Moderate or intensive management of the active phase of second-stage labor and risk of urinary and anal incontinence: results of the PASST randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Incontinence occurs frequently in the postpartum period. Several theoretical pathophysiological models may underlie the hypothesis that different types of management of the active phase of the second stage of labor have different effects on pelvic floor muscles and thus perhaps affect urinary and anal continence. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of "moderate pushing" on the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence compared with "intensive pushing," and to determine the factors associated with incontinence at 6 months postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned analysis of secondary objectives of the PASST (Phase Active du Second STade) trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PASST included nulliparous women with singleton term pregnancies and epidural analgesia, who were randomly assigned at 8 cm of dilatation to either the intervention group that used "moderate" pushing (pushing only twice during each contraction, resting regularly for 1 contraction in 5 without pushing, and no time limit on pushing) or the control group following the usual management of "intensive" pushing (pushing 3 times during each contraction, with no contractions without pushing, with an obstetrician called to discuss operative delivery after 30 minutes of pushing). Data about continence were collected with validated self-assessment questionnaires at 6 months postpartum. Urinary incontinence was defined by an ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) score ≥1 and anal incontinence by a Wexner score ≥2. A separate analysis was also performed among the more severely affected women (ICIQ-UI SF ≥6 and Wexner ≥5). Factors associated with incontinence were assessed with univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among 1618 women initially randomized, 890 (55%) returned the complete questionnaire at 6 months. The rate of urinary incontinence was 36.6% in the "moderate" pushing group vs 38.5% in the "intensive" pushing group (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.13), whereas the rate of anal incontinence was 32.2% vs 34.6% (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.12). None of the obstetrical factors studied related to the second stage of labor influenced the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence, except operative vaginal delivery, which increased the risk of anal incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.15). CONCLUSION: The results of the PASST trial indicate that neither moderate nor intensive pushing efforts affect the risk of urinary or anal incontinence at 6 months postpartum among women who gave birth under epidural analgesia.

Preferences for labor and childbirth, expressed orally or as a written birth plan: Prevalence and determinants from a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is an important component of a patient-centered healthcare system. We assessed the prevalence of parturients with preferences for their labor and childbirth, expressed verbally in the birthing room or as a written birth plan, and studied maternal, obstetric, and organizational factors associated with their expression. METHODS: Data came from the 2016 National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional nationwide population-based survey conducted in France. Preferences for labor and childbirth were studied in three categories: expressed verbally, in writing (birth plan), or unexpressed or nonexistent. Analyses used multinomial multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: The analysis included 11,633 parturients: 3.7% had written a birth plan, 17.3% expressed their preferences verbally, and 79.0% either did not have or did not express any preferences. Compared with the latter group, written or verbal preferences were both significantly associated with prenatal care by independent midwives (respectively, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), [1.59-3.03], and aOR 1.43; 95% CI [1.19-1.71]) and with attendance at childbirth education classes (respectively, aOR 4.99; 95% CI [3.49-7.15], and aOR 2.27; 95% CI [1.98-2.62]). As years in traditional schooling increased, so did its association with preferences. Conversely, parturients from African countries were significantly less likely than French mothers to express preferences. A written birth plan was also associated with characteristics of maternity unit organization. CONCLUSION: Only one in five parturients reported having expressed preferences for labor and childbirth to healthcare professionals in the birthing room. This expression of preferences was associated with maternal characteristics and the organization of care.

