Microfluidic reactor designed for time-lapsed imaging of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.

The effect of tissue-specific biochemical heterogeneities of lignocellulosic biomass on biomass deconstruction is best understood through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) combined with immunohistochemistry. However, this process can be challenging, given the fragility of plant materials, and is generally not able to observe changes in the same section of biomass during both pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. To overcome this challenge, a custom polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic imaging reactor was constructed using standard photolithographic techniques. As proof of concept, CLSM was performed on 60 µm-thick corn stem sections during pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis using the imaging reactor. Based on the fluorescence images, the less lignified parenchyma cell walls were more susceptible to pretreatment than the lignin-rich vascular bundles. During enzymatic hydrolysis, the highly lignified protoxylem cell wall was the most resistant, remaining unhydrolyzed even after 48 h. Therefore, imaging thin whole biomass sections was useful to obtain tissue-specific changes during biomass deconstruction.

A high solids field-to-fuel research pipeline to identify interactions between feedstocks and biofuel production.

BACKGROUND: Environmental factors, such as weather extremes, have the potential to cause adverse effects on plant biomass quality and quantity. Beyond adversely affecting feedstock yield and composition, which have been extensively studied, environmental factors can have detrimental effects on saccharification and fermentation processes in biofuel production. Only a few studies have evaluated the effect of these factors on biomass deconstruction into biofuel and resulting fuel yields. This field-to-fuel evaluation of various feedstocks requires rigorous coordination of pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation experiments. A large number of biomass samples, often in limited quantity, are needed to thoroughly understand the effect of environmental conditions on biofuel production. This requires greater processing and analytical throughput of industrially relevant, high solids loading hydrolysates for fermentation, and led to the need for a laboratory-scale high solids experimentation platform. RESULTS: A field-to-fuel platform was developed to provide sufficient volumes of high solids loading enzymatic hydrolysate for fermentation. AFEX pretreatment was conducted in custom pretreatment reactors, followed by high solids enzymatic hydrolysis. To accommodate enzymatic hydrolysis of multiple samples, roller bottles were used to overcome the bottlenecks of mixing and reduced sugar yields at high solids loading, while allowing greater sample throughput than possible in bioreactors. The roller bottle method provided 42-47% greater liquefaction compared to the batch shake flask method for the same solids loading. In fermentation experiments, hydrolysates from roller bottles were fermented more rapidly, with greater xylose consumption, but lower final ethanol yields and CO2 production than hydrolysates generated with shake flasks. The entire platform was tested and was able to replicate patterns of fermentation inhibition previously observed for experiments conducted in larger-scale reactors and bioreactors, showing divergent fermentation patterns for drought and normal year switchgrass hydrolysates. CONCLUSION: A pipeline of small-scale AFEX pretreatment and roller bottle enzymatic hydrolysis was able to provide adequate quantities of hydrolysate for respirometer fermentation experiments and was able to overcome hydrolysis bottlenecks at high solids loading by obtaining greater liquefaction compared to batch shake flask hydrolysis. Thus, the roller bottle method can be effectively utilized to compare divergent feedstocks and diverse process conditions.