Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22276514

RESUMO

BackgroundUnderstanding the local epidemiology, including mortality, of COVID-19 is important for guiding optimal mitigation strategies such as vaccine implementation, need for study of more effective treatment, and redoubling of focused infection control measures. MethodsA retrospective observational cohort study design was utilized. We included adult patients diagnosed in the hospital or emergency department with COVID-19 from March 8, 2020 through May 17, 2020 at Grady Memorial Hospital (Atlanta, GA). Medical chart data abstraction was performed to collect clinical, laboratory and outcome data. Death, defined as inpatient mortality or discharge to hospice, was the primary outcome. ResultsAmong 360 persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, 50% were [≥] 60 years, and most (80%) were Black and had a BMI [≥]25 kg/m2 (64%). A total of 53 patients (15%) had an outcome of death with the majority (n=46, 88%) occurring in persons [≥] 60 years. Persons [≥] 60 years were less likely to have typical COVID-19 symptoms while more likely to have multiple comorbidities, multifocal pneumonia, and to be admitted to intensive care. The death rate was 27% among persons [≥]60 years versus 4% in those <60 years (p<.01). Furthermore, most deaths (n=40, 75%) occurred among residents of long-term care facilities (LCFs). ConclusionsWe describe early COVID-19 cases among predominantly Black and older patients from a single center safety net hospital. COVID-19 related mortality occurred predominantly among older patients from LCFs highlighting the need for improved preparedness and supporting prioritization of vaccination efforts in such settings.

2.
Trials ; 19(1): 286, 2018 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29788982

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary stone disease is very common with an estimated prevalence among the general population of 2-3%. Ureteric stones are associated with severe pain as they pass through the urinary tract and have significant impact on patients' quality of life due to the detrimental effect on their ability to work and need for hospitalisation. Most ureteric stones can be expected to pass spontaneously with supportive care. However, between one-fifth and one-third of cases require an intervention. The two standard active intervention options are extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic stone retrieval. ESWL and ureteroscopy are effective in terms of stone clearance; however, they differ in terms of invasiveness, anaesthetic requirement, treatment setting, complications, patient-reported outcomes (e.g. pain after intervention, time off work) and cost. There is uncertainty around which is the most clinically effective in terms of stone clearance and the true cost to the NHS and to society (in terms of impact on patient-reported health and economic burden). The aim of this trial is to determine whether, in adults with ureteric stones, judged to require active intervention, ESWL is not inferior and is more cost-effective compared to ureteroscopic treatment as the initial management option. METHODS: The TISU study is a pragmatic multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of ESWL as the first treatment option compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment for ureteric stones. Patients aged over 16 years with a ureteric stone confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidney, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) will be randomised to either ESWL or ureteroscopy. The primary clinical outcome is resolution of the stone episode (no further intervention required to facilitate stone clearance) up to six months from randomisation. The primary economic outcome is the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained at six months from randomisation. DISCUSSION: Determining whether ESWL is not inferior clinically and is cost-effective compared to ureteroscopic treatment as the initial management in adults with ureteric stones who are judged to require active treatment is relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to healthcare providers, both in the UK and globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN92289221 . Registered on 21 February 2013.


Assuntos
Litotripsia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia/economia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Tamanho da Amostra , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Ureteroscopia/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...