Alternative to intensive management of the active phase of the second stage of labor: a multicenter randomized trial (Phase Active du Second STade trial) among nulliparous women with an epidural.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on an optimal strategy for managing the active phase of the second stage of labor. Intensive pushing could not only reduce pushing duration, but also increase abnormal fetal heart rate because of cord compression and reduced placental perfusion and oxygenation resulting from the combination of uterine contractions and maternal expulsive forces. Therefore, it may increase the risk of neonatal acidosis and the need for operative vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of the management encouraging "moderate" pushing vs "intensive" pushing on neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial, including nulliparas in the second stage of labor with an epidural and a singleton cephalic fetus at term and with a normal fetal heart rate. Of note, 2 groups were defined: (1) the moderate pushing group, in which women had no time limit on pushing, pushed only twice during each contraction, and observed regular periods without pushing, and (2) the intensive pushing group, in which women pushed 3 times during each contraction and the midwife called an obstetrician after 30 minutes of pushing to discuss operative delivery (standard care). The primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity criterion, including umbilical arterial pH of <7.15, base excess of >10 mmol/L, lactate levels of >6 mmol/L, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, and severe neonatal trauma. The secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal satisfaction. RESULTS: The study included 1710 nulliparous women. The neonatal morbidity rate was 18.9% in the moderate pushing group and 20.6% in the intensive pushing group (P=.38). Pushing duration was longer in the moderate group than in the intensive group (38.8±26.4 vs 28.6±17.0 minutes; P<.001), and its rate of operative delivery was 21.1% in the moderate group compared with 24.8% in the intensive group (P=.08). The episiotomy rate was significantly lower in the moderate pushing group than in the intensive pushing group (13.5% vs 17.8%; P=.02). We found no significant difference for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, or maternal satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Moderate pushing has no effect on neonatal morbidity, but it may nonetheless have benefits, as it was associated with a lower episiotomy rate.

No pain management for labour: individual and organisational determinants: A secondary analysis of the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in access to pain management have been identified in several care settings, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, but with regard to labour analgesia, it remains poorly explored. OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of women without pain management during labour and its individual and organisational determinants. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional population-based study, the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey. SETTINGS: All maternity units in France. PARTICIPANTS: Ten thousand and eleven women who attempted vaginal delivery with a labour duration at least 15 min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Absence of pain management, defined as absence of any pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic method during labour. RESULTS: Among the 10 011 women included, 542 (5.4%) had no labour pain management: 318 (3.7%) of the 8526 women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia and 222 (15.8%) of the 1402 who did not. Using generalised estimating equations stratified according to the maternal antenatal preference for neuraxial analgesia, the common determinants of no labour pain management in both groups were no attendance at childbirth education classes and admission to a delivery unit during the night. Among women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia, those who delivered in units with <1500 annual deliveries compared with units with 2000 to 3499 annual deliveries, were more likely to do without pain management [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 2.78]; among those who did not prefer to use it, women born abroad were more likely to do without labour pain management (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40). CONCLUSION: In France, 1 : 20 women had no labour pain management, and this proportion was three times higher among women who preferred not to use neuraxial analgesia. Enhancing maternal information on labour pain and its management, especially nonpharmacological methods, and rethinking care organisation, could improve access to analgesia of any kind.

Maternal Intensive Care Unit Admission as an Indicator of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) accounts for any life-threatening complication during pregnancy or after delivery. Measuring and monitoring SAMM seem critical to assessing the quality of maternal health care. The objectives were to explore the validity of intensive care unit (ICU) admission as an indicator of SAMM by characterizing the profile of women admitted to an ICU and of their ICU stay, according to the association with other SAMM criterion. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the 2540 women with SAMM included in the epidemiology of severe acute maternal morbidity (EPIMOMS) multiregional prospective population-based study (2012-2013, n = 182,309 deliveries). The EPIMOMS definition of SAMM, based on national experts' consensus, is a combination of diagnosis, organ dysfunctions, and intervention criteria, including ICU admission. Among women with SAMM, we identified characteristics associated with maternal ICU admission with or with no other SAMM criterion compared with ICU admission, by using multivariable multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 511 women were admitted to an ICU during or up to 42 days after pregnancy, for a population-based rate of 2.8 of 1000 deliveries (511/182,309; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-3.1); 15.5% of them (79/511; 95% CI, 12.4-18.9) had no other SAMM criterion compared with ICU admission. Among women with SAMM, the odds of ICU admission with no other morbidity criterion were increased in women with preexisting medical conditions (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.13; 95% CI, 1.17-3.86) and cesarean before labor (aOR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.47-6.64). Women admitted to ICU with no other SAMM criterion had more often decompensation of a preexisting condition, no interventions for organ support, and a shorter length of stay than women admitted with other SAMM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with SAMM, 1 in 5 is admitted to an ICU; 15.5% of those admitted in ICU have no other SAMM criterion and a less acute condition. These results challenge the use of ICU admission as a criterion of SAMM.

