Looking Across the Drape: A Novel Quality Improvement Approach to Understanding Surgeon and Anesthesiologist Burnout.

OBJECTIVE: To identify well-being threats for surgeons and anesthesiologists and develop interventions using the Quality of Life Improvement (QOLI) approach. BACKGROUND: Developing feasible perioperative well-being interventions requires identifying shared and specialty-specific well-being needs. The QOLI framework integrates human-centered design, implementation science, and quality improvement to address well-being needs. METHODS: Anesthesia and surgery faculty in eight perioperative departments at an academic medical center completed cross-sectional surveys containing validated measures of well-being and workplace satisfaction, and open-ended questions about professional motivations, pain points, strategies for improvement, and well-being priorities. Using template analysis, we analyzed open-ended survey data and presented resulting themes at a joint-specialty town hall for live-voting to identify well-being priorities. RESULTS: 104 perioperative faculty completed the survey. Across specialties, higher MHC-SF scores (representative of individual global well-being) were associated with higher satisfaction with workplace control, values, decision latitude, and social support. Anesthesiologists reported lower satisfaction and control than surgeons across multiple domains. Template analysis yielded five areas for intervention: (1) Work culture, (2) Work environment/resources, (3) Sources of fulfillment, (4) Work/life harmony, (5) Financial compensation. Surgeons and anesthesiologists both prioritized high-quality patient care but differed in their other top priorities. The most frequently cited well-being threats for surgeons were OR inefficiencies/delays and excessive workload, while anesthesiologists cited understaffing and unpredictable work hours. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and anesthesiologists share many needs and priorities, with pain points that are often negatively synergistic. Applying the QOLI approach across specialties allows for well-being interventions that honor complexity and promote the development of feasible solutions.

Patient Safety and Clinician Well-Being.

Clinician well-being and patient safety are intricately linked. We propose that organizational factors (ie, elements of the perioperative work environment and culture) affect both, as opposed to a bidirectional causal relationship. Threats to patient safety and clinician well-being include clinician mental health issues, negative work environments, poor teamwork and communication, and staffing shortages. Opportunities to mitigate these threats include the normalization of mental health care, peer support, psychological safety, just culture, teamwork and communication training, and creative staffing approaches.

Drivers of Well-Being and Burnout in Anesthesiology Residents.

Background: With more than 50% of anesthesiology residents reporting burnout, many residency programs have begun creating wellness programs to address burnout and promote well-being. However, to date, many wellness initiatives have focused on individual strategies rather than systems approaches to improve the learning environment. Individual-focused interventions in the absence of systematic efforts can lead to resentment, resistance, and worsening burnout and precipitate a loss of trust in leadership and the organization. Here, we describe a process to engage anesthesiology residents, who are key stakeholders, by exploring their perspectives on burnout and well-being to better inform systematic interventions to improve the clinical work and learning environments. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with second- and third-year clinical anesthesia residents at the University of California, San Francisco, using the areas of worklife model as sensitizing concepts. We conducted a thematic analysis on transcribed interviews grounded in constructivist orientation. Results: We identified the following 3 major categories of themes based on interviews with 10 residents: (1) definition of well-being, (2) challenges to well-being, and (3) strategies for coping with challenges and burnout. Challenges described by anesthesiology residents align with the areas of the worklife model, with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic precipitating additional threats in the domains of workload and community. Conclusions: Anesthesiology residents' definition of well-being includes both individual (resilience) and systemic (meaning in work, job autonomy, and control) factors, reaffirming that positive work and learning environments are critical to professional well-being.

Quality of Life Improvement: A Novel Framework and Approach to Well-Being.

Physician burnout is a complex problem that requires creative solutions. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of systems approaches to address physician well-being, few tools exist for organizations to bridge the gap between well-being theory and practice. As demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic, new threats to well-being can arise at any time, necessitating an iterative approach. Here we outline the quality of life improvement (QOLI) approach, a novel framework and approach that incorporates principles of human-centered design (HCD), quality improvement (QI), and implementation science (IS) to address clinician well-being. Additionally, we share our experience using this approach in a large academic anesthesiology department.

Awake spinal surgery: simplifying the learning curve with a patient selection algorithm.

