Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 189(5): 1104-11, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17954647

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the significance of extracolonic abnormalities in patients older than 70 years referred for CT colonography (CTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 400 consecutive patients older than 70 years undergoing CTC over a 14-month period. All patients presented with weight loss, alteration of bowel habits, rectal blood loss, abdominal pain, or anemia; these symptoms led to clinical suspicion of lower gastrointestinal abnormalities. RESULTS: Five hundred five separate extracolonic abnormalities were detected in 268 of 400 patients (67%). One hundred thirty-nine pathologic processes were deemed significant in 116 patients. Of these, 110 lesions (79%) were previously unknown in 96 of the 400 patients (24.0%). Forty-nine of the 400 patients (12.3%) had at least one malignancy, including 23 extracolonic malignancies and 29 colorectal malignancies. Thirteen patients had early cancers (T1N0M0 or T2N0M0). Twenty of the colon cancer patients had significant previously unknown extracolonic abnormalities, half of which were related to the primary tumor and half of which were unrelated extracolonic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: In patients older than 70 years being examined because of lower gastrointestinal symptoms, CTC findings yield a high number of new significant extracolonic abnormalities. This finding makes a compelling case for targeting this group of patients for a CTC service.


Assuntos
Sulfato de Bário , Colonografia Tomográfica Computadorizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Enema/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 187(5): 1168-78, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17056901

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the accuracy of sonography in patients with symptoms suggestive of a hernia and normal or equivocal clinical examination findings. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (47 men, 12 women; median age, 51 years; range, 19-82 years) were enrolled in a prospective study of sonography and herniography for investigation of inguinofemoral pain. All patients were referred with a history suggestive of hernia but with equivocal clinical features by three experienced surgeons. All patients underwent sonography and herniography examinations performed by experienced radiologists blinded to clinical details. The imaging variables recorded for each side were normal (including posterior inguinal wall bulging), hernia (indirect, direct, femoral, and abdominal wall), or nondiagnostic. The percentage of exact agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for sonography and herniography and were compared with surgery when performed; then all sides for sonography were compared with herniography. RESULTS: Surgery was performed in 18 patients (31%) on 21 sides and found hernia (n = 20) and patulous posterior inguinal wall (with no hernia) (n = 1). Compared with surgery, the results of sonography versus herniography, respectively, were exact agreement (91% vs 71%), sensitivity (95% vs 70%), specificity (100% vs 100%), PPV (100% vs 100%), and NPV (50% vs 14%). The sensitivity of sonography was significantly higher than that of herniography (McNemar test, p = 0.025). Both techniques had one false-negative in the same patient. Herniography had five additional false-negatives identified as hernias at sonography and surgery. Compared with herniography as the reference, the sonography findings were in exact agreement in 91% (107/118) of the cases; and sensitivity was 90% (19/21); specificity, 91% (88/97); PPV, 68% (19/28); and NPV, 98% (88/90). CONCLUSION: Sonography is an accurate technique for the detection of inguinofemoral hernias in patients with clinically equivocal findings.


Assuntos
Hérnia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Inguinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hérnia Femoral/complicações , Hérnia Inguinal/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...