Time course of iron metabolism in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Altered iron metabolism plays a central role in the development of anaemia in critically ill patients but the time course of iron status in septic and non-septic critically ill patients has not been well defined. METHODS: Prospective study in a 34-bed medico-surgical ICU. The complete blood count, iron, ferritin, transferrin, and transferrin receptor concentrations, transferrin saturation and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were measured on days 1, 3 and 5 of the ICU stay in 95 consecutive ICU patients (33 with sepsis and 62 without). RESULTS: Despite an identical complete blood count on day 1, septic patients had significantly lower iron concentrations (21 [13-34] vs 50[28-75] microg/dL, p<0.001), transferrin concentrations (169[121-215] vs 214[173-247] mg/dL; p=0.003), and transferrin saturation (11[7-15] vs 19[11-25]%; p= 0.004), and higher ferritin concentrations (432[184-773] vs 204[78-354] ng/mL; p=0.002) than non-septic patients. These alterations were associated with a lower reticulocyte count (42[29-61] vs 58[48-77] x 10(3)/mm3; p=0.028). On day 1, CRP concentrations, which were higher in septic than in non-septic patients (20.0[13.5-27.5] vs 2.3[0.7-5.9] mg/dL; p<0.001), were directly correlated with ferritin concentrations (rho=0.55, p<0.001) and inversely correlated with transferrin concentrations (rho=-0.49, p=0.0001) and transferrin saturation (rho=-0.49, p=0.0001). After 3 days, iron and transferrin concentrations were identical in septic and non-septic patients. Iron metabolism remained altered in both populations until the 5th day. CONCLUSIONS: Iron status is rapidly altered in critically ill patients, especially in septic patients. These alterations persist during the course of the disease and are associated with decreased erythropoiesis.

Comparison of two versions of the Vigileo-FloTrac system (1.03 and 1.07) for stroke volume estimation: a multicentre, blinded comparison with oesophageal Doppler measurements.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the validity of stroke volume measurements obtained using the Vigileo-FloTrac system in comparison with those obtained using oesophageal Doppler considered as a reference. METHODS: Prospective, multicentre study (four university hospitals), in which investigators were blinded to stroke volume values acquired simultaneously with the other technique. Two different versions of the Vigileo software (1.03 and 1.07) were studied and compared over two consecutive periods of time. Forty critically ill patients (three ICUs) and 20 high-risk surgical patients (one operating theatre) were studied over a 6-month period. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty paired stroke volume values obtained using the second version of the Vigileo (1.07) yielded better correlation and agreement (R=0.48, P<0.001; bias=4 ml, limits of agreement: +/- 41 ml) than the 207 paired values obtained using version 1.03 (R=0.12, P=0.1; bias=1 ml, limits of agreement: +/- 75 ml). However, even with the second version, the percentage error in stroke volume measurement was 58%, a value still above the range considered clinically acceptable (30%). CONCLUSIONS: The precision of stroke volume estimation using Vigileo-FloTrac has improved with the second version of the software (1.07), but remains insufficient to allow the replacement of the reference technique in the population studied.