A single-dose PK study of onapristone including the effect of food on absorption.

PURPOSE: Onapristone is an antiprogestin with activity in breast cancer and is under investigation for use in endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancers. Megestrol acetate and abiraterone generally show variability in absorption and, depending on the formulation, food effect. This study was conducted to determine the effect of food on 10 mg oral immediate-release (IR) onapristone and to help identify a formulation to minimize variability. METHODS: This is an open-label, randomized, crossover study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of onapristone and its main metabolite, N-mono-desmethyl onapristone. Twelve healthy female subjects received 10 mg of oral IR onapristone after an overnight fast, or within 30 min of a high-fat, high-calorie meal with a 2-week washout between dosing periods. RESULTS: Onapristone plasma t1/2 (mean ± SD) was 4.36 ± 0.81 h for the fasted state and 3.76 ± 0.36 h for the fed state. Following food, onapristone tmax was delayed from 1 to 4 h. Food intake was also associated with a small increase in AUC0-∞ of approximately 13 % and a statistically significant decrease in Cmax of approximately 18 %. One subject experienced a 23-day delay in menses after one 10 mg onapristone dose, while another subject experienced transient grade 2 NCI-CTCAE liver enzyme elevation 3 weeks post dose. CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with previous observations, indicating that there is a small increase in onapristone exposure and a significant decrease in Cmax when taken with food. These changes are within acceptable limits set out by the FDA. Thus, our findings indicate that onapristone could be administered without regard to food.

Effects of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, on the pharmacokinetics of a hormonal combination contraceptive.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of steady-state concentrations of the selective S1P1 receptor modulator ponesimod on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of a combined oral contraceptive, containing 1 mg norethisterone (NET) and 35 µg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and to investigate the effects on heart rate at different ponesimod doses within an up-titration regimen prior to co-administration of the contraceptive. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy women (age: 29-60 years) received twice a single oral dose of the combined oral contraceptive, alone or in combination with multiple doses of 40 mg ponesimod attained by an up-titration regimen. Heart rate (HR) effects were assessed on the first day of each up-titration level. PK parameters of NET and EE were determined by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Geometric mean ratios (ponesimod and contraceptive / contraceptive alone) of Cmax and AUC0-24 of NET were 0.87 (90 % CI: 0.80, 0.94) and 0.84 (90 % CI: 0.76, 0.93), respectively. Geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-24 of EE were 0.94 (90 % CI: 0.86, 1.03) and 0.95 (90 % CI: 0.89, 1.01), respectively. The maximum mean HR reduction after the first dose of 10 mg ponesimod was 12.4 bpm (SD ± 6.2) at 2.5 h post-dose. On Day 4 (first dose of 20 mg) and Day 7 (first dose of 40 mg) the maximum mean HR reduction was 4.3 bpm (SD ± 5.7) and 1.4 (SD ± 6.4), respectively, at 2.5 h post-dose compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: No clinically relevant PK interactions between ponesimod and the combined oral contraceptive were observed, therefore, efficacy of hormonal contraceptives is not expected to be affected by concomitant administration of ponesimod. The up-titration regimen showed that HR reductions are diminished upon repeated ponesimod administration.

A serum-free, purified vero cell rabies vaccine is safe and as immunogenic as the reference vaccine Verorab for pre-exposure use in healthy adults: results from a randomized controlled phase-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Verorab was licensed in 1985 for both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis of rabies. The next generation purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG) is a highly purified vaccine. We performed a phase II clinical study in adults in France to assess its immunological non-inferiority and clinical safety for pre-exposure prophylaxis. METHODS: In a randomized phase-II trial, 384 healthy adult subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive a three-dose primary series of PVRV-NG or Verorab. One year later, the PVRV-NG group received a PVRV-NG booster while the Verorab group participants were randomized to receive a booster of PVRV-NG or Verorab for. Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) were evaluated on days 0, 28 (subgroup), 42, months 6, 12 and 12+14 days. Safety was evaluated for seven days after each dose. Adverse event between doses, until 28 days after the final dose was recorded. Serious adverse events were recorded up to 6 months after the last dose. RESULTS: The criterion for non-inferiority was met in the per-protocol analysis set and confirmed in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS, 99.6% and 100% of subjects had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL in PVRV-NG and Verorab groups, respectively. While RVNA levels gradually decreased over the 12-month period, at 6 and 12 months after vaccination >89% and >77%, respectively, in both groups had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL. The PVRV-NG booster induced a strong response, irrespective of the vaccine given for the primary series. PVRV-NG was safe and well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to Verorab for unsolicited adverse events and solicited systemic reactions. The incidence of solicited injection-site reactions was lower with PVRV-NG than with Verorab after the primary series and the booster dose. CONCLUSIONS: PVRV-NG was shown to be at least as immunogenic as Verorab and to present a similar safety profile.

