Interferon-γ release assay screening in biologics: safe and reliable, but not perfect.

Background: Systemic biologic agents can increase the risk of re-activation of latent tuberculosis (TB). Prior to initiation, screening for latent TB using an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) is recommended. There is concern that false-negative IGRAs may be more likely in this context. Methods: This retrospective analysis of IGRAs, specifically T-SPOT.TB, results and outcomes of patients already on or due to start biologics identifies the rate of TB re-activation in a low TB incidence setting. Additionally, we estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of IGRAs in this population. Results: Patients on biologics were more likely to have a negative IGRA result than patients not on biologics. There was no statistically significant change in conversion or reversion rates between groups. Of 9263 patients on biologics, 19 developed active TB after starting biologics at an incidence rate of 55.1 per 100 000 patient-years. This occurred despite screening in half of the 16 patients for whom we were able to review medical records. Most drugs implicated were known to be high risk, although rituximab and natalizumab were being taken by five patients and one patient, respectively. The T-SPOT.TB NPV was 99.20% and dropped only slightly to 99.17% when we simulated an approach where all borderline IGRA results were regarded as being negative. Conclusions: Negative IGRA results confer a low risk of subsequent active TB in patients on biologics in a low TB incidence setting. However, continued awareness is needed given that a number of active TB cases will have had a prior negative result.

Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities/Programs in the United Kingdom.

Since first identified in late 2019, the acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) and the resulting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems worldwide, often diverting key resources in a bid to meet unprecedented challenges. To measure its impact on national antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities, a questionnaire was designed and disseminated to antimicrobialstewardship leads in the United Kingdom (UK). Most respondents reported a reduction in AMS activity with 64% (61/95) reporting that COVID-19 had a negative impact on routine AMS activities. Activities reported to have been negatively affected by the pandemic include audit, quality improvement initiatives, education, AMS meetings, and multidisciplinary working including ward rounds. However, positive outcomes were also identified, with technology being increasingly used as a tool to facilitate stewardship e.g., virtual meetings and ward rounds and increased the acceptance of using procalcitonin tests to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the AMS activities undertaken across the UK. The long-term impact of the reduced AMS activities on incidence of AMR are not yet known. The legacy of innovation, use of technology, and increased collaboration from the pandemic could strengthen AMS in the post-pandemic era and presents opportunities for further development of AMS.

Lesson of the month 1: A rare adverse reaction between flucloxacillin and paracetamol.

Flucloxacillin, a beta-lactam antibiotic, is a commonly prescribed antibiotic for the treatment of infections caused by staphylococci and streptococci, most notably Staphylococcus aureus Paracetamol is one of the most dispensed medications by NHS England and is used for the treatment of fever and pain.1 However most doctors are unaware that concurrent use of these drugs can cause a potentially fatal drug interaction due to pyroglutamic acidosis (PGA), also known as 5-oxoprolinaemia. PGA is a rare cause of raised anion gap metabolic acidosis due to disruption of the γ-glutamyl cycle. We report the case of a patient with multiple comorbidities who developed PGA due to coadministration of paracetamol and flucloxacillin.