Vaccination boosts protective responses and counters SARS-CoV-2-induced pathogenic memory B cells.

Much is to be learned about the interface between immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We monitored immune responses specific to SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding-Domain (RBD) in convalescent individuals for eight months after infection diagnosis and following vaccination. Over time, neutralizing antibody responses, which are predominantly RBD specific, generally decreased, while RBD-specific memory B cells persisted. RBD-specific antibody and B cell responses to vaccination were more vigorous than those elicited by infection in the same subjects or by vaccination in infection-naïve comparators. Notably, the frequencies of double negative B memory cells, which are dysfunctional and potentially pathogenic, increased in the convalescent subjects over time. Unexpectedly, this effect was reversed by vaccination. Our work identifies a novel aspect of immune dysfunction in mild/moderate COVID-19, supports the practice of offering SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regardless of infection history, and provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the vaccination-induced reduction of "Long-COVID" symptoms.

Integrin α4ß7 Expression Increases HIV Susceptibility in Activated Cervical CD4+ T Cells by an HIV Attachment-Independent Mechanism.

BACKGROUND: CD4 T cells are crucial for the establishment and dissemination of HIV in mucosal tissues during acute infection. Studies indicate that integrin α4ß7 CD4 T cells are preferentially infected by HIV in vitro and during acute SIV infection. The integrin α4ß7 is thought to promote HIV capture by target cells; however, the role of integrin α4ß7 in HIV transmission remains controversial. In this study, we characterized immune phenotypes of human cervical T cells and examined HIV preference in integrin α4ß7 CD4 T cells. In vitro all-trans retinoic acid-differentiated peripheral CD4 T cells (atRA-differentiated cells) were included as a comparison. RESULTS: In both peripheral and cervical cells, the majority of HIV p24 cells were activated CD4 T cells expressing integrin α4ß7. Among infected atRA-differentiated cells, the frequency of CCR5 expression was higher in HIV p24 cells than in HIV p24 cells; no such difference was observed in cervical cells. Neither the cyclic hexapeptide CWLDVC nor a monoclonal antibody against integrin α4ß7 blocked HIV attachment or gp120 binding to target cells regardless of the presence of CD4, indicating that integrin α4ß7 did not facilitate HIV capture by target cells. CONCLUSIONS: Integrin α4ß7 expression increases HIV susceptibility, but the mechanism is not through promoting HIV binding to target cells.

CAF-mediated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 transcriptional inhibition is distinct from alpha-defensin-1 HIV inhibition.

CD8(+) T lymphocytes can inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication by secreting a soluble factor(s) known as CD8(+) T-lymphocyte antiviral factor (CAF). One site of CAF action is inhibition of HIV-1 RNA transcription, particularly at the step of long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven gene expression. The inhibitory effect of CAF on HIV-1 LTR activation is mediated through STAT1 activation. A recent study reports that alpha-defensins 1 to 3 account for CAF activity against HIV-1. Here, we address whether alpha-defensins, particularly alpha-defensin-1, contribute to CAF-mediated inhibition of HIV-1 transcription. Both recombinant alpha-defensin-1 and CAF derived from herpesvirus saimiri (HVS)-transformed CD8(+) cells inhibited HIV-1 infection and gene expression. For both factors, the inhibition of HIV-1 infection did not occur at the level of viral entry. Pretreatment of cells with alpha-defensin-1 followed by a washing out prior to infection blocked infection by HIV-1, indicating that direct inactivation of virions was not required for its inhibitory effect. In contrast to CAF, alpha-defensin-1 did not inhibit phorbol myristate acetate- or Tat-mediated HIV-1 LTR activation in a transient transfection system, nor did it activate STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Furthermore, alpha-defensins 1 to 3 were below the level of detection in a panel of HVS-transformed CD8(+) cells with potent HIV-1 inhibitory activity and a neutralizing antibody against alpha-defensins 1 to 3 did not reverse the inhibitory effect of CAF on HIV-1 gene expression in infected cells and on HIV-1 LTR activation in transfected cells. Taken together, our results suggest that alpha-defensin-1 inhibits HIV-1 infection following viral entry but that alpha-defensins 1 to 3 are not responsible for the HIV-1 transcriptional inhibition by CAF.

Interaction of the CC-chemokine RANTES with glycosaminoglycans activates a p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent signaling pathway and enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity.

The interaction of the CC-chemokine RANTES with its cell surface receptors transduces multiple intracellular signals: low concentrations of RANTES (1 to 10 nM) stimulate G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity, and higher concentrations (1 microM) activate a phosphotyrosine kinase (PTK)-dependent pathway. Here, we show that the higher RANTES concentrations induce rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins. Several src-family kinases (Fyn, Hck, Src) are activated, as is the focal adhesion kinase p125 FAK and, eventually, members of the p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. This PTK signaling pathway can be activated independently of known seven-transmembrane GPCRs for RANTES because it occurs in cells that lack any such RANTES receptors. Instead, activation of the PTK signaling pathway is dependent on the expression of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on the cell surface, in that it could not be activated by RANTES in GAG-deficient cells. We have previously demonstrated that RANTES can both enhance and inhibit infection of cells with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here we show that activation of both PTK and MAPK is involved in the enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity caused by RANTES in cells that lack GPCRs for RANTES but which express GAGs.

A soluble factor(s) secreted from CD8(+) T lymphocytes inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication through STAT1 activation.

CD8(+) T lymphocytes can suppress human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication by secreting a soluble factor(s) known as CD8(+) T-lymphocyte antiviral factor (CAF). One site of CAF action is inhibition of HIV-1 RNA transcription, particularly at the step of long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven gene expression. However, the mechanism by which CAF inhibits LTR activation is not understood. Here, we show that conditioned media from several herpesvirus saimari-transformed CD8(+) T lymphocytes inhibit, in a time- and dose-dependent manner, the replication of HIV-1 pseudotype viruses that express the envelope glycoproteins of vesicular stomatitis virus (HIV-1(VSV)). The same conditioned media also inhibit phorbol myristate acetate-induced activation of the HIV-1 LTR and activate the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) protein. We have obtained direct evidence that STAT1 is necessary for CAF-mediated inhibition of LTR activation and HIV-1 replication. Thus, the inhibitory effect of CAF on HIV-1(VSV) replication was abolished in STAT1-deficient cells. Moreover, CAF inhibition of LTR activation was diminished both in STAT1-deficient cells and in cells expressing a STAT1 dominant negative mutant but was restored when STAT1 was reintroduced into the STAT1-deficient cells. We also observed that CAF induced the expression of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1), and that IRF-1 gene induction was STAT-1 dependent. Taken together, our results suggest that CAF activates STAT1, leading to IRF-1 induction and inhibition of gene expression regulated by the HIV-1 LTR. This study therefore helps clarify one molecular mechanism of host defense against HIV-1.