The value of the International Association for the Study of Pain to developing countries.

ABSTRACT: Since it was founded, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has been at the forefront of improving pain research, education, and effective pain management in both developed and developing countries. As IASP activities progressed, major differences between the practice of pain management, education, and research in developed countries compared with developing countries were identified. This led to areas of focus by IASP that included pain education to address poor knowledge of pain assessment and treatment, prioritization of pain management by governments and official national legislation and programs, and availability of pain treatments (especially potent analgesics). A few pioneering IASP members from developing countries in the early years encouraged more multidisciplinary professionals to join IASP and attend conferences. Inauguration of national and regional chapters was also encouraged, and regular continuing medical education programs were held, especially on topics from IASP conferences and global pain events. Many IASP chapters in developing countries have established collaborations with groups from developed countries, whereas IASP also implemented other innovative approaches including the developing countries working group, educational grants, pain camps, and multidisciplinary pain hubs with toolkits to develop pain experts for regions in the developing world. Thus, the influence of IASP in many developing countries has had a multiplier effect on the progress made in effective pain management, education, and research. Nonetheless, challenges remain and include better integration of pain management, education, and research in national health systems and academic programs for health professionals.

Tramadol: a valuable treatment for pain in Southeast Asian countries.

BACKGROUND: The supply of controlled drugs is limited in the Far East, despite the prevalence of health disorders that warrant their prescription. Reasons for this include strict regulatory frameworks, limited financial resources, lack of appropriate training amongst the medical profession and fear of addiction in both general practitioners and the wider population. Consequently, the weak opioid tramadol has become the analgesic most frequently used in the region to treat moderate to severe pain. METHODS: To obtain a clearer picture of the current role and clinical use of tramadol in Southeast Asia, pain specialists from 7 countries in the region were invited to participate in a survey, using a questionnaire to gather information about their individual use and experience of this analgesic. RESULTS: Fifteen completed questionnaires were returned and the responses analyzed. Tramadol is used to manage acute and chronic pain caused by a wide range of conditions. Almost all the specialists treat moderate cancer pain with tramadol, and every one considers it to be significant or highly significant in the treatment of moderate to severe non-cancer pain. The reasons for choosing tramadol include efficacy, safety and tolerability, ready availability, reasonable cost, multiple formulations and patient compliance. Its safety profile makes tramadol particularly appropriate for use in elderly patients, outpatients, and for long-term treatment. The respondents strongly agreed that tighter regulation of tramadol would reduce its medical availability and adversely affect the quality of pain management. In some countries, there would no longer be any appropriate medication for cancer pain or the long-term treatment of chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: In Southeast Asia, tramadol plays an important part in the pharmacological management of moderate to severe pain, and may be the only available treatment option. If it were to become a controlled substance, the standard of pain management in the region would decline.

Pain: A Neglected Problem in the Low-Resource Setting.

Approximately 80% of the world's population lives in countries with little or no access to pain management. These countries also have 74% of the world's deaths from cancer and human immunodeficiency virus. Appropriate use of oral opioids can control 80%-90% of cancer pain. However, only 6.7% of the world's medical opioids are available in these low-resource countries. With the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery calling for a significant expansion of surgical services, postoperative pain management will need to be an increasing focus of our attention. There are multiple barriers to providing effective pain management. These include the type and funding of the health care system, the size and educational level of the workforce, the ease of access to effective medications, and the expectations and knowledge base of the community. Some barriers can be addressed by education at the undergraduate level, postgraduate level, and community level. Others will require continued advocacy at government level. Only when we tackle these problems will the considerable neglect of access to effective pain treatment in low- and middle-income countries be lessened.

