Did the severity of appendicitis increase during the COVID-19 pandemic?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the severity of appendicitis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, as patients with appendicitis may procrastinate seeking medical attention during the pandemic. METHODS: Information on patients with appendicitis who were treated at the Taipei City Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020) was retrieved. Patients who were diagnosed with appendicitis and treated at the same hospital from January 1, 2019 to July 1, 2019 were designated as the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess changes in the severity of appendicitis (at a 2-week interval) between the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 307 (study group: 149; control group: 158) consecutive patients with appendicitis. The mean age was 46.2 +- 19.8 years. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidity, surgery type (laparoscopic or open appendectomy) or surgery time. The number of patients in the study group decreased between January 29, 2020 and April 21, 2020, which paralleled the period of spikes in the confirmed COVID-19 cases and restricted daily activities. The percentage of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis (excluding mild appendicitis or normal appendix) in the study group increased between February 26 and March 10, as well as between April 8 and April 21. In the multivariate regression analysis, the odds of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis increased in three bi-weeks for the study group but not in the control group. CONCLUSION: The severity of acute appendicitis might increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, because patients with mild appendicitis (or abdominal pain) may hesitate to seek help.

Long-Term Survival of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is an aggressive primary liver cancer. However, the clinical features are not clearly understood because of limited literature and the complex nature of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC). METHODS: The records of 100,754 patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer between 2004 and 2013 were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The primary outcome measures were overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. The median follow-up time was 60 months (29-120 months). RESULTS: HCC-CC tended to share some characteristics with HCC, including increased frequency of stage I cases, high individual tumor rates, and similar patterns of viral hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections. In contrast, HCC-CC showed malignant behavior similar to that of CC, as high-grade tumor cell differentiation and presentation of jaundice were predominant in HCC-CC and CC compared with HCC. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival rates of HCC-CC were between HCC and CC rates. The mortality rate of HCC-CC was 79.2% (HCC, 77.5%; CC, 93.5%) and the local recurrence rate of HCC-CC was 65.3% (HCC, 74.6%; CC, 88.4%). Surgical treatment was an independent factor for the long-term prognosis of HCC-CC, whereas transarterial chemoembolization (TAcE) promoted survival in both surgical and nonsurgical groups. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed that, although it reflects the malignant behavior of CC, HCC-CC should mainly be characterized as a subtype of HCC. With careful selection of patients, curative resection and TAcE might benefit the survival of patients with HCC-CC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a rare cancer that shares demographic characteristics, as well as survival probabilities, with both hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. It occurs frequently in patients with hepatitis B virus infection, cirrhotic liver background, and early-stage disease. Compared with 20% of initial resection rates of its counterparts, HCC-CC has higher initial resection rate (55%). Although short-term overall survival is inferior to HCC, its long-term overall survival is similar with HCC.

Relationship between practices of eye protection against solar ultraviolet radiation and cataract in a rural area.

BACKGROUND: Cataract is a public health concern worldwide that differentially affects rural residents of outlying islands where ultraviolet radiation (UVR) may have greater penetration because of less shading. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationships between attitudes and practices of eye protection and eye diseases for residents of an offshore island of Taiwan. METHODS: Questionnaire survey was administered to local residents (age > 50 years) regarding socio-demographic information, attitudes/practices of eye protection under sun exposure and eye diseases. RESULTS: A total of 816 participants (response rate 90.7%, 816/900) completed the questionnaires. Mean age was 63.7 (+ 10.8) years. Among these participants, 44.4%, 15.1% and 8.3% had cataract, dry eye and glaucoma, respectively. Although 86.3% and 88.2% of participants agreed that they should avoid outdoor activities and wear glasses/broad-brimmed hats in harsh daylight, 69.4% and 48.3% of participants never/rarely used glasses or hats/umbrellas in harsh daylight, respectively. Predictors of less practices of eye protection against solar UVR included residents who were male, with lower education level, with longer residence and lack of commercial health insurance. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that practices of eye protection under sun exposure were significantly associated with less cataract, but not glaucoma or dry eye. Participants who did not wear glasses, broad-brimmed hats/use umbrellas or both in harsh sunlight (almost) every time were respectively associated with a 57% (P = 0.028), 45% (P = 0.027) or 70% (P = 0.026) increase of cataract than those who did in harsh sunlight (almost) every time. CONCLUSIONS: Practices of eye protection under sun exposure is associated with lower risk of cataract.