Predictors of incomplete maternal satisfaction with neuraxial labor analgesia: A nationwide study.

PURPOSE: Neuraxial analgesia is effective and widely used during labour, but little is known about maternal satisfaction with its use. Our objectives were to assess the frequency of incomplete maternal satisfaction with neuraxial labour analgesia and its predictors. METHODS: We extracted data from the 2016 National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional population-based study including all births during one week in all French maternity units. This analysis included all women who attempted vaginal delivery with neuraxial analgesia. Maternal satisfaction with analgesia was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale during a postpartum interview. Incomplete satisfaction grouped together women who were fairly, not sufficiently and not at all satisfied. We performed generalised estimating equations analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, obstetric, anaesthetic, and organisational characteristics to compare women with incomplete satisfaction to those completely satisfied. RESULTS: Among the 8538 women included, 35.2% were incompletely satisfied with their neuraxial analgesia. The odds of incomplete satisfaction were higher among women who reported a prenatal preference not to use neuraxial analgesia but subsequently did (adjusted odds ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.39) and among those who did not use patient-controlled neuraxial analgesia (1.20; 1.07-1.34); the odds were lower among women who used combined spinal epidural analgesia (0.53; 0.28-0.99) than among those with epidural analgesia. CONCLUSION: Incomplete maternal satisfaction with neuraxial analgesia is a frequent concern in France. Increasing the use of patient-controlled neuraxial analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia, as well as consistency between prenatal preference and actual use of neuraxial analgesia may improve maternal satisfaction.

Repeated maternal ICU admission: Results from a nationwide analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and profile of repeated maternal ICU admissions during or after pregnancy and to compare the characteristics of these women's first and second ICU admissions. METHODS: A descriptive analysis from the French national hospital discharge database that included all women admitted to an ICU during pregnancy or within 42 days after delivery, between 2010 and 2014. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, there were 371 women with more than one maternal ICU admission, representing 2.5% of all women admitted during or after pregnancy (371/15,096) and a 0.9 per 10,000 deliveries (371/4,030,409) rate of repeated maternal ICU admission. Compared with women with only one maternal ICU admission, those with repeated maternal ICU admissions were more often admitted during the pregnancy rather than during or after the delivery stay (P < 0.001), for organ failure or sepsis (P < 0.001), and with a SAPS-II score > 25 (P < 0.001). Women with repeated admissions were usually readmitted for the same indications and had similar SAPS-II scores. Half of ICU readmissions occurred within 72 h of first ICU discharge, with similar causes and levels of severity for both stays. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of women with repeated maternal ICU admissions was low, their initial stay had a specific profile of causes of admission and greater severity compared with the stay of women admitted only once. The pattern and similar characteristics of both first and second ICU admission and the short interval for readmission suggests that some ICU discharges may have been potentially premature.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The safety of methods of labor induction in women with previous cesarean deliveries is still debated. We investigated perinatal outcomes associated with labor induction among women with a trial of labor after one cesarean delivery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 339 women with a trial of labor after one prior cesarean and a singleton term fetus in cephalic presentation in 2013-2016 in a French maternity unit. Labor induction was performed with oxytocin, artificial rupture of membranes and/or prostaglandin E2, according to the Bishop score. The primary outcome was a composite of uterine rupture, low Apgar score, neonatal resuscitation or admission to a neonatal unit. The secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery after onset of labor, postpartum hemorrhage and maternal hospital stay after delivery. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios adjusted (aOR) for potential confounders. RESULTS: In our sample, 67.3% of women had spontaneous labor and 32.7% were induced. More than half of the women received oxytocin during labor regardless of the mode of labor. The proportions of the composite outcome and of cesarean after onset of labor were higher in the induced group compared to the spontaneous group (26.1% vs 15.8%, p = 0.02 and 45.0% vs 27.6%, p<0.01, respectively). There were 9 uterine ruptures (2.6%) and this proportion was higher in the induced group compared to the spontaneous group, although this difference was not statistically significant (3.6% vs 2.2%, p = 0.48). After adjustment, labor induction was associated with higher risks of the composite outcome (aOR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.29-4.65), cesarean after onset of labor (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.15-3.68) and maternal hospital stay after delivery ≥6 days (aOR = 6.20, 95% CI: 3.25-11.81). No association was found with postpartum hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Labor induction after one prior cesarean was associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Nevertheless, the higher proportion of uterine rupture did not differ significantly from that in the spontaneous labor group.

