Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ; 60(4): 268-71, 2009.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19814973

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to determine whether the incidence of hypothyroidism in patients with Head and Neck Cancer who have undergone neck radiotherapy justifies the inclusion of thyroid function monitoring in the pre-operative and follow-up evaluation protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with all the patients seen in the Oncology Section of the Otorhinolaryngology Department in the "Hospital de Clínicas", Montevideo, Uruguay, from January 1970 to May 2008. A total of 550 case records were analyzed. Of the 550 patients, 188 were excluded due to the fact they had not received radiotherapy as part of their treatment and 362 were included in the study. Of these, 55 patients had thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level determination after treatment with radiation therapy. Hypothyroidism was defined as a TSH value greater than or equal to 4.5 mIU/L, regardless of whether or not any symptoms were presented. RESULTS: 36.4% of the patients were diagnosed as having clinical or sub-clinical hypothyroidism. The type of treatment carried out, particularly whether or not surgical resection was performed, was found to be the most significant predictive factor for the development of hypothyroidism (P=0.054). CONCLUSION: Monitoring of the thyroid function on a six-month or annual basis, at least during the first 5 post-treatment years, has to be included in the follow-up and control protocols of every patient undergoing neck RT, and patients with TSH values over 4.5 mIU/L should be referred to the endocrinologist for hormone replacement, whether they present symptoms or not.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Hipotireoidismo/epidemiologia , Hipotireoidismo/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 60(4): 268-271, jul.-ago. 2009. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-72597

RESUMO

Introducción: El propósito de este trabajo es determinar si la incidencia de hipotiroidismo en los pacientes con cáncer de cabeza y cuello en los que se realizó radioterapia cervical justifica la inclusión de la monitorización de la función tiroidea en los protocolos de valoración preoperatoria y de seguimiento. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de todos los pacientes atendidos en la Sección Oncológica del Departamento de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital de Clínicas Montevideo, Uruguay, desde enero de 1970 a mayo de 2008. Se revisó un total de 550 historias clínicas. Del total de 550 pacientes, se excluyeron 188 pacientes dado que no habían recibido radioterapia (RT) como parte del tratamiento, y 362 fueron incluidos en el estudio. Cincuenta y cinco pacientes tenían dosificación de hormona estimulante de la tiroides (TSH) postratamiento con RT. El hipotiroidismo fue definido como un valor de TSH mayor o igual a 4,5mU/l, independientemente de si presentaba o no síntomas. Resultados: Se encontró un 36,4% de pacientes con hipotiroidismo clínico o subclínico. Se determinó que la modalidad de tratamiento efectuado, en especial si se realizó resección quirúrgica o no, es el factor predictivo más significativo de desarrollo de hipotiroidismo (p = 0,054). Conclusión: La monitorización de la función tiroidea debe ser incluida en los protocolos de seguimiento y control de todos los pacientes en los que se realice RT de cuello, semestral o anualmente, por lo menos durante los primeros 5 años postratamiento, y derivar al endocrinólogo para el reemplazo hormonal a los pacientes con TSH mayores a 4,5mU/l, tengan o no síntomas (AU)


Introduction: The aim of this study is to determine whether the incidence of hypothyroidism in patients with Head and Neck Cancer who have undergone neck radiotherapy justifies the inclusion of thyroid function monitoring in the pre-operative and follow-up evaluation protocols. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted with all the patients seen in the Oncology Section of the Otorhinolaryngology Department in the Hospital de Clínicas , Montevideo, Uruguay, from January 1970 to May 2008. A total of 550 case records were analyzed. Of the 550 patients, 188 were excluded due to the fact they had not received radiotherapy as part of their treatment and 362 were included in the study. Of these, 55 patients had thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level determination after treatment with radiation therapy. Hypothyroidism was defined as a TSH value greater than or equal to 4.5mIU/L, regardless of whether or not any symptoms were presented. Results: 36.4% of the patients were diagnosed as having clinical or sub-clinical hypothyroidism. The type of treatment carried out, particularly whether or not surgical resection was performed, was found to be the most significant predictive factor for the development of hypothyroidism (P=0.054). Conclusion: Monitoring of the thyroid function on a six-month or annual basis, at least during the first 5 post-treatment years, has to be included in the follow-up and control protocols of every patient undergoing neck RT, and patients with TSH values over 4.5mIU/L should be referred to the endocrinologist for hormone replacement, whether they present symptoms or not (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Hipotireoidismo/etiologia , Testes de Função Tireóidea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos
5.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ; 58(8): 362-6, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17949664

RESUMO

Sulcus vocalis, vergetures, mucosal bridges, and cysts as intracordal lesions constitute a group of great diagnostic difficulty. We present 6 patients in whom microlaryngoscopy was the final diagnostic step in the evaluation of a lesion not recognized in the initial evaluation. The criteria selected were as follows: Severe GRABS. Stroboscopic parameters: glottal chink without mass lesion, asymmetry of amplitude, and irregularity of vibration, or when discrepancy between examination and quality of the voice exists. Acoustic and aerodynamic measures that demonstrate severe dysphonia. High scores on the Voice Handicap Index. We recommend carrying out a diagnostic microlaryngoscopy examination where the cause of dysphonia is unclear.


Assuntos
Laringoscopia/métodos , Microcirurgia/instrumentação , Distúrbios da Voz/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Espectrografia do Som , Prega Vocal/fisiopatologia
6.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 58(8): 362-366, oct. 2007. ilus, tab
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-056397

RESUMO

Los sulcus vocalis, vergetures, puentes mucosos y quistes son lesiones intracordales que constituyen un grupo de lesiones de difícil diagnóstico. Presentamos a 6 pacientes en los que la microlaringoscopia fue el paso diagnóstico definitivo en la evaluación de una lesión que no había sido apreciada en la evaluación en el consultorio. Los criterios para indicar una microlaringoscopia directa diagnóstica son altas puntuaciones del índice GRABS; los defectos de cierre glótico sin lesión tipo masa y la asimetría de fase y amplitud entre las ondas mucosas de ambas cuerdas; la desproporción entre los hallazgos de la estroboscopia o la endoscopia con la intensidad percibida de la disfonía; la disfonía severa objetivada mediante análisis acústico y aerodinámico, y las puntuaciones altas en el índice de incapacidad vocal. Recomendamos la realización de una microlaringoscopia diagnóstica en los casos de disfonía de origen incierto


Sulcus vocalis, vergetures, mucosal bridges, and cysts as intracordal lesions constitute a group of great diagnostic difficulty. We present 6 patients in whom microlaryngoscopy was the final diagnostic step in the evaluation of a lesion not recognized in the initial evaluation. The criteria selected were as follows: Severe GRABS. Stroboscopic parameters: glottal chink without mass lesion, asymmetry of amplitude, and irregularity of vibration, or when discrepancy between examination and quality of the voice exists. Acoustic and aerodynamic measures that demonstrate severe dysphonia. High scores on the Voice Handicap Index. We recommend carrying out a diagnostic microlaryngoscopy examination where the cause of dysphonia is unclear


Assuntos
Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humanos , Laringoscopia/métodos , Distúrbios da Voz/diagnóstico , Microcirurgia/instrumentação , Prega Vocal/fisiopatologia , Espectrografia do Som
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...