Survival Predictability Between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This study compared the prognostic significance of staging between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study population comprised patients with liver cancer registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2007 to 2013 and was followed up until December 31, 2016. The study included patients with HCC, with known staging in both TNM and BCLC systems, and with follow-up >1 month. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were constructed to investigate the significance of staging by two systems. Goodness-of-fit of model was evaluated via Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the lower the better. Among 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer, a total of 37,062 patients with HCC (25.6% underwent surgery) were eligible. The mean age and overall survival of this cohort were 63.9 years and 27.2%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages I, II, III, and IV (the TNM system) were 54.5%, 34.9%, 10.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages A, B, C, and D (the BCLC classification) were 54.5%, 29.2%, 9.8%, and 4.0%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 59.4 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both systems predicted overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free rate well. Values of ΔAIC of the BCLC classification and the TNM system were lower for the surgery group and nonsurgery group, respectively. The TNM system (8th edition) predicted long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification in patients with HCC. But in patients treated initially with surgery, the BCLC classification outperformed the 8th edition of the TNM system. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates that the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) system (8th edition) and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification both predict long-term outcome significantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but that the TNM system (8th edition) predicts long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification. For patients treated initially with surgery, BCLC classification outperforms in 8th edition TNM system in predicting long-term outcome.

Population-based matching comparison between radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Loco-regional therapies are evolving for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has changed the landscape in treating HCC; however, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection (PEI/PAI) remains a widely used and easily performed technique by experienced clinicians. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of RFA compared to that of PEI/PAI remains unclear. METHODS: Records of 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed HCC between 2007 and 2013 were drawn from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The primary outcome measures were the overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the effectiveness of RFA and PEI. Median follow-up time was 61.6 months (36-120 months). RESULTS: After PSM, 4496 patients diagnosed with stage I-III HCC, who were initially treated with RFA (3372 patients) or PEI/PAI (1124 patients), were assessed. Compared to PEI/PAI, patients treated with RFA had better 5- and 9-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients treated with RFA vs PEI/PAI were 61.5 vs 41.9 months and 72.1 vs 45.2 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox model analysis revealed that, except for patients with high cell grade or advanced stage, RFA resulted in better overall survival (HR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.81, P < 0.001) and local recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.75, P < 0.001) than PEI/PAI. CONCLUSIONS: RFA provides advantages over conventional PEI/PAI for HCC. Considering technological advances in instruments, loco-regional therapies for HCC can be employed in carefully selected patients.

Is vegetarian diet associated with a lower risk of breast cancer in Taiwanese women?

BACKGROUND: Studies on the relationship between vegetarian diet and breast cancer in Asian populations are limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between vegetarian diet, dietary patterns, and breast cancer in Taiwanese women. METHODS: This case-control study compared the dietary patterns of 233 breast cancer patients and 236 age-matched controls. A questionnaire about vegetarian diets and 28 frequently-consumed food items was administered to these 469 patients in the surgical department of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital. Serum biochemical status was also examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for age, education, family history, oral contraceptive usage, or regular exercise. However, the cancer group presented with both a higher body mass index and an older age of primiparity (P < 0.05). Two food items (shellfish and seafood) were highly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.77), so shellfish was excluded to avoid multicollinearity. A factor analysis of 27 food items produced five dietary patterns: meat, processed meat, fruit/vegetable/soybean, dessert/sugar, and fermented food. Multivariate logistic regression showed that meat/fat and processed meat dietary patterns were associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio (OR): 2.22, 95% CI 1.67-2.94, P < 0.001; OR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.04, P = 0.013, respectively). Vegetarian diet, high isoflavone intake, and high albumin levels were inversely associated with breast cancer risk (P < 0.05). Vegetarians had a higher daily soy isoflavone intake than non-vegetarians (25.9 ± 25.6 mg vs. 18.1 ± 15.6 mg, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Vegetarian diets show as protective role against breast cancer risk, while meat and processed meat dietary patterns are associated with a higher breast cancer risk.

Accessibility of ophthalmic healthcare for residents of an offshore island-an example of integrated delivery system.

BACKGROUND: To assess the utilization of and satisfaction with ophthalmic healthcare provided by integrated delivery system (IDS) since 2000 and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) for residents of an offshore island of Taiwan. METHODS: Facilitators interviewed residents (age ≥ 50 years) with the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for VRQoL and a questionnaire on clinical information, ophthalmic care utilization and satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 841 participants (response rate 93.4 %, 841/900) completed the questionnaire survey. Mean age was 63.7 (±10. 7) years. The common eye diseases were cataract (44.7 %), dry eye (15.5 %), and glaucoma (8.7 %). Among the participants, 61.0 % sought ophthalmic care under the IDS in the past year and 17.6 % experienced unmet ophthalmic needs in the past 6 months. Satisfaction with ophthalmic care under the IDS was 88.1 %. Determinants of dissatisfaction under the IDS were distance to healthcare facility and VRQoL. Predictors of VRQoL included age, residential area, marital status, occupation, comorbid condition, commercial insurance, household income, cataracts and glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of IDS improves accessibility of ophthalmic care for residents of an offshore island. Geographic proximity to avail healthcare facility and VRQoL affect satisfaction with the IDS.

