New colistin population pharmacokinetic data in critically ill patients suggesting an alternative loading dose rationale.

Colistin is an old antibiotic that has recently gained a considerable renewal of interest as the last-line defense therapy against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. It is administered as colistin methanesulfonate (CMS), an inactive prodrug, and it was shown that due to slow CMS conversion, colistin plasma concentrations increase very slowly after treatment initiation, which constitutes the rationale for a loading dose in critically ill patients. However, faster CMS conversion was observed in healthy volunteers but using a different CMS brand, which may also have a major impact on colistin pharmacokinetics. Seventy-three critically ill patients not undergoing dialysis received multiple doses of CMS. The CMS concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and a pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a population approach. We confirmed that CMS renal clearance and colistin concentrations at steady state are mostly governed by creatinine clearance, but we predict a typical maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) of colistin close to 2 mg/liter, occurring 3 h after an initial dose of 2 million international units (MIU) of CMS. Accordingly, the estimated colistin half-life (t1/2) was relatively short (3.1 h), with rapid attainment of steady state. Our results are only partially consistent with other recently published results. We confirm that the CMS maintenance dose should be adjusted according to renal function in critically ill patients. However, much higher than expected colistin concentrations were observed after the initial CMS dose, with rapid steady-state achievement. These discrepancies challenge the pharmacokinetic rationale for a loading dose, which may still be appropriate for rapid bacterial eradication and an improved clinical cure rate.

Pharmacokinetics of midazolam: comparison of sublingual and intravenous routes in rabbit.

In France, the legal routes used to administer midazolam to a patient are intravenously and intramuscularly. For anaesthetists, these routes are not well adapted to paediatric use; they lead to pain at injection site and stress on children. The sublingual route should be a good compromise between stress and quick efficiency. We have developed a sublingual tablet of midazolam. The aim of the present investigation is to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam tablets administered by the sublingual and intravenous routes in 6 rabbits to determine the bioequivalence between these routes. We have estimated the 1-hydroxy-midazolam serum level by difference between RRA and HPLC values. By the sublingual route, midazolam absorption is substantial and fast. The statistical analysis, on data obtained with HPLC dosage, shows no significant difference between pharmacokinetic parameter values calculated after intravenous and sublingual administration (0.5 mg). The absolute bioavailability was close to 100%. With RRA dosage, however, AUCs were greater than those obtained by HPLC dosage (174%). 1-hydroxy-midazolam seems to have a great importance in BZD activity. To estimate the bioequivalence between intravenous and sublingual midazolam administration, it is necessary to take into account the active metabolites.