Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Virol ; 73(4): 2916-20, 1999 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10074140

RESUMO

The Chinese hamster cell lines E36 and CHOK1 dramatically differ in susceptibility to amphotropic murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV) and gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV); E36 cells are highly susceptible to both viruses, CHOK1 cells are not. We have previously shown that GALV can infect E36 cells by using both its own receptor, HaPit1, and the A-MuLV receptor, HaPit2. Given that the two cell lines are from the same species, the loss of function of both of these receptors in CHOK1 cells is surprising. Other studies have shown that CHOK1 cells secrete proteins that block A-MuLV entry into CHOK1 as well as E36, suggesting the two A-MuLV receptors are functionally identical. However, CHOK1 conditioned medium does not block GALV entry into E36, indicating the secreted inhibitors do not block HaPit1. HaPit1 and ChoPit1 therefore differ as receptors for GALV; ChoPit1 is either inactivated by secreted factors or intrinsically nonfunctional. To determine why GALV cannot infect CHOK1, we cloned and sequenced ChoPit1 and ChoPit2. ChoPit2 is almost identical to HaPit2, which explains why CHOK1 conditioned medium blocks A-MuLV entry via both receptors. Although ChoPit1 and HaPit1 are 91% identical, a notable difference is at position 550 in the fourth extracellular region, shown by several studies to be crucial for GALV infection. Pit1 and HaPit1 have aspartate at 550, whereas ChoPit1 has threonine at this position. We assessed the significance of this difference for GALV infection by replacing the aspartate 550 in Pit1 with threonine. This single substitution rendered Pit1 nonfunctional for GALV and suggests that threonine at 550 inactivates ChoPit1 as a GALV receptor. Whether native ChoPit1 functions for GALV was determined by interference assays using Lec8, a glycosylation-deficient derivative of CHOK1 that is susceptible to both viruses and that has the same receptors as CHOK1. Unlike with E36, GALV and A-MuLV exhibited reciprocal interference when infecting Lec8, suggesting that they use the same receptor. We conclude both viruses can use ChoPit2 in the absence of the inhibitors secreted by CHOK1 and ChoPit1 is nonfunctional.


Assuntos
Vírus da Leucemia do Macaco Gibão/fisiologia , Receptores Virais/metabolismo , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Proteínas de Transporte/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular , Cricetinae , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Receptores Virais/genética , Alinhamento de Sequência , Transdução de Sinais , Replicação Viral
2.
J Virol ; 72(12): 9453-8, 1998 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9811678

RESUMO

We have sequenced the envelope genes from each of the five members of the gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) family of type C retroviruses. Four of the GALVs, including GALV strain SEATO (GALV-S), were originally isolated from gibbon apes, whereas the fifth member of this family, simian sarcoma-associated virus (SSAV), was isolated from a woolly monkey and shares 78% amino acid identity with GALV-S. To determine whether these viruses have identical host ranges, we evaluated the susceptibility of several cell lines to either GALV-S or SSAV infection. GALV-S and SSAV have the same host range with the exception of Chinese hamster lung E36 cells, which are susceptible to GALV-S but not SSAV. We used retroviral vectors that differ only in their envelope composition (e.g., they contain either SSAV or GALV-S envelope protein) to show that the envelope of SSAV restricts entry into E36 cells. Although unable to infect E36 cells, SSAV infects GALV-resistant murine cells expressing the E36-derived viral receptor, HaPit2. These results suggest that the receptors present on E36 cells function for SSAV. We have constructed several vectors containing GALV-S/SSAV chimeric envelope proteins to map the region of the SSAV envelope that blocks infection of E36 cells. Vectors bearing chimeric envelopes comprised of the N-terminal region of the GALV-S SU protein and the C-terminal region of SSAV infect E36 cells, whereas vectors containing the N-terminal portion of the SSAV SU protein and C-terminal portion of GALV-S fail to infect E36 cells. This finding indicates that the region of the SSAV envelope protein responsible for restricting SSAV infection of E36 cells lies within its amino-terminal region.


Assuntos
Vírus da Leucemia do Macaco Gibão/patogenicidade , Receptores Virais/fisiologia , Vírus do Sarcoma do Macaco-Barrigudo/patogenicidade , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Produtos do Gene env/química , Produtos do Gene env/genética , Produtos do Gene env/fisiologia , Genes env , Vetores Genéticos , Vírus Auxiliares/patogenicidade , Vírus da Leucemia do Macaco Gibão/genética , Camundongos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/química , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/genética , Vírus do Sarcoma do Macaco-Barrigudo/genética , Homologia de Sequência de Aminoácidos , Virulência/genética
3.
J Virol ; 71(10): 8078-81, 1997 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9311908

RESUMO

Region A of Pit1 (residues 550 to 558 in domain IV) and related receptors has remained the only sequence implicated in gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) infection, and an acidic residue at the first position appeared indispensable. The region has also been proposed to be the GALV binding site, but this lacks empirical support. Whether an acidic residue at the first position in this sequence is a definitive requirement for GALV infection has also remained unclear; certain receptors retain function even in the absence of this acidic residue. We report here that in Pit1 an acidic residue is dispensable not only at position 550 but also at 553 alone and at both positions. Further, the virus requires no specific residue at either position. Mutations generated a collection of region A sequences, often with fundamentally different physicochemical properties (overall hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity and net charge of -1, or 0, or +1), and yet Pit1 remained an efficient GALV receptor. A comparison of these sequences and a few previously published ones from highly efficient GALV receptors revealed that every position in region A can vary without affecting GALV entry. Even Pit2 is nonfunctional for GALV only because it has lysine at the first position in its region A, which is otherwise highly diverse from region A of Pit1. We propose that region A itself is not the GALV binding motif and that other sequences are required for virus entry. Indeed, certain Pit1/Pit2 chimeras revealed that sequences outside domain IV are specifically important for GALV infection.


