Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cytometry ; 22(3): 232-42, 1995 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8556955

RESUMO

Flow cytometry has become the preferred technique by which critical clinical evaluations are made such as CD4 counts and aneuploid analyses. Mounting concern has arisen over the numerous techniques, reagents, and different flow cytometric employed to determine these data. Several studies have documented significant differences in results when different flow cytometers are utilized to analyze the same sample. Fluorochrome-dependent instrument sensitivity also has been reported by numerous investigators. As more and more procedures are performed by cytometric analysis, light scatter and fluorescence limitations, which appear to be instrument dependent, demonstrate that not all flow cytometers have the same capabilities. Attempts were made to calculate molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) values on nine different flow cytometers using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and R-phycoerythrin (R-PE) labeled microsphere reference standards produced by Flow Cytometry Standards Corporation (FCSC). Dramatic differences were observed in the ability of some cytometers to resolve these microspheres. The diminished resolution appeared to be instrument model and fluorochrome dependent. We propose that diminished fluorescence resolution in certain flow cytometers could be responsible for significant variability in clinical values reported from laboratories utilizing different flow cytometers.


Assuntos
Citometria de Fluxo/instrumentação , Corantes Fluorescentes , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Citometria de Fluxo/normas , Fluoresceína-5-Isotiocianato , Microesferas , Ficoeritrina , Padrões de Referência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Hand Surg Br ; 17(5): 569-74, 1992 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1479252

RESUMO

Although it is thought to be a relatively common tumour, only 34 positively identified cases of subungual exostosis in the hand have been found in the literature to date. 16 further cases are reported, making this the largest published series. Seven cases presented with an incorrect diagnosis. An X-ray easily differentiates the tumour from an osteochondroma of the distal phalanx, a spike of bone from a crush injury, or a response to a penetrating injury called a turret exostosis. Removal of the deformed nail and excision of the mass from the distal phalanx produces a useful finger without pain, tender scar, or resultant nail deformity. No case of malignancy has ever been reported.


Assuntos
Exostose/cirurgia , Dedos/cirurgia , Exostose/diagnóstico por imagem , Exostose/etiologia , Feminino , Dedos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Unhas Malformadas/etiologia , Unhas Malformadas/cirurgia , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...