p73 gene promoter methylation in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma.

To clarify the significance of p73 in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma (GC), the immunohistochemical expression and CpG-island methylation of p73 were evaluated in cancer tissues and adjacent nonneoplastic tissues of GC with and without EBV infection. Loss of p73 expression by immunohistochemistry was specific to EBV-associated GC (11/13) compared to EBV-negative GC (3/38), which was independent of abnormal p53 expression. With methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), the aberrant methylation of p73 exon 1 was similarly specific to EBV-associated GC (12/13), and also rare in EBV-negative GC (2/38). Bisulfite sequencing for p73 exon 1 and its 5' region confirmed the MSP results, showing uniform and high-density methylation in EBV-associated GC. Comparative MSP analysis of p14, p16 and p73 methylation, using 20 cases each of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues of early GC with and without EBV infection, confirmed 2 types of methylation: global methylation with increased rates (p14 and p16) and specific methylation of p73 in EBV-associated GC. In nonneoplastic mucosa, p14, p16 and p73 methylation occurred in both EBV-associated (8/33, 6/34 and 3/38, respectively) and EBV-negative GC (6/23, 4/35, and 1/35). p73 methylation was observed in the mucosa without H. pylori infection in all 4 samples. Loss of p73 expression through aberrant methylation of the p73 promoter occurs specifically in EBV-associated GC, together with the global methylation of p14 and p16. A specific type of gastritis, prone to a higher grade of atrophy and p73 methylation, may facilitate the development of EBV-associated GC.

Phenotype analysis by MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and CD10 expression in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Gastric marker mucins (MUC5AC and MUC6) and intestinal marker molecules (MUC2 and CD10) have been used to determine the cell lineage of epithelial cell of gastric carcinoma (GC). METHODS: To clarify the characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated GC, 18 cases were immunohistochemically evaluated along with 56 cases of EBV-negative GC. RESULTS: MUC2 expression was lower in EBV-associated GC: immunostaining grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 10, 6, 1, 1, and 0 cases of EBV-associated GC, respectively, and in 18, 11, 15, 6, and 6 cases of EBV-negative GC, respectively (P = 0.013). CD10 positivity (grades 2-4) in EBV-associated GC was 6%, significantly lower than in EBV-negative GC (34%) (P = 0.030). When phenotypes of GC were categorized by the combined positivities of gastric markers (either MUC5AC or MUC6) and intestinal markers (either MUC2 or CD10), EBV-associated GC included primarily null (44%) and gastric (39%) types, but EBV-negative GC comprised null (7%), gastric (30%), intestinal (27%), and mixed (36%) types. The age of patients with gastric types was significantly younger for both EBV-associated GC and EBV-negative GC cases. CONCLUSIONS: Neoplastic epithelial cells of EBV-associated GC did not express MUC2 or CD10, and most of them were categorized as null or gastric types. EBV infection may occur in the epithelial cells of null or gastric phenotypes, which may be devoid of transdifferentiation potential toward intestinal phenotypes.

CpG island methylation status in gastric carcinoma with and without infection of Epstein-Barr virus.

PURPOSE: EBV-associated gastric carcinoma shows global CpG island methylation of the promoter region of various cancer-related genes. To further clarify the significance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status in gastric carcinoma, we investigated methylation profile and clinicopathologic features including overall survival in four subgroups defined by EBV infection and CIMP status: EBV-associated gastric carcinoma and EBV-negative/CIMP-high (H), EBV-intermediate (I), and EBV-negative (N) gastric carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Methylation-specific PCR was applied to 106 gastric carcinoma cases. CIMP-N, CIMP-I, and CIMP-H status was determined by the number (0, 1-3, and 4-5, respectively) of methylated marker genes (LOX, HRASLS, FLNc, HAND1, and TM), that were newly identified as highly methylated in gastric cancer cell lines. The methylation status of 10 other cancer-related genes (p14, p15, p16, p73, TIMP-3, E-cadherin, DAPK, GSTP1, hMLH1, and MGMT) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Nearly all (14 of 15) of EBV-associated gastric carcinoma exhibited CIMP-H, constituting a homogenous group (14%). EBV-negative gastric carcinoma consisted of CIMP-H (24%), CIMP-I (38%), and CIMP-N (24%). EBV-associated gastric carcinoma showed significantly higher frequencies of methylation of cancer-related genes (mean number +/- SD = 6.9 +/- 1.5) even if compared with EBV-negative/CIMP-H gastric carcinoma (3.5 +/- 1.8). Among EBV-negative gastric carcinoma subgroups, CIMP-H gastric carcinoma showed comparatively higher frequency of methylation than CIMP-I or CIMP-N, especially of p16 and hMLH1. CIMP-N gastric carcinoma predominantly consisted of advanced carcinoma with significantly higher frequency of lymph node metastasis. The prognosis of the patients of CIMP-N was significantly worse compared with other groups overall by univariate analysis (P = 0.0313). CONCLUSION: The methylation profile of five representative genes is useful to stratify gastric carcinomas into biologically different subgroups. EBV-associated gastric carcinoma showed global CpG island methylation, comprising a pathogenetically distinct subgroup in CIMP-H gastric carcinoma.

A huge primary peritoneal papillary adenocarcinoma which demonstrated imaging findings similar to those of extrahepatic-growing type hepatic tumor: report of a case.

We herein report a 69-year-old woman who presented with a huge intra-abdominal tumor which demonstrated imaging findings similar to those of extrahepatic-growing type hepatic tumor, but turned out to be primary peritoneal papillary adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography showed a well-demarcated mass, measuring 12.0 cm in diameter, which came in contact with the lateral segment of the liver and invaded the diaphragm and abdominal wall. Distant lymph node metastasis was also detected. A fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the tumor showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. After chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, the maximal diameter of the tumor decreased to 6.0 cm. The patient then underwent a tumorectomy together with a lateral segmentectomy of the liver, a splenectomy, a partial resection of the diaphragm and abdominal wall, and a left oophorectomy. Histological and immunohistochemical examinations demonstrated the tumor to be primary peritoneal papillary adenocarcinoma.