in Hong Kong are prescribed AAInj and formal guidance do not exist. International anaphylaxis guidelines have been largely based on Western studies, which may not be as relevant for non-Western populations. OBJECTIVE: To formulate a set of consensus statements on the prescription of AAInj in Hong Kong. METHODS: Consensus statements were formulated by the Hong Kong Anaphylaxis Consortium by the Delphi method. Agreement was defined as greater than or equal to 80% consensus. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate differences between allergy and emergency medicine physicians. RESULTS: A total of 7 statements met criteria for consensus with good overall agreement between allergy and emergency medicine physicians. AAInj should be used as first-line treatment and prescribed for all patients at risk of anaphylaxis. This should be prescribed prior to discharge from the Accident and Emergency Department together with an immediate referral to an allergy center. The decision for prescribing AAInj should be based on the severity of previous reactions; including objective signs of respiratory involvement, objective signs of cardiovascular involvement and multiorgan involvement (regardless of severity). Patient demographics and comorbidities, specifically history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, should also be considered. Patients deemed eligible for AAInj should be offered avoidance advice and prescribed one AAInj while awaiting review by allergists. AAInj technique should be demonstrated by a healthcare professional or instruction video, and a return demonstration by the patient is required. The patient should also be counseled that the decision on the continued need of AAInj prescription in the long-term should be reviewed by an allergist. CONCLUSION: Consensus statements support the prescription of AAInj by front-line physicians with subsequent allergist review when treating patients at risk of anaphylaxis in Hong Kong.

Prediction of prognosis in acute paraquat poisoning using severity scoring system in emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate and compare the performance of serum paraquat level, severity index of paraquat poisoning (SIPP), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), modified Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (MSAPS II), and modified Expanded Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (MSAPS IIe) calculated immediately after arrival on emergency department (ED) for assessing the mortality of acute paraquat poisoning. METHODS: A retrospective study design was employed with the main outcome measure being mortality from year 2001 to 2010. MSAPS II and MSAPS IIe were employed in that assessment of the 24-hour urine output were not included. The performance of APACHE II, MSAPS II, MSAPS IIe, serum paraquat level and SIPP for prediction of mortality in acute paraquat poisoning were compared. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled in the study. The area under the ROC curve for APACHE II (0.800) was statistically lower than those for MSAPS II, MSAPS IIe, SIPP and serum paraquat (0.879, 0.893, 0.924,and 0.951, respectively). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test C statistic revealed that APACHE II, MSAPS II, MSAPS IIe and serum paraquat level showed good calibrations (chi-square 8.477 and p = 0.388, chi-square 4.614 and p = 0.798, chi-squared 5.301 and p = 0.725, chi-squared 1.009 and p = 0.985 respectively), but poor calibration for SIPP (chi-square 21.293 and p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Serum paraquat level is still the most reliable prognosis factor in acute paraquat poisoning. But MSAPS II or MSAPS IIe calculated immediately after arrival on ED may be helpful to predict mortality in acute paraquat poisoning especially when hospital has no facility to measure serum paraquat level.

Reversal of Brugada electrocardiographic pattern with sodium bicarbonate solution after amitriptyline overdose.

A Brugada electrocardiographic pattern (BEP) associated with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) overdose has been reported rarely, but its reversal by sodium bicarbonate has not been described previously. We reported a case of amitriptyline overdose induced Type 1 BEP which was reversed by 150 mEq of intravenous sodium bicarbonate.

Hepatitis induced by Teucrium viscidum.

INTRODUCTION: In Hong Kong, Chinese medicine is popular and coexists with orthodox Western medicine. Despite a long history of use, many herbs have not been submitted to rigorous scientific testing and there are reports of hepatotoxicity. We describe a woman who developed acute hepatitis after drinking an herbal remedy containing Teucrium viscidum. CASE REPORT: A previously healthy 51-year-old woman was admitted to a regional hospital because of jaundice, with complaints of nausea, vomiting, and tea-colored urine for three days prior to admission. She denied any recent ingestion of known hepatotoxins, but she had consumed an herbal remedy for low back pain for three days before the onset of symptoms. She was icteric and had a serum total bilirubin level of 11.4 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase of 2620 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 1876 U/L, and alkaline phosphatase level of 186 U/L. Discontinuation of the herbal remedy resulted in normalization of the liver enzymes two months later. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of hepatitis probably related to use of Teucrium viscidum. The herb is infrequently used in Chinese medicine for treatment of rheumatic and bleeding disorders. T. viscidum contains teucvin, similar to other Teucrium species and is related to T. chamaedrys, commonly known as germander, which is a well documented cause of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Teucrium viscidum can cause hepatotoxicity similar to that of germander.

Acute renal failure and hepatitis following ingestion of carp gallbladder.

INTRODUCTION: Fish gallbladder has long been used as folk remedy in China. Poisoning due to carp gallbladder ingestion has been reported in many countries but the majority of cases are in Chinese journals. We report a case of grass carp gallbladder poisoning and review the literature, including the Chinese reports. CASE REPORT: A 67 year old woman ingested a grass carp gallbladder and complained of nausea and epigastric pain in two hours, and had elevated alanine aminotransferase by 8 hours. She developed oliguria on day three and hemodialysis was performed on day five, following which she gradually recovered and was discharged on day 26. DISCUSSION: Carp gallbladder contains 5 alpha-cyprinol sulphate, which is hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic. The exact mechanism of toxicity is unknown. Mild poisoning causes only gastroenteritis, liver and kidneys are affected in moderate poisoning, and multi-organ failure occurs in severe poisoning. The initial symptoms are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain, which usually occur 5 to 12 hours after ingestion. Raised liver enzymes or jaundice occurs in 75% to 87% of patients. Acute renal impairment occurs in 72% to 87% of patients, usually on day 3 to 6. Treatment is supportive and often included hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: The ingestion of grass carp gallbladder may result in transient hepatitis with subsequent acute renal failure. This case also illustrated the importance of understanding the use and potential serious complications of alternative medicines. Fish gallbladder poisoning should be considered in unexplained acute renal failure in Chinese and Asian patients.