Small metastasizing choroidal melanomas.

PURPOSE: Small choroidal melanomas have a better prognosis than large tumours. However, these small tumours can spread, often late in their course. The aim of the study was to analyse survival and tumour characteristics of six cases of late metastatic diseases after conservative treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon among 523 patients treated between 1991 and 2010 by proton beam therapy (508) or brachytherapy with 106 (Ru/Rh) (15) for uveal melanomas. We have selected patients with small choroidal melanoma (thickness≤3 mm and diameter≤9 mm) (59 patients), who have developed hepatic metastases (six of 59). RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, median age was 57 years (range, 37-82 years). The mean tumour thickness was 2.9 mm (range 2.5-3 mm), and the mean diameter was 7 mm (5-8 mm). Orange pigment was observed in four cases, subretinal fluid was observed in two cases, and one tumour touched the optic disc. Five patients had proton beam therapy. One patient had beta brachytherapy (106 Ru/106 Rh). Average follow-up was 8.3 years (range 4.2-11.8 years). None of the six patients developed local tumour recurrence. The mean survival time after diagnosis of melanoma was 9.8 years (range, 4.9-14.6 years). The average time from treatment of primary tumour to detection of liver metastasis was 7 years (range 3.9-12 years). The mean survival time from the diagnosis of metastasis was 35.2 months (range 9-101 months). Small melanoma-related death was 0% at 3 years, 1.7% at 5 years, 5.1% at 10 years and 10.2% at 15 years in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a small tumoral size and an early and effective local treatment, six of 59 small choroidal melanomas have developed metastasis after local treatment. Small tumours represent a significant risk of metastasis.

Proton beam therapy for presumed and confirmed iris melanomas: a review of 36 cases.

BACKGROUND: To report the clinical features and outcomes of iris melanomas treated by proton beam therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, Department of Ophthalmology, in 36 patients treated by proton beam therapy for presumed (n = 29) and confirmed (n = 7) iris melanomas between July 1997 and October 2010. Ciliary body melanomas with iris involvement were excluded. The patients' mean age was 54.4 years (range, 22-82 years). The average tumor diameter was 3.8 mm (range, 2.5-8.0). The iridocorneal angle was invaded by the tumor in 47% of cases (n = 17), the ciliary body in 17% of cases (n = 6), and the sclera in 3% (n = 1). Raised intraocular pressure was present before treatment in 11.1 % of cases (n = 4). Tumor biopsy was performed in 19% of cases (n = 7). Four patients had undergone an initial incomplete surgical excision of tumor before radiotherapy. Surgical preparation of the eye with tantalum ring positioning had been performed in all cases 3-4 weeks before irradiation. The prescribed dose was 60 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) of proton beam radiotherapy delivered in four fractions on four consecutive days. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 50 months (mean 60.5, range 15-136). One patient (2.7%) was lost to follow-up. None of the patients showed tumor progression, local recurrence, or metastasis. None of the patients required secondary enucleation. Cataract was developed in 62% of patients, glaucoma in two cases (6%) after irradiation, and hyphema with the aggravation of pre-existing glaucoma in one patient. No patients developed neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Proton beam therapy appears to be the treatment of choice for the conservative treatment of iris melanomas with excellent tumor control and an acceptable rate of complications. Longer follow-up studies on a larger series is necessary to consolidate these results.

Proton beam radiotherapy of uveal melanoma: Italian patients treated in Nice, France.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of 15 years of experience with proton beam radiotherapy in the treatment of intraocular melanoma, and to determine univariate and multivariate risk factors for local failure, eye retention, and survival. METHODS: A total of 368 cases of intraocular melanoma were treated with proton beam radiotherapy at Centre Lacassagne Cyclotron Biomedical of Nice, France, between 1991 and 2006. Actuarial methods were used to evaluate rate of local tumor control, eye retention, and survival after proton beam radiotherapy. Cox regression models were extracted to evaluate univariate risk factors, while regularized least squares algorithm was used to have a multivariate classification model to better discriminate risk factors. RESULTS: Tumor relapse occurred in 8.4% of the eyes, with a median recurrence time of 46 months. Enucleation was performed on 11.7% of the eyes after a median time of 49 months following proton beam; out of these, 29 eyes were enucleated due to relapse and 16 due to other causes. The univariate regression analysis identified tumor height and diameter as primary risk factors for enucleation. Regularized least squares analysis demonstrated the higher effectiveness of a multivariate model of five risk factors (macula distance, optic disc distance, tumor height, maximum diameter, and age) in discriminating relapsed vs nonrelapsed patients. CONCLUSIONS: This data set, which is the largest in Italy with relatively long-term follow-up, demonstrates that a high rate of tumor control, survival, and eye retention were achieved after proton beam irradiation, as in other series.

