Effect of Extraction Procedure Substitution on Automated Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Cyclosporine Assays.

BACKGROUND: An erroneously high tacrolimus level was reported to a clinician. A root cause analysis investigation failed to determine the cause of the error. It was suspected that the incorrect preanalytical extraction reagent and procedure was used during testing; however, how this would affect the assayed drug concentration was unclear. Here we investigated the effect of the substitution of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine extraction reagents on assayed drug concentration. METHODS: Tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine concentration were measured on the Abbott Architect i2000 analyzer. Each assay requires a preanalytical extraction step, with a distinct reagent. We investigated the effect of the substitution of the extraction reagents and procedure between the 3 assays on the measured drug concentration. Two experiments were performed, one on samples of known drug concentration and one on samples with no drug present. RESULTS: Substituting cyclosporine and sirolimus extraction procedures increased assayed tacrolimus concentrations from 5.6 to 8.47 (+51.25%) and 8.13 (+45.18%) ng/mL, respectively. Extraction procedure substitutions decreased assayed sirolimus from 13.63 to 4.60 (-66.25%) and 8.07 (-40.79%) ng/mL for cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Cyclosporine concentration increased from 274.60 to 391.30 (+42.50%) ng/mL using sirolimus extraction reagents and to 757.30 (+175.78%) ng/mL using tacrolimus extraction reagents. Cross-reactivity was observed between the tacrolimus assay and sirolimus and cyclosporine extraction reagents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes, both positive and negative, are observed in assayed drug concentration when incorrect extraction procedures are used in the Abbott i2000 tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine assays. Preanalytic extraction procedures should be investigated when performing root cause analysis for erroneous therapeutic drug values.

Analytical assessment and validation of the ProteinSimple ELLA serum B-cell maturation antigen assay.

Objectives: Soluble B-Cell Maturation Antigen (sBCMA) is a degradation product of plasma cell-bound BCMA found in serum. Serum sBCMA concentrations correlate with bone marrow plasma cellularity, making it an attractive biomarker for monitoring plasma cell disorders, such as multiple myeloma. Here we evaluated the automated BCMA immunoassay for the ProteinSimple ELLA, for the analysis of sBCMA. Design & methods: Inter and intra-run precision was assessed through replicate sBCMA measurements at 3 different concentration levels. Linearity was determined through serial dilution of a high sBMCA patient sample. Accuracy was assessed through split specimen analysis on two separate lots of reagents. Stability was assessed at 3 temperature levels over 14 days. Cross-reactivity was assessed on BCMA targeting and non-targeting chemotherapeutics. A reference range was established through the analysis of 146 healthy donor samples. The effect of endogenous interferents was assessed through spiking and recovery studies. Results: Inter and intra-run precision studies afforded CVs of <10% at all three concentration levels. Analytical measurement range was confirmed from 0.1 to 7 ng/mL. Accuracy studies afforded a slope of 0.976, intercept of 1.22, R2 of 0.996. Assayed sBCMA values were unaffected by endogenous interferents and non-BMCA targeting antibodies. BCMA targeting therapeutics negatively affected assayed sBCMA concentrations. The reference range was established at 19-58 ng/mL sBCMA is analytically stable. Conclusions: The ProteinSimple ELLA sBCMA assay shows acceptable performance for the clinical assessment of sBCMA. The assay was highly affected by BCMA targeting therapeutics, thereby patients undergoing this therapy should not have their sBCMA levels assessed by this method.