Validación de la versión en español del cuestionario COPD-Q/EPOC-Q de conocimiento de la EPOC / Validation of the Spanish Version of the COPD-Q Questionnaire on COPD Knowledge

Fundamentos: A pesar de que el reconocimiento de la importancia de la formación de los pacientes con EPOC ha crecido en los últimos años, no se está midiendo el grado de conocimiento de dicha enfermedad por falta de instrumentos específicos. El objetivo de este estudio es validar el cuestionario de conocimiento de la EPOC (EPOC-Q) de 13 ítems. Métodos: Tras la doble traducción del EPOC-Q se llevó a cabo la validación lógica y de contenido por un grupo de neumólogos expertos en EPOC y 8 pacientes con la enfermedad. La fiabilidad se estudió en un grupo independiente de 59 pacientes con EPOC grave vistos en planta o en consultas de neumología de 6 centros de varias regiones de España (Andalucía, Baleares, Castilla-La Mancha, Galicia y Madrid). Esta muestra también se usó para otras validaciones internas y externas. Resultados: El grupo tenía una media de edad de aproximadamente 70 años y una alfabetización en salud media baja. El número de respuestas acertadas fue de 8,3 (DE: 1,9), con una mediana de 8 y un rango entre 3 y 13. Los efectos suelo y techo fueron 0 y 1,5%, respectivamente. La consistencia interna del cuestionario es buena (alfa de Cronbach de 0,85) y la fiabilidad también alta, siendo el coeficiente kappa > 0,6 en todos los ítems y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase de la puntuación total de 0,84. Conclusión: El cuestionario EPOC-Q de 13 ítems es un instrumento válido, aplicable y fiable para evaluar el conocimiento de la EPOC

Rationale: Although recognition of the importance of educating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients has grown in recent years, their understanding of this disease is not being measured due to a lack of specific instruments. The aim of this study was to validate the COPD-Q questionnaire, a 13-item instrument for determining COPD knowledge. Methods: The COPD-Q was translated and backtranslated, and subsequently submitted to logic and content validation by a group of COPD experts and 8 COPD patients. Reliability was studied in an independent group of 59 patients with severe COPD seen in the pulmonology ward or clinics of 6 hospitals in Spain (Andalusia, Baleares, Castilla-La Mancha, Galicia and Madrid). This sample was also used for other internal and external validations. Results: The mean age of the group was approximately 70 years and their health awareness was low-to-medium. The number of correct answers was 8.3 (standard deviation: 1.9), median 8, range 3-13. Floor and ceiling effects were 0% and 1.5%, respectively. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) and reliability was also high, with a kappa coefficient > 0.6 for all items and an intraclass correlation efficient of 0.84 for the total score. Conclusion: The 13-item COPD-Q is a valid, applicable and reliable instrument for determining patients' knowledge of COPD

Validation of the Spanish Version of the COPD-Q Questionnaire on COPD Knowledge.

RATIONALE: Although recognition of the importance of educating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients has grown in recent years, their understanding of this disease is not being measured due to a lack of specific instruments. The aim of this study was to validate the COPD-Q questionnaire, a 13-item instrument for determining COPD knowledge. METHODS: The COPD-Q was translated and backtranslated, and subsequently submitted to logic and content validation by a group of COPD experts and 8 COPD patients. Reliability was studied in an independent group of 59 patients with severe COPD seen in the pulmonology ward or clinics of 6 hospitals in Spain (Andalusia, Baleares, Castilla-La Mancha, Galicia and Madrid). This sample was also used for other internal and external validations. RESULTS: The mean age of the group was approximately 70 years and their health awareness was low-to-medium. The number of correct answers was 8.3 (standard deviation: 1.9), median 8, range 3-13. Floor and ceiling effects were 0% and 1.5%, respectively. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.85) and reliability was also high, with a kappa coefficient >0.6 for all items and an intraclass correlation efficient of 0.84 for the total score. CONCLUSION: The 13-item COPD-Q is a valid, applicable and reliable instrument for determining patients' knowledge of COPD.

The association between COPD and heart failure risk: a review.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly associated with heart failure (HF) in clinical practice since they share the same pathogenic mechanism. Both conditions incur significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the prognosis of COPD and HF combined is poorer than for either disease alone. Nevertheless, usually only one of them is diagnosed. An active search for each condition using clinical examination and additional tests including plasma natriuretic peptides, lung function testing, and echocardiography should be obtained. The combination of COPD and HF presents many therapeutic challenges. The beneficial effects of selective ß1-blockers should not be denied in stable patients who have HF and coexisting COPD. Additionally, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin-receptor blockers may reduce the morbidity and mortality of COPD patients. Moreover, caution is advised with use of inhaled ß2-agonists for the treatment of COPD in patients with HF. Finally, noninvasive ventilation, added to conventional therapy, improves the outcome of patients with acute respiratory failure due to hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD or HF in situations of acute pulmonary edema. The establishment of a combined and integrated approach to managing these comorbidities would seem an appropriate strategy. Additional studies providing new data on the pathogenesis and management of patients with COPD and HF are needed, with the purpose of trying to improve quality of life as well as survival of these patients.