OBJECTIVE: There is a learning curve for surgeons performing "awake" spinal surgery. No comprehensive guidelines have been proposed for the selection of ideal candidates for awake spinal fusion or decompression. The authors sought to formulate an algorithm to aid in patient selection for surgeons who are in the startup phase of awake spinal surgery. METHODS: The authors developed an algorithm for selecting patients appropriate for awake spinal fusion or decompression using spinal anesthesia supplemented with mild sedation and local analgesia. The anesthetic protocol that was used has previously been reported in the literature. This algorithm was formulated based on a multidisciplinary team meeting and used in the first 15 patients who underwent awake lumbar surgery at a single institution. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients who underwent decompression or lumbar fusion using the awake protocol were reviewed. The mean patient age was 61 ± 12 years, with a median BMI of 25.3 (IQR 2.7) and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.1 ± 1.7; 7 patients (47%) were female. Key patient inclusion criteria were no history of anxiety, 1 to 2 levels of lumbar pathology, moderate stenosis and/or grade I spondylolisthesis, and no prior lumbar surgery at the level where the needle is introduced for anesthesia. Key exclusion criteria included severe and critical central canal stenosis or patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria. Using the novel algorithm, 14 patients (93%) successfully underwent awake spinal surgery without conversion to general anesthesia. One patient (7%) was converted to general anesthesia due to insufficient analgesia from spinal anesthesia. Overall, 93% (n = 14) of the patients were assessed as American Society of Anesthesiologists class II, with 1 patient (7%) as class III. The mean operative time was 115 minutes (± 60 minutes) with a mean estimated blood loss of 46 ± 39 mL. The median hospital length of stay was 1.3 days (IQR 0.1 days). No patients developed postoperative complications and only 1 patient (7%) required reoperation. The mean Oswestry Disability Index score decreased following operative intervention by 5.1 ± 10.8. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose an easy-to-use patient selection algorithm with the aim of assisting surgeons with patient selection for awake spinal surgery while considering BMI, patient anxiety, levels of surgery, and the extent of stenosis. The algorithm is specifically intended to assist surgeons who are in the learning curve of their first awake spinal surgery cases.

Conflict Management Education for Anesthesiology Residents: Bridging the Gap in Interpersonal and Communication Skills Competency.

Effective communication and conflict management are important skills for anesthesiologists and are designated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as elements of the "interpersonal and communication skill" competency (ACGME Anesthesiology Milestone Project 2020). However, structured conflict management education for anesthesiology residents remains limited. To address this gap, we developed and implemented a conflict management session incorporating didactics and application exercises using role-play and high-fidelity simulation (SIM) for anesthesiology residents (postgraduate years 3 and 4) at a tertiary academic medical institution. These sessions were well-received, and both role-play and SIM appear to help residents learn conflict management skills.

Increasing the use of multimodal analgesia during adult surgery in a tertiary academic anaesthesia department.

OBJECTIVE: Multimodal analgesia pathways have been shown to reduce opioid use and side effects in surgical patients. A quality improvement initiative was implemented to increase the use of multimodal analgesia in adult patients presenting for general anaesthesia at an academic tertiary care centre. The aim of this study was to increase adoption of a perioperative multimodal analgesia protocol across a broad population of surgical patients. The use of multimodal analgesia was tracked as a process metric. Our primary outcome was opioid use normalised to oral morphine equivalents (OME) intraoperatively, in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and 48 hours postoperatively. Pain scores and use of antiemetics were measured as balancing metrics. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement study of a multimodal analgesia protocol implemented for adult (≥18 and≤70) non-transplant patients undergoing general anaesthesia (≥180 min). Components of multimodal analgesia were defined as (1) preoperative analgesic medication (acetaminophen, celecoxib, diclofenac, gabapentin), (2) regional anaesthesia (peripheral nerve block or catheter, epidural catheter or spinal) or (3) intraoperative analgesic medication (ketamine, ketorolac, lidocaine infusion, magnesium, acetaminophen, dexamethasone ≥8 mg, dexmedetomidine). We compared opioid use, pain scores and antiemetic use for patients 1 year before (baseline group-1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019) and 1 year after (implementation group-1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) project implementation. RESULTS: Use of multimodal analgesia improved from 53.9% in the baseline group to 67.5% in the implementation group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative OME use before and after implementation (ß0=44.0, ß2=0.52, p=0.875). OME decreased after the project implementation in the PACU (ß0=34.4, ß2=-3.88, p<0.001) and 48 hours postoperatively (ß0=184.9, ß2=-22.59, p<0.001), while pain scores during those time points were similar. CONCLUSION: A perioperative pragmatic multimodal analgesic intervention was associated with reduced OME use in the PACU and 48 hours postoperatively.

