Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(10): 633-641, 2018 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29610290

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The implementation and quality assessment of a pharmacy services call center (PSCC) for outpatient pharmacies and specialty pharmacy services within an academic health system are described. SUMMARY: Prolonged wait times in outpatient pharmacies or hold times on the phone affect the ability of pharmacies to capture and retain prescriptions. To support outpatient pharmacy operations and improve quality, a PSCC was developed to centralize handling of all outpatient and specialty pharmacy calls. The purpose of the PSCC was to improve the quality of pharmacy telephone services by (1) decreasing the call abandonment rate, (2) improving the speed of answer, (3) increasing first-call resolution, (4) centralizing all specialty pharmacy and prior authorization calls, (5) increasing labor efficiency and pharmacy capacities, (6) implementing a quality evaluation program, and (7) improving workplace satisfaction and retention of outpatient pharmacy staff. The PSCC centralized pharmacy calls from 9 pharmacy locations, 2 outpatient clinics, and a specialty pharmacy. Since implementation, the PSCC has achieved and maintained program goals, including improved abandonment rate, speed of answer, and first-call resolution. A centralized 24-7 support line for specialty pharmacy patients was also successfully established. A quality calibration program was implemented to ensure service quality and excellent patient experience. Additional ongoing evaluations measure the impact of the PSCC on improving workplace satisfaction and retention of outpatient pharmacy staff. CONCLUSION: The design and implementation of the PSCC have significantly improved the health system's patient experiences, efficiency, and quality.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Call Centers/organização & administração , Assistência Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Call Centers/normas , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Reorganização de Recursos Humanos , Assistência Farmacêutica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Especialização , Telefone , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Clin Liver Dis ; 7(2): 369-79, vi, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12879989

RESUMO

Troglitazone, the first of the thiazolidinediones, caused severe hepatotoxicity including liver failure in several patients. It appears, however, that the thiazolidinediones as a class are not as hepatotoxic as troglitazone. Comparative data at comparable dates of usage indicate that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are not significant hepatotoxins. This is further supported by experimental data that demonstrate that troglitazone, alone among the thiazolidinediones, is toxic in hepatocyte cell culture. All of the thiazolidinediones cause ALT elevations; however, ALT monitoring for hepatotoxicity does not appear to prevent serious liver disease nor reduce patient risk.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Falência Hepática Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Tiazolidinedionas , Cromanos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pioglitazona , Rosiglitazona , Troglitazona , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14635823

RESUMO

Older anticonvulsants have been used to manage both chronic pain and bipolar disorders. As the armamentarium of anticonvulsants increases, the role of the newer agents for pain or mood disorders is uncertain. This paper summarizes the clinical data available with gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and topiramate for bipolar disorder and lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and topiramate for neuropathic pain.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14640355

RESUMO

Meperidine is FDA-approved for relieving moderate to severe pain and has been widely used since its introduction in the 1930s. However, the drug is no longer considered a first-line analgesic. Many clinicians recommend that meperidine be removed from health-systems or that its use be restricted, due to concerns about adverse reactions, drug interactions, and normeperidine neurotoxicity. In addition, clinical evidence shows that meperidine has no advantage over other opioids for biliary colic or pancreatitis. The formulary status of meperidine has been extensively discussed at University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics. The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee has been working with hospital staff to assess the impact of either removing meperidine from the formulary, or limiting its use. The Drug Information Service developed this document to help pharmacists respond to prescribers' questions and to alleviate the prescribers' concerns about these changes. Information is provided comparing meperidine with other opioids, including dosage equivalency, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, cost, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Where available, alternatives to meperidine are suggested for various indications.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Formulários de Hospitais como Assunto , Meperidina/efeitos adversos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas , Química Farmacêutica , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Meperidina/química , Comitê de Farmácia e Terapêutica , Utah
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14650458

RESUMO

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal toxicity is associated with morbidity and mortality, and given the very wide use of NSAIDs, is problematic and costly to society. Several options are now available to minimize gastrointestinal toxicity from NSAIDs. These options include the proton pump inhibitors, misoprostil, double-dose H2-receptor blockers and the COX-2 selective NSAIDs. No head-to-head clinical trials have compared these options. The effectiveness of these strategies to minimize NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity is summarized. In addition, their associated adverse effect profiles and costs are compared.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Gastroenteropatias/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapêutico , Bombas de Próton/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...