Structural correlates of language processing in primary progressive aphasia.

Understanding the relationships between brain structure and language behaviour in primary progressive aphasia provides crucial information about these diseases' pathomechanisms. However, previous investigations have been limited from providing a statistically reliable view of broad language abilities by sample size, variant focus and task focus. In this study, the authors aimed to determine the relationship between brain structure and language behaviour in primary progressive aphasia, to determine the degree to which task-associated regions were atrophied across disease variants and to determine the degree to which task-related atrophy overlaps across disease variants. Participants were 118 primary progressive aphasia patients and 61 healthy, age-matched controls tested from 2011 to 2018 in the German Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration cohort. Diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia required progressive deterioration of mainly speech and language for ≥ 2 years, and variant was diagnosed by the criteria of Gorno-Tempini et al. (Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76(11):1006-1014). Twenty-one participants not fulfilling a specific subtype were classified as mixed-variant and excluded. Language tasks of interest included the Boston naming test, a German adaptation of the Repeat and Point task, phonemic and category fluency tasks and the reading/writing subtest of the Aachen Aphasia Test. Brain structure was measured by cortical thickness. We observed networks of language task-associated temporal, frontal and parietal cortex. Overlapping task-associated atrophy was observed in the left lateral, ventral and medial temporal lobes, middle and superior frontal gyri, supramarginal gyrus and insula. Some regions, primarily in the perisylvian region, were associated with language behaviour despite showing no significant atrophy. The results crucially extend less powerful studies associating brain and language measures in primary progressive aphasia. Cross-variant atrophy in task-associated regions suggests partially shared underlying deficits, whereas unique atrophy reinforces variant-specific deficits. Language task-related regions that are not obviously atrophied suggest regions of future network disruption and encourage understanding of task deficits beyond clearly atrophied cortex. These results may pave the way for new treatment approaches.

The role of the angular gyrus in semantic cognition: a synthesis of five functional neuroimaging studies.

Semantic knowledge is central to human cognition. The angular gyrus (AG) is widely considered a key brain region for semantic cognition. However, the role of the AG in semantic processing is controversial. Key controversies concern response polarity (activation vs. deactivation) and its relation to task difficulty, lateralization (left vs. right AG), and functional-anatomical subdivision (PGa vs. PGp subregions). Here, we combined the fMRI data of five studies on semantic processing (n = 172) and analyzed the response profiles from the same anatomical regions-of-interest for left and right PGa and PGp. We found that the AG was consistently deactivated during non-semantic conditions, whereas response polarity during semantic conditions was inconsistent. However, the AG consistently showed relative response differences between semantic and non-semantic conditions, and between different semantic conditions. A combined analysis across all studies revealed that AG responses could be best explained by separable effects of task difficulty and semantic processing demand. Task difficulty effects were stronger in PGa than PGp, regardless of hemisphere. Semantic effects were stronger in left than right AG, regardless of subregion. These results suggest that the AG is engaged in both domain-general task-difficulty-related processes and domain-specific semantic processes. In semantic processing, we propose that left AG acts as a "multimodal convergence zone" that binds different semantic features associated with the same concept, enabling efficient access to task-relevant features.

Effects of semantic diversity and word frequency on single word processing.

Some research suggests that semantic diversity (SemD), a measure of the variability of contexts in which a word appears, plays an important role in language processing, determining the availability of word representations (e.g., Adelman et al., 2006) and causing task-specific benefits or detriments to performance (e.g., Hoffman & Woollams, 2015). Some researchers have claimed that word frequency has no effect once such diversity measures are taken into account (Adelman et al., 2006). Taking advantage of the power of five large-scale databases, we investigated the effects of SemD, word frequency, and their interaction in five tasks, including word reading, lexical and concreteness decision, object picture naming, and word repetition. We found: (a) word frequency and SemD effects were consistently distinct; (b) effects of SemD were facilitatory in nearly all tasks, but inhibitory effects were also found; contrary to existing claims, we conclude that inhibitory SemD effects do not necessarily imply semantic selection requirements; (c) the presence of SemD effects minimally influenced the size of frequency effects when SemD was left uncontrolled, suggesting that SemD does not explain absent frequency effects in the patient literature; and (d) word frequency and SemD only interact in the largest data sets. Results are discussed in the context of rational models of memory (Anderson & Milson, 1989; Anderson & Schooler, 1991) and the Controlled Semantic Cognition framework (Lambon Ralph et al., 2017). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia.

Theories of semantic memory based on neuropsychological findings have posited a distinction between stored semantic representations and the mechanisms used to access and manipulate them (e.g., Lambon Ralph, Jefferies, Patterson, & Rogers, 2017; Warrington & Cipolotti, 1996). The most recent instantiation of this view, the controlled semantic cognition theory (Lambon Ralph et al., 2017), is supported by findings suggesting that multimodal (i.e., both verbal and nonverbal) semantic deficits may result from qualitatively different impairments: on the one hand, damage to a semantic access mechanism related to executive control, which is observed in semantic aphasia (SA), and on the other, damage to semantic representations, which is observed in semantic dementia (SD) (Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006). In this study we compared SA and SD patients on several phenomena previously used to support these distinctions. Contrary to the prior results, we found that (1) overall, cross-task consistency was equivalent for the two groups; (2) neither patient group showed consistency driven by item identity across different semantic tasks; (3) correlations among task performance were not obviously driven by the semantic control demands of different tasks; (4) both groups showed executive function deficits; and (5) both groups showed strong effects of distractor interference in a synonym judgment task. Furthermore, we investigated the components of executive ability that could underlie semantic control deficits by correlating performance on updating, shifting, and inhibition tasks with performance on tasks testing semantic abilities. We found that updating was related to semantic processing generally, whereas shifting and inhibition were not. These results also suggest that complex executive function tasks relate to semantic tasks through their shared relationship with language abilities. Overall, evidence from SA and SD patients does not differentiate representations and access mechanisms in the semantic system, as has previously been suggested. Implications for the storage-access distinction are discussed.