Proton radiotherapy as an alternative to exenteration in the management of extended conjunctival melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse and multifocal patterns of conjunctival melanoma may not be treatable with standard eye-sparing methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of proton beam radiation therapy as an alternative to exenteration. METHODS: Twenty patients with extended conjunctival melanoma were treated by proton beam irradiation. Most cases were T3 tumours which were not accessible to brachytherapy due to their extension, localisation with fornical or caruncular involvement. Only 2 patients had a tumour limited to the bulbar conjunctiva. Both were recurrent tumours with multiple lesions. Sixteen cases were recurrences after various pre-treatments. The area of the conjunctiva which was suspected to have microscopic disease was treated by 31 Gy in 6 fractions. The "high risk" areas with a clinically detectable tumour (primary target volume) were treated by an additional boost using a smaller beam size and applying 2 fractions up to 45 Gy. An individually shaped compensator was brought into the beam to modify the range of the protons so that the eye was irradiated only at a depth of 2 mm. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 38.1+/-26.6 months (median 34 months). Recurrent disease occurred in 6 cases (30%); 2 of them outside the irradiated volume, 3 within the target volume treated by 31 Gy, and just one in the primary target volume treated by 45 Gy. An exenteration followed only in two patients (10%). 6 patients (30%) suffered from metastatic disease and 4 (20%) of them have died by now. During follow up we found no statistically significant association between the occurrence of local recurrence after proton radiotherapy and the development of metastases. Best corrected visual acuity remained stable in 12 cases (60%); in 14 patients the best corrected visual acuity was 0.25 or better. A sicca-syndrome developed in 19/20 patients. However, only 10/20 patients used artificial tears more than 5x/d. A focal cataract developed in 7 patients (35%). There was eyelash loss in the area of irradiated eyelids. In 4 cases a limbal stem cell deficiency occurred with the consequence of corneal vascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy may serve as an alternative to exenteration in case of T3 and diffuse T1 or T2 conjunctival melanomas.

French multicenter phase III randomized study testing concurrent twice-a-day radiotherapy and cisplatin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy (BiRCF) in unresectable pharyngeal carcinoma: Results at 2 years (FNCLCC-GORTEC).

BACKGROUND: Unresectable carcinomas of the oropharynx and hypopharynx still have a poor long-term prognosis. Following a previous phase II study, this phase III multicenter trial was conducted between November 1997 and March 2002. METHODS: Nontreated, strictly unresectable cases were eligible. Twice-daily radiation: two fractions of 1.2 Gy/day, 5 days per week, with no split (D1-->D46). Total tumor doses: 80.4 Gy/46 day (oropharynx), 75.6 Gy/44 day (hypopharynx). Chemotherapy (arm B): Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (D1, D22, D43); 5FU, continuous infusion (D1-->D5), 750 mg/m2/day cycle 1; 430 mg/m2/day cycles 2 and 3. RESULTS: A total of 163 evaluable patients. Grade 3-4 acute mucositis 82.6% arm B/69.5% arm A (NS); Grade 3-4 neutropenia 33.3% arm B/2.4% arm A (p < 0.05). Enteral nutrition through gastrostomy tube was more frequent in arm B before treatment and at 6 months (p < 0.01). At 24 months, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and specific survival (SS) were significantly better in arm B. OS: 37.8% arm B vs. 20.1% arm A (p = 0.038); DFS: 48.2% vs. 25.2% (p = 0.002); SS: 44.5% vs. 30.2% (p = 0.021). No significant difference between the two arms in the amount of side effects at 1 and 2 years. CONCLUSION: For these unresectable cases, chemoradiation provides better outcome than radiation alone, even with an "aggressive" dose-intensity radiotherapy schedule.