Ratio and log odds of positive lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with mastectomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of lymph nodes (LNs) and assess the prognostic significance of the ratio of positive LNs (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) in breast cancer patients who have undergone a mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All of the breast cancer patients in the Taiwan Cancer Database during 2002-2006 were considered. We excluded patients who had inflammatory breast cancer, stage 0 and IV disease, breast conservative surgery or survival <1 month. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). A Cox hazards model was constructed and compared via Nagelkerke R(2) (R(2)N) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: A total of 11,349 (6042 node-negative, 5307 node-positive) patients were enrolled, and 10.5% patients had a limited number of LNs harvested. In a multivariate Cox model, LNR and LODDS demonstrated prognostic significance (<0.001). For node-positive patients, a model with LNR showed the best fit (P < 0.001; R(2)N = 18.2%) when sufficient LNs were examined. However, a model with LODDS showed the best fit in patients with a limited number of LNs harvested (P < 0.001; R(2)N = 21.1%), even in node-negative patients (P = 0.004; R(2)N = 13.5%). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest for LODDS (AUC: 0.761), followed by LNR (AUC: 0.757). A limited LN harvest induced an AUC value for an approximate 3.6% loss (LNR) or 3.1% loss (LODDS). CONCLUSION: The prognostic superiority of LNR is confounded by a limited LN harvest, thus making LODDS the most powerful and unified prognostic classifier in breast cancer patients who have had a mastectomy.

Recursive partitioning analysis of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients.

Lymph node ratio (LNR) is a powerful prognostic factor for breast cancer. We conducted a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of the LNR to identify the prognostic risk groups in breast cancer patients. Records of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients between 2002 and 2006 were searched in the Taiwan Cancer Database. The end of follow-up was December 31, 2009. We excluded patients with distant metastases, inflammatory breast cancer, survival <1 month, no mastectomy, or missing lymph node status. Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). For univariate significant predictors, RPA were used to determine the risk groups. Among the 11,349 eligible patients, we identified 4 prognostic factors (including LNR) for survival, resulting in 8 terminal nodes. The LNR cutoffs were 0.038, 0.259, and 0.738, which divided LNR into 4 categories: very low (LNR ≤ 0.038), low (0.038 < LNR ≤ 0.259), moderate (0.259 < LNR ≤ 0.738), and high (0.738 < LNR). Then, 4 risk groups were determined as follows: Class 1 (very low risk, 8,265 patients), Class 2 (low risk, 1,901 patients), Class 3 (moderate risk, 274 patients), and Class 4 (high risk, 900 patients). The 5-year OS for Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 93.2%, 83.1%, 72.3%, and 56.9%, respectively (P< 0.001). The hazard ratio of death was 2.70, 4.52, and 8.59 (95% confidence interval 2.32-3.13, 3.49-5.86, and 7.48-9.88, respectively) times for Class 2, 3, and 4 compared with Class 1 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, we identified the optimal cutoff LNR values based on RPA and determined the related risk groups, which successfully predict 5-year OS in breast cancer patients.

Can composite performance measures predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer?

AIM: To assess the relationship between long-term colorectal patient survival and methods of calculating composite performance scores. METHODS: The Taiwan Cancer Database was used to identify patients who underwent bowel resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2004. Patients were assigned to one of three cohorts based on tumor staging: cohort 1, colon cancer stage < III; cohort 2, colon cancer stage III; cohort 3, rectal cancer. A composite performance score (CPS) was calculated for each patient using five different aggregating methods, including all-or-none, 70% standard, equal weight, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms. The relationships between CPS and five-year overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survivals were evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model. A goodness-of-fit analysis for all five methods was performed using Akaike's information criterion. RESULTS: A total of 3272 colorectal cancer patients (cohort 1, 1164; cohort 2, 790; cohort 3, 1318 patients) with a mean age of 65 years were enrolled in the study. Bivariate correlation analysis showed that CPS values from the equal weight method were highly correlated with those from the AHP method in all cohorts (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox hazards analysis showed that CPS values derived from equal weight and AHP methods were significantly associated with five-year survivals of patients in cohorts 1 and 2 (all P < 0.05). In these cohorts, higher CPS values suggested a higher probability of five-year survival. However, CPS values derived from the all-or-none method did not show any significant process-outcome relationship in any cohort. Goodness-of-fit analyses showed that CPS values derived from the PCA method were the best fit to the Cox proportional hazards model, whereas the values from the all-or-none model showed the poorest fit. CONCLUSION: CPS values may highlight process-outcome relationships for patients with colorectal cancer in addition to evaluating quality of care performance.