Neuroanesthesia Guidelines for Optimizing Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Neuromonitoring During Deformity and Complex Spinal Surgery: A Delphi Consensus Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Expert opinion-modified Delphi study. OBJECTIVE: We used a modified Delphi approach to obtain consensus among leading spinal deformity surgeons and their neuroanesthesiology teams regarding optimal practices for obtaining reliable motor evoked potential (MEP) signals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of transcranial MEPs provides the best method for assessing spinal cord integrity during complex spinal surgeries. MEPs are affected by pharmacological and physiological parameters. It is the responsibility of the spine surgeon and neuroanesthesia team to understand how they can best maintain high-quality MEP signals throughout surgery. Nevertheless, varying approaches to neuroanesthesia are seen in clinical practice. METHODS: We identified 19 international expert spinal deformity treatment teams. A modified Delphi process with two rounds of surveying was performed. Greater than 50% agreement on the final statements was considered "agreement"; >75% agreement was considered "consensus." RESULTS: Anesthesia regimens and protocols were obtained from the expert centers. There was a large amount of variability among centers. Two rounds of consensus surveying were performed, and all centers participated in both rounds of surveying. Consensus was obtained for 12 of 15 statements, and majority agreement was obtained for two of the remaining statements. Total intravenous anesthesia was identified as the preferred method of maintenance, with few centers allowing for low mean alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetic. Most centers advocated for <150 µg/kg/min of propofol with titration to the lowest dose that maintains appropriate anesthesia depth based on awareness monitoring. Use of adjuvant intravenous anesthetics, including ketamine, low-dose dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine, may help to reduce propofol requirements without negatively effecting MEP signals. CONCLUSION: Spine surgeons and neuroanesthesia teams should be familiar with methods for optimizing MEPs during deformity and complex spinal cases. Although variability in practices exists, there is consensus among international spinal deformity treatment centers regarding best practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Applying Conflict Management Strategies to the Pediatric Operating Room.

Effective communication is essential in today's health care environment, and poor communication can lead to conflict among health care providers. Differences in cultures and beliefs can further incite conflict among health care team members, families, and patients. Pediatric patient care has a higher potential for conflict because decision-making responsibilities are shared among patients, parents/guardians, and clinicians. It is important to understand the phases and types of conflict because each conflict situation requires a different approach to optimize management. Equally important is an understanding of styles used by individuals to manage conflict. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument and the Dutch Test for Conflict Handling are 2 validated tools used to assess conflict management styles. The different styles include competing/forcing, collaborating/problem solving, compromising, avoiding, and yielding/accommodating. A successful physician should be able to identify the phases and types of conflict to use the conflict management approach most suitable for the given conflict.There are several techniques for managing conflict in the pediatric operating room. Acknowledging and managing one's own emotions during conflict is a pivotal first step toward diffusing the situation. Active listening is an important communication skill that improves team dynamics. Aligning the interests of the parties involved in conflict will encourage collaborative problem solving. Cultural competency training can improve communication and conflict management skills. Effective conflict management through formal education of all perioperative team members can lead to improved communication and teamwork and better patient outcomes.

Comparative effects of surgical and percutaneous repair on P-wave and atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial septal defect--ostium secundum type.

Both surgical and percutaneous closures of atrial septal defects have been successful in reversal of atrial dilatation. We compared the effects of surgical and percutaneous transvenous device closure of atrial septal defect on post-operative changes of P-wave duration, PR segment, and PR interval. Electrocardiographic data were prospectively collected from 30 patients following either surgical (n equal to 16) or percutaneous (n equal to 16) repair of atrial septal defects between 2004 and 2010. A cardiologist blinded to the closure technique performed the electrocardiographic analyses. P-wave duration (98.5 plus or minus 15.4 to 86.4 plus or minus 13.2 milliseconds, p-value less than 0.05) and PR interval (162.9 plus or minus 18.5 to 140.6 plus or minus 15.2 milliseconds, p-value less than 0.05) were reduced after percutaneous transvenous device closure. P-wave duration (104.5 plus or minus 24.7 versus 83.2 plus or minus 13.3 milliseconds, p-value less than 0.05) and PR interval (173.2 plus or minus 38.7 versus 144.3 plus or minus 32.0 milliseconds, p-value less than 0.05) were also reduced after surgical closure. PR segment in the percutaneous group was significantly reduced (63.4 plus or minus 14.5 to 52.1 plus or minus 10.8 milliseconds, p-value less than 0.05), but not in the surgical group (68.6 plus or minus 18.7 versus 61.1 plus or minus 24.7 milliseconds). However, the difference in PR segment changes between the two groups was not significant (-11.3 plus or minus 15.0 versus -7.6 plus or minus 20.5 milliseconds, p-value equal to 0.18). Our analysis demonstrates that the changes between the two groups were not different and that both closure techniques reduce P-wave duration, PR segment, and PR interval within 6 months.