Effect of Co-Morbid Conditions on Persistent Neuropathic Pain after Brachial Plexus Injury in Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuropathic pain (NeuP) associated with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) can be severe, persistent, and resistant to treatment. Moreover, comorbidity associated with NeuP may worsen the pain and quality of life. This study compared persistent NeuP after BPI between patients with and without co-morbid conditions (psychiatric dysfunction and other painful conditions) and tramadol usage as a second-line agent in combination with an antiepileptic and/or antidepressant during a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with BPI referred to a pain center between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed for 2 years retrospectively. Data regarding patient demographics, injury and surgical profiles, characteristics of NeuP and its severity, and treatment received were compared between patients with and without manifesting co-morbid conditions. The NeuP and pain intensity assessments were based on the DN4 questionnaire and a numerical rating scale, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients studied, 24 patients presented with one of the following co-morbid conditions: myofascial pain (21%), psychiatric disorder (17%), phantom limb pain (4%), complex regional pain syndrome (21%), and insomnia (37%). Tramadol was required by 20 patients with co-morbidity and, 9 patients without co-morbidity (p<0.001). The mean pain score after 2 years was higher in patients with co-morbidity than in those without co-morbidity (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent pain following BPI was more common in patients manifesting other painful conditions or psychiatric co-morbidity. A higher proportion of the patients in the co-morbid group required tramadol as a second-line of agent for pain relief.

Validation of the Thai Version of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-T) in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most frequent and deleterious symptoms for patients with advanced cancer. Pain assessment is important because it is used for detecting severity of disease and the response to treatment. To provide the adequate treatment for pain relief in cancer patients, an assessment tool should be used for pain evaluation. Moreover, suitable tools for pain evaluation should be validated in local language to obtain better pain information. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to demonstrate validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-T), which is a simple and concise instrument for pain assessment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The available data were obtained from 520 patients with cancer pain. The data included pain severity, which patients reported using Thai version of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-T). The pain severity and pain information were reported three times with 2-week intervals between each assessment time point. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the Thai version of the Brief Pain Inventory resulted in two factors, pain severity and pain interference, showing valid structures consistent with other language versions of the instrument. Cronbach's alphas, computed for pain interference and pain severity item were 0.88 and 0.89, 0.01 and 0.92, and 0.93 and 0.94, for first, second, and third assessment time, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thai version of the Brief Pain Inventory is a reliable and valid instrument for cancer pain assessment in Thailand

Cross-cultural adaptation to the Thai language of the neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4).

OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt the neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4) to Thai language MATERIAL AND METHOD: Phase 1: Forward and backward translation followed by assessment of semantic equivalence. Phase 2: Testing of the questionnaire in 30 neuropathic pain patients who were seen and diagnosed by experts, followed by modifications to produce a final version. RESULTS: All the Thai translated pain descriptors except 'tingling' got high percentages of understanding among neuropathic pain patients in the first round of testing. After some adaptation of the Thai word for 'tingling' had been made, the new translated word was retested, and all subjects doing the retest understood the word very well. CONCLUSION: The Thai DN4 questionnaire was systematically translated and validated. This offers a simple Thai neuropathic pain diagnostic tool for clinical use.

Anesthetic pain management in Siriraj Hospital: a retrospective review.

Neural blockade has been used as the single method to anesthetize a part of the body or used in combination with general anesthesia to lessen perioperative pain. Currently, nerve blocks are used for diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic and prophylactic proposes for management of chronic, acute and cancer pain in a Pain Clinic. Reviewing the records of the 3,349 patients at Siriraj Pain Clinic, we found 2,662 and 687 cases had chronic and acute pain problems respectively, and only 646 patients were treated with anesthetic interventions during 1990 to 1998. They consisted of 317 male and 329 female. The techniques included stellate ganglion block, paravertebral nerve block, celiac plexus block, hypogastric plexus block, mesenteric plexus block, sacral nerve block, epidural steroid, lumbar sympathectomy, first and second thoracic sympatholysis, facet joints injection, sacroiliac joint injection, intravenous regional block with guanethidine or ketanserin, continuous opioid infusion, intravenous lidocaine infusion, and a phentolamine test. The common problems of pain included brachial plexus injury, chronic spinal pain, herpetic neuralgia, ischemic pain, central post-stroke pain, and causalgia. This retrospective review showed that 38 per cent of them reported 50 per cent pain relief with temporary effect. 34 per cent experienced good and satisfactory pain relief while 9 per cent reported excellent pain relief. 17 per cent did not gain benefit from any technique of pain relief and about 2 per cent could not be evaluated due to they did not return for follow-up. One serious complication after thoracic sympatholysis was brachial plexus injury. The neural blockade is proven to be one of the useful adjunct in the management of chronic pain but the selection of the technique is subjected to its critical appraisal.