Determinants of the use of nonpharmacological analgesia for labor pain management: a national population-based study.

Besides neuraxial analgesia, nonpharmacological methods are also proposed to help women coping with pain during labor. We aimed to identify the individual and organizational factors associated with the use of nonpharmacological analgesia for labor pain management. Women who attempted vaginal delivery with labor analgesia were selected among participants included in the 2016 National Perinatal Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study. Labor analgesia was studied as neuraxial analgesia alone, nonpharmacological analgesia alone, and neuraxial and nonpharmacological analgesia combined. The associations were studied using multilevel multinomial logistic regression. Among the 9231 women included, 62.4% had neuraxial analgesia alone, 6.4% had nonpharmacological analgesia alone, and 31.2% had both. Nonpharmacological analgesia alone or combined with neuraxial analgesia were both associated with high educational level (adjusted odds ratio 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.23 and 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.63), antenatal preference to deliver without neuraxial analgesia, and public maternity unit status. Nonpharmacological analgesia alone was more frequent among multiparous women, and in maternity units with an anesthesiologist not dedicated to delivery unit (1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.12) and with the lowest midwife workload (2.15; 95% CI, 1.43-3.22). Neuraxial and nonpharmacological analgesia combined was negatively associated with inadequate prenatal care (0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94). In France, most women who had nonpharmacological analgesia during labor used it as a complementary method to neuraxial analgesia. The use of nonpharmacological analgesia combined with neuraxial analgesia mainly depends on the woman's preference, but also on socioeconomic factors, quality of prenatal care, and care organization.

Monitoring severe acute maternal morbidity across Europe: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) appears essential for optimising care and informing health care policies, especially given changes in obstetric practices and mother profiles. International comparisons can identify areas where improvement is needed, but the comparability of indicators must be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of monitoring SAMM using common definitions from hospital discharge databases across Europe. METHODS: We used hospital discharge data in eight countries (2 826 868 deliveries) to identify women with SAMM among all hospitalisations of women of reproductive age admitted for antenatal or delivery care. Five SAMM indicators were investigated: eclampsia, septicaemia, hysterectomy, hysterectomy associated with a diagnosis of obstetric haemorrhage, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion associated with a diagnosis of obstetric haemorrhage. Between-country variation was described, by the ratio of the highest to lowest rates, while external validation was assessed by comparing with population-based studies on maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Ratios for hysterectomy and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the context of obstetric haemorrhage were 1:2.1 and 1:3.5, respectively. High values of hysterectomy and low values of transfusion were both consistent with high maternal mortality from haemorrhage (France, Italy, Portugal). Ratios across countries were relatively low for eclampsia (1:3.4) but very high for septicaemia (1:22.5). Compared to population-based morbidity estimates, eclampsia was over-reported in hospital databases whereas the two indicators of severe haemorrhage had good external validity. CONCLUSIONS: In association with diagnosis codes indicating obstetric haemorrhage, hysterectomy and RBC transfusion appear to be good candidates for surveillance of maternal morbidity in Europe.