Inhibition of ovulation by NOMAC/E2, a novel monophasic oral contraceptive combining nomegestrol acetate and 17ß-oestradiol: a double-blind, randomised, dose-finding pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal dose of the progestogen, nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), required in a monophasic oral contraceptive, in combination with 1.5 mg 17ß-oestradiol (E(2)), to inhibit ovulation. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised study assessing 41 normally cycling women (aged 18-35 years) over two screening cycles, one control cycle and one consecutive treatment cycle; 38 women completed the treatment period. Subjects received 0.625 mg NOMAC/1.5 mg E(2) (n = 9), 1.25 mg NOMAC/1.5 mg E(2) (n = 10), 2.5 mg NOMAC/1.5 mg E(2) (n = 10) or 2.5 mg NOMAC alone (n = 9) for 21 days. RESULTS: During the treatment cycle, ovulation was suppressed in all treatment groups. The lowest plasma E(2) levels were observed with 2.5 mg NOMAC given alone. Addition of 1.5 mg E(2) to 2.5 mg NOMAC resulted in statistically significant increases in E(2) levels and decreases in mean follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone levels. In the three NOMAC/E(2) combination groups, a statistically significant inverse correlation was found between E(2) plasma levels and NOMAC dose. CONCLUSION: The dose of 2.5 mg NOMAC was confirmed to be optimal to inhibit both ovulation and follicular maturation. The antigonadotropic effect of 2.5 mg NOMAC was reinforced when combined with 1.5 mg E(2).

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ascending single and multiple doses of lecozotan in healthy young and elderly subjects.

AIMS: To determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of oral immediate release (IR) lecozotan in healthy young and elderly subjects. METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential, ascending dose Phase I studies of lecozotan were conducted. In a single-dose study, ascending doses of 2, 5 and 10 mg were administered to cohorts of eight young subjects. In the two ascending 14-day multiple-dose studies, 41 young subjects received 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 5 mg q12h of lecozotan or placebo and 24 elderly received 0.5 mg and 5 mg q12h of lecozotan or placebo. Assessments included safety evaluations, a complete PK profile and PD. RESULTS: Lecozotan was safe and well tolerated at steady state up to 5 mg q12. The maximum tolerated dose after multiple doses was >10 mg (5 mg q12). In the single-dose study, the maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg. Dose-limiting mild-to-moderate adverse events included paraesthesia, dizziness and visual disturbances peaking at t(max) and disappearing concomitantly with plasma concentrations. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs, ECG intervals or routine laboratory tests occurred. Lecozotan did not significantly change cognitive function, EEG or hormone levels. PK was characterized by rapid absorption, dose proportionality, extensive distribution and rapid elimination. The mean CL/F was approximately 35% lower in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Lecozotan IR was safe and well tolerated after administration of multiple oral doses up to 5 mg q12h in young and elderly subjects. These results support the development of lecozotan in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

A randomized prospective trial of the cutaneous and sensory effects of feminine hygiene wet wipes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of feminine hygiene wet wipes on vulvar skin. STUDY DESIGN: An examiner-blind, randomized, prospective clinical trial of prototype wet wipes (treatment group) and dry toilet tissue (comparison group) in 120 premenopausal and 60 postmenopausal women was conducted in which the wipes or toilet tissues were for approximately 28 consecutive days. RESULTS: Use of wet wipes in lieu of toilet tissue caused no significant impact on erythema of the external genitalia. Mean vulvar erythema scores after 28 days of product use were lower than baseline scores for both wipes and toilet tissue. In postmenopausal women, wet wipes were associated with increased labial and perineal skin moisture. A minority of premenopausal participants found skin wetness from wipes less appealing and sometimes associated with slight sensory irritation; however, wet wipes were favored for personal cleansing by postmenopausal women. CONCLUSION: Four weeks of using wet wipes caused negligible clinical effects on vulvar skin irritation and appeared to contribute to skin moisture in postmenopausal women. This subgroup preferred using wet wipes, possibly due to the skin atrophy and dryness that accompany estrogen depletion. An opportunity exists to tailor the lotion level on the wipes m to the genital skin condition and preferences of younger and older Women.

Investigation of the impact of sarizotan on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of sarizotan on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in fixed combination with carbidopa or benserazide. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, crossover study, healthy male subjects (n=16) received levodopa 100 mg t.i.d. over two 5-day periods, alone or in combination with sarizotan 5 mg b.i.d. Levodopa was administered with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (carbidopa 25 mg, n=8 or benserazide 25 mg, n=8). Pharmacokinetic parameters of levodopa were obtained on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: ANOVA showed the C(max) values for levodopa were not significantly different with or without sarizotan after single doses (1001 vs 1082 ng/ml; point estimate [PE] 1.10, 90% confidence intervals [CI] 0.83-1.45) or at steady-state (1549 vs 1663 ng/ml; PE 1.06, 90% CI 0.89-1.27); nor were AUC values for single doses (1661 vs 1665 ng h/ml; PE 1.01, 90% CI 0.91-1.11) or at steady-state (2462 vs 2482 ng h/ml; PE 1.01, 90% CI 0.97-1.05). Seven subjects reported adverse events of mild-to-moderate intensity; the most frequent were headaches and dizziness. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of sarizotan with levodopa, in combination with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or adverse event profile of levodopa.

A single centre, open-label, cross-over study of pharmacokinetics comparing topical zinc/clindamycin gel (Zindaclin) and topical clindamycin lotion (Dalacin T) in subjects with mild to moderate acne.