Application of the analytic hierarchy process in the performance measurement of colorectal cancer care for the design of a pay-for-performance program in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To prioritize performance measures for colorectal cancer care to facilitate the implementation of a pay-for-performance (PFP) system. DESIGN: Questionnaires survey. SETTING: Medical hospitals in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six medical doctors from 5 November 2009 to 10 December 2009. INTERVENTION: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. Main outcome measure(s) Performance measures (two pre-treatment, six treatment related and three monitoring related) were used. RESULTS: Forty-eight doctors responded and returned questionnaires (response rate 72.7%) with surgeons and physicians contributing equally. The most important measure was the proportion of colorectal patients who had pre-operative examinations that included chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography or MRI (global priority: 0.144), followed by the proportion of stages I-III colorectal cancer patients who had undergone a wide surgical resection documented as 'negative margin' (global priority: 0.133) and the proportion of colorectal cancer patients who had undergone surgery with a pathology report that included information on tumor size and node differentiation (global priority: 0.116). Most participants considered that the best interval for the renewal indicators was 3-5 years (43.75%) followed by 5-10 years (27.08%). CONCLUSIONS: To design a PFP program, the AHP method is a useful technique to prioritize performance measures, especially in a highly specialized domain such as colorectal cancer care.

Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Though lymph node status may predict long-term outcome of patients with non-metastatic colon cancer, discordant findings exist among various expressions of lymph node status. The present study was designed to assess the prognostic value among these lymph node evaluations. METHODS: The analysis was based on surgical patients with newly diagnosed colon adenocarcinoma registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2003 to 2005. Exclusion criteria included those patients who had stage IV disease, those whose survival period was <1 month, or those whose lymph node information was unavailable. Studied variables included total number of lymph nodes (LNT), number of positive lymph nodes (LNP), number of negative lymph nodes (LNN), ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). RESULTS: Of 16,790 newly diagnosed colon cancer patients, there were 9,644 (65.4 ± 13.5 years; male 54.9 %) patients with non-metastatic disease who met the criteria. Correlation analyses for patients with stage III disease showed that LNR and LODDS were highly correlated, as were LNT and LNN. By the Cox proportional hazard model, LNT was prognostic of long-term survival in patients with stage II disease, while LNR and LNP were the most powerful prognosticators for patients with stage III disease (p < 0.001). Both the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and area under the curve indicated that LNR had the best discriminating capability to predict 5-year survival (0.704, 0.700, and 0.709 for overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survival, respectively), followed by LODDS. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing resection for colon cancer, LNR, LODDS, and LNP are better prognostic factors for those with stage III disease than LNT is for patients with stage III disease.

Application of propensity score model to examine the prognostic significance of lymph node number as a care quality indicator.

PURPOSE: There is a controversy about whether lymph node yield can be used as a proxy of quality care for patient with colorectal cancer. We aim to use propensity score models to investigate the association between lymph node number and long-term survival for colorectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Taiwan Cancer Database was employed to review all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer from 2003 to 2005. Exclusion criteria included those patients with stage IV disease or without information of lymph node. Propensity score models (examined lymph node >12 or <12 as dependent variable) were applied to group of patients with Stage II or Stage III disease and primary end point was 5-year survival (and mortality). We also report results of Stage I-III for comparison. RESULTS: We identified 15,731 newly diagnosed colorectal cancers during study period, among which a total of 10,517 colorectal cancer patients treated at 32 hospitals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Pathology reports of about 63 % (6658/10517) patients revealed lymph node retrieval >12. After propensity score matching, there were 2888, 1079, 1094 pairs recruited for Stage I-III, Stage II and Stage III, respectively. According to analysis of these matched pairs, the 5-year risk adjusted overall mortality were lower for lymph node examined ≥12 than <12 among Stage II (24.3% vs. 31.1%, p=0.012) and Stage I-III (20.8% vs. 23.6%, p=0.003), but insignificant for Stage III (40.2% vs. 45.6%, p=0.073). Similar situation happened with regard to disease-free and disease-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients with colorectal cancer undergoing colorectal surgery, the quality metric of lymph node is associated with significantly better 5-year survival except for Stage III disease.