Monitoring quality of obstetric care from hospital discharge databases: A Delphi survey to propose a new set of indicators based on maternal health outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Most indicators proposed for assessing quality of care in obstetrics are process indicators and do not directly measure health effects, and cannot always be identified from routinely available databases. Our objective was to propose a set of indicators to assess the quality of hospital obstetric care from maternal morbidity outcomes identifiable in permanent hospital discharge databases. METHODS: Various maternal morbidity outcomes potentially reflecting quality of obstetric care were first selected from a systematic literature review. Then a three-round Delphi consensus survey was conducted online from 11/2016 through 02/2017 among a French panel of 37 expert obstetricians, anesthetists-critical-care specialists, midwives, quality-of-care researchers, and user representatives. For a given maternal outcome, several definitions could be proposed and the indicator (i.e. corresponding rate) could be applied to all women or restricted to specific subgroup(s). RESULTS: Of the 49 experts invited to participate, 37 agreed. The response rate was 92% in the second round and 97% in the third. Finally, a set of 13 indicators was selected to assess the quality of hospital obstetric care: rates of uterine rupture, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion incident, severe perineal lacerations, episiotomy, cesarean, cesarean under general anesthesia, post-cesarean site infection, anesthesia-related complications, postpartum pulmonary embolism, maternal readmission and maternal mortality. Six were considered in specific subgroups, with, for example, the postpartum hemorrhage rate assessed among all women and also among women at low risk of PPH. IMPLICATIONS: This Delphi process enabled us to define consensually a set of indicators to assess the quality of hospital obstetrics care from routine hospital data, based on maternal morbidity outcomes. Considering 6 of them in specific subgroups of women is especially interesting. These indicators, identifiable through codes used in international classifications, will be useful to monitor quality of care over time and across settings.

Intensive care and pregnancy: Epidemiology and general principles of management of obstetrics ICU patients during pregnancy.

In developed countries, the rate of obstetric ICU admissions (admission during pregnancy or the postpartum period) is between 0.5 and 4 per 1000 deliveries and the overall case-fatality rate is about 2%. The most two common causes of obstetric ICU admissions concerned direct obstetric pathologies: obstetric hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This review summarized the principles of management of critically ill pregnant patient. Its imply taking care of two patients in the same time. A coordinated multidisciplinary team including intensivists, anesthesiologists, obstetricians, pediatricians and pharmacists is therefore necessary. This team must work effectively together with regular staff aiming to evaluate daily the need to maintain the patient in intensive care unit or to prompt delivery. Keeping mother and baby together and fetal well-being must be balanced with the need of specialized advanced life support for the mother. The maternal physiological changes imply various consequences on management. The uterus aorto-caval compression implies tilting left the parturient. In case of cardiac arrest, uterus displacement and urgent cesarean delivery are needed. The high risk of aspiration and difficult tracheal intubation must be anticipated. Even during acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxemia and permissive hypercapnia must be avoided due to their negative impact on the fetus. Careful analysis of the benefit-risk ratio is needed before all drug administration. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and perineal fasciitis must be feared and a high level of suspicion of sepsis must be maintained. Finally the potential benefits of an ultrasound-based management are detailed.

Lateral asymmetric decubitus position for the rotation of occipito-posterior positions: multicenter randomized controlled trial EVADELA.

BACKGROUND: Fetal occiput posterior positions are associated with poorer maternal outcomes than occiput anterior positions. Although methods that include instrumental and manual rotation can be used at the end of labor to promote the rotation of the fetal head, various maternal postures may also be performed from the beginning of labor in occiput posterior position. Such postures might facilitate flexion of the fetal head and favor its rotation into an occiput anterior position. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture facilitates the rotation of fetal occiput posterior into occiput anterior positions. STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of Decubitus Lateral Asymmetric posture was a multicenter randomized controlled trial that included 322 women from May 2013 through December 2014. Study participants were women who labored with ruptured membranes and a term fetus that was confirmed by ultrasound imaging to be in cephalic posterior position. Women who were assigned to the intervention group were asked to lie in a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture on the side opposite that of the fetal spine during the first hour and encouraged to maintain this position for as long as possible during the first stage of labor. In the control group, women adopted a dorsal recumbent posture during the first hour after random assignment. The primary outcome was occiput anterior position at 1 hour after random assignment. Secondary outcomes were occiput anterior position at complete dilation, mode of delivery, speed of dilation during the active first stage, maternal pain, and women's satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred sixty women were assigned to the intervention group, and 162 women were assigned to the control group. One hour after random assignment, the rates of occiput anterior position did not differ between the intervention and control groups (21.9% vs 21.6%, respectively; P=.887). Occiput anterior rates did not differ between groups at complete dilation (43.7% vs 43.2%, respectively; P=.565) or at birth (83.1% vs 86.4%, respectively; P=.436). Finally, the groups did not differ significantly for cesarean delivery rates (18.1% among women in lateral asymmetric decubitus and 14.2% among control subjects (P=0.608) or for speed of cervical dilation during the active first stage of labor (P=.684), pain assessment (P=.705), or women's satisfaction (P=.326). No maternal or neonatal adverse effect that was associated with either posture was observed. CONCLUSION: Lateral asymmetric decubitus position on the side opposite that of the fetal spine did not facilitate rotation of fetal head. Nevertheless, other maternal positions may be effective in promoting fetal head rotation. Further research is needed; posturing during labor, nonetheless, should remain a woman's active choice.