Zinc/clindamycin gel (Zindaclin 1%) gel, is a new once-daily topical acne treatment (Strakan Ltd) containing clindamycin phosphate equivalent to 1% clindamycin and zinc acetate in a formulation, which leads to a reduced systemic absorption of clindamycin through the skin. The objective of the study was to compare the systemic absorption of clindamycin from zinc/clindamycin gel and clindamycin lotion (Dalacin T topical lotion, Pharmacia Ltd) after repeated twice-daily topical administration for two periods of 5 days with an intervening gap of 2 weeks in 24 subjects with mild to moderate acne. Plasma Cmax, and AUC0-12 of clindamycin measured after single and multiple applications of zinc/clindamycin gel were between 30% and 50% lower than for clindamycin lotion. As zinc/clindamycin gel is a topical treatment for acne, the lower systemic bioavailability may be beneficial because there may be a correspondingly lower risk of systemic events in zinc/clindamycin gel-treated subjects.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction when switching from fluoxetine to milnacipran.

The lack of a therapeutic effect or unsupportable side-effects can lead to substitution of one antidepressant by another. The present study investigated potential modifications to the pharmacokinetic profile of milnacipran at steady-state when it is substituted for fluoxetine without any washout period. The open-label, multiple dose, three-period study was carried out in 12 evaluable healthy volunteers. A reference period (period 1) comprising a 3.5-day treatment with milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. was followed, after a 5-10-day washout, by 3 weeks of administration of 20 mg fluoxetine once daily (period 2), immediately followed by a further 3.5 days of administration of milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. (period 3). Blood samples collected at each period were analysed for milnacipran, N-dealkyl milnacipran, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Potential drug-drug interactions were evaluated by comparing milnacipran pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 1 and 3. A steady-state of fluoxetine and its metabolite was effectively reached by the end of the 3-week period. A steady-state of milnacipran was reached on day 2 of both periods 1 and 3. Trough concentrations of milnacipran were 66 and 65 ng/ml before and after the fluoxetine administration period, respectively. Cmax values were 226 and 248 ng/ml. When comparing the kinetic parameters of milnacipran before and after fluoxetine treatment, all the 90% confidence intervals were in the 20% range. No significant difference in the adverse events of milnacipran was observed before or after fluoxetine administration.

Skin sensitivity to rocuronium and vecuronium: a randomized controlled prick-testing study in healthy volunteers.

UNLABELLED: Prick tests are frequently used for the authentication of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) as causative drugs for anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia. Unfortunately, the actual threshold concentration for skin testing remains debatable for most NMBDs. We studied the flare and wheal responses to prick tests with rocuronium and vecuronium. Thirty healthy, nonatopic, anesthesia-naive male and female volunteers (14 men and 16 women) from 18 to 40 yr of age were assigned randomly to receive a total of 10 prick tests-4 ascending dilutions (1:1000, 1:100, 1:10, and 1) of rocuronium and vecuronium and 2 controls-on both forearms. An assessor blinded to the assignment monitored systemic and skin responses to NMBDs and measured wheal and flare surfaces immediately after and 15 min after prick tests. None of the volunteers experienced any immediate systemic or cutaneous responses to rocuronium or vecuronium. Although a dilution of 1:1000 of both NMBDs failed to promote any skin response at 15 min, 50% and 40% of the subjects had a positive skin reaction to undiluted rocuronium and vecuronium, respectively. We demonstrated a sex effect related to smaller threshold concentration-induced cutaneous reactions in female volunteers to both muscle relaxants. Our observation questions the reliability of prick testing with undiluted solutions of rocuronium and vecuronium for the diagnosis of allergy. IMPLICATIONS: Building concentration-skin response curves to prick tests with rocuronium and vecuronium in healthy, nonatopic, anesthesia-naive male and female volunteers demonstrated that the nonreactive concentration for both muscle relaxants is the 1:1000 dilution of the stock solutions. Our observation calls into question the past practice of prick-testing skin for sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking drugs by using undiluted solutions.

[The relative pharmacokinetics of two oral formulations of chlormadinone acetate: Lutéran 5mg. and Lutéran tablet 10 mg]. / Etude de la biodisponibilité relative de deux formulations orales d'acétate de chlormadinone: Lutéran 5 mg et Lutéran comprimé dosé à 10 mg.

The bioavailability of a new formulation of chlormadinone acetate (one 10 mg Lutéran tablet) was compared with that of the reference formulation (two 5 mg Lutéran tablets) in a randomised crossover open trial after single oral administration of a 10 mg dose to 12 healthy female volunteers. Measurements of chlormadinone acetate plasma samples were performed by combined gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Blood samples were collected before administration and up to 144 hours after administration. No significant difference was found between the two formulations in pharmacokinetic parameters. The bioavailability of the two formulations was equivalent in terms of time to maximum concentration (tmax [mean tmax about 2.5 h]) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) [Weslake's symmetric confidence interval: 19.24%, Schuirmann two one-sided tests procedure: p < 0.05]. No difference was found between the two formulations with regard to clinical safety parameters.