Assuntos
Vírus da Leucemia do Macaco Gibão/metabolismo , Vírus da Leucemia do Macaco Gibão/patogenicidade , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Receptores Virais/metabolismo , Infecções por Retroviridae/virologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/virologia , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Células CHO , Proteínas de Transporte/química , Proteínas de Transporte/metabolismo , Cricetinae , Hylobates , Proteínas de Membrana/química , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Mutagênese Sítio-Dirigida , Mutação Puntual , Receptores Virais/química , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão
4.
J Biol Chem ; 268(13): 9437-41, 1993 May 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8486636

RESUMO

To introduce a free sulfhydryl into Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A (ETA), methionine 161 in domain I of the toxin was changed to cysteine by site-directed mutagenesis. The free sulfhydryl provides a convenient site for covalent attachment of ETA to other proteins in the production of chimeric toxins. The mutation was then introduced into a variant of ETA that is impaired in receptor binding, termed ETA-60EF61, that has the dipeptide Glu-Phe inserted between residues 60 and 61. The resulting double mutant, ETA-60EF61 Cys161, was conjugated to three different monoclonal antibodies via a thioether linkage, and the immunotoxins were tested for cytotoxicity with cells in culture. Each immunotoxin was extremely potent against cells that expressed surface determinants for the monoclonal antibodies but had little cytotoxicity for cells that did not bind the antibodies. For comparison, we also conjugated ricin A chain to each of the three monoclonal antibodies and found that the resulting immunotoxins were at least two-orders of magnitude less potent than the corresponding immunotoxins made with ETA-60EF61Cys161. This study demonstrates that ETA-60EF61Cys161 makes potent and specific immunotoxins and may potentially be useful in selectively eliminating subpopulations of cells in vitro and in vivo.


Assuntos
ADP Ribose Transferases , Toxinas Bacterianas , Proteínas de Transporte , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Cisteína , Exotoxinas/genética , Exotoxinas/toxicidade , Imunotoxinas/toxicidade , Metionina , Receptores de Superfície Celular , Fatores de Virulência , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/isolamento & purificação , Sequência de Bases , Clonagem Molecular , Escherichia coli/genética , Exotoxinas/metabolismo , Variação Genética , Humanos , Células L , Camundongos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Mutagênese Sítio-Dirigida , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos , Plasmídeos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Receptores Colinérgicos/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/toxicidade , Mapeamento por Restrição , Células Tumorais Cultivadas , Exotoxina A de Pseudomonas aeruginosa
6.
J Biol Chem ; 264(25): 15151-6, 1989 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2570071

RESUMO

Deletions within the structural exotoxin A gene of 27 or 119 amino acids in domain I of the mature polypeptide, or of 88 or 105 amino acids in domains I and II, resulted in the synthesis of exotoxin A (ETA) polypeptides that were not secreted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa hosts but were localized in the cell membrane. Insertions of a hexanucleotide sequence, either pCGAGCT or pCGAATT, at TaqI sites within the gene resulted in variant exotoxin A polypeptides which were secreted normally. pCGAGCT causes insertion of either Glu-Leu or Ser-Ser in the amino acid sequence of the toxin, while pCGAATT causes insertion of either Glu-Phe or Asn-Ser dipeptides. Although the cytotoxicity of eight variants was unimpaired, that of four others was reduced, and one variant which had a Glu-Phe insert between residues 60 and 61 (ETA-60EF61) was 500-fold less cytotoxic than wild-type exotoxin A. Purified ETA-60EF61 dissociated much faster from mouse LMTK- cells than wild-type ETA, suggesting that the insertion impaired the ability of ETA-60EF61 to interact with exotoxin A receptors. The location of the insert is within a major concavity on the surface of domain I of the exotoxin A molecule, suggesting that this concavity is important for toxin-receptor interaction.


Assuntos
ADP Ribose Transferases , Toxinas Bacterianas , Proteínas de Transporte , Dipeptídeos/genética , Exotoxinas/genética , Mutação , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Receptores de Superfície Celular , Receptores Colinérgicos/genética , Fatores de Virulência , Deleção Cromossômica , Desoxirribonucleases de Sítio Específico do Tipo II , Exotoxinas/metabolismo , Genes Bacterianos , Glutamatos/genética , Ácido Glutâmico , Fenilalanina/genética , Conformação Proteica , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/metabolismo , Difração de Raios X , Exotoxina A de Pseudomonas aeruginosa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...