Postpartum practice: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: To make evidence-based recommendations for the postpartum management of women and their newborns, regardless of the mode of delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of articles from the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library and of recommendations from the French and foreign societies or colleges of obstetricians. RESULTS: Because breast-feeding is associated with reductions in neonatal, infantile, and childhood morbidity (lower frequency of cardiovascular, infectious, and atopic diseases and infantile obesity) (LE2) and improved cognitive development in children (LE2), exclusive and extended breastfeeding is recommended (grade B) for at least 4-6 months (professional consensus). Pharmacological treatments for inhibition of lactation should not be given routinely to women who do not wish to breastfeed (professional consensus). Because of potentially serious adverse effects, bromocriptine is contraindicated in inhibiting lactation (professional consensus). For women aware of the risks of pharmacological treatments to inhibit lactation but choose to take them, lisuride and cabergoline are the preferred drugs (professional consensus). Regardless of the mode of delivery, only women with bleeding or symptoms of anemia should be tested for it (professional consensus). Immediate postoperative monitoring after cesarean delivery should be performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). An analgesic multimodal protocol for analgesia, preferring oral administration, should be developed by the medical team and be available for all staff (professional consensus) (grade B). Thromboprophylaxis with compression stockings should begin the morning of all cesarean deliveries and maintained for at least 7 postoperative days (professional consensus) with or without the addition of LMWH, depending on the presence and severity (major or minor) of additional risk factors. It is recommended that women be informed of the dangers of closely spaced pregnancies (LE3), that effective contraception begin no later than 21 days post partum for women who do not want such a pregnancy (grade B), and that it be prescribed at the maternity ward (professional consensus). In view of the postpartum risk of venous thromboembolism, use of combination hormonal contraception is not recommended before six weeks post partum (grade B). Pelvic floor rehabilitation in asymptomatic women to prevent urinary or anal incontinence in the medium or long term is not recommended (professional consensus). Rehabilitation using pelvic floor muscle contraction exercises is recommended to treat persistent urinary incontinence at 3 months post partum (grade A), regardless of the type of incontinence. Postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation is recommended to treat anal incontinence (grade C), but not to treat or prevent prolapse (grade C) or dyspareunia (grade C). The months following the birth are a period of transition and of psychological changes for all parents (LE2) and are still more difficult for those with psychosocial risk factors (LE2). Situations of evident psychological difficulties can have a significant effect on the child's psychological and emotional development (LE3). Among these difficulties, postpartum depression is most common, but the risk of all mental disorders is generally higher in the perinatal period (LE3). CONCLUSION: The postpartum period presents clinicians with a unique and privileged opportunity to address the physical, psychological, social, and somatic health of women and babies.

[Complications of breastfeeding]. / Complications de l'allaitement. Son arrêt précoce est moins souvent l'effet d'un choix que de difficultés rencontrées.

Complications of breastfeeding. Complications of breastfeeding are the main causes of early termination. The identification and treatment of nipple pain is essential to ensure continued breastfeeding. Breast engorgement is a physiological event during lactation. Mastitis can be inflammatory or infectious and bacteriological culture of milk sample is needed to decide antibiotherapy and suspend breastfeeding. In case of proven infection, continuing drainage of the breast is indicated. Incision and drainage of breast abscess are the standard treatment. Past history of esthetic breast surgery or breast cancer does not contraindicate breastfeeding but are both risk factor of milk insufficiency.

