RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Various adjuvants for prolongation of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia have been clinically studied in the literature. AIM: This study was done to evaluate and compare the effects of nalbuphine and clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, placebo control, double-blind, and comparative study, a total of ninety patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under subarachnoid block were randomly divided into three groups. In addition to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine administered, patients of groups BS, BN, and BC received 0.9% normal saline, 1.6 mg nalbuphine, and 30 µg clonidine, respectively. The total volume of drugs administered intrathecally was made up to 3.5 ml by addition of sterile isotonic normal saline in all. The onset time and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and total dose of postoperative analgesic requirement in the first 24 h were compared among groups. Hemodynamic changes and side effects were also recorded. RESULTS: Addition of study adjuvants brought significantly faster onset of sensory and motor block. Patients in clonidine group showed significantly longer mean time two segment sensory block regression (P < 0.05) lowest seen in control group. The regression time of motor block to modified Bromage Grade I was significantly longer in clonidine group and comparable in the other groups. Adjuvants have significantly increased the mean duration of analgesia, highest in clonidine group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intrathecal clonidine is associated with prolonged motor and sensory block, better hemodynamic stability, and less postoperative analgesic requirement as compared to nalbuphine.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We studied the effects of oral gabapentin and intravenous (I.V.) dexamethasone given together or separately 1 h before the start of surgery on intraoperative hemodynamics Postoperative analgesia and postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing gynaecological procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 (gabapentin, n = 46) received 400 mg gabapentin, Group 2 (dexamethasone, n = 46) received 8 mg dexamethasone and Group 3 (gabapentin plus dexamethasone, n = 46) received both 400 mg gabapentin and 8 mg dexamethasone I.V. 1 h before the start of surgery. Standard induction and maintenance of anesthesia were accomplished. Visual analog scale for pain was recorded for 12 h. Side effects were noted. RESULTS: Hemodynamics at various time interval (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min) of laryngeal mask airway insertion and PONV were found significantly lower in Group 3 than in Group 1 and Group 2 (P < 0.05). The average time to first postoperative analgesic requirement at (visual analogue score >3) was significantly longer in Group 3 (510.00 ± 61.64 min) than in Group 1 (352.83 ± 80.61 min) and in Group 2 (294.78 ± 60.76 min), (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study concludes that the combination of oral Gabapentin and I.V. dexamethasone has significantly less hemodynamic changes, better postoperative analgesia and less incidence of PONV than individual administration of each drug.