A networking for patient recruitment: the experience of choroidal melanoma.

The organization of a networking for patient recruitment is a main concern for a new facility using charged particles. The experience of choroidal melanoma in Nice demonstrates the possibility to create "de novo" a protontherapy center treating a sufficient number of patients. The influence of the opening of new facilities is analyzed.

[2003 Update of Standards, Options and Recommendations for management of patients with salivary gland malignant tumors (excluding lymphoma, sarcoma and melanoma) (summary report)]. / Standards, Options et Recommations 2003 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints de tumeurs malignes des glandes salivaires (lymphomes, sarcomes et mélanomes exclus), mise à jour (rapport abrégé).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To update clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with salivary gland malignant tumors previously validated in 1997. These recommendations cover diagnosis, classification, treatment and follow-up of patients with these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPG s according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article is a summary version of the full document presenting the updated clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. The main questions addressed by the expert group in this update concern the place of fine needle aspiration biopsy in preoperative diagnosis, the place of cervical lymph node area surgical treatment, the place of postoperative irradiation and neutron therapy in the treatment of unresectable tumors and also the place of medical imaging, especially RMI, for the diagnosis of these tumors.

Automatic three-dimensional model for protontherapy of the eye: preliminary results.

Recently, radiotherapy possibilities have been dramatically increased by software and hardware developments. Improvements in medical imaging devices have increased the importance of three-dimensional (3D) images as the complete examination of these data by a physician is not possible. Computer techniques are needed to present only the pertinent information for clinical applications. We describe a technique for an automatic 3D reconstruction of the eye and CT scan merging with fundus photographs (retinography). The final result is a "virtual eye" to guide ocular tumor protontherapy. First, we make specific software to automatically detect the position of the eyeball, the optical nerve, and the lens in the CT scan. We obtain a 3D eye reconstruction using this automatic method. Second, we describe the retinography and demonstrate the projection of this modality. Then we combine retinography with a reconstructed eye, using a CT scan to get a virtual eye. The result is a computer 3D scene rendering a virtual eye into a skull reconstruction. The virtual eye can be useful for the simulation, the planning, and the control of ocular tumor protontherapy. It can be adapted to treatment planning to automatically detect eye and organs at risk position. It should be highlighted that all the image processing is fully automatic to allow the reproduction of results, this is a useful property to conduct a consistent clinical validation. The automatic localization of the organ at risk in a CT scan or an MRI by automatic software could be of great interest for radiotherapy in the future for comparison of one patient at different times, the comparison of different treatments centers, the possibility of pooling results of different treatments centers, the automatic generation of doses-volumes histograms, the comparison between different treatment planning for the same patient and the comparison between different patients at the same time. It will also be less time consuming.

Familial uveal melanoma: a report on two families and a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: A total of 69 families affected by uveal melanoma have been reported in the literature. This report describes two additional families. In addition to presenting these cases, which constitute exceptions, the paper reviews the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two families, each with two affected members, were analysed in this retrospective study. The pedigree of each family has been pieced together. RESULTS: Considering the low incidence of familial uveal melanoma in the general population, it seems unlikely that inherited genetic factors are responsible for the condition; this question remains difficult to resolve. DISCUSSION: The characteristics of each family history are described and compared with the literature data. The mode of possible inheritance is discussed. Both the histopathology and anatomical location are studied, after which we discuss the body of evidence to establish whether there is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome in patients with familial uveal melanoma. CONCLUSION: The statistical likelihood of such an uncommon tumour occurring independently in two or more family members leads us to believe that some cases of familial uveal melanoma may go unrecognized, and that reports on too few families have been published worldwide to prove the existence of a single mendelien gene. However, appropriate tissue samples, such as blood and tumour samples, should be obtained and conserved for present or future cytogenetic and molecular genetic studies.