Complications de l'allaitement. Les complications de l'allaitement maternel sont la principale cause de son arrêt précoce. L'identification et le traitement des pathologies du mamelon sont essentiels pour garantir le bon déroulement de l'allaitement maternel. L'engorgement mammaire est un événement physiologique au cours de la montée laiteuse. La mastite peut être inflammatoire ou infectieuse et un prélèvement bactériologique du lait est nécessaire pour décider une antibiothérapie et d'interrompre l'allaitement, en cas d'infection avérée, tout en poursuivant le drainage du sein par un tire-lait. L'incision et le drainage d'un abcès du sein sont le traitement de référence. L'allaitement des femmes ayant des antécédents de chirurgie esthétique des seins ou de cancer du sein n'est pas contre-indiqué mais peut constituer un facteur favorisant une insuffisance de lait.

Pregnancy-related ICU admissions in France: trends in rate and severity, 2006-2009.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the national rate per delivery of pregnancy-related ICU admissions of women in France, the characteristics and severity of these cases, and their trends over the 4-year study period. DESIGN: Descriptive study from the national hospital discharge database. SETTING: All ICUs in France. PATIENTS: All women admitted to an ICU during the pregnancy, the delivery, or the postpartum period from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2009. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 3,262,526 deliveries, 11,824 women had pregnancy-related ICU admissions, for an overall rate of 3.6 per 1,000 deliveries. The conditions reported most frequently were obstetric hemorrhages (34.2%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (22.3%). Case severity was assessed with four markers: case-fatality rate (1.3%), length of ICU stay (mean, 3.0 ± 0.1 d), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score (mean: 19.7 ± 0.1), and a SUP REA code, which indicates the combination of a Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score more than or equal to 15 and at least one specific procedure related to life support or organ failure (23.0%). The most frequent causes of ICU admission were those associated with the least severity in the ICU. During the study period, the rate of pregnancy-related ICU admissions decreased from 3.9 to 3.4 per 1,000 deliveries (p < 0.001), whereas the overall severity of cases increased with longer stays, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II scores, and a greater proportion of SUP REA codes (all p < 0.001). Analysis by principal diagnosis showed that the severity of the condition of women admitted to ICU significantly increased over time for hemorrhages and hypertensive complications. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of women with pregnancy-related ICU admissions decreased and the severity of their cases increased. Most ICU admissions remained related to the least severe conditions. This raises the issue of the most appropriate organization of care for women with pregnancy-related conditions who require continuous surveillance but not necessarily intensive care.

Pitfalls of national routine death statistics for maternal mortality study.

BACKGROUND: The lessons learned from the study of maternal deaths depend on the accuracy of data. Our objective was to assess time trends in the underestimation of maternal mortality (MM) in the national routine death statistics in France and to evaluate their current accuracy for the selection and causes of maternal deaths. METHODS: National data obtained by enhanced methods in 1989, 1999, and 2007-09 were used as the gold standard to assess time trends in the underestimation of MM ratios (MMRs) in death statistics. Enhanced data and death statistics for 2007-09 were further compared by characterising false negatives (FNs) and false positives (FPs). The distribution of cause-specific MMRs, as assessed by each system, was described. RESULTS: Underestimation of MM in death statistics decreased from 55.6% in 1989 to 11.4% in 2007-09 (P < 0.001). In 2007-09, of 787 pregnancy-associated deaths, 254 were classified as maternal by the enhanced system and 211 by the death statistics; 34% of maternal deaths in the enhanced system were FNs in the death statistics, and 20% of maternal deaths in the death statistics were FPs. The hierarchy of causes of MM differed between the two systems. The discordances were mainly explained by the lack of precision in the drafting of death certificates by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Although the underestimation of MM in routine death statistics has decreased substantially over time, one third of maternal deaths remain unidentified, and the main causes of death are incorrectly identified in these data. Defining relevant priorities in maternal health requires the use of enhanced methods for MM study.