Risk groups defined by Recursive Partitioning Analysis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND: To define different prognostic groups of surgical colorectal adenocarcinoma patients derived from recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). METHODS: Ten thousand four hundred ninety four patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent colorectal resection from Taiwan Cancer Database during 2003 to 2005 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included those patients with stage IV disease or without number information of lymph nodes. For the definition of risk groups, the method of classification and regression tree was performed. Main primary outcome was 5-year cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: We identified six prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival, resulting in seven terminal nodes. Four risk groups were defined as following: Group 1 (mild risk, 1,698 patients), Group 2 (moderate risk, 3,129 patients), Group 3 (high risk, 4,605 patients) and Group 4 (very high risk, 1,062 patients). The 5-year cancer-specific survival for Group 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 86.6%, 62.7%, 55.9%, and 36.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Hazard ratio of death was 2.13, 5.52 and 10.56 (95% confidence interval 1.74-2.60, 4.58-6.66 and 8.66-12.9, respectively) times for Group 2, 3, and 4 as compared to Group 1. The predictive capability of these grouping was also similar in terms of overall and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: The use of RPA offered an alternative grouping method that could predict the survival of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Statistical process control as a tool for controlling operating room performance: retrospective analysis and benchmarking.

BACKGROUND: There is much research using statistical process control (SPC) to monitor surgical performance, including comparisons among groups to detect small process shifts, but few of these studies have included a stabilization process. This study aimed to analyse the performance of surgeons in operating room (OR) and set a benchmark by SPC after stabilized process. METHODS: The OR profile of 499 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by 16 surgeons at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan during 2005 and 2006 were recorded. SPC was applied to analyse operative and non-operative times using the following five steps: first, the times were divided into two segments; second, they were normalized; third, they were evaluated as individual processes; fourth, the ARL(0) was calculated;, and fifth, the different groups (surgeons) were compared. Outliers were excluded to ensure stability for each group and to facilitate inter-group comparison. RESULTS: The results showed that in the stabilized process, only one surgeon exhibited a significantly shorter total process time (including operative time and non-operative time). CONCLUSION: In this study, we use five steps to demonstrate how to control surgical and non-surgical time in phase I. There are some measures that can be taken to prevent skew and instability in the process. Also, using SPC, one surgeon can be shown to be a real benchmark.

Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Although performance measurement for assessing care quality is an emerging area, a system for measuring the quality of cancer care at the hospital level has not been well developed. The purpose of this study was to develop organization-based core measures for colorectal cancer patient care and apply these measures to compare hospital performance. METHODS: The development of core measures for colorectal cancer has undergone three stages including a modified Delphi method. The study sample originated from 2004 data in the Taiwan Cancer Database, a national cancer data registry. Eighteen hospitals and 5585 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We used indicator-based and case-based approaches to examine adherences simultaneously. RESULTS: The final core measure set included seventeen indicators (1 pre-treatment, 11 treatment-related and 5 monitoring-related). There were data available for ten indicators. Indicator-based adherence possesses more meaningful application than case-based adherence for hospital comparisons. Mean adherence was 85.8% (79.8% to 91%) for indicator-based and 82.8% (77.6% to 88.9%) for case-based approaches. Hospitals performed well (>90%) for five out of eleven indicators. Still, the performance across hospitals varied for many indicators. The best and poorest system performance was reflected in indicators T5-negative surgical margin (99.3%, 97.2%-100.0%) and T7-lymph nodes harvest more than twelve(62.7%, 27.6%-92.2%), both of which related to surgical specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, quality of colorectal cancer care still shows room for improvement. These preliminary results indicate that core measures for cancer can be developed systematically and applied for internal quality improvement.

Metaanalysis of cataract development after phakic intraocular lens surgery.

We performed a systematic literature review to determine the incidence of and predisposing factors for cataract after phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation. Of the 6338 eyes reported, 4.35% were noted to have new-onset or preexisting progressive cataract. The incidence of cataract formation was 1.29%, 1.11%, and 9.60% with anterior chamber, iris-fixated, and posterior chamber (PC) pIOLs, respectively. In the PC pIOL group, early cataract formation was related to surgical trauma and late-onset cataract was related to IOL-crystalline lens contact. Analysis of cataract progression in eyes with preexisting cataract showed a progression rate of 29.5% after pIOL surgery. These results suggest that cataract formation is most likely to occur after PC pIOL implantation. Patients with preexisting progressive cataract should be informed about the possibility of cataract progression and possible need for cataract surgery after pIOL implantation. Cataract surgical intervention resulted in